http://www.aina.org/news/20080904215411.jsp

If you disagree with the numbers, I suppose you’d have to talk to Sheikh Kabbani; but I suspect he’s in a better position to know than you. I think the influence of a dangerous and reactionary band of religious fanatics like the Wahhabis (and even some Shi’ites and Sunnis) should not be underestimated.

Best regards,

Geoff

You are truly offensive. Allow me to hold your hand, again…on what basis are veterans at risk? Please show me any justification the allows for this conclusion. Because someone dreamed it up doesn’t make it so. I will clarify, stating that veterans specifically are at risk is to say that there is reason to believe that veterans will become radicalized. You think that the only concern is that veterans will be approached? Right, “we don’t think veterans pose a threat, we are simply concerned that they will be approached”! BTW, please make more suppositions about me.

You wouldnt know a point if it kicked you in the nutz. They arent SAYING Veterans are more of a threat. CAN YOU READ? It said they were at RISK for being targetted for recrutiment and radicalization. This was a risk assessment. This is a way to keep an EYE on the activities. To talk to veterans groups to see if they have been approached this was sent to law enforcement agencies so THEY can do their jobs. Do we really have to hold your hand and walk you through these simple concepts that any reasonably bright ten year old could see just because you are comitted to supporting whatever idiocy Rush or Hannity has programmed you with?

If you want to call Pat toll free and thank him for indicting himself as a right wing extremist you can do so by calling his hot line any time. don’t forget to ask for free perks.

There is a vidio of Pat at C&L…

This is exactly the point! How difficult would it be to show that veterans committ (or any accused group) acts of terrorism at a higher rate than there identity compared to the population? If there is substance, than I will be a believer (although sadly that my brothers in arms would behave in such a way). This is RATIONALITY. Perhaps you should study Philo 101 again, you know, deductive and inductive reasoning. See Kant, Mach, Popper, Witt, etc… When the FBI produces a similar intetrnal report regarding empirical data suggessting that ceratin ethnic groups engage in criminal activity that exceeds their rate in the population it is called bigotry and racial profiling. Even if it is not covered in the SUMMARIZED report, it should be based off of some element of factuality. It seems repubs are not the only ‘wing-nuts’ fearful of facts. We now see Neopolitan express concern at the inclusion of vets and the good Dem. congressman from Miss. decry this report because it has no substance. Are you so entrenched in your liberal fervor that you disregard truth? We should all be beyond left and right and concerned more with right and wrong.

conservatives.

when they don’t get their

way, they kill people.

pat roberstson.

:|

The repot contained NOTHING to establish the merits of the suppositions,
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Did I say it was the UNQUESTIONED TRUTH? You need to work on your reading comprehension. At this point it is pretty poor. I said it HADNT been rationally disputed and that would be hard to do since it was only talking about what they see as potential threats in the future. Do you have any dim idea what you are talking about? Uh yeah I read the report DID YOU?

The repot contained NOTHING to establish the merits of the suppositions, yet you claim its unquestionable truth.

Uh, because nowhere in the report did it say it WOULD. It’s a summary of threat trends prepared for various law enforcement agencies, not an end-all be-all catalog of activities. It’s ten pages for crissakes.

(U) Scope
(U//FOUO) This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the
Extremism and Radicalization Branch to facilitate a greater understanding of the
phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States. The information is
provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement
officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks
against the United States. Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be
conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States
Government sponsorship.

The repot contained NOTHING to establish the merits of the suppositions,
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Did I say it was the UNQUESTIONED TRUTH? You need to work on your reading comprehension. At this point it is pretty poor. I said it HADNT been rationally disputed and that would be hard to do since it was only talking about what they see as potential threats in the future. Do you have any dim idea what you are talking about? Uh yeah I read the report DID YOU?

The report WAS truthful nothing in it is rationally disputed. What do you mean by comprehensive? Do you think every report should deal with EVERY subject under the sun? The report was about INTERNAL threats and there was another one on leftwing radical groups. I dont really see a valid complaint here.

The repot contained NOTHING to establish the merits of the suppositions, yet you claim its unquestionable truth. Have you read this report?

No cooperation? Here’s what then-FBI Director Mueller said on 9/27/2001:

I want to add that I met earlier today with key leaders of the Arab American, Muslim American and Sikh American communities, and we addressed issues of mutual concern and discussed ways which we could together address those concerns.

I want to today acknowledge the outpouring of support and cooperation that the FBI has received from these communities, not only in the course of our investigation, but in response to our call last week for translators. We literally were inundated with volunteers from any one of the Arab American, Muslim American, Sikh American communities. And I want to thank those communities for their assistance in this regard, as well as their assistance in our investigations.

Moreover, I don’t seek “fair-and-balanced”, I seek “comprehensive and truthful”.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The report WAS truthful nothing in it is rationally disputed. What do you mean by comprehensive? Do you think every report should deal with EVERY subject under the sun? The report was about INTERNAL threats and there was another one on leftwing radical groups. I dont really see a valid complaint here.

Ah not unless you mean it is only concerned with INTERNAL theats which is what it WAS the point of the report and NONE of what you posted qualifies.

Rep. Peter King Responds To Extremism Report, Says DHS Should Be Targeting ‘Mosques’ Instead

No, that would make too much sense……
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

No it wouldnt make sense it would be stupid bigoted and un-American a lot like YOU

http://mediamatters.org/items/200904160027?f=h_latest

He didnt just cover up Jesus name he covered up ALL the symbols you moron. Look you are a punk and you are stupid and CNS is propaganda MORON

By the way you LYING PUNK. They covered up all the symbols and everything that wasnt part of the backround for the speech like they ALWAYS DO. CNSN that is conservative news is pure propaganda and everyone NOT as stupid as you knows that.