Think Progress

Hatch Peddles Luntz Talking Points, Misrepresents Kennedy’s Health Bill

During an interview with Fox News this morning, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) criticized the draft version of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (HELP) health care bill as a “one-size fits all government mandated health care plan.”

Hatch repeated the Frank Luntz-inspired charge that a government plan would place a bureaucrat between “you and your doctor” at least four times during the segment. And he wildly misrepresented the HELP bill while pressing Democrats in Congress to track a bipartisan path towards passing health reform. Watch it:

Hatch joins a long line of conservative lawmakers who rely on poll-tested Republican talking points that are intended to stall reform rather than fix the system.

For instance, contrary to Hatch’s insistence that the bill would put a bureaucrat “between you and your doctor,” Section 2 of the draft legislation explicitly states that “a strong doctor-patient relationship is essential to the practice of medicine, and patients have a right to an effective doctor patient relationship”:

helpbill

This suggests that Hatch is overstating his willingness to work with Democrats in a “bipartisan” fashion. After all, the first step towards compromise is truthfully characterizing legislation.

Cross-posted from The Wonk Room.



41 Responses to “Hatch Peddles Luntz Talking Points, Misrepresents Kennedy’s Health Bill”

  1. ElBruce says:

    Bet you anything he hasn’t even read the draft.


  2. hivanh says:

    Hatch should close his. We have too much to do and worry about to be able afford damage control caused by loose-lippers.


  3. tom says:

    Who you going to believe? Orrin Hatch or your own lying eyes?


  4. AMcG312 says:

    Better a bureaucrat than a health insurance company. Has he never heard of having to get a referral?

    I have BC/BS’s PPO, and now, if a doctor wants to prescribe a particular medication that is on a list, the doctor has to get permission from BC/BS to prescribe that med. That’s right, a doctor with all of those years of education and training needs to call someone at an insurance company who does not have a medical degree to get permission to practice medicine.


  5. hotelal says:

    Its time to put out these OLD dogs out of office…need fresh blood.. not the same old,tired dogs!!


  6. Jess Wonderin says:

    After EIGHT years of “solid leadership’, just WHAT did the Republican Health Plan offer? . . . oh? . . . yea? . . .

    Big Pharma/health “providers” will finance a media blitz of lies that will baffle and bedazzle the masses to keep their GOLDEN CALF . . . and also, why is Wal-Mart able to “negotiate bargain meds” for THEIR PHARMACIES, but the Republicans BLOCK FEDERAL AGENCIES from using the “power of volume buying” to “negotiate” lower prices for us???


  7. Xisithrus says:

    Hatch, of course, doesnt talk about the bureaucrat in his government health insurance plan


  8. spencers mom says:

    When are the Dems going to hit the airwaves and debunk these ridiculous talking points? I’m hearing nothing from them, but the lying liars are splashed all over the teevee machine!

    PEACE


  9. had enough says:

    Confused are we Hatch?
    The vulturous for profit insurance running the show now do all of which you accused a public health plan would do.


  10. Xisithrus says:

    Private health insurance spending its clients premiums on lobbyists and congress critters. Im sure they are thrilled.


  11. oldgranny says:

    Spencers mom @ 8,
    You really are right on that one.
    As J. Carville says in his book, 40 More Years, the problem with the Dems is that they let the Regreedicans run the agenda. The Dems need to be all over the airwaves.


  12. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre says:

    Senator Orrin Hatch (R – HMO) accepts free socialized health care for himself and his family, no problemo. But he thinks that the present system of the Unholy Trinity of Private GReed: insurance companies, HMOs and pharmaceutical corporations that places seventeen papershufflers between us and our doctor is fine and dandy…


  13. Xisithrus says:

    Correction: Private health care spending its clients premiums on lobbyists and congress critters while 60% of bankruptcies are due to medical costs with those who have private healthcare.


