Terkel to appear on Olbermann tonight to talk about the continuing O’Reilly smears.
By on Mar 26th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Terkel to appear on Olbermann tonight to talk about the continuing O’Reilly smears.
Since Bill O’Reilly sent his henchmen to track down, follow, and ambush ThinkProgress’s Amanda Terkel, he has continued to go after the blog, calling us “insects” and claiming that Amanda deliberately attacked a rape victim. Tonight, Amanda will be on MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann to respond to the vicious smears and talk about what progressives are doing to respond.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Business
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Economy
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Hoffman
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Sports
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Tea Party
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Get em!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:06 pmGive Bill-O a KO!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:07 pmMeanwhile, the “MSNBC Politics Network” — which provides blog ads — is doing some thinning of its own. From an email our site (stinque.com) received today:
“I had to put your account on hold. MSNBC is reviewing all sites in their networks and sites containing profanity are an item of concern. If you can remove the profanity please let me know.”
Any website that follows in the tradition of George Carlin and Lewis Black is subject to this threat. It may be completely coincidental to the TP campaign against O’Reilly, or it may be MSNBC covering its arse.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pmAgain, we play into the mainstream media’s hands. As long as it’s on Olbermann’s show, the media can keep on with the meme that this is a partisan bickering match and totally ignore the facts.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:11 pmGO, AMANDA!!!!!
Woohooo! A TTKO - Terkel Total Knock Out!!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:12 pmAs long as Amanda is a dignified, calm and rational being, O’Reilly will get more and more shrill and nutty.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:12 pmRayn – and the corporate media will do that anyway.
If Keith Olbermann didn’t do it, NOBODY would stand up and expose Billo’s lies, bullying and bluster.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:12 pm“In a programming “counterpunch”, Glen Beck will host the girl who carved the B on her cheek to demonstrate how conservatives are oppressed and unfairly attacked.”
March 26th, 2009 at 5:14 pmOf course, it would be nice if the Alexa Foundation came out with a statement that underscored that they perceived no slight from Amanda or Think Progress.
But they’ve been strangely silent….
March 26th, 2009 at 5:16 pmperhaps keith will allow amanda to present tonight’s “worst person in the world” segment. you know bill-o the dildo is bound to be on that list
March 26th, 2009 at 5:17 pmNo offense to Mr. Olbermann but, I would think that NBC would have something to say and might want to hear Amanda tell her side of the story on NBC Nightly News. After all, Bill0 slandered them as well.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:24 pmAmanda’s showing you just what kind of man you are, Bill-O.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:26 pmWow maybe NBC wants to start paying her as their new henchwomen :) Go Amanda give em hell!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:27 pmBillo is a rapist! A man who thinks rape is the victims fault by the clothes she wears, being drunk or out late, is in my opinion, a man who thinks like the rapist himself!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:30 pmI was a victim of rape at the age of 13. Its just appalling how Bill sends out a msg that it was somehow my fault because i was wearing a mini skirt and walking home alone at night from a school function! The Billo’s in this world will eventually get locked up where they can experience being raped by others just like them.
I’m so glad Olberman has exposed Billo for what he really is. A rapist and a stalker!
tombaker Says:
“Glen Beck will host the girl who carved the B on her cheek”
I thanked her all that weekend for the cheap Halloween costume… even won a contest @ work.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:34 pmjanac Says:
Thank you for that post. I’m glad you are marching forward despite those tough times.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:38 pmGo Amanda & TP! I will be all eyes and ears!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:39 pmLeftside Annie Says:
——————————————————————————–
Rayn – and the corporate media will do that anyway.
If Keith Olbermann didn’t do it, NOBODY would stand up and expose Billo’s lies, bullying and bluster.
You are so right! It’s like most of MSM is controlled by conservatives. It’s difficult to watch MSM sometimes because of it.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:41 pmAmanda, you are really stirring up the hornets nest. Billo is getting it from all ends. With Ford and Capitol One having to actually respond to people making legitimate complaints, Billo’s head might explode.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:41 pmKlatuu Says:
I’m in total suspenders now!
Can’t wait to see who Olbermann has for worst person tonight. I’m sure it will be a surprise.
**
is nice.
:|
March 26th, 2009 at 5:46 pmKlatuu Says:
“I’m in total suspenders now!
Can’t wait to see who Olbermann has for worst person tonight. I’m sure it will be a surprise.”
my money’s on you
March 26th, 2009 at 5:47 pmKlatuu
It always is a surprise. Since the same old talking heads insist on sticking around, they’ll always have something incredibly vile to say.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:48 pmCan’t wait to see you, Amanda — oh great leader of the TP Insect Cabal.
~Zooey Lepidoptera
March 26th, 2009 at 5:50 pmHaha!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:53 pmFlagged for sexual perversion.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:53 pmI, for one, have bombarded the Fox News tip line on just what I think of ol’ Billo and his producers!
March 26th, 2009 at 5:54 pmI think it would be hard to get a conviction, Dr. Matt. I wouldn’t presume to give legal advice but I’ve watched Mike Wallace barge into a lot of offices and make people VERY uncomfortable. I also wouldn’t presume to compare what the goons do to Mike Wallace’s better work but there is a precedent of press access.
Slander, however, is a different story. In my humble opinion, a lot of people with deep enough pockets to pursue charges could present a VERY strong case and prove tangible damages. Amanda posting her side of the encounter before they aired Bill0’s initial tantrum would be extremely compelling evidence that Bill0 himself acted with malice.
It would be grand to watch Bill0 walk the proverbial plank. I just hope he doesn’t continue dragging good people into the slime where he lives.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:54 pmWhy focus on stuff that actually matters like millions of homeless people, wars and terrorists when you can just waste your time smearing a talking head on an “irrelevant” news channel?
March 26th, 2009 at 5:56 pmI think Bill O is a complete moron. To track this blogger down the way he did is pathetic. With that being said, I think when looking at his original comments about the rape victim I agree with him. I don’t believe that he was saying it was the victims fault for being raped. I think what he was saying that it was not smart of her to put herself in a situation where a insane jerk could do something like this. Of course a woman should be able to wear whatever they want and go wherever they want without being raped, but we live in a sick world where people are going to commit violent crimes. A person that puts themself in a position where rape is likely to occur as it was in this case is not using common sense. From the perspective of a father with a young daughter I would not want her walking alone at 2am in NY dressed in what this girl was wearing because her chances of being raped increase drastically. I think that is all Bill O was saying. Again, I just want to point out that I think the man is a loser and he should not have had his hench men follow the blogger to another state to confront her.
March 26th, 2009 at 5:56 pmHank, maybe you’d enjoy exploring the rest of the site before making assumptions?
March 26th, 2009 at 5:59 pmIf Keith Olbermann didn’t do it, NOBODY would stand up and expose Billo’s lies,
How else could Olbermann feed his O’Reilly obsession?
March 26th, 2009 at 5:59 pmThank you for your concern, Hank.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pmMaybe not…
March 26th, 2009 at 6:00 pmAmanda tells me it is not illegal for OReilly to stalk and harass her. I wonder about that. If there is an insect here, that maggot OReilly is a cancer on american news and entertainment.With Murdoch losing half his holdings in this economy, Bill O might be out on the streets before long. I have no doubt but that Amanda will set the record straight tonight. But we need more: what can We do to speak up about OReilly and get him off the backs of innocent Americans?
March 26th, 2009 at 6:02 pmHank Says:
If Keith Olbermann didn’t do it, NOBODY would stand up and expose Billo’s lies,
How else could Olbermann feed his O’Reilly obsession?
*
the same way you feed
your thinkprogress obsession;
by never letting go.
:)
March 26th, 2009 at 6:04 pmJohnM Says:
March 26th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
If a sex crime had touched your life? You wouldn’t have posted that. I’m not questioning your motives and have no intention of arguing the point. You obviously don’t know why it’s a rotten thing to say. I won’t even try to make you understand because it’s obviously beyond your personal experience. I can’t fault a person for that.
I do, however, ask you to never make such an insensitive comment again. Even if your intentions are good. You simply don’t know what you’re talking about and should refrain from comment. Thank you.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:04 pm32. Hank Says: Why focus on stuff that actually matters like millions of homeless people, wars and terrorists when you can just waste your time smearing a talking head on an “irrelevant” news channel?
So hank, why aren’t you out focusing on millions of homeless people, wars and terrorists rather than smearing an “irrelevent” progressive blog?
March 26th, 2009 at 6:06 pmKlatuu,
Do you have anything to say that might be on topic?
March 26th, 2009 at 6:08 pm42. Klatuu Says: When the comments slow down it all gets started again.
I’ve an idea: go away and let’s see if works like that….
March 26th, 2009 at 6:10 pmYou flatter yourself, stupid troll. We amuse ourselves by holding mirrors in front of creatures that run from their own reflections. Simply a way to kill a couple minutes between chores and dinner.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:11 pmZooey Says:
Klatuu,
Do you have anything to say that might be on topic?
***
yes,
his test results came back positive
and he has no friends or family who care.
:|
March 26th, 2009 at 6:14 pmraynman Says:
Again, we play into the mainstream media’s hands. As long as it’s on Olbermann’s show, the media can keep on with the meme that this is a partisan bickering match and totally ignore the facts.
So what’s the alternative. To totally ignore the issue? Because Keith and Rachel are the only two who would even report on this story.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:17 pmraynman Says:
Of course, it would be nice if the Alexa Foundation came out with a statement that underscored that they perceived no slight from Amanda or Think Progress.
But they’ve been strangely silent….
I’m thinking that Alexa and the people who run the foundation are probably conservatives and that’s why they ignored O’Reilly’s hateful words and booked him as a guest at their fundraiser. That’s why they are keeping quiet.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:18 pmJohnm says:
Agree with what Billo says about rape victims:
So when i was raped at age 13, that was my fault for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? I was asking for it because i put myself on a dark street at night? I invited rape by the skirt i was wearing?
March 26th, 2009 at 6:24 pmYou are so messed up in your thinking man!
avchavis Says:
You are so right! It’s like most of MSM is controlled by conservatives. It’s difficult to watch MSM sometimes because of it.
Then why do you do it? Just STOP. Get all your news/opinion from the Internet. You will be much better off if you do because you will then be able to make up your own mind rather than absorbing the “news” through the filter of the conservatives. The only MSM I listen to are Olberman and Maddow and not to get the news. They rarely tell me something I didn’t already know. I just watch them for their entertainment value telling us their take on the news. I love to watch Rachels facial expressions. She can say more in a facial expression than most people can with 10 sentences.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:25 pmjanac Says:
March 26th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
Yes, basically that’s what they’re all saying. Rapists are not quite as bad when they make certain wardrobe choices. Insanity!!
I’m sorry you went through such a horror at so tender an age, janac.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:28 pmOops,
Let me try again: Yes, basically that’s what they’re all saying. Rapists are not quite as bad when their victims make certain wardrobe choices. Insanity!!
Sorry. :|
March 26th, 2009 at 6:29 pmI don’t care if a woman (or man) is blind drunk and naked. Rape is wrong, and the rapists are guilty.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:29 pmThank you.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:31 pmWith that being said, I think when looking at his original comments about the rape victim I agree with him. I don’t believe that he was saying it was the victims fault for being raped. I think what he was saying that it was not smart of her to put herself in a situation where a insane jerk could do something like this.
I guess you missed the part about where her car broke down and that was why she was on foot.
Also, if that was really his intention, then why didn’t he mention the perp at all. Why didn’t he say something at the end about how it is NEVER ok to rape or murder anyone? What Billo did that day was give tacit permission to every sicko out there who sees a woman walking on a street late at night. That sicko can say to themselves “well, they’re just asking for it”.
You, I believe, are just another “concern” troll sent here by Billo to try to defend his honor. You have failed at your task.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:32 pmSeems like conservatives are always complaining about how we favor the criminal over the victim, except when it comes to rape.
Then it seems to be the other way around.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:42 pmI find it suspect the lengths Billo will go through and the level of his outrage when someone merely points out a flaw in his attitude on rape.
If billo was not a Greasy Old Pervert he would have blown this off as nothing.
Instead, he chooses to over react, expose and make a complete idiot fool of himself.
March 26th, 2009 at 6:55 pmjanac Says:
——————————————————————————–
Johnm says:
Agree with what Billo says about rape victims:
So when i was raped at age 13, that was my fault for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? I was asking for it because i put myself on a dark street at night? I invited rape by the skirt i was wearing?
