Think Progress

Feinstein to Obama: Torture prosecutions should still be on the table.

ap090121036520.jpg In recent days, President Obama has reiterated his pledge to oppose prosecutions of individuals responsible for torture under the Bush administration. However, Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) yesterday wrote to the President and asked him to keep the door open to prosecutions. From the text of the letter, obtained by ThinkProgress:

I am writing to respectfully request that comments regarding holding individuals accountable for detention and interrogation related activities be held in reserve until the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is able to complete its review of the conditions and interrogations of certain high value detainees.

This study is now underway, and I estimate its completion within the next six to eight months. A study of the first two detainees has already been completed and will shortly be before the committee.

Please join our campaign calling on Congress to begin impeachment hearings against Jay Bybee.

Update The New York Times’ Peter Baker and Scott Shane report that, yesterday, aides to Obama “did not rule out legal sanctions for the Bush lawyers who developed the legal basis for the use of the techniques.”


49 Responses to “Feinstein to Obama: Torture prosecutions should still be on the table.”

  1. misscoleopteramolly says:

    It doesn’t make up for voting to confirm Mukasey. But it’s a step in the right direction.


  2. raynman says:

    Oh, this is going to be interesting. When the Republicans start screaming that this is a partisan witch hunt, Obama can now say that, initially, he took it off the table. It was only when an outcry from the American People compelled him that prosecutions were put back on the table.


  3. Megaloptera McWars says:

    Gotta love the separation of powers.


  4. citizen_pain says:

    Another smart move my Obama. He’s in effect positioned himself to say, “Hey, I was willing to let the past remain in the past and move forward, but I have no authority to prevent Congress and/or the Justice Department to move forward on investigations and possible prosecutions.”


  5. And Yet... says:

    DiFi must be getting heat from constituents, otherwise she wouldn’t give a rat’s ass & certainly not publicly. I’m betting she actually doesn’t give one but it’s important to make noise now, fold quietly later if expedient or told to do so.


  6. Jackie says:

    Obama to Feinstein you got caught for the second time giving your husband millions of taxpayers money in contract. Obama to Feinstein you approved all of Bush/Cheney Policy now you want to act like you didn’t know about it. Talk to the hand the big ears aren’t listening.


  7. fire _ant_chavis says:

    Good on Feinstein – I think that it’s going to take pressure from American people and Congress to get this process moving forward. Let the Rethuglicans scream and let their heads explode. LOL


  8. dixie blood says:

    And Yet,

    You nailed DiFi’s MO!


  9. DNFP says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    THE STUPIDITY, THE IGNORANCE, IT BURNS!!!!!!!!


  10. Megaloptera McWars says:

    cfp, no legal memo was penned in the policies in place leading to these supposedly worsening conditions. How convenient of you to omit that gitmo is due for closure. The previous administration’s crimes are their own, and your strawman won’t change a thing.


  11. And Yet... says:

    dixie blood @ 9-

    Yeah, unfortunately we’ve all seen this movie before.


  12. Uncle Ho says:

    torture prosecutions should still be on the table

    phucking A straight


  13. dixie blood says:

    OT only kinda but important…

    This link:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/us/politics/21harman.html?_r=1

    points to the problem we have with the Democrats in power and the unchecked, undue influence of Israel over our elected officials and our government.

    I had hoped that TP would post this. I sent the link as an email. This cannot be ignored!!!!!

    Harman and Pelosi both must resign. And this might just explain Feinstein’s sudden “change of heart!!!!”


  14. AlphaLiberal says:

    Holy smokes, Batman! When Dianne Feinstein is reining in your torture apologia, you’ve gone way too far!!


  15. rastaman says:

    careful DIFI……investigations and prosecutions will lead to the cracking open of the AIPAC and the rest of the zionist agenda.

    you’ll be walking back that advocacy shortly


  16. MCMetal says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    Then, of course, we’ll follow it with prosecutions of the Obama administration based upon first hand reports that conditions at Gitmo have “worsened sharply” since he has taken office.

    April 21st, 2009 at 11:38 am

    From your link :

    Exclusive: Lawyer says Guantanamo abuse worse since Obama
    Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:23pm EST
    LONDON (Reuters) – Abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay has worsened sharply since President Barack Obama took office as prison guards “get their kicks in” before the camp is closed, according to a lawyer who represents detainees.

    How is Obama liable/responsible for this type of behavior ?

    It isn’t a direct or even an implied order from the CIC , you stupid tool…………..


  17. ElBruce says:

    We seem to have forgotten what an independent DoJ looks like. So whenever Obama says he’s not interested in prosecution we take that to mean he intends to interfere with any potential DoJ investigations, because that’s the sort of behavior we’re used to.

    .

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    Then, of course, we’ll follow it with prosecutions of the Obama administration based upon first hand reports that conditions at Gitmo have “worsened sharply” since he has taken office.

    (your link)

    Abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay has worsened sharply since President Barack Obama took office as prison guards “get their kicks in” before the camp is closed, according to a lawyer who represents detainees.

    Quit spamming that. Nobody’s impressed.

    .

    dixie blood Says:

    OT only kinda but important…

    dixie, TP has that story here, and here.


  18. MCMetal says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    Try reading the rest of the article.

    April 21st, 2009 at 11:57 am

    Try dealing in reality instead of going off on some half-assed fishing expedition ………..


  19. Bushie says:

    DiFink (Jello Jay in drag) doesn’t want real investigations or hearings. She’s like Spector and Leahy; tough sounding (on the side of justice and god), then undercutting she position and causing the whole effort to implode. As has been stated before, she’s culpable for the excesses of Bushco and will cover her backside at any cost.


  20. gummble-bee-itch says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    Try reading the rest of the article.

    You should do that, yes.

    He stressed the mistreatment did not appear to be directed from above, but was an initiative undertaken by frustrated U.S. army and navy jailers on the ground. It did not seem to be a reaction against the election of Obama, a Democrat who has pledged to close the prison camp within a year, but rather a realization that there was little time remaining before the last 241 detainees, all Muslim, are released.

    “It’s ‘hey, let’s have our fun while we can,’” said Ghappour, who helped secure the release this week of Binyam Mohamed, a British resident freed from Guantanamo Bay after more than four years in detention without trial or charge.

    “I can’t really imagine why you would get your kicks from abusing prisoners, but certainly, having spoken to certain guards who have been injured in Iraq, who indirectly or directly blame my clients for their injuries and the trauma they have suffered, it’s not too difficult to put two and two together.”


  21. pastcaring says:

    What I would prefer to see is someone who isn’t worried about protecting their ‘political future’ doing the investigations.

    Is it possible there is an ‘agenda-free’ individual out there…anyone?


  22. middleline says:

    CFP, you’re not getting anywhere. Is that story posted out of sincere outrage or is it an attempt on your part to scrape for a few political coins out from under the cushions?


  23. dixie blood says:

    Thanks ElBruce…I missed it…it’s not the first time…8-))


  24. Buckie Boy says:

    I estimate its completion within the next six to eight months….

    …unless the public forgets about it before then.


  25. Uncle Ho says:

    def.
    Conservative: dedicated to MAINTAINING the status quo., opposes change.

    Progressive; dedicated to CHANGING the status quo.

    so, ConservativeForProgress, you are contradicting yourself.


  26. MCMetal says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    Obama doesn’t want to prosecute and set a standard by which he, himself can be prosecuted for allowing the conditions at Guantanamo Bay to worsen under his watch.

    April 21st, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    Obama CANNOT prosecute anyone , you mental furball ; he’s the President of the US , not Judge of the US………

    BTW

    He just said during a Q&A session with reporters after meeting with the King of Jordan , that investigations/prosecutions of those involved in regards to trying to justify/legalize torture are left up to his AG , Eric Holder………..


  27. ElBruce says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    Obama doesn’t want to prosecute and set a standard by which he, himself can be prosecuted for allowing the conditions at Guantanamo Bay to worsen under his watch.

    a) according to one lawyer
    b) as opposed to creating the conditions
    c) as opposed to authorizing the abuses

    No really, you’ve got nothing.


  28. Steppenwoof says:

    Just breaking news on Huffingtonpost. Obama is now open to prosecuting Bush officials.


  29. Art says:

    Her request is fair and reasonable.

    Where are the similar calls from the Republican side of the aisle?


  30. A Patriotic Anopheles Acting says:

    Can’t recall the exact wording but President Obama stated that no CIA underlings who may have performed torture on detainees by following the directives in the memos would face prosecution. This leaves a bit of wiggle room regarding prosecutions as it appears that several CIA agents went much further than even the memos allowed. When the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence finishes it’s review I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see a long list of abuses that took the Administrations guidelines much further than even the Bush Administration intended. These agents would be the first to willingly give up the goose as to exactly what may have been officially sanctioned. I suspect that this went much deeper than these despicable memos even allowed and I agree with Senator Feinstein that to make blanket statements of forgiveness to the CIA may be a bit too hasty. I understand to an extent that Obama needs to ease the fears of a CIA that he must rely on for National Defense but if crimes were commited there needs to be a major house cleaning and those that participated in these abuses should be made afraid enough to step forward and do their patriotic duty. Right now I have strong reservations as to the competency and ability of our CIA to perform their duties within the law. President Obama needs to step outside of that bubble that he said he would avoid. It’s rapidly closing in around him and he is becoming deaf to the continued efforts of the Progressive community.


  31. calfacon says:

    #21 Bushie Says
    I fear you are too right. She’s been on Intelligence Committes, vote for the Patriot Act, for the new “improved” FISA, Mukasey, Roberts. This is one statement I don’t feel the need to apologise to the rest of the country over. But’s got to put a lot into action before she’s even close to catching up. Not Holding My Breath.


  32. 08Dariana says:

    “I estimate its completion within the next six to eight months”

    Why six to eight months? that’s a long time from now.


  33. 08Dariana says:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/21/obama-administration-bush_n_189521.html

    WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is leaving the door to open to possible prosecution of Bush administration officials who devised harsh terrorism-era interrogation tactics.

    He also said Tuesday that he worries about the impact of high-intensity hearings on how detainees were treated under former President George W. Bush. But Obama did say, nevertheless, he could support a Hill investigation if it were conducted in a bipartisan way.

    Obama has said he doesn’t support charging CIA agents and interrogators who took part in waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics, acting on advice from superiors that such practices were legal. But he also said that it is up to the attorney general whether to prosecute Bush administration lawyers who wrote the memos approving these tactics.


  34. Eugene atrax robustus Debs says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    Are you STILL pushing this ignorant meme? Arent you embarassed to be so stupid? Obama should be punished because a story says the guards at Guantanamo are ON THIER OWN abusing the inmates??? MY GOD you are stupid


  35. Eugene atrax robustus Debs says:

    Jackie

    Congratulations you have combined impressive stupid with long ago debunked talking points. Does the Limborg hivemind give extra credit for that?


  36. Eugene atrax robustus Debs says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says: 28

    At this point you have gone beyond stupid. You are a liar and a fool. A punk who is trolling. You KNOW it is BS you dont care because you are a liar. You LIKE to tell lies you worthless punk. Go sit in the corner and STFU


  37. chiroptera toasterhead says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    Eugene: I have posted links to back my story. You have posted nothing but name calling. Typical.

    April 21st, 2009 at 1:01 pm
    __________

    We don’t need to post links to verify that you are a moron. Your posts are proof enough.

    PWN


  38. Zimzone says:

    Buh-bye, Bybee…


  39. Max Anax junius -1 says:

    .

    I hear voices from the Senate asking, “Where is that Impeachment?”

    Will John Conyers respond?

    .


  40. hanshiro the antlion says:

    Fire Feinstein, burn the GD table, and follow the law!

    How hard could it be…?


  41. kmac813 says:

    pandoras box has been officially opened


  42. freeman says:

    Not prosecuting torture is a violation of our international agreements and the Geneva conventions !
    http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/04/18/un-official-obama39s-decision-not-to-prosecute-torture-violates-international-law/


  43. hanshiro the antlion says:

    4.ConservativeForProgress Says: Then, of course, we’ll follow it with prosecutions of the Obama administration based upon first hand reports that conditions at Gitmo have “worsened sharply” since he has taken office.

    Your article does not support your contention. This paragraph pretty much broadsides your implication:

    He stressed the mistreatment did not appear to be directed from above, but was an initiative undertaken by frustrated U.S. army and navy jailers on the ground. It did not seem to be a reaction against the election of Obama, a Democrat who has pledged to close the prison camp within a year, but rather a realization that there was little time remaining before the last 241 detainees, all Muslim, are released.

    On the other hand, the torture of detainees under bush was directed from above. Q.E.D.

    You really have nothing. Nada. Zip. Zilch.


  44. Eugene atrax robustus Debs says:

    ConservativeForProgress Says:

    Eugene: I have posted links to back my story. You have posted nothing but name calling. Typical.
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    You are such a LIAR. Your links do not in ANY way back up your ignorant claims. You are a troll. You KNOW you are a liar and just keep lying or are so brainwashed by Rush Limbaugh that you are incapable of independent thought and cant even SEE that we have completely debunked your claim is in ANY way backed up by your stupid link. If you dont like being called a liar I have a simple solution STOP LYING


  45. John Barringer says:

    I suppose even Feinstein can get something right sometimes.


  46. hanshiro the antlion says:

    Besides, “ConservativeForProgress” is an oxymoron…


  47. pastcaring says:

    hanshiro the antlion Says:

    Besides, “ConservativeForProgress” is an oxymoron..

    Nah…just a moron…


  48. sacopenapa says:

    Yeah… here is Feinstein saying what we want to listen, however, when it comes to the crunch, she is always a disapointment…


  49. wiley says:

    Dog the democrats in Congress.

    From the outset, Wright and Byrd’s opposition to any consideration of presidential impeachment, no matter what evidence is unearthed, loses them their biggest advantage in the proceedings. Not only will committee Republicans feel more confident in pulling the investigation away from sensitive and potentially embarrassing matters, the committee will ignore important evidence of Reagan’s own involvement in the Iran-Contra decision-making process, including recordings of telephone conversations showing Reagan discussing financing the Contras with foreign leaders.

    The Democratic and Republican leaders of Congress’s joint Iran-Contra investigation begin meetings to discuss the logistics of the upcoming public hearings (see May 5, 1987). Speaker of the House Jim Wright (D-TX) later recalls that House committee chairman “Lee Hamilton and I bent over backwards to be fair to the Republicans.” Many of the committee Republicans are not predisposed to return the favor. Moderate Republican Warren Rudman (R-NH), the co-chairman of the Senate committee, recalls that deep divides were forming between the committee’s moderate Republicans and the more hardline Republicans led by Dick Cheney (R-WY). “The meetings were very, very intensive,” Rudman will recall. Cheney helps put together the Republican committee members’ staff, and includes a number of hardline Reagan loyalists: the Justice Department’s Bruce Fein; the former assistant general counsel to the CIA, David Addington; and others. Notably, it is during the Iran-Contra hearings where Cheney and Addington form their lasting professional association.


    link



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll