KILL WHITEY.

That would in fact solve everything, and therefore must be considered as a viable option.

seslisohbet seslichat sesli sohbet sesli chat

How dare the same idiots who supported Sarah Palin for the second highest office in the nation, talk about Sotomayor not having the intellectual abilities to be on the Supreme Court.

How dare the same white, racist, idiots talk about the fear that her race and gender might influence here decisions! I hope to God they do! We have seen how the influence of white, mediocre, males decisions have impacted our nation – ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! The people need to be called out for their ignorance and their disgusting ways.

It’s not like the right wingers on the court don’t make decisions that favor white men.

Read Malthus…

Um…Malthus was wrong. He failed utterly to consider the effects of industrialization and the demographic shift on population growth. The doom-and-gloom scenarios he predicted have not come to pass. His analysis – like yours – was oversimplified and based on a rather significant lack of real-world data or knowledge of economics. Might try a better model next time you want to make a point…

After graduation from Yale Law School, he worked for then Missouri attorney general John Danforth, and spent 2 1/2 years litigating cases of all descriptions. In 1977, Judge Thomas practiced law in the private sector, and in 1979, he rejoined Senator Danforth as a legislative assistant in the U.S. Senate. In 1981, President Reagan appointed him Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights in the Department of Education. From 1982 to 1990, he served as President Reagan’s Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. And I appointed him to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in 1990.

Judge Thomas’ life is a model for all Americans, and he’s earned the right to sit on this nation’s highest Court. And I am very proud, indeed, to nominate him for this position, and I trust that the Senate will confirm this able man promptly.

Heh.

But a Hispanic woman is to be denied the same privilege,

and everybody is ok with this?

Meanwhile Senator In-hoax is unduly influenced by his ignorance and unwillingness to learn. web tasar?m? l Tabldot Yemek l yüz esteti?i

Now, if you could just make comments of your own, we wouldn’t slam you so much for spamming us.

KILL WHITEY.

I like the idea of having different races, sexes, and ethic groups represented in a democracy. They all have their own special talents and points of view. “Humanistic ideas” that rich white men can’t fathom or want to contemplate. More people with a greater sense of morality(?). Not just money guys? Maybe we’ll have some judges who look out for the little guy because they know what it’s like to be trampled.

But the criminal rich don’t like it because it means giving up more of their power. So they want more rich white guys.

I hope someday we will get a Native American on the Supreme Court. There’s a lot to be said about common sense, whether lawyers like it or not.

Imagine how different the laws in this country would be if we could apply this standard to Congress.

You mean if we were actually able to get rid of Gerrymandering in every state, as it has been ruled illegal by numerous courts? Yeah, that would go a long way towards fixing democracy. Let’s start with Texas…

Let us not forget that wise men like Oliver Wendell Holmes and Justice Cardozo voted on cases which upheld both sex and race discrimination in our society. Until 1972, no Supreme Court case ever upheld the claim of a woman in a gender discrimination case. I, like Professor Carter, believe that we should not be so myopic as to believe that others of different experiences or backgrounds are incapable of understanding the values and needs of people from a different group. Many are so capable. As Judge Cedarbaum pointed out to me, nine white men on the Supreme Court in the past have done so on many occasions and on many issues including Brown.

Hey, I’m a white male past middle-age myself. I’d like to think that I could judge such cases fairly, in the tradition of Oliver W. Holmes and Justice Cardozo. And I probably could. But that’s besides the point. Given a wide variety of qualified folks that Obama could/not choose from, there’s no reason why he should not select someone who brings the demographics of the SCOTUS more in line with the demographics of the nation. The degree to which personal experience “colors” judicial rulings is arguable: if a qualified jurist can completely exclude their own experience from their ruling, then fine, Sotomayor fits as she’s a qualified jurist. However, if they can’t, then she fits just fine anwyas since her experience would bring the SCOTUS more in line with the mass of people over which it rules. Either way, she’s the right person for the job.