You are so messed up in your thinking man!
That is certainly not what I was saying. I truly feel for all rape victims and I am sorry that you were raped. Nobody deserves that and don’t put any fault on you. I would never think it was the victims fault. I am merely saying that in this situation the victim could have avoided the horrible act caused by a nut job if she would have used some sound judgement and not ventured into an unsafe situation.
March 26th, 2009 at 7:26 pmJohnM Says:
March 26th, 2009 at 7:26 pm
John. I’ve asked you, very politely, to please drop the subject. I’m asking again. Please drop it.
March 26th, 2009 at 7:30 pmThe foundation in the background of all this is raising money for rape victims who are going to court, trying to get convictions. One of the problems with getting convictions is the perception that the woman is responsible for her victimization if she isn’t at home and/or isn’t dressed in a manner that magically wards off rapists.
March 26th, 2009 at 7:35 pmSuspenders pic of Borat Klatuu
*searches for mellon baller to gouge eyes out*
March 26th, 2009 at 8:13 pmI am merely saying that in this situation the victim could have avoided the horrible act caused by a nut job if she would have used some sound judgement and not ventured into an unsafe situation.
Maybe the girl thought getting a ride would be safer than walking? Maybe the predator killer looked trustworthy? Maybe she even knew the guy from somewhere?
March 26th, 2009 at 8:16 pmI’m gonna cut JohnM a wee bit of Christian slack, not because I think he’s right (I don’t, not by any stretch), but because I recognize his sort of comment as woefully ignorant as opposed to WILLFULLY ignorant. After all, even progressives often tout the virtues of personal responsibility, and some people are just crazy just like some women are just c***teases blah blah blah. It’s all irrelevant. A woman can be doing more that just dress provocatively. Hell, a woman can strip, give you a lap dance & start having sex with you, then change her mind mid-coitus. You stop. It’s over. To not stop is rape. Once you accept that as a very simple truth, it’s pretty plain to see it doesn’t matter what a woman or girl wears or says or does. There’s no justification for rape, ever. There’s no lesson to be learned from your crank.
I oft hear that the way some women dress is like jumping in a lions’ den with raw meat around your neck. Sh*tty comedian routines aside, men are better than animals. It’s just not an excuse.
We all have heard the old solemn along the lines of “they came for the jews & I said nothing for I was not a jew.” Well, where’s the line drawn when it comes to what a woman wears meaning she’s “asking for it?” Do we come for the miniskirted and the bikini’d first? Move on to those wearing stockings & garters? Clothes that are too tight? Should buxom women be forced to tape down? Should butt floss be outlawed? O’Reilly’s one of those dillholes who will mock Middle Eastern men for forcing their women into burkhas, or for stoning a woman who showed an inch more skin than local elders consider decent, then chastise a rape victim for her choice of clothes. Who decides the happy medium? I have an idea, unless a woman says “touch me” then don’t touch her. It’s not a mutual concept of personal responsibility. A man with his wallet on top of his head doesn’t give you the right to rob him, no matter how dumb his actions seem TO YOU. A house filled with oily rags doesn’t give you the right to set it on fire, no matter how much of a lesson YOU THINK it teaches the owner. So there’s no appropriate stretch of logic that allows someone to say “rape is always wrong, but let’s look at the victim.” It may allow others to understand a cautionary tale, but that doesn’t excude the act, ever.
March 26th, 2009 at 8:19 pmAm I to assume according to John M, billo and other idiots that if a woman looks appealing she deserves the violent act of rape?
What is wrong with these people?
March 26th, 2009 at 8:46 pmFaux news can commit stalking, but oh, we can not have any vulgarity.
March 26th, 2009 at 8:52 pmYou were made for Television Amanda. You sound like a pro vocally, very articulate and you look good on camera.
Only thing I’d say is be sure to listen for the interviewers leads. Keith was trying to lead you on the issue of Oreilly’s projectionism, i.e. accusing you of the tactics that not you, but they are actually guilty of.
Its the new right wing tactic and we see it across the board. Whatever the right is guilty of, they accuse the left of, so as to dilute any real investigation into their tactics and deeds.
If they accuse the left of it, then when the left is charging them with the same things it will make it sound more like two sides bickering, which is what they want. The last thing they want is a debate on the issues so they try to drown it all in a wash of ambiguity.
I think Keith was just trying to point out the hubris of Oreilly accusing you and TP of “gotcha” tactics when that’s what he just got through doing to you.
Anyway great interview. I see a burgeoning career in television on the horizon. :D
March 26th, 2009 at 9:15 pmWhy doesn’t someone “stalk” O”Reilly back, and demand he respond to the sexual harassment lawsuit that he purportedly paid 10 million dollars to “make go away” and said he would never discuss again. How convenient for him. Too bad he wouldn’t give all the people he harasses a chance for the same declaration. (Oct. 13, 2004: A female Fox news producer filed a lawsuit against Fox News tv broadcaster Bill O’Reilly, claiming that he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment, and spoke often and explicitly to her about phone sex, vibrators, sexual threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and various sexual fantasies.) The entire transcipt of the suit is available on the internet. She also talks about his scary mood swings and his description to her of his own sexual organ. Unfortunately he seems to have succeeded in hiding his own dirt while following and harrassing innocent people trying to “expose” them for things that he actually makes up or embellishes upon or presents his own twisted and distorted version of the “truth”.I hate to see him get away with this and I hope that more people will continue to confront him about his own mistreatment of other people and his own hypocricy and give him a little dose of his own medicine.
March 26th, 2009 at 9:33 pmAmanda did a great job tonight! At this point any rational human being just needs to almost laugh at the giant talking head! It’s outright insane how far he’s taking this! Oddly, a simple apology for the initial comment might have prevented all of this.
Having type that out, I have now been accosted by Jesse the Stalker and I now have to explain my connection to Joseph Stalin, Ivan The Terrible, Emperor Hirohito, Hannibal Lechter, the MLB steroids scandal, the 1919 Chicago White Sox, Ghengis Khan, Cancellor Palpatine, the Jedi Council, Blackbeard the Pirate, Barack Obama and of course………NBC.
Thanks Think Progress..THANKS A LOT!!!!
March 26th, 2009 at 9:49 pmwell done AMANDA…again.
What (Unconscionable) companies advertise on the Bill O’Reilly show? ….I will be sending an email to those lame companies….threatening BOYCOTT.
March 26th, 2009 at 10:07 pmTo janac: I think most of us agree that no human should ever be raped, and the entire fault rests with the rapist. That being said, the idea that anyone would EVER put any fault whatsoever on a child of 13 in this kind of matter is crazy to me. Societies exist to protect children and the future, if you were not so protected the fault lies entirely outside yourself. I wish you every good thing.
March 26th, 2009 at 10:34 pm“A recent commentary on NPR by media guy David Folkenflik cited the tremendous ratings the FOX News Channel is currently getting. That, in contrast to the collapse at MSNBC and CNN.
March 26th, 2009 at 10:44 pmAs you know, the liberal media ran wild during the election cycle supporting Barack Obama. Because of that, some Obama voters tuned in to the left media. Apparently, they have left as fast as they arrived.
Sixty-two million Americans voted against Mr. Obama, and many of those people are now worried because of the bold moves the president has made. So folks who are uneasy with the direction of the country are not going to watch or read product from news organizations that are in the tank for Barack Obama. That’s why some committed-left newspapers are failing and the liberal cable networks are getting hammered.
That is galling radical-left zealots, and they are on the attack. FNC’s Glenn Beck is a good example of what’s going on. The usual smear merchants on NBC are now attacking Glenn personally, and the Internet nutcases are doing the same. The more successful Mr. Beck becomes, the more these people try to hurt him.
As we told you on Monday, NBC President Jeff Zucker allows these hateful attacks on a daily basis, forever branding his network as a place of cheap and dishonest discourse.
Along with Zucker, former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta is also driving the hate industry. Podesta runs the Center for American Progress, a far-left hate group partially funded by our pal George Soros.
In addition to working for President Clinton, Podesta was the co-chairman of Barack Obama’s transition team, and here is where the story takes a very serious turn. Podesta’s Web site is devoted to hurting any prominent person who disagrees with liberal politics, and that includes critics of President Obama. And Podesta’s mainstream media outlet is, of course, NBC News.
*After we reported on Podesta’s deputy, Amanda Terkel, harming a rape victim and her family because of Ms. Terkel’s hatred for me, she showed up almost immediately on NBC News. NBC says it has no connection to Ms. Terkel and says I am disregarding the truth. Sure.*
Finally, why should you care about any of this? Well, because it’s your country. A well-coordinated, well-financed cabal attacking dissent is a pretty big story, especially because it involves Podesta, who has access to the president and NBC, which along with it’s parent company General Electric is misusing its power.
Bottom line: The far left wants to silence and damage opposition, whether it’s Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity or anyone else in the public eye. And those people will do just about anything to achieve their goals.
And that’s “The Memo.”"
Long Live Bill O.
March 26th, 2009 at 10:52 pmMs. Terkel: Grow up. If you’re gonna dish it out, better be prepared to take it. Quit whining and be honest. It’d be a start.
Honest Man Says a whole bunch of stupid shit:
March 26th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
How very dishonest….
Paranoia much?
March 26th, 2009 at 11:00 pmNYDaisy Says:
March 26th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Tell it to your Lord Billo, lightweight.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:01 pmFirst time here — hello everybody.
Amanda, excellent job! Bill-O needs to learn that in today’s world of DVR’s and internet, he can’t just pretend the past didn’t happen. As for John who was sort of siding with O’Dorky’s comments concerning the rape victim, I ask about Shawn Hornbeck. Bill claimed that Shawn was enjoying himself while being held prisoner because he didn’t have to go to school — never mind the fact that he was a teenage sex slave.
For the record, rape victims are NEVER at fault … period!
Also for the record, Bill O’Reilly is an idiot … period!
I gladly joined in on the email barrage on O’Dorky’s sponsors and would encourage everybody reading this to do the same. It’s time we take our country back!
March 26th, 2009 at 11:21 pmWelcome MCH! And well said.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:24 pmwell, I’ll do what I’m good at. A Cursing Ceremony against the O’R. clique. Bless Ms. T, who deserved better. Hope she takes out some restraining orders.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:30 pmMCH Says:
First time here
Sure, it is.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:31 pmThank you, Jim Wolf. It’s always fun to find a new hangout.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:34 pmActually, Honest Man, it is.
However, I have this feeling you’ve got this conspiracy theory already starting to form so let’s see if I can help …
MCH, claiming to have just registered at the TP blog, is in reality the psuedonym for President Barack Obama, the secret chairman of the board of NBC and Think Progress … or is he? Perhaps Obama is actually an imposter, a clever disguise concocted by Amanda Terkel, the supposed executive editor for ThinkProgress.org … or is she? Perhaps Terkel is actually a clever disguise of Vice President Joe Biden … after all, when was the last time you saw Amanda and VP Biden in the same place? Think About it!
March 26th, 2009 at 11:40 pmSeek help, soon.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:43 pmNYDaisy Says:
Long Live Bill O.
Ms. Terkel: Grow up. If you’re gonna dish it out, better be prepared to take it. Quit whining and be honest. It’d be a start.
___________
Long live Amanda M.
Mr BillO: Grow up. If you’re gonna dish it out, better be prepared to take it. Quit whining and be honest. It’d be a start.
Wow… that plays just as well the other way around! T’anks Daisy… yer tha tops!
March 26th, 2009 at 11:44 pmAH, my boy, I have all the help I need. I thank you for your concern, however.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:45 pmHonest Man Says:
Seek help, soon.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:43 pm
Is that a ‘note to self’?
————————————
Hi, Jim Wolf359. Welcome, MCH!
March 26th, 2009 at 11:45 pmDishonest Man says @ 89:
March 26th, 2009 at 11:46 pmOh! The Irony.
Hi Jane!
March 26th, 2009 at 11:47 pmLets go METS!
Hi, Jane, and thank you! I just followed the link to your own blog. Probably won’t be able to check it out fully tonight but it looks like a fun read!
March 26th, 2009 at 11:49 pmDishonest Man says @ 89: March 26th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Jim, your comment was #87 from where I’m sitting.
Yeah, definitely ‘let’s go Mets!’ Even if I can’t afford to get down to our sparkly new ShitiField (or Bailout Park, whatever) this season, I’m looking forward to Opening Day.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:51 pmAlas, Jane & Jim, I will be unable to join you in your rooting for the Mets. Living in St Louis, the old Mets-Cardinals rivalry still ramins fresh in my memory.
I look forward to some good-nature bantering as the season gets underway though.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:54 pmrepublicans hate facts Says:
Which is EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE SAYING! You’re saying THE VICTIM is THE ONE RESPONSIBLE! What a TYPICAL REPUBLICAN PIECE OF SH!T!
That certainly is not what I am saying. Let me say it again, I do not think the victim is responsible, but I do think that she did put herself in a situation based on her poor judgement.
If I were walking down that same street at 2am waving a bunch of $100 bills and some thug came up behind me, smashed me in the head and stole all my money would the fact that I was robbed be my fault? No, but I would have excercised poor judgement for putting myself in that situation. Obviously being mugged is not as tramatic as being raped, but the same principle applies. By putting myself in a situation that increases my chances of being mugged is poor judgment. That is all I am saying.
Does anybody here think that a woman alone at night dressed in a halter top walking down the west side highway intoxicated is less likely to be raped than a woman that calls a cab or stays with a group of friends and goes home? Anybody that says yes simply does not want to face reality. While it certainly is not the fault of the woman that raped her and the man that did it should be sent to jail for a long time if she would have used sound judgement she would not have been in that situation.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:57 pmHonest Man Says:
Along with Zucker, former Bill Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta is also driving the hate industry. Podesta runs the Center for American Progress, a far-left hate group partially funded by our pal George Soros.
__________
The Hate Industry? How’s that work?
Ya mean, like a media figure saying we should poison a SCOTUS judge?
Hmmm… that was Anne Coulter…
Or hoping terrorists hit an American city, like San Francisco?
Hmmm… that was Bill O’Reilly…
Or joking about “killing liberals”?
Hmmm… that was Greg Gutfield on Fox…
Give me some help, Honest Man…
Explain this “hate industry” a little better, m’kay?
March 26th, 2009 at 11:57 pmYou got it MCH! I look forward to it. Hmm…wonder how I got 89 from 83? I’m going back and forth tween here and the Nova/Duke game. Boy, Nova looks good. Back to the game.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:57 pm“…I just followed the link to your own blog…”
MCH, it’s not ‘my own’ blog as such, but I’m proud to be associated with it…a bunch of us regulars here started it about two years ago. I don’t contribute much at all, but there’s a great bunch of Critters there who put together an exellent mix of stories. And some fun stuff, too.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:59 pmJane said:
Ah, I thank you for the clarification. I’ll be sure and give it a good look-see.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:02 amhmmm … ok, the block quote thing doesnt mean what I thought it meant. Pretend your paragraph follows the “Jane said:”, ok?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:03 amYeah, the ZOO another great Progressive blog. Good people, and posts. And I second the fun stuff. Check out the Friday Night Music MCH. Good stuff!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:03 amThere’s another liberal blog I used to hang out at but one of the main contributors there is a paranoid who reads conspriacy theories into everything — viciously attacking anybody and everybody who dares to disagree with him. After he dragged my name through the mud in a fashion only Bill’O and Rush could appreciate, and the owner of the blog decided she didnt care, I said “forget it” and went looking for a new home. Looks like a good bunch of people here and a good supply of trolls to have fun with.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:07 amThe accusations of O’Reilley stalking are well documented and longstanding, stalkers include several network employees doing this as part of their job (and under the orders of network person Bill-O), and the network has done absolutely nothing about it.
It seems that a legal case could be made that the network is responsible for the stalking.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:07 amthe old Mets-Cardinals rivalry still ramins fresh in my memory.
Yes, I still hate the phrase ‘pond scum.’ ;) Although, before the Mets came along, I was kind of split between the Cards and the Yankees (my dad watched all the baseball that was on the TV machine when I was little.)
Excuse me for a moment…
JohnM, you keep mentioning ‘poor judgment’ – don’t forget, one of the points that BillO was emphasizing was that she was drunk, and while, yes, that was poor judgment if you’re looking at this from the perspective of a (supposedly) wiser age, NOTHING excuses the MURDERER/RAPIST’S actual CRIME. So stop trying!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:09 amJohnM Says:
…if she would have used sound judgement she would not have been in that situation.
March 26th, 2009 at 11:57 pm
If you have a wife or daughter, I truly hope her car never breaks down in an area with no cell service.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:14 amWhat a load of horse-hockey, “honest man”.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:15 amWelcome, MCH!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:15 amJohnM, let me ask a question. If a guy is drunk and rapes a women, does his intoxication excuse the act?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:16 amHey, Zooey – nice new name!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:18 amJane E. Schneider Says:
JohnM, you keep mentioning ‘poor judgment’ – don’t forget, one of the points that BillO was emphasizing was that she was drunk, and while, yes, that was poor judgment if you’re looking at this from the perspective of a (supposedly) wiser age, NOTHING excuses the MURDERER/RAPIST’S actual CRIME. So stop trying!
I am not excusing murder or rape in anyway which I don’t believe Bill O was doing either.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:18 amJim Wolf,
Remember, the woman has to fight back REALLY HARD, or maybe she liked it.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:18 am/sarc
Jane E. Schneider Says:
Hey, Zooey – nice new name!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:18 am
Thank you, Jane. It’s special for the TP Insect Cabal. :-)
March 27th, 2009 at 12:18 amJim Wolf359 Says:
——————————————————————————–
JohnM, let me ask a question. If a guy is drunk and rapes a women, does his intoxication excuse the act?
Of course not.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:19 amZooey Lepidoptera Says:
If you have a wife or daughter, I truly hope her car never breaks down in an area with no cell service.
Having a car breakdown is not poor judgement. If my daughter had her car break down I would also hope she was not driving drunk because that would be poor judgement.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:21 amJohn, please take my advice … quit while you’re not too far behind.
And thank you, Zooey!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:21 amZooey Lepidoptera says:
March 27th, 2009 at 12:22 amYeah I forgot about that part Zoo. How people who rationalize the actions of perps like rapists is beyond me.
BTW, I like your new handle too!
Okay gang, time for Bedtime here. 5:00 AM comes way to early for self. See ya tomorrow!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:24 amJim Wolf359 Says:
——————————————————————————–
Zooey Lepidoptera says:
Yeah I forgot about that part Zoo. How people who rationalize the actions of perps like rapists is beyond me.
BTW, I like your new handle too!
Are people here unable to understand simple English. I am not rationalizing anything and I am not saying that it was not the jerk’s fault for raping her. Actually, I have said the opposite many times. Do you think the woman that was raped an murdered excercised sound judgment?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:25 amJohnM Says:
Having a car breakdown is not poor judgement. If my daughter had her car break down I would also hope she was not driving drunk because that would be poor judgement.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:21 am
If I remember correctly, the young rape/murder victim’s car broke down the night she was killed.
So you’re saying that since she’d been drinking that night, she’s still partly at fault for her own murder?
You seemed to be weighed down by a lot of BUTS, JohnM.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:25 amYeah, I’m done for the night too.
Looking forward to tomorrow though!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:26 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
REALLY? What if she didn’t MAINTAIN HER CAR in the BEST MANNER? What if she FORGOT to FILL UP? What if she RAN OVER a NAIL? She’s STILL RESPONSIBLE in YOUR SADISTIC SH!THEAD ATTITUDE!
Obviously you are unable to have a rational discussion. I will ask you what I have asked others. Do you think she excercised sound judgement?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:26 amToo bad fer you, JohnM…
rhf is here… and he don’t like apologists fer rapists.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:27 amZooey Lepidoptera Says:
If I remember correctly, the young rape/murder victim’s car broke down the night she was killed.
So you’re saying that since she’d been drinking that night, she’s still partly at fault for her own murder?
You seemed to be weighed down by a lot of BUTS, JohnM.
Actually it had been towed, she could have called a cab, called a friend and stayed with the friend she was with. She walked from a place that was safe to a place that was unsafe, that is poor judgement.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:28 amOkay, I’ll post this one more time:
O’REILLY: So anyway, these two girls come in from the suburbs and they get bombed, and their car is towed because they’re moronic girls and, you know, they don’t have a car. So they’re standing there in the middle of the night with no car. And then they separate because they’re drunk. They separate, which you never do. All right.
Now Moore, Jennifer Moore, 18, on her way to college. She was 5-foot-2, 105 pounds, wearing a miniskirt and a halter top with a bare midriff. Now, again, there you go. So every predator in the world is gonna pick that up at two in the morning. She’s walking by herself on the West Side Highway, and she gets picked up by a thug. All right. Now she’s out of her mind, drunk...
Not only is BillO implying that it was the victim’s fault for her own rape and murder, his obvious sexism is despicable.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:30 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
No OBVIOUSLY *YOU* are unable to have a RATIONAL DISCUSSION as you keep saying a RAPE/MURDER VICTIM was RESPONSIBLE for her OWN DEATH like a FREAK!
Please actually read my posts, I have said many times she was not responsible for her rape and murder, but that she did not use good judgement. Again, I ask do you think she excercised sound judgement?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:31 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
You ASSUME she HAD A CELL PHONE or the MONEY to PAY A CAB. How do you KNOW she didn’t EXERCISE the BEST JUDGMENT in the SITUATION – D!CKWEED?
She was at a bar buying alcohol but could not afford 50 cents for a phone call? She also could have asked a number of businesses to use their phones.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:32 amJohnM Says:
Do you think the woman that was raped an murdered excercised sound judgment?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:25 am
No, not necessarily. The penalty for being young and making a poor decision should not be rape and murder.
This is a societal problem, we spend more time picking apart the judgment of the victim — and little or no time concentrating on what a sick f uck the perpetrator is. We just assume people know that we think the perpetrator is sick, and fail to voice it as loud or LOUDER than our criticism of the victim.
I hope you can see the difference, JohnM.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:34 amJane E. Schneider Says:
Not only is BillO implying that it was the victim’s fault for her own rape and murder, his obvious sexism is despicable.
He is not implying that it was her fault he is flat out saying that she was an idiot for going out alone down the street drunk like that. You may find it sexist, but the truth hurts. There are jerks that like to rape women and women should try and avoid situations where it is more likely to happen if they can. In this case she could have.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:35 amJohnM Says:
Do you think the woman that was raped an murdered excercised sound judgment?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:25 am
No, not necessarily. The penalty for being young and making a poor decision should not be rape and murder.
This is a societal problem, we spend more time picking apart the judgment of the victim — and little or no time concentrating on what a sick f uck the perpetrator is. We just assume people know that we think the perpetrator is sick, and fail to voice it as loud or LOUDER than our criticism of the victim.
I hope you can see the difference, JohnM.
I completely agree that we should be focusing more on what a sick ass the perp was. I think rapists are the lowest of the low. I also agree that her poor judgement should not have a penalty of murder.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:37 am“Do you think she excercised sound judgement?”
She was freakin’ 18! How many 18-year-olds exercise ’sound judgment’?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:38 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
——————————————————————————–
So JohnM, how do you KNOW she wasn’t LOOKING FOR A CAB when she was MURDERED you WHINY LITTLE PR!CK
Why would she walk away from where people are to a place where cabs are less likely to be?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:39 amJane E. Schneider Says:
——————————————————————————–
“Do you think she excercised sound judgement?”
She was freakin’ 18! How many 18-year-olds exercise ’sound judgment’?
Very good point, hopefully women learn from her poor judgement and stay away from situations that increase the chances of getting raped.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:40 amJohnM Says:
Actually it had been towed, she could have called a cab, called a friend and stayed with the friend she was with. She walked from a place that was safe to a place that was unsafe, that is poor judgement.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:28 am
Ok, let’s play that out, but with a new character.
Your 18 year old daughter is in the city with a friend. They park in the wrong spot, purely by accident, and the car is towed away. Her cell is dead, or there is simply no service, and they can’t find a pay phone. Your daughter and her friend decide to each walk a block or two to try to find a phone. Sadly, she is grabbed by a man who viciously rapes and murders her.
Are you going to spend the rest of your life ruminating about her poor judgment?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:40 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
YET you STILL IMPLY that it *IS* the PENALTY and THEREFORE *SHE* was RESPONSIBLE! WOW you’re a PIECE OF SH!T!
Certainly not what I am implying. I am flat out saying that she is not responsible. She simple put herself in a situation that would increase her chances of being raped.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:42 amJohnM Says:
Very good point, hopefully women learn from her poor judgement and stay away from situations that increase the chances of getting raped.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:40 am
You do know that men are raped, don’t you?
If nothing else, I hope that you will temper the “buts” out of your language, and recognize a streak a sexism that you may not be aware you possess.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:44 amZooey Lepidoptera Says:
Ok, let’s play that out, but with a new character.
Your 18 year old daughter is in the city with a friend. They park in the wrong spot, purely by accident, and the car is towed away. Her cell is dead, or there is simply no service, and they can’t find a pay phone. Your daughter and her friend decide to each walk a block or two to try to find a phone. Sadly, she is grabbed by a man who viciously rapes and murders her.
Are you going to spend the rest of your life ruminating about her poor judgment?
No, that is not poor judgement and it is very different that what happened. She was alone intoxicated and walking in an unsafe place. She started in a place that would have allowed her to get to a phone, but she chose not to do that. It may have been the alcohol, it may have been ignorance. Either way it was poor judgement.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:45 amZooey Lepidoptera Says:
You do know that men are raped, don’t you?
If nothing else, I hope that you will temper the “buts” out of your language, and recognize a streak a sexism that you may not be aware you possess.
Yes men are raped, but not nearly at the same rate as women.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:46 amHmmm… I’m thinkin’ mebbe JohnM is sorry he brought it up by now…
March 27th, 2009 at 12:46 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
LIAR! THAT *EXPLICITLY* STATES she’s RESPONSIBLE you ILLITERATE RUBE!
So saying that a women is not responsible explicitly states that she is responsible? Wow, ok.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:48 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
You don’t know ANY OF THOSE ASSUMPTIONS are TRUE. You don’t know if they allowed RE-ENTRANCE, you don’t know if she felt THREATENED by the PEOPLE HANGING OUT SIDE. You don’t know ANYTHING other than you are DEFENDING O’REILLY’S *SSH*LE STATEMENTS – BLINDLY! Like a good HACK!
And you are assuming that the place she was at was not near any other places of business or pay phones?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:50 amrepublicans hate facts Says:
REALLY? I’m sure that MANY A PRISONER would DISAGREE with YET ANOTHER ONE OF YOUR UNEDUCATED *ASSUMPTIONS*!
Ok did I miss something? Was she raped in a prison? What are you talking about?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:52 amrepublicans hate facts,
It has been fun, but I am heading to bed. I think I have exposed your ignorance enough. Don’t let the facts get in the way, you keep on sticking to your weak arguments with attacks and name calling. That is what people without any arguments rely on most.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:53 amI hope so, TRoS. I don’t understand how he can assert “She simple(sic) put herself in a situation…”, yet he’s “flat out saying that she’s not responsible.”
I’ve had enough for the night. See you tomorrow.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:55 amI think JohnM just needs to be able to rationalize his Billo love somehow, so he just argues the same point over and over. Like Billo, but without the head-spinning pseudo-rage.
Of course, I’m not actually sitting by his computer, so I don’t know for sure.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:57 amGoodnight JimWolf, MCH & Jane. It’s been fun. :-)
I’m outta here, too.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:59 amI think I have exposed your ignorance enough. Don’t let the facts get in the way, you keep on sticking to your weak arguments with attacks and name calling. That is what people without any arguments rely on most.
Do you think that you exposed MY ignorance? I quoted you facts, straight from the ass’s mouth, yet your sole obsession was with the dead girl’s ‘poor judgment.’ That was YOUR only argument this whole time. And this ‘exposes’ our ‘ignorance’? While I wouldn’t usually phrase my comments the same way, I agree with RHF’s responses to you.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:01 amG’night, Zooey and everyone.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:02 amI finally had time to sit down and see JohnM just gave up by stating he “sticks to the facts.” The only thing I’ve seen by John’s posts (and he’s been at it for some time) is that he’s a classic narcissist.
I guess that’s a nice way of saying he’s a first class low life ahole.
Oh well, good night everyone.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:17 amA woman should be able to walk after dark dressed any way she wants and be free of any fear of being raped.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:44 amJohnM showed bad judgment spouting that drivel.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:46 amKlatuu Says:
Klatuu you are laboring under the delusion you are a rational thinking human being. You are not. You are an ignorant, moronic, brainwashed TROLL. TP writes a thread. Ignorant brainwashed trolls like YOU come in and attack either TP of posters here or tell the lies you were programmed with since you are far too stupid to think for yourself and the normal humans here mop the floor with you and your fellow trolls. Since you are so stupid it is pretty easy to do.
March 27th, 2009 at 2:01 amThe American people have had just about enough of you cowardly nutjobs. Your days are numbered.
March 27th, 2009 at 2:04 amHonest Man Says:
You may be honest but there is no question you are DELUSIONAL. The media is NOT liberal. Never has been. It wont BECOME liberal just because you are brainwashed enough to believe it because you were PROGRAMED to believe it. I am a liberal they have NEVER pushed my agenda. Nor did they push Obama at McCains expense if anything they hit Obama hard and treated McCain with kid gloves. The rest of your rant is similar in that it is based on such brainwashed delusions that it isnt worth taking the time to address. Simply put you dont know what you are talking about.
March 27th, 2009 at 2:06 amHonest Man Says:
Seek braincells. IMEDIATLY
March 27th, 2009 at 2:08 amstephen109 Says:
Whose days are numbered stephen. Certainly you realize that your post made no sense without some indication of who you are talking to.
March 27th, 2009 at 2:13 amstephen109 Says:
The American people have had just about enough of you cowardly nutjobs. Your days are numbered.
____________
Gee, Stevie… making threats?
March 27th, 2009 at 2:19 amThe Republic of Stupidity Says:
Its pretty clear stevie is a moron. I guess he wanted to threaten us but was too much of a coward so he just threw a vague generic threat out there like a Roschark test that can be taken any way you want to see it.
March 27th, 2009 at 2:27 amJohnM Says:
She was at a bar buying alcohol but could not afford 50 cents for a phone call? She also could have asked a number of businesses to use their phones.
Maybe she had $20 but could not find a phone to take a $20 bill.
There are few pay phones nowadays and many of them are broken. Maybe there were no open businesses where her car was towed away. It was after 2am, you know. If you or BillO are going to criticize her, then you two are going to have to prove there WERE.
Why would she walk away from where people are to a place where cabs are less likely to be?
You do not know if what you are saying is true. The opposite is probably true.
And you are assuming that the place she was at was not near any other places of business or pay phones?
Quite possibly. Do you know better? Really?
I think I have exposed your ignorance enough.
Not in the slightest, Mr. Projectionist! You and BillO should be talking about why sickos rape abd murder—not criticizing the 18-year-old who died. We SHOULD be talking about the hypocrisy of BillO going to that luncheon to plug his book!
And all the charges about what Amanda and TP did are LIES. Apparently, it was a poster at Newshound who posted contact info of the Alexa Foundation. Amanda and TP DID NOT!!
March 27th, 2009 at 3:29 am^^
March 27th, 2009 at 3:46 amYou obviously didn’t listen to the program for if you had then you would know that the subject was on what alcohol does to people. How it affect their judgment. He was saying that her alcohol induced state of mind caused her to use bad judgment. He was using her, along with many others, as an example. He also gave her the highest respect. Again, if you took the time to listen to the program in it’s entirety you would know this. Guess you’d just rather be uninformed and look like a boob.
stephen109 Says:
I remember this when it happened. I dont care WHAT the overall context of his statement was. He called her a moron. He BLAMED her for her rape and murder. Whatever his EXCUSE for that it IS what he did. I guess you would rather BE a brainwashed moron than think for yourself. Thats fine. It provides us the opportunity to LAUGH at you. Thanks for the free clown show. By the way. Forget about telling us what Billy O’falafel TOLD you to think about what he said. If you cannot speak to WHAT HE SAID then you are wasting our time. That is other than providing that free clown show.
March 27th, 2009 at 5:47 amBill O’Reilly, you’re the best! I didn’t even know about this great little site until seeing you chat about it on your prime time television show. Thanks again, Bill!
March 27th, 2009 at 6:45 amstephen109 Says:
The American people have had just about enough of you cowardly nutjobs. Your days are numbered.
Like most right-wing nazi nutbags, the eliminationist rhetoric is never far from the surface.
Seig heil, you little goosestepper.
March 27th, 2009 at 7:38 amLiberals are stupid. This website proves your ability to use any real, critical reasoning in your arguments is non-existent.
March 27th, 2009 at 8:21 amSilly fascist bully is giving TP some free advertising.
TP should thank the creep.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:15 amLanguage people.By getting yourselves all worked up and bent out of shape, you are becoming blo’riely. But seriously, he always seems to be wearing a pretty nice suit. Think he’s asking to be robbed?
March 27th, 2009 at 9:38 amBill Oreilly is a sex deviate and sex offender ,needs a sign in his yard warning people who live near,he last million od dollars in lawsut afterhew masterbated on phone talking ot co-worker she be his ass to pulp just like thsi gal will do.Bill oreilly is a big pussy agree with him or he is trouble,no one is a bit scard of that chichken shit JERK all he has on his mind is sex dont buy any products trelatedto any fox show and for sureOreillys show Foed is one of them po,lets all work to-geter to get him off tv prime time,ghis boss Murdock is pissed now at Oreilly sex pusher pimp.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:47 amsend an email (see below)….to Proctor & gamble….Johnson & johnson and BAYER at the company’s home page (CONTACT US).
………………..
I will be BOYCOTTING all (Johnson & Johnson, Protor & gamble, BAYER)products as a result of your poor judgement in paying for advertisements on FOX’s O’Reilly FACTOR television program. Bill O’Reilly is a HYPOCRITE, bigot and sexual harasser. He claims to be in support of women’s rights and be PAPARAZZI yet O’Reilly sends out his assistants to STALK & harass journalists.
STOP spending advertising funds at FOX, and I will re-start buying (SPLENDA, and TYLENOL….CREST & BOUNTY….ALEVE & Alka Seltzer) and other products.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:56 amNYDaisy Says:
The projection is precious. You could total up the IQ of the ENTIRE rightwing and still not reach triple digits. You people are astonishingly stupid morons. You wouldnt know an original thought from a migrane you are so stupid. IF only there were a couple of conservatives with a functioning cerebral cortex who could at least tell a cogent argument from a ball of dryer lint and even TRY to make a point instead of ignorant dribble like YOUR post you would SEE some critical thinking skills. On the other hand why waste them on morons like YOU. Remember your Bible. No pearls before swine and you guy are MUCH stupider than pigs
March 27th, 2009 at 11:39 amstephen109 Says:
You obviously didn’t listen to the program for if you had then you would know that the subject was on what alcohol does to people.
BillO was criticizing the deceased, Jennifer Moore, and saying the rape and murder were also due to the type of clothes she wore, the fact that she was walking (she had her car towed away), and being in a not-so-good neighborhood.
It is perfectly possible the rape and murder would have happened if she never had a drop of alcohol in her life. It was not solely about alcohol. Gee, you people lie a lot!
March 27th, 2009 at 12:59 pmTerkel deserves to be confronted. She can’t even answer a simple question and completely smeared O’Rielly by taking him completedly out of context.
Here it is…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce3xgC2z6Ew
She seems completely inable to answer a simple question and very insincere.
March 27th, 2009 at 11:03 pmtim43,
You do realize that the video of Amanda is HIGHLY EDITED by BillO to make her look bad, don’t you? It was three weeks later, she was on vacation in Winchester, and a couple of goons come up to her and shoved a mic and camera in her face. She did not want to quote him or herself unless she could do it accurately. She was unprepared for the ambush. Why the ambush? She has an office, a phone, email and everything.
BillO said she led a charge of protest against the Foundation. She DID NOT. If she did you could show me the proof, but you cannot because she DID NOT.
BillO “was unsympathetic to the plight of a crime victim (his words)”. Her name is Jennifer Moore. She was raped and murdered. Read #189 to see why the “Mel Gibson context defense” does not apply.
March 28th, 2009 at 12:51 amTimmeh. Nice of you to drop by to show us again that you are insufferably stupid and gullible. Do you think you are stupider or more gullibible.
March 28th, 2009 at 1:43 amTerkel should quit crying and suck it up. She’s playing with the big boys now.
March 28th, 2009 at 8:16 pm