  14. had enough says:

    spencers mom Says:

    When are the Dems going to hit the airwaves and debunk these ridiculous talking points?

    Probably when the media, also invested in insurance, big pharma, defense… get the green light for profit insurance remains and is in cement.


  15. COProgressive says:

    1. How can anyone support a non-portable Sickness & Injury Medical Insurance industry that makes their profit not by PROVIDING care, but by DENYING care?

    2. How can anyone support a non-portable Sickness & Injury Medical Insurance industry that PROFITS from excessive costs in providing care by passing along the continuing increases in cost and then adding an additional 30% on top of each cost increase?

    3. Would it not be better for Americans to INVEST in a lifetime HEATH CARE plan that provides cost control and covers every American from cradle to grave, rather than a YEARLY TEMPORARY, NON-PORTABLE Sickness and Injury Insurance plan?

    INVEST in Universal Single Payer Health Care, it lasts a lifetime!

    Without a PUBLIC OPTION, there is NO health care reform!


  16. pastcaring says:

    Not a surprise that a man who receives $481,381 from Health care industry in 2008, alone, would oppose anything that threatens said industry.

    Source


  17. had enough says:

    comment from Thom Hartmann in so many words:

    Need a job? They are out there.. as republican groups hire those that will go on message boards, log in with many names, have conversations with yourself, some as a liberal and then admit you were wrong.


  18. COProgressive says:

    spencers mom Says:
    When are the Dems going to hit the airwaves and debunk these ridiculous talking points? I’m hearing nothing from them

    The Dems need to sell the notion of a Lifetime Heath Care System. People are sick and tired of having to deal with the YEARLY buying of a Sickness & Injury Insurance policy at ever increasing rates.

    Each YEAR we are sending money in to the S&I Insurance industry and come Janurary we have nothing to show for it except another bill for another YEAR.

    We need to INVEST that money into a Universal Lifetime Health Care System that covers ALL Americans.

    INVEST in Universal Single Payer Health Care, it lasts a lifetime!

    Without a PUBLIC OPTION, there is NO health care reform!


  19. pastcaring says:

    2008, alone

    Correction 2003-2008…


  20. had enough says:

    15 COProgressive

    Americans overwhelmingly want a decent health care system.

    The real question is:

    Who has the most influence over Congress? We the people who vote them in or the insurance industries that line their pockets?

    It appears the latter with hopes no one will know or remember during election time.


  21. Hoodathunktick says:

    It appears the latter with hopes no one will know or remember during election time.

    Since the two parties decide who gets to have the funding to run, remembering at election time is no big deal. Last November folks ‘remembered’ and the lobbyists still run Congress.

    I seem to recall a candidate who made some statements about the need to clear this up.


  22. Pachydiplax de St. Augustine says:

    One would think that a political party that relishes war as policy in dealing with the rest of the world would want the healthiest population possible to provide for the military manpower needs and provide that health care from the defense budget.

    The same could be said for education so the military would have the smartest soldiers to fight our battles and the private companies would have the smartest engineers and technicians to develop our weapons.


  23. ElBruce says:

    Not to mention that the health insurance industry is acting as a leech on all other industries, depressing their profits and operations as well as causing labor rifts. A huge amount of the specific messes that many industries have found themselves in are caused or exacerbated by the fact that health care is mostly employer-based at present.

    Why do Republicans hate business?


  24. the freedom says:

    since we’re talking about health care will he retroactively force himself to give a damn about that woman at the bottom of the lake?


  25. blackwidow says:

    Oh look, a Republican lying on TV.
    I’m shocked, shocked I say!


  26. Zimzone says:

    Small business’ biggest direct expense is health care coverage of employees.

    On a scale of 1:10, health care is #1, tax cuts at 7 or 8.

    Hatch wants free socialist health care for himself while trying to maintain the 1/2 million or so annually the insurers donate.

    Double standard? You betcha!


  27. Keith says:

    Conservatives did not want Social Security under FDR.
    They did not want universal healthcare under Truman when he wanted it, nor Nixon when he considered it, nor Carter when he considered it, nor Clinton when he tried to compromise with them. They opposed Medicare in 1965. Congressman GHW Bush called it socialized medicine. They do not want public healthcare now. They will not compromise. They will only move the goal posts and have add-ons to harm/sabotage the plans.

    Do not rely on their votes. Pass it without their votes. If you can’t, so be it—they will have more voted out in 2010.


  28. Keith says:

    the freedom Says:
    since we’re talking about health care will he retroactively force himself to give a damn about that woman at the bottom of the lake?

    Do you give a damn about the 20,000 Americans who die each and every year due to lack of healthcare? Only in the US—not in any other developed country in the world. Many of these are full-time workers, but cannot afford private healthcare (which costs twice as much as any other country).


  29. Keith says:

    the freedom, for half the costs, you can have a plan with no deductible, no co-pay—includes dental, optometric, and behavioral—-and covers the 47,000,000 who currently have nothing! Do you give a damn about them? Even little babies?


  30. nellieh says:

    When these parrots are on the Sunday morning shows opposite a pro-health care reform guest, the pro-health care person should ask. “are you sure that’s what Luntz really said?”


  31. the freedom says:

    i do give a damn and that’s why i support health care reform right here right now with a public option.


  32. kasinca says:

    It is time for the Dempocratic Party to pass Single Payer and leave the wingnut senators holding their wankers, complaining about the cost. Fix healthcare in this country and scrue the wankers.


  33. ElBruce says:

    kasinca Says:

    It is time for the Dempocratic Party to pass Single Payer and leave the wingnut senators holding their wankers, complaining about the cost.

    It would be massively cheaper than it is now. But you know, gubmit socialist invaders and all…


  34. Hoodathunktick says:

    Last I heard HR676 had 77 cosigners. Why isn’t it on the floor for a vote?


  35. Hoodathunktick says:

    My bad, it seems it is 53 co-signers. The question remains, why isn’t it up for vote?

    Because it hasn’t been ‘approved’ by some damn committee?


  36. Hoodathunktick says:

    Double my bad, it seems the co-sponsors are at 93.


  37. dasm says:

    Duh– Repubs misrepresent everything. They have no facts. Lies, dishonesty, cheating & smears– the Repub way.


  38. kevsters says:

    Check out this clip of Uber-Christian, Pat Robertson slipping and saying that private health care systems couldn’t compete with a government run system. Does he even realize what he said?

    http://progressnotcongress.org/blog/?p=1666


  39. ElBruce says:

    texaslady Says:

    Uhhh, you can’t fix stupid.

    You can beat it into unconsciousness though.

    .

    Romartin16985 Says:

    Two very good examples of liberals who just can’t help insulting anyone they disagree with.

    Fcuk off, verminous traitor.


  40. SJU90 says:

    Effective, responsible communication of policy by the institutions of government to the mass populace is vital to a functioning democracy. Such communication ultimately assists in educatng and enlightening the electorate of complex issues. Democracy simply cannot function and is destined to fail without an educated public.

    It is this reality which compelled me to comment re this post. Luntz, his ilk and those who peddle his market-tested misrepresentations seriously undermine our democratic government. They foster ignorance at the expense of truth with the intent to control “policy outcome”, i.e. the will of the people in a democracy. Such actions place these individuals squarely in the company of every totalitarian regime throughout history. We can only hope that the Democratic party is up to the challenge to not only communicate the truth of its policy but to bring to light the actual intent BEHIND the tactics of Luntz, et. al., to the American public.


  41. wiley says:

    I know my client of ten years, and a couple of others who would love to work part-time, but a full-time job in which their health coverage is not guaranteed is a death sentence. I want a plan that will help the disabled out of the ghetto of SSDI, and provide insurance for people who do not qualify for Medicare.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll