Think Progress

Feith Responds To Spanish Charges: ‘I Never Advocated’ For Torture, I Was Just ‘Giving Advice’

Last week, a Spanish court said it would consider opening a criminal case against six Bush administration officials “over allegations they gave legal cover for torture at Guantanamo.” Yesterday, former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith, one of the officials implicated in the complaint, went on Fox News to defend himself in front of torture advocate Bill O’Reilly.

Feith argued that the charges that he helped approve torture are completely bogus. “I’m being criticized for a position that I never advocated. And so the facts are just wrong,” he said. Feith said he was simply giving “advice” to President Bush and had no role in “directing” torture policy:

FEITH But there’s also a broader point of principle here, which is what the Spanish authorities are considering doing is indicting people, former U.S. government officials for giving advice to the president. And the idea that a foreign official can disagree with advice given to the president, they’re not talking about action. And they’re not even talking about directing people to take action. They’re talking about people who were advising the president on policy and legal questions.

“This is an effort to intimidate U.S. government officials,” Feith alleged. Watch it:


But last year, Feith himself bragged in an interview with British law professor Phillippe Sands that he played a pivotal role in ensuring that Geneva protections against “outrages upon personal dignity” did not apply to detainees:

I asked Feith, just to be clear: Didn’t the administration’s approach mean that Geneva’s constraints on interrogation couldn’t be invoked by anyone at Guantánamo? “Oh yes, sure,” he shot back. Was that the intended result?, I asked. “Absolutely,” he replied. I asked again: Under the Geneva Conventions, no one at Guantánamo was entitled to any protection? “That’s the point,” Feith reiterated. … “This year I was really a player,” Feith said, thinking back on 2002 and relishing the memory.

Indeed, Feith’s arguments became official U.S. policy with the signing of a presidential memorandum on February 7, 2002.

Feith’s knee-jerk denial that he pushed for torture is nothing new. “We took an extremely strongly pro-Geneva Convention position in the Pentagon,” he said last April. Speaking with O’Reilly, Feith also made sure to go after Sands. “What’s going on in Spain is implementing, essentially, an, idea that a British lawyer has been proposing, a guy named Phillippe Sands, who wrote an extremely dishonest book on the subject,” he said.



97 Responses to “Feith Responds To Spanish Charges: ‘I Never Advocated’ For Torture, I Was Just ‘Giving Advice’”

  1. Uncle Ho says:

    “I was just giving advice” = “I was just following orders” at Nuremberg.

    SWING TIME!(from the gallows, that is)


  2. spencers butterfly mom says:

    What a pussy! Sad you won’t be able to travel out of the country anymore, isn’t it, Dougie?

    PEACE


  3. raynman says:

    I just handed the man the gun, I didn’t pull the trigger!!!


  4. MrBrown says:

    “I smoked, but I didn’t inhale…”

    “I had sex, but didn’t have an orgasm…”

    “I shot the guy, but didn’t intend to kill him…”

    Anyone got more?


  5. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    As Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, wasn’t it Doug Feith’s job to give advice within the confines of the Law? Isn’t he required to comport to the Law, not find ways to circumvent the law?

    .


  6. tombaker says:

    “I’m scared, and my wife is pissed that I won’t take her to Europe for vacation.”


  7. Luis Chapulin M says:

    “Gee, I didn’t expect this to be some sort of Inquisition”


  8. Hoodathunktick says:

    “I told them it was a bad idea. I was just joking.”

    Isn’t that the usual Republican response?


  9. rastaman says:

    WHEN ARE PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY GOING TO WAKE UP?

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT HE SAID….IT MATTERS WHAT HE DID

    FEITH YOU’RE GOING TO SWING MOFO


  10. Buckie Boy says:

    Uh oh, they are starting the media campaign to make them look like the victims..

    …instead of the all the VICTIMS they TORTURED for NO REASON other than their own sadistic pleasure.

    And of course that so called “Liberal Media” will give them plenty of air time to make up their pack of lies.

    Please feel free to Travel overseas very soon Feith.


  11. trooper says:

    private bounties are legal in the USA. i am currently supporting one that will reward whomever lets us know who our local spray paint artists are.

    how can it be illegal to support a private bounty in another country? when will the international bounty on this bunch of crooks be issued? how do i support it? if they open a paypal account, i will happily give them $50 a week and build the pot until somebody snatches them off the street and ships them to spain for the reward money.


  12. Hoodathunktick says:

    and as campy as it may sound…”No one expects the Spanish Inquistion!”

    But it seems they are sweating bullets over the possibility.


  13. Curlew says:

    Viva Espana!!! Lets hope they find the means to put every one of those crooked bastards from the Bush abomination in prison. I would prefer they be placed in an 8 x 5 cage just like they advocated for Guantanamo Bay. And to top it off, have each Bush official guarded by a huge German shepherd whose slobbering mouth sits 1/2 inch from their scrotums. Maybe with an occasional bite just for the hell of it.


  14. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    “War crimes will be prosecuted,
    war criminals will be punished
    and it will be no defense to say,
    ‘I was just following orders.’”

    – President George W. Bush, March 17, 2003.

    .


  15. spencers butterfly mom says:

    Here’s a question: I wonder who is passing documents to the Spanish prosecutors? And I hope they’re passing along enough evidence to build an airtight case because these crooks must not escape justice.

    Which stooge will be the first to flip and finger Bush/Cheney, complete with inside documents? My money’s on pasty-faced Dougie.

    PEACE


  16. mk3872 says:

    Now we’ll have to rename Spanish Flies to Freedom Flies


  17. spencers butterfly mom says:

    “My advocacy for torture and the legal loopholes that made it possible are all taken out of context.”

    Uh huh.

    PEACE


  18. jb says:

    Maybe some lobbyist could arrange a junket to Spain for Mr. Feith, you know for golf and tappas.


  19. fletc3her says:

    He should have an opportunity to defend himself before the court. The judge or jury can decide whether he was complicit in these crimes against humanity or merely a bystander.


  20. jjm says:

    Tommy Franks was right.


  21. jb says:

    Even scum like Feith and other Bush officials deserve to have their day in court despite the fact that they have denied others that right.


  22. shoeless Chilopoda says:

    Tell it to the court. I’ll chip in on your plane ticket to Madrid.


  23. SWBob says:

    I asked again: Under the Geneva Conventions, no one at Guantánamo was entitled to any protection? “That’s the point,” Feith reiterated. … “This year I was really a player,” Feith said, thinking back on 2002 and relishing the memory.

    Well, guess what Doug, you are still a player when it comes to being accountable for your actions. I know, I know, bush/cheney told you there would be no accountability for anything anyone did while working for them…they lied.


  24. Rich H says:

    trooper #11,

    I said much the same thing, but I can’t afford as much as you. Let’s say everyone that wants the Bush cabal on trial donate whatever they can to a specified account (overseas if necessary). Say the average is $10.00, not bad if you figure about 3,000,0000 people would donate. That should be enough to fund a little renditiion.


  25. Hoodathunktick says:

    Who is up for chipping in to a fund to provide Mr. Feith with an all expense paid trip to Madrid?


  26. joe cantwell says:

    mk3872 Says:
    Now we’ll have to rename Spanish Flies to Freedom Flies

    ***

    well thank god we don’t have to

    call them freedom ticklers anymore.

    “”"


  27. The Republic of Hymenoptera Stupidity says:

    “This is an effort to intimidate U.S. government officials,” Feith alleged.
    ___________

    Sweating a little, Dougie?

    Trying to wrap yer smarmy shimkus in the flag?

    Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say, “Ex-U.S government officials”???


  28. Hoodathunktick says:

    See the sights, get your azz prosecuted…heckuva vacation.


  29. Perry logan says:

    It would be more credible for him to say, “I simply couldn’t believe they were serious.”


  30. jb says:

    Here I sit broken hearted….
    This Feith guy is a professional victim. Send him off to Spain.


  31. dbadass says:

    i am currently supporting one that will reward whomever lets us know who our local spray paint artists are.

    Well I think you can safely rule out Keith Haring unfortunately


  32. Hoodathunktick says:

    “This is an effort to intimidate U.S. government officials,” Feith alleged.

    And it scares the bejaizuz out of you that it works.

    Are those bullets or dumplings in your Armani shorts?


  33. shoeless Chilopoda says:

    These cases have previously been thrown out of European courts because it must be shown that the country, in which the war criminals are citizens, will not prosecute them. Now, every day that passes without prosecution of the war criminals in the Bush administration strengthens the argument that the US has no intention of doing so.


  34. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    Let the parsing of the words begin…

    Advocate: –verb (used with object)
    1. to speak or write in favor of; support or urge by argument; recommend publicly: He advocated higher salaries for teachers.

    –noun
    2. a person who speaks or writes in support or defense of a person, cause, etc. (usually fol. by of): an advocate of peace.
    3. a person who pleads for or in behalf of another; intercessor.
    4. a person who pleads the cause of another in a court of law.

    ———————-

    Advice: –noun
    1. an opinion or recommendation offered as a guide to action, conduct, etc.: I shall act on your advice.
    2. a communication, esp. from a distance, containing information: Advice from abroad informs us that the government has fallen. Recent diplomatic advices have been ominous.
    3. an official notification, esp. one pertaining to a business agreement: an overdue advice.

    —————

    Q U E S T I O N:
    Was Feith acting in his role as the Official Advocate to circumvent the law, or did he merely write advice on how to circumvent the law?

    Isn’t giving advice, in an Official capacity, an Advocate.

    .


  35. Hoodathunktick says:

    shoeless, the US is well on record for not being willing to even think about possible prosecution. The government has proclaimed its capon status quite clearly.


  36. Laszlo Panaflex says:

    I propose we form a fund to pay for a trip to Spain for Mr. Feith to answer these charges. He is so confident, and has been provided with the address, let’s give him no reason not to go. Airfare and a couple weeks in a decent hotel should be doable – and we may get a bit of a refund when he doesn’t need the return flight and gets moved out of the hotel into a cell. I’ll throw in the first ten bucks.


  37. spencers butterfly mom says:

    I’ve heard of people setting up a legal defense fund, but I’d be into helping Spain with their legal offense fund.

    There is a part of me that thinks Team Obama is fully aware of what’s been going on in Europe, and is quietly allowing it to move forward so they will be “forced” to bring charges here in this country to prevent a trial by a foreign court.

    I’ve learned not to doubt the wisdom of my new President when it comes to allowing the general public the time it needs to digest information and demand action. And he will get it on this.

    Chess anyone?

    PEACE


  38. pastcaring ceratopogonidae says:

    Hey Doug “dumbest f^cking guy” Feith.

    I’m one of those @ssholes concerned about torture, you arrogant p.o.s. It is my fervent hope that you get nailed for the role you played.

    BTW, F^ck YOO Too.


  39. stateofthedivision says:

    It’s accountability time, Douglas. Take it like a man. Cut the sniveling minion act.


  40. shoeless Chilopoda says:

    Hoodathunktick Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    shoeless, the US is well on record for not being willing to even think about possible prosecution. The government has proclaimed its capon status quite clearly.

    But, they had to wait until the criminal Bush regime was out of office in order to determine whether they would be held to justice by the new government. Now, these cases can move forward. I would imagine Spain has extradition treaties with most European countries.


  41. shoeless Chilopoda says:

    I sorry, I meant I would imagine the U.S. has extradition treaties with most European countries.


  42. zuch says:

    “Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest?” — Henry II

    Just asking for ‘advice’.

    Cheers,


  43. Fontsdeleon says:

    This is one scumbag (among many) who belongs in a gulag.


  44. IgnoranceIsNotBliss says:

    I wonder how long it will be before Feith goes into hiding.


  45. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    Me thinks it’s time for Alberto Gonzales, Douglas Feith, David Addington, John Yoo, Jay S. Bybee, and William Haynes to not only Lawyer up…
    … But to man up, too.

    .


  46. spencers butterfly mom says:

    I wonder if President Obama will now allow the U.S. to be a member of the ICC. Of course Bush wanted no parts of it.

    According to wikipedia:

    As of March 2009[update], 108 states are members of the Court;[7][8][9] A further 40 countries have signed but not ratified the Rome Statute.[7] However, a number of states, including China, Russia, India and the United States, are critical of the court and have not joined.[10]

    The ICC can generally exercise jurisdiction only in cases where the accused is a national of a state party, the alleged crime took place on the territory of a state party, or a situation is referred to the court by the United Nations Security Council.[11] The court is designed to complement existing national judicial systems: it can exercise its jurisdiction only when national courts are unwilling or unable to investigate or prosecute such crimes.[12][13] Primary responsibility to investigate and punish crimes is therefore left to individual states.[14]

    I also wonder if the U.N. will refer these war crimes to the ICC.

    PEACE


  47. pseverinc says:

    Is it possible that Bill would/could cross the British slander line with his comments on Sands? Perhaps there’s a reason that the Factor isn’t carried overseas. Or is it?


  48. kasinca says:

    Bend over and grab your ankles, Douglas, you have a treatment coming.


  49. PFWoody488 says:

    Nobody seems to be asking the obvious questions.
    1. Shouldn’t it be the United States that is indicting these guys (Not to mention Bush and Cheney)? After all, they didn’t just break international laws, they broke American laws.
    2. People seem to be gleeful at the prospect of these guys not being able to travel. They don’t seem to realize that this implies that the US will be in the position of sheltering these criminals from prosecution.
    3. The US is going to leave it to Spain to enforce justice? Seems to me that America once stood for the ideals of truth and justice. Isn’t that the American way?

    The United States has always claimed the high moral ground based on ‘American’ values. Is America now going to abandon it’s claim to moral superiority in order to protect Bush and the rest of his torturing henchmen?

    The United States has long ‘Talked the talk.’ It’s time to ‘Walk the walk.’ Put up or shut up.


  50. A Patriotic Anopheles Acting says:

    spencers butterfly mom took the words right out of my mouth. Maybe AG Holder should contact Mr. Feith to discuss the possibility of rolling over on Bush/Cheney. Holder should compel Feith to weigh the options of being hanged/languishing in a foreign prison or spending the rest of his pathetic life in a US federal prison for his crimes. I understand Obama’s political concerns with going after Bushco but his hand may very well be forced (please Spain don’t twist my arm) if this talk turns to action. Stay tuned…


  51. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    PFWoody488,
    Exactly.

    The Leader of just what, then…?
    … No truth, no Justice. What American way?

    .


  52. Doc Rock says:

    What manly men these heroes of the Right were?


  53. amish_edison says:

    It’s all basically moot anyway because 1) Bushies who violated the Geneva conventions won’t travel to countries who attempt to prosecute them, 2) many countries won’t have the politcal will to prosecute them, and 3) Barack Obama is essentially giving them a Get Out of War Crimes Free card here at home. Although I would like to see legal justice applied, the odds are that all of these Bush
    administration war criminals will live out long and unfettered lives here in the States without prosecution.



  54. Jackie says:

    Look Feith is scared as hell and pissed in his pants when he was given the information of his charges. O’Reilly is helping him dig his self deeper. Now he has the ” I didn’t do it defense”. While on video during the Bush years he was talking about how he adviced the dumb President and he was giving the information in his book and how smart he is. Now he can’t sleep thinking of being waterboarded. Look for this chicken to tell all and even out Dick Cheney. The weakest link is always the one to tell all. Look for other countries to do the same as Spain as many innocent men/woman/children were kidnapped, transported, tortured and raped, as they were held for years illegally by the United States. I wonder what Americans would think of this Bush Policy if it were applied to American citizens and even our children?


  55. Silence is Golden says:

    “Indeed, Feith’s arguments became official U.S. policy with the signing of a presidential memorandum on February 7, 2002. ”

    Indeed, an official policy of torture DOESN”T EXIST.

    The Presidential memo does not set a torture policy.

    There is NO official policy EVER that endorses torture.
    Its a figment.

    No case, no evidence.


  56. Hoodathunktick says:

    PFWoody488 Says: Sorry, buddy but the US has this thing about national security. Somebody believes that if US criminals are brought to justice in the US it will cause the collapse of our government. Its why we hide all our dirty laundry.

    Personally, if we can’t stand the heat, we are the very thing the rest of the world has been fearing we would become. A cowardly bully. We hide behind big words and lofty ideals while we crap all over ourselves.


  57. Hoodathunktick says:

    Oh, geez, Mr Rourke is back. Welcome to Fantasy Island.


  58. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    Dear Golden,

    Here’s a test for you:
    What’s 2am + a drunk woman + mini skirt + alone on the highway =?

    Or, let’s try a Political Science quiz:
    What do Liberalism and Fascism have in common?

    .


  59. Hoodathunktick says:

    Liberals are fascists, totalitarian governments are leftists, Captain Hook was a nice guy. Don’t confuse me with facts, I’m just here to earn nickles SIG.


  60. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    Dear Showers,
    The links are provided in the above article that directly show the Bush43 Administrations involvement and advocacy of a systematic use of TORTURE and inhumane treatment of detainees.

    Please provide proof of otherwise…
    … Or do you prefer that your ignorance PWN you A-G-A-I-N?

    .


  61. Pachydiplax St. Augustine says:

    spencers butterfly mom Says:

    I’ve heard of people setting up a legal defense fund, but I’d be into helping Spain with their legal offense fund.

    The right has funded many an offense effort with the likes of PNAC, Heritage Foundation, etc.


  62. wiley says:

    Congress would have to ratify a treaty in order for us to rejoin the I.C.C.

    Am off to find torture documents.



  63. pete says:

    Stupid troll says: “No evidence

    Guantanamo is evidence. Public admissions are evidence. Every pile of rubble and drop of blood in Iraq is evidence.


  64. nanlichi nasschagii says:

    We can argue this for years, with Mr. Showers always defending his idols, or we can put an end to the pissing match (sorry for the pun Goldie) by having a real trial. Put Feith, Cheney, Bush, Gonzo and the whole lot on trial. If there is insufficent evidence as Showers contends, then they walk and we all shut up. If, on the other hand, they are found guilty they get to hang by their necks and Showers has to STFU.


  65. wiley says:

    I believe these are the latest documents released through the FOIA that implicate the CIA in torture.

    Of course Yoo and Addington were involved with the designation of captives as “enemy combatants”. The whole point of that was to skate out of the Geneva Convention as if it didn’t apply to everyone. Very weasel-ey.


  66. Bob says:

    Isn’t this just another stretched-out extention of ‘Executive Privilege’, ‘I’m not responsible for the advise I give’ defense?

    One person says he was just giving advise, another says he was just taking advise, so clearly no one is at fault so nothing can be done?

    All the war criminals of the past wish that defense worked for them.


  67. fergus says:

    Spain won’t dare try to prosecute our war criminals, because The Mighty O’Reilly has threatened to boycott Spain if it happens. Just the way he boycotted the country that used to be called France a few years ago. We can all see how that worked out. Spain’s entire economic future rests on O’Reilly’s trips to their fair country. They are totally shaking in their boots in fear of his wrath.


  68. Marie says:

    Excuses didn’t carry at Nuremburg and I don’t think they will carry today either.


  69. MapleStreet says:

    As pointed out on Countdown ?last night?, the Spanish charges give Obama and Democratic Senate a wonderful opportunity to “take the high road” and simply say (similar to PFCWoody above):

    The investigation really belongs in US hands. While we didn’t start the process, in order to continue it in an orderly fashion, we will start a USA investigation.


  70. Marie says:

    Feith and his criminal friends are starting to sweat now. They are covering their rears, re-writing history, tossing the blame off to Bush(?) as Feith claims he only gave advice – he didn’t actually commit torture.
    When all is said and done, these guys are like squealing pigs, but far less attractive.


  71. barfly says:

    FEITH But there’s also a broader point of principle here, which is what the Spanish authorities are considering doing is indicting people, former U.S. government officials for giving advice to the president.

    Paying attention, all you folks who criticized Obama for not doing something?

    If Obama had gone after Feith and the rest, he would have had to use the “advice” thet gave as evidence, and set a precedent for compelling advisors to testify in US court. This bit of political zen has put Feith and the others on the fast track to a court that cannot be packed with conservative judges, or tranferred to a more-friendly jurisdiction, and it has preserved his own presidential-advice perogatives.


  72. Marie says:

    This is OT, sorry. But the topic is weasels.
    Newt Gingrich has converted to catholicism this past Sunday, for his 3rd wife. We all know his lack of integrity, his immorality and his sheer opportunism — but his spokesman said that all Newt’s past life has been absolved and he has a clean slate now ( to run for president in 2012??).


  73. happyturtle says:

    Lynndie England needs to be pardoned. She was following orders from the top and then was made the scapegoat. Its a complete miscarriage of justice for her to sit in prison while those who crafted the policy continue dodge and weave their way scot free. PARDON LYNNDIE ENGLAND!


  74. speshuled67 (locust in training) says:

    I NEVER ADVOCATED HEROIN USE, I JUST TOLD THE 9 YEAR OLD WHERE TO BUY IT FROM.

    doesn’t work like that feithy baby… i hear spanish prisons are hell.


  75. Brian Crooks says:

    So if you didn’t do anything wrong, just go to trial and state that. I know personally that I never advocated torture, so if Spain wanted to drag me before a judge, I would be the first one to pack my bags and grab my fancy paella bowl.


  76. sacopenapa says:

    D. Feith, the stupidest man on Earth, is a WAR CRIMINAL! Thank God for their ‘arrogance’, for now we have plenty of interviews where they argue for the exemption of Geneva convention and statutes against torture! Feith, there is plenty of evidence that YOU ARE GUILT AS CHARGED! YOU ARE A WAR CRIMINAL!
    Rice, you too! The day of reckoning is drawing near! You will be free to stay inside the USA, the country you helped to bankrupt or have a vacation in Israel. Anywhere else, you will be arrested!


  77. LizCoro says:

    FEITH, a real stand up guy, huh??

    He’d be the first guy on the witness stand to testify against Bush or Cheney . .

    Remember when Jon Stewart asked him: ‘Have you no shame’?


  78. NOLIESPLEASE says:

    PFWoody488 Says: Sorry, buddy but the US has this thing about national security. Somebody believes that if US criminals are brought to justice in the US it will cause the collapse of our government

    I don’t know about you…maybe the government should collapse! IF we can’t abide by our laws and international laws, WHAT IS THE POINT OF HAVING A GOVERNMENT????? What’s the point in having LAWS?????

    As more and more information comes out…it will not be just the Spanish that will start proceedings, look for other nations to join in the unvaling of US hypocrocy!!!

    If the US want’s to maintain any respect…the Government must bring these culprits to justice.


  79. sacopenapa says:

    I hope Mr. Obama get the drift and APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTER NOW!


  80. candide says:

    My only complaint about the Spanish actions is they didn’t reach high enough. I imagine that if the trials go forward and the minions are found guilty, we then have no option but to have the trial of the real perpetrators of these crimes, Bush and Cheney.


  81. NOLIESPLEASE says:

    Here is an interesting question…if international courts find the BUshies guilty as charged, will the people of the US pressure government to hand over the guilty????

    If the government does not, the US will be just like the Serbs protecting there war criminals.


  82. LizCoro says:

    Watching that video . .

    If it was up to Bildo, America would have NO ALLIES . .

    Probably like when the Pervert was growing up, NO FRIENDS . .


  83. sacopenapa says:

    Candie
    My only complaint about the Spanish actions is they didn’t reach high enough.
    This is just the begining of a long process which will get to Bush/Chnney & Co.
    Don’t forget we have their admition on Tape saying they personaly approved Torture!
    We also know very well the the War Criminal and Lier, Rice, chaired secret meetings in the WH about the US’s Torture program.
    This is just the begining, and for Feith to go on Fox advocating ignorance and innocence… he is feeling the heat!
    It is just the begining!


