Comments on: Lieberman breaks with Cheney: ‘We’re not less safe’ under Obama.

By: sacopenapa

sacopenapa — Tue, 12 May 2009 20:14:47 +0000

Lieberman is a two or three faced bastard. He is now feeling the Heat and wants to portray himself with the “good” guys.
Go to Israel Lieberman… people love you there!

By: zirvesesli

zirvesesli — Tue, 12 May 2009 13:13:43 +0000

sesli chat
seslichat
sesli sohbet
seslisohbet

By: ucsbclassics53

ucsbclassics53 — Tue, 12 May 2009 07:07:29 +0000

happily liberal Says:
orangutan, clinton had first dibs on him long before that fake memo. Please, educate yourself.

oh I forgot, it was Clinton who penned that “fake memo” in order to embarrass Bush and to distract the American people from the fact that Clinton himself set up the Republican impeachment hoopla in order to set the United States up for 9/11…so he could blame Bush and the Republicans for 9/11 and for the fact he “supposedly” didn’t go after Bin Laden…he knew that having an affair and getting into impeachment hearings would allow his buddy, oh I forgot, Obama’s buddy, Bin Laden to work against the U.S. with impunity…

See, it makes sense! Clinton could then claim that the Republicans and the impeachment ruckus distracted him from going after Al Qaeda…and then he can have Bush blamed for 9/11…

Thanks for the edumacation…now I can claim my place as one of the sheep 20%ers…Where can I get my GOP talking points?

By: Robt

Robt — Tue, 12 May 2009 07:06:57 +0000

And Joe Lieberman is a pillar of congressional trust and credibility?

By: ucsbclassics53

ucsbclassics53 — Tue, 12 May 2009 07:06:30 +0000

happily liberal Says:
Yet, we were attacked under herr dubyah’s policies. Oops.

See what happens when you get your “news” from newshounds/liars?
Clinton policies were in place, einstein.

Right, Bush’s obsession with going after Saddam and his administration’s pooh-poohing of the terrorism threat had nothing to do with it, genius…

By: rational american

rational american — Tue, 12 May 2009 06:07:02 +0000

The good old Zionist “King Chameleon” makes real Chameleon shy !!!

By: keepinon

keepinon — Tue, 12 May 2009 02:25:09 +0000

The truth of the matter as I see it is that another attack could occur at any time. Hopefully it will not occur, and I’m sure the Obama administration is doing what it can to minimize the risk. Can the same be said of the previous administration? When we strayed away from Afghanistan and attacked Iraq over what was at best bogus intelligence, it would seem that we created another whole generation of would be terrorists for many successive administrations to be concerned about.

By: Evil Spaniard

Evil Spaniard — Tue, 12 May 2009 01:46:47 +0000

Oh, I get it. the (I) means that he kisses the ass of the party of the President in charge. Slug.

By: Libellula saturata Annie

Libellula saturata Annie — Tue, 12 May 2009 01:39:20 +0000

Ah – gotta love that instinct for self-preservation, eh, Joe?

By: pluege

pluege — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:56:32 +0000

Lieberman breaks with Cheney: ‘We’re not less safe’ under Obama.

yea, well LIEberman has the credibility of a mad hatter so who gives a crap what LIEberman thinks.

By: Game of Life

Game of Life — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:54:22 +0000

This man is ickyfied. he is just a shylock looking for another repug.

his usefulness in the dem party is null. They call him ind in his state but to the rest of us he means sneaky back door bs.

By: Pennsylvanianne

Pennsylvanianne — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:33:43 +0000

Richard Clarke, a holdover from the Clinton administration, vainly tried to speak with the Bush-Cheney officials about the threat that Osama bin Laden posed before 9/11 and was roundly IGNORED. So much for keeping us safe on 9/11, Bush-Cheney!! And how about those anthrax attacks? They were never fully resolved, though officials blamed them on the scientist who conveniently committed suicide. I am glad Lieberman and Perino aren’t giving credence to Cheney’s outrageously untrue, self-serving remarks.

By: AtoZ

AtoZ — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:22:02 +0000

Maybe Joe L. understands in the U.S. with the Titanic 21% on republican party identification today, how this now plays out in his state. On a simple moral issue like torture Lieberman can not afford to lose his core constituents here. The current administration is now closer to the political middle than the previous lot on any moral issues.

Lieberman like Senator Specter does not need a democratic primary challenger as his independent dem status is now becoming a liability in Connecticut. He needs to support something and McCain in ‘08 was not his meal ticket. Badmouthing Obama would be a losing strategy like Limbaugh now does and will not pull any votes in Lieberman’s direction. Joe knows it is time to stop cutting bait and go fishing.

By: eyeswideopen1

eyeswideopen1 — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:21:46 +0000

If Liebermann is against it then maybe it’s was the right thing to do.

By: fletc3her

fletc3her — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:12:41 +0000

Let’s see, in 2009 have we had any major terrorist attacks on U.S. soil? No. During Bush’s tenure? Yes! In fact, Bush will be remembered as the President with the worst record of defending America.

By: KayInMaine

KayInMaine — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:32 +0000

Jackie Says:

As Republicans watch the response to Obama by the billions around the world and even Iran and Russia, now people are slowly changing sides if only for a short time. We just saw a Journalist who made the mistake of working for Fox News as she was asked to spy and she was in prison in Iran. No torture was done and she was allowed an appeal. Once the evidence showed she was being used by the Bush Fox News Station and she admitted what they asked her to do she was released. Now just think if the Bush Administration arrest a spy well he/she would be tortured and without charges keep for life. Makes you wonder which country was really the Axis of Evil Bush was talking about.
May 11th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

I will laugh my arse off if the country of Iran proclaims Fox News as part of their Axis of Evil!

By: KayInMaine

KayInMaine — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:04:26 +0000

America was safe until George Bush was selected to office in 2001. 9/11/01 happened on his watch, the anthrax attacks happened on his watch, the stock market lost 8,000 points under his watch,and America went into financial crisis under his watch!

He has not made us safe. In fact, Clinton did until George Bush came along.

Dick Cheney hasn’t made us safe for 3 decades.

By: Jackie

Jackie — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:17 +0000

As Republicans watch the response to Obama by the billions around the world and even Iran and Russia, now people are slowly changing sides if only for a short time. We just saw a Journalist who made the mistake of working for Fox News as she was asked to spy and she was in prison in Iran. No torture was done and she was allowed an appeal. Once the evidence showed she was being used by the Bush Fox News Station and she admitted what they asked her to do she was released. Now just think if the Bush Administration arrest a spy well he/she would be tortured and without charges keep for life. Makes you wonder which country was really the Axis of Evil Bush was talking about.

By: EugeneDebs

EugeneDebs — Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:39 +0000

LuckilySTUPID.

Oh my God you are just a delusional brainwashed moron that spews whatever idiocy you have been programmed with no matter how ignorant it makes you look. My GOD you are stupid

By: EugeneDebs

EugeneDebs — Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:22 +0000

LuckilyMoronic

People like you are SO stupid, so simpleminded. Your world is a series of false dichotomies. Either it goes in the black box or the white box. Either you are all good or all bad and either you always do good or always do bad. Shheeesh. Usually you get over this simpleminded worldview about age five. Its all arrested development all the time for morons like you though