We don’t need any to-ing and fro-ing with the war criminals.

Dick Cheney has more integrity in his little finger than all the above have in their whole bodies combined!

That’s sort of like hitting Godzilla for not acting like a kitty.

Faire

Yeah he worked real hard to protect us by using our tax dollars to open a torture chamber in Cuba to maime innocent people while he and Cheney watched and drooled.

And the financial crisis can be traced directly to dirtballs in California, i.e. Countrywide, who took advantage of the Fannie/Freddie meltdown. What is this crap about democrat-linked housing programs? Banks were giving loans to people who couldn’t afford them. Get your facts straight before posting such drivel.

WOW another troll stupidity explostion. Do you have any idea how stupid you are? So Clinton cut defense spending by 25% WOW I didnt know that. Probably because it never happened and whatever screechmonkey does your thinking for you is playing you for the fool you are. Did his defense cuts somehow make it EASIER for nutbags with boxcutters to take over a commercial airliner of were they on Cold War weapons that even Rumsfeld and Cheney wanted? My GOD you are stupid but there is hope. You dont have to be PROUD of your stupidity by the way there is practically NO DIFFERENCE between the last Bush sr defense Budget and what Clinton spent on defense MORON

http://www.csbaonline.org/4Publications/PubLibrary/H.20000831.Post-Cold_War_Defe/H.20000831.Post-Cold_War_Defe.php

The post-Cold War decline in defense spending began during the Bush Administration.
There is almost no difference between the level of funding proposed for defense by President Bush in his last fiscal year (FY) 1994-99 budget plan and the level of funding actually provided for defense over this six-year period under the Clinton Administration. Both Bush planned funding and actual funding amounted to $1.72 trillion (in FY 2001 dollars).
Congressional add-ons since 1995, when the Republican Party gained control of both houses, account for only about 3 percent of the defense topline of the past six years.
Not only was the drawdown of the 1990s clearly a bipartisan affair, the best available evidence suggests that Democrats and Republicans are still remarkably close in terms of their support for defense spending. Under the latest Clinton Administration plan, funding for defense is projected to remain essentially flat in real (inflation-adjusted) terms through fiscal year (FY) 2005. The latest Congressional Budget Resolution (CBR) would provide only about one-third of 1 percent more over this period. In reality, the effectiveness with which the Department of Defense (DoD) is able to address US security challenges in the future is likely to depend much more on how wisely DoD spends than how much it spends.

Got any more idiocy that Rush programmed you with?

America has it’s own Osama bin Laden and his name is Adolf ‘Dickless’ Cheney.

btw- the link is broken for me right now…

Axelrod, either your a fool for crossing Cheney , or your conscience has gotten the better of you. The statement was needed from the Republican side.

Just an observation, and if I were you I would give up both. give your brain a rest.

Gimme a break, moron. You were on board with all of Chimpy’s abysmal drunken and out-of-control spending on war, no bid contracts for KBR and Halliburton and on tax breaks for the filthy rich, weren’t you?? You salivated at the thought of the plotlines of “24″ being carried out for real at Gitmo, didn’t you? You drooled with joy over the thought of killing Muslims all over the world, I’ll bet.

Well now, you’ve got no room to talk. You should have spoken up EIGHT YEARS AGO, you moron. Now you’re just being an a**hole – so go spew your ridiculous crap on Redstate.

Have you plans to stay awhile or do you have other places to be. If you want we could talk some, get to know each other.

I enjoy meeting new people, even if I’m just a dragonfly. You don’t have anything against dragonflies do you?