  84. sacopenapa says:

    Mr. Obama argues that he wants to restore America’s moral stand in the World…
    Mr. Obama, if that is your real intent, it is time to appoint a special prosecuter to deal with the War Crimes of the previous administration. Also, it is Time to forget the Oil Pipeline through Afheganistan, stop both occupation (Iraq and Afheganistan), and stop drones attacks inside Pakistan. It has been years now and the US will not prevail with yet another ’surge’.
    You were elected because you said you were going to end the War. If the economy is your concern, it is time to review and cut by half the military budget. Time to invest in productive industry, infraestructure and education…

    My advice to you is to read Chalmers Johnson’s “Nemesis”, do that while you still can, before it is too late. If it is not too late already!

    Make the real CHANGE and appoint a special prosecuter now!


  85. obama-biden2009 says:

    Picture of George W Bush on Ebay, $ 3.99

    Dick Cheney & KBR No Bid Contracts in Iraq – $16,059,282,020

    Bush officials being investigated for WAR CRIMES – PRICELESS


  86. Davey says:

    Relax, Doug, you’ve been working too hard (to change the historical record.) How about a nice vacation on Menorca?


  87. realpatriot says:

    Didn’t General Frank call Feith, the stupidist man he ever met?
    Bill-o and Feith….This time two negatives don’t equal a positive.


  88. squidbilly says:

    Can’t wait for to Feith to say

    “Well I didn’t expect the Spanish Inquisition…..”


  89. politicscorner says:

    It’s sad to hear Feith squealing like a pig. Must be worried.


  90. wizard2000 says:

    The top “torturous” and traitorous Republican officials in the former Bush/Cheney administration, if they ever travel overseas, will probably take along some of their lawyers with them, just in case.

    My bet is that they will stay within U.S. borders, hoping that whatever party is in power in the White House and on Capitol Hill, now and in future years, will protect them from prosecution, blocking any attempt to hold them accountable for their war crimes.

    The only solution, the only way to bring these criminal Republican Bush officials to justice is if enough Republicans, and equally corrupt, insane and perverse Blue Dog Democrats, are replaced in Congress with “law and order” “rule of law” Constitution-honoring patriotic U.S. citizens who actually believe that no one is “above the law,” no matter what political party, no matter what statute of limitations might be invoked, no matter how long it takes.


  91. Daddy-O says:

    realpatriot Says:
    Didn’t General Frank call Feith, the stupidist man he ever met?

    He called him the stupidest f**king guy on the face of the planet, to be a bit MORE specific.

    And this was in 2003. BEFORE the Iraq Invasion.


  92. Eugene atrax robustus Debs says:

    The high level brass hated Bushco. I read a three star general say about Stephen Cambone the number three guy at the defense dept that if the Pentagon were under foriegn attack he would save his last bullet for Stephen Cambone.


  93. Uncle Ho says:

    happyturtle says:

    A pardon for Lyndie England would be like a pardon to a camp guard at Auschwitz who shoved his victims into the gas chambers.

    I was just following orders is NO DEFENSE.
    see: Nuremberg trials.

    ASSWHOLE!


  94. mikehunt says:

    A Spanish court, are you kidding? Why can’t the American libs go after these guys? Because its a joke, and gives Keith Putz Olberman something to talk about. Is anybody sick of him bashing O’Reilly? Olberman couldn’t shine O’Reillys shoes. Bush, Bush, Bush, Cheney, Cheney, Cheney, they are laughing at Obambi and his new administration, none of which have paid their taxes. Nobama is a joke that doesn’t know what he’s doing. Olberman is a jealous punk.


  95. Eugene atrax robustus Debs says:

    mikePUNK

    You ignorant brainwashed moron. You are so stupid you are lucky it isnt physically painful to be ignorant or you would be on a morphine drip. Your ignorance drips off of you like water off an icicle. Go away your stupidity is a stench in the nostrils of decent people



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll