ThinkFast: June 8, 2009
ThinkFast: June 8, 2009
After a “nearly unprecedented turnout” by Lebanese voters, the ” American-backed alliance appeared to retain control of the Lebanese Parliament on Sunday,” representing “a significant and unexpected defeat for Hezbollah and its allies, Iran and Syria.” Iran follows with its own presidential election this Friday.
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) “admonished the Obama administration on Saturday for proposing cuts to Alaska’s missile defense network,” giving her “strongest public remarks to date on the matter.” “Reducing Alaska’s defense readiness in these perilous times is a show of weakness, it is not a sign of strength,” Palin said at a speech in upstate New York.
A Gallup poll released late last week found that conservatives are now in favor of allowing gay Americans serve openly in the military. Majorities of “weekly churchgoers (60%), conservatives (58%), and Republicans (58%) now favor what essentially equates to repealing the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy.”
North Korea sentenced American journalists Laura Ling and Euna Lee to 12 years of hard labor today for “committing hostilities against the Korean nation and illegal entry,” charges that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called “baseless.” White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton released a statement saying that the Obama administration is “engaged through all possible channels to secure their release.”
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said yesterday on ABC’s This Week that the U.S. “will consider reinstating North Korea to a list of state sponsors of terrorism.” At the same time, however, she acknowledged that there was a legal process for the move. “Obviously we would want to see recent evidence of their support for international terrorism,” Clinton said.
President Obama promised today “to deliver more than 600,000 jobs through his $787 billion stimulus plan this summer, with federal agencies pumping billions into public works projects, schools and summer youth programs.” The administration “had always viewed the summer as a peak for stimulus spending,” but “Obama now promises an accelerated pace of federal spending over the next few months to boost the economy and produce jobs.”
Former Sens. Bob Graham (D-FL) and Jim Talent (R-MO), who currently head a “bipartisan commission on weapons of mass destruction,” sent a letter to OMB Director Peter Orszag yesterday saying that Obama’s plan to finance swine flu vaccine production using the BioSheild Reserve Fund would “severely diminish the nation’s efforts to prepare for WMD events and will leave the nation less, not more, prepared.”
In its first report to Congress, the Wartime Contracting Commission found that “the Defense Department has failed to provide adequate oversight over tens of billions of dollars in contracts to support military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.” The report, which will be released publicly on Wednesday, says that U.S. reliance on private sector employees has grown to “unprecedented proportions.”
In what amounts to an “end-run” around campaign finance laws, lobbyists in 2008 made $35.8 million in payments to charities affiliated with lawmakers and to “honor” lawmakers and other federal officials. The USA Today analysis found that “[m]ost of the money — about $28 million — went to non-profit groups, some with direct ties to members of Congress.” Twice, the donations “came in response to a personal appeal for funds from the lawmaker.”
And finally: Stephen Colbert yesterday taped the first of the four shows he will be doing in Iraq this week, “wearing a business suit made of the same camouflaged material used for soldiers’ desert uniforms.” “It must be nice in Iraq, because some of you keep coming back again and again,” Colbert joked, referring to the multiple tours many soldiers have gone through. During the show, Colbert also received a regulation military haircut, called Gen. Ray Odierno “Shrek,” and “declared himself the only person man enough finally to declare victory in Iraq.”
Sign up here to receive our daily e-newsletter, The Progress Report.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) “admonished the Obama adminstration on Saturday for proposing cuts to Alaska’s missile defense network,” giving her “strongest public remarks to date on the matter.” “Reducing Alaska’s defense readiness in these perilous times is a show of weakness, it is not a sign of strength,” Palin said at a speech in upstate New York.
You , Bible Spice Palin , being a military readiness expert and all ………
June 8th, 2009 at 9:02 amwow – i just heard an AP radio report that during a COLBERT show in iraq that, during a phone call with president obama, general ordinero (SP?) was ordered to shave stephen’s head –
which he promptly DID!!!
weird! stephen’s beautiful hair! GONE!!!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:06 amThis coming from the women who says she can see Russia from her kitchen window.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:07 amkaty Says:
——————————————————————————–
wow – i just heard an AP radio report that during a COLBERT show in iraq that, during a phone call with president obama, general ordinero (SP?) was ordered to shave stephen’s head -
which he promptly DID!!!
weird! stephen’s beautiful hair! GONE!!!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Here’s a photo of it……….
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/08/arts/television/08colb.html?_r=2&scp=2&sq=colbert&st=cse
June 8th, 2009 at 9:10 amWhy does Sarah Palin consider Alaska to be a separate country, with a separate missile defense network? I’ve never heard of any other state claim their state’s defense was weakened as a result of military bases closing or other defense cuts that affected their state.
States often have objections to defense cuts happening in their back yard, but they mostly have to do with fairly legitimate reasons, such as job losses. The “you’re leaving us defenseless” complaint is generally only heard from foreign countries dependent on our aid.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:12 amBut I thought Palin wanted to secede from the Union, which would mean she’d have to provide her own missile defense network anyway. What about all her experience as Commander in Chief of the Alaska National Guard? She can’t keep Alaska safe in case ol’ Putin raises his head?
June 8th, 2009 at 9:13 amA Gallup poll released late last week found that conservatives are now in favor of allowing gay Americans serve openly in the military. Majorities of “weekly churchgoers (60%), conservatives (58%), and Republicans (58%) now favor what essentially equates to repealing the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy.”
Conservatives: Always keeping at least one entire demographic between them and military service.
Next up: Illegal aliens…then real aliens…
June 8th, 2009 at 9:18 amShould be an interesting election in Iran Friday.
This morning’s NYT, as well as last night’s ‘Dateline’, focus on Iran’s youth and how they’re as fed up with present ‘leadership’ as we were with Bush.
If Iranians oust their President this election, perhaps the grown ups can begin a dialogue the moves diplomacy and logic forward.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:19 amSarah was feeling lonely since she doesn’t get as many opportunities to share her idiocy with the rest of the country as much anymore since the election.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:26 amRegarding Colbert…
Can you imagine Billdo taking his show to a war zone? I believe the soldiers themselves find him obnoxious and self serving.
‘Laughter is the best Medicine’ was always on the last page of Reader’s Digest. How true. Our soldiers need to laugh; even if it’s about their own situation or the politicians sending them there.
Thank you, Colbert, for giving our troops a brief moment to release all that negative energy and laugh.
And thank you for protecting our 2nd Amendment right to ‘arm bears’!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:28 ammisscoleopteramolly Says:
——————————————————————————–
Why does Sarah Palin consider Alaska to be a separate country
Very well put. Perhaps it is because she is from another planet, not in our solar system.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:29 amoh! NOW i read the story about colbert here… ha!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:32 amSpeaking of Palin, how ironic that she’s worried about President Obama making the USA a Socialist country…
…while she writes $3,000 checks for each Alaskan.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:32 amHey, I’ll probably be working a lot today, so if you guys see a$$wipe$, could you do me a favor and point him to the smack-down I just laid on him in the Burger King thread?
Thanks.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:37 amYou keep hoping that, C4Pee.
You keep pinning your hopes on all the false equivalencies you can construct. We’ll be here for you when you’re left beaten and despairing once again.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:40 amHey, Palin, pay for your own damn defense. None of that socialist federal military for you Alaskans. You betcha.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:42 amOh… NOW C4Pee grasps a little bit of nuance in the term “socialism”.
Sad thing is, in an hour he’ll be back to claiming that raising the top marginal rate from 36% to 39% is the very definition of it.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:42 amConservativeForProgress Says:
——————————————————————————–
Zimzone Says:
——————————————————————————–
Speaking of Palin, how ironic that she’s worried about President Obama making the USA a Socialist country…
…while she writes $3,000 checks for each Alaskan.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:32 am
_____________________________________________
Giving each Alaskan a share of the money made from their natural resources is quite a bit differnt from “redistributing the wealth” through punitive taxation of the financially successful.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:37 am
As opposed to making perfect sense by rewarding those that are financially successful with unnecessary and undeserved tax breaks for no reason other than being wealthy to begin with ?
Yeah , that Reaganomics thing sure has worked real well 21 of the past 28 or so years it was used , hasn’t it , stooge ?
June 8th, 2009 at 9:43 amConservativeForProgress Says:
This may be a sign of things to come in the US 2010 Republican Revolution.
_______________
Oh yeah… Teabaggers 2010!!!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:43 amConservativeForProgress Says:
Giving each Alaskan a share of the money made from their natural resources is quite a bit differnt from “redistributing the wealth” through punitive taxation of the financially successful.
______________
“Financially successful”???
You mean “those lucky enough to have been born rich”???
June 8th, 2009 at 9:45 amI wonder how much of the infrastructure of Alaska, like roads and utilities have been paid by the Federal government to build and maintain the military installations?
The DoD could probably save a lot of money by outsourcing Alaska’s defense jobs to China.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:45 amColbert was troll-bashed here over the weekend for hating the troops, but…
On the other hand he is unquestionably a real supporter of the troops, raising money through donorschoose.org for school supplies for children of soldiers, through his WristStrong bracelets for the Yellow Ribbon Fund, which helps injured veterans, and by donating to the U.S.O. proceeds from iTunes downloads of this week’s episodes.
Of course, the facts have always had a very liberal bias.
PEACE
June 8th, 2009 at 9:46 amthank you, MCMetal, for that photo!
HIlarious! a camo SUIT! only colbert!
he looks good! glad his head wasn’t shaved!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:47 amConservativeForProgress Says:
” through punitive taxation of the financially successful”.
______________
While you’re at it, please qualify the use of the word “punitive” in that statement.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:47 amAlaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) “admonished the Obama adminstration on Saturday for proposing cuts to Alaska’s missile defense network,” giving her “strongest public remarks to date on the matter.” “Reducing Alaska’s defense readiness in these perilous times is a show of weakness, it is not a sign of strength,” Palin said at a speech in upstate New York.
Whoa, I thought Alaska wanted to secede? They don’t get enough federal welfare dollars?
Build your own defense system, governor. Use the oil money.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:47 amConservativeForProgress Says:
——————————————————————————–
June 8th, 2009 at 9:35 am
Funny how you purposely overlooked the election results in Lebanon , where Hezbollah has been voted out , so soon after Bush the Clueless Wonder left office here………
June 8th, 2009 at 9:48 amConstipatedForProgress Says (in bold, no less):
This may be a sign of things to come for in the US 2010 Republican Revolution.
OR NOT!
June 8th, 2009 at 9:48 amIn its first report to Congress, the Wartime Contracting Commission found that “the Defense Department has failed to provide adequate oversight over tens of billions of dollars in contracts to support military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.” The report, which will be released publicly on Wednesday, says that U.S. reliance on private sector employees has grown to “unprecedented proportions.”
Note to President Obama:
In your second term, please get us back to the self sufficient military I served in.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:49 amThanks.
The Obama administration appointed Fran Townsend to the Homeland Security Advisory Council.
http://stateofthedivision.blogspot.com/2009/06/barack-hack-obama-appoints-covergirl.html
A year ago this was concerning to progressives:
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/04/townsend-intelligence/
Since then, we had change.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:49 amConservativeForProgress Says:
On this day in 1864, …
Yes, the Republican party originally stood for good stuff.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:50 amNot the corporatist fascist party of today.
C4Pee, the Republican Party of the 1860s forward bears no resemblence to the racist wingnuttery that calls itself Republican today. Lincoln would be tagged “empathetic”, Teddy Roosevelt would be considered a tree hugger, hell, even Nixon would be considered an appeaser for talking with communist China.
But nice try.
PEACE
June 8th, 2009 at 9:50 amConservativeForProgress Says:
——————————————————————————–
On this day in 1864, the Chairman of the Republican National Committee, Senator Edwin Morgan inspired the delegates to made abolishing slavery part of the platform. And so, Republicans entered the 1864 presidential campaign determined to defeat the Democrats’ pro-slavery policies once and for all. The 13th Amendment