Of oucrse, one could just as easily, and with as much justification, say “”Bill O is scared to debate anyone who disagree with him. He refuses to talk about Keith O. and cuts off anyone’s mic who does. Bill O. is obsessed with Keith.”

April 23rd, 2009 at 3:17 pm
______

It would be interesting to see a comparison of who actually has more guests who disagree with the host. O’Reilly would probably win that one. If he would stop talking over them, he could truthfully claim that his show is less biased than Olby. Olby, like Maddow, is a good source of the liberal point of view. He just needs to practice a little self restraint and to realize that he’s no Jon Stewart.

NOLIESPLEASE Says
April 23rd, 2009 at 10:51 am

Please oh pretty please…anyone who is confronted by Jesse, please do one thing if your a male….pull out your di** while looking him in the eyes and PISS ON HIS LEG AS HE IS ASKING YOU THE QEUSTIONS.
_____________________________________________________________

Um…as a woman, I’d have a hard time doing that. I’m sure this option wasn’t available to Amanda for the same reason (of course, she’s probably classy enough that she didn’t even think of it).

April 23rd, 2009 at 11:05 am
_______

It’s a shame that our society has reached a point where that is considered a compliment. ;)

Instead of calling everybody names, what are the liberals going to do about it? How are you going to get the American people to back up and listen to your ideas?

Let’s hear some ideas istead of name calling.

Duh.

Please, one video clip.

***

here’s a clip of billy reading his porno.

would you like to hear it?

:)

;<)

I am against violence but I would allow for someone to haul off and kick Jesse in the ass.

Kieth O is scared to debate anyone who disagree with him.

He regularly debates people on his show, without shouting at them or cutting off their mic.

.

jeff2001 Says:

Keith goes on and on about Bill O every night. There is no way you can say he is not jealous of Bill O.

Are you jealous of a train wreck that you drive slowly past?

.

lisaqmoon Says:

Jesse Waters is a GE shareholder. As such, he had every right to be there, Fox News employee or not.

Except the “questions” he was “asking” weren’t relevant to the share price or stability of GE. Your argument only holds up if this doesn’t get used on BillO’s show. The moment it does, it proves that his motivations can’t be actual concern as a shareholder, but rather setting up a stunt for his TV show.

Your argument is like saying that somebody has the right to yell “fire” in a movie theater because they paid for their ticket.

jeff2001 Says:
Keith goes on and on about Bill O every night. There is no way you can say he is not jealous of Bill O.

He is not jealous of Bill O.

There. I found a way to say it.

Jeff, if you’re gonna talk amongst grownups, you might want to step up your game a little. For instance, do you have a point?

Of oucrse, one could just as easily, and with as much justification, say “”Bill O is scared to debate anyone who disagree with him. He refuses to talk about Keith O. and cuts off anyone’s mic who does. Bill O. is obsessed with Keith.”

And what “propaganda” would that be?

Reality has a known liberal bias. Therefore, if you aren’t slanting the news rightward, that counts as slanting it leftward. At least, as the wingnuts see it.

.

Proud Says:

Jesse is a stock holder asking a legitimate question…

What, he bought 1 share on e-Trade the day before? And it’s not a legitimate question. It’s just whining and grandstanding.

ralph has it right. Or you could look at it this way: since FAUX News is doing so well in the ratings, then it doesn’t take a marketing genius to see that there’s definite market share to be had in having a blatantly left-leaning cable news channel, what with Obama being so popular and all. If you believe that MSNBC is horribly slanted, then they’re just following FAUX News’ business model with the other demographic. Which would be a very good thing for GE’s shareholders.

Assuming for the sake of argument (and ONLY for the sake of argument) that MSNBC has adopted a leftward slant to its programming… given that the most left-leaning programs are getting increased ratings over a year ago, wouldn’t this simply be a reasonable response to the demands of the marketplace?

After all, that’s basically the argument put forth by defenders of Faux News whenever they trot out ratings numbers, isn’t it? At least, I’m guessing that’s their argument, since I have yet to get a straight answer out of any of them on the question…