I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies’
profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the
government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% is okay.

I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a
better job of spending the money I earn than I would.

I voted Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long
as nobody is offended by it.

I voted Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust
that the bad guys will stop what they’re doing because
they now think we’re good people.

I voted Democrat because I’m way too irresponsible to
own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to
protect me from murderers and thieves.

I voted Democrat because I believe that people who
can’t tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that
the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I
don’t start driving a Prius.

I voted Democrat because I’m not concerned about the
slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death
row inmates alive.

I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not
be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to
break even and give the rest away to the government for
redistribution as THE GOVERNMENT sees fit.

I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to
rewrite The Constitution every few days to suit some fringe
kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.

I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my
ass that it is unlikely that I’ll ever have another
point of view.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“A Liberal is a person who will give away everything that they don’t own.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.

Marinemike

sikis
porno izle
porno videolar
porn videos

How is it different to “demonize” obama, as you claim was done to lilaWol you want to know?

Well, genius,……

1. Did RICH dems create protests because a state’s rights, legal recount in Fla was STOPPED by his daddy’s cronys before the votes could all be counted and while aWol was ahead by a few hundred votes, although he garnered HALF A MILLION less votes?

2. Has Obama even been in office for 3 months yet? Did he do anything but SIGN a bill SPONSORED BY REPUGS, (remember how mccain stopped his campaign in a big show to insure bailout was passed?)

3. Did lilaWol screw the pooch or what? Are you so blinded by right wing indoctination that you cannot see the total FAILURE of his policies, both economic and foreign?

4. Common Ground? How about stfu, pay your taxes like we all do, and get behind a NEW POTUS elected by a wide mandate to FIX the FAILURES of the last 8 years?

5. Tell us genius, WHY would you protest a tax code that gives YOU and 95% of American working people a tax break and asks the RICH 5% to pay a little bit more?

6. As far as being invaded occupied by a foreign country……hmmmm. Who borrowed BILLIONS from Japan, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, and commie China to invade/occupy a country THAT DID NOT ATTACK US??

get a frickin clue buddy…..

There is not much intelligence in protesting tax rates that help 95% of Americans imho.

And btw, MOST repugs I’ve met never fought in any frickin wars……but support sending other people to do it for them…

USAF Security 68-72
including gasoline truck convoy (Long Bihn to Tay Nihn) and perimeter security in RVN 69-70

How about you big talker?

An ASS umption is right….and see how it turned out? You made an ass out of yourself twisting facts to suit your partisan politics. The cop killer was an ex con, who was stopped for a traffic offense and shot cops with the gun he was not allowed to possess. Nothing political at all. Terrorism indicates violence attempting to promote a political aim.

So, as usual, the right wingers attempt to twist facts and lie to suit themselves and their political agenda……nothing new there, eh?

LMFAO

Yes I made an assumption that a black guy from Oakland California is a liberal. That assumption (which has a 99.9% chance of being correct) was to prove a point. Again I will explain this to you…On this site people were associating the police officer killings of a crazy conspiracy theorist with the ‘right’. I simply made the point that it has nothing to do with politics so to prod and yes in a sarcastic fashion is said “how about liberals who kill police officers?” and again I was assuming that the black inner city thug would lean slightly to the left. You obviously missed the sarcasm and the point.

California is a Republican. COME ON.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

You SAID a liberal killed those cops not a Democrat. You dont even KNOW he was a Democrat. So you are now admitting you pulled that directly out of your A$$

My point was that the killing by the crazy black guy and the crazy white guy weren’t politically motivated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ah NO you are LYING that wasnt your point. Not that it wasnt political. You said WHAT ABOUT THE LIBERAL… Your POINT was that this LIBERAL killed some cops except your example WASNT of a liberal just someone who comitted a murder. So stop LYING to make a point and remember the first rule of holes and STOP DIGGING

So NOW you are just LYING

Yes I’m sure that a black man in Oakland California is a Republican. COME ON.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ah NO you are LYING that wasnt your point. Not that it wasnt political. You said WHAT ABOUT THE LIBERAL… Your POINT was that this LIBERAL killed some cops except your example WASNT of a liberal just someone who comitted a murder. So stop LYING to make a point and remember the first rule of holes and STOP DIGGING

RP2012 Says:

So when a poor black man kills three cops and it is basically applauded by a radical left wing group it isn’t political? He’s just a criminal?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

So are you a moron or just being a jerk. It was YOU that said what about the LIBERAL WHO KILLED… His answer wasnt an appology for the murder it was pointing out the man was NOT A LIBERAL LIKE YOU CLAIMED. Either cough up evidence this guy is a liberal or admit your original claim was so much hoooey

Yes I’m sure that a black man in Oakland California is a Republican. COME ON. My point was that the killing by the crazy black guy and the crazy white guy weren’t politically motivated. The crazy white guy did express insanity through conspiracy theories and fearing the government was coming to get him. But the straw that broke the camels back was a cat peeing on his floor. Crazy people will think crazy things and no one but those two men are responsible for their actions…….. and yes I made a generalization about a black guy.

Yes it is.

How about if 4-5 transit cops place a black man face down then a white cop shoots him to death in the back.

Is that considered terrorism?

wikipedia

Hmm, nope don’t see a POLITICAL agenda there barfly. Just a 3 or 4 time loser who violated his parole and didn’t want to go back to prison, eh?

Next example of “left wing” terrorism please…..

The word was used to describe support for the Jacobins during the French Revolution, who supported using violence and repression to achieve democracy……

Ambushing law enforcement in a deadly, premeditated manner, in political retaliation for perceived threats from a political group, would be one.

Just wondering what the definition of terrorism is now?

Hey Bonat, just to be fair, RP2012 was not the one who used the phrase “poor black” . I meant poor as in pitiable – up against the cops in Oakland, that certainly doesn’t help. And yes, the guy was a danger and they had no choice but to kill him. it was all very sad from all sides.

RP2012 Says:
So when a poor black man kills three cops and it is basically applauded by a radical left wing group it isn’t political? He’s just a criminal? Of course he is just a criminal and a crazy bastard at that.

Yes, he is a criminal. He violated his parole by having guns. The cops did their job and died in the line of duty, sadly.

Just like the guy who went out and killed cops because he had a fight with his mother about a cat peeing on his floor. He was a conspiracy theorist that was more of an anarchist than anything on the ‘right’.

Except that he had right wing political views. I don’t see much anarchistic about his racist rants.

No sane person supports this killing and I don’t really know of any protesters praising this guy.

You’re right, no sane people are. But if they did, they would have the right in this country to protest. It’s a red herring you are laying out here – you said there was a LIBERAL killer in Oakland. Do you have any links to support this theory? Did you know the guy personally or something? Just because someone decided to protest does not mean the killer shared their political views.

So this is grasping at straws and like I said before there is a fringe element on both sides. ELF anybody??

I’ll say you’re grasping at straws! I agree there is a fringe element on both sides. But the rightist fringe are the ones who go out and kill people. The leftist ones protest, which is legal.

And I personally don’t believe in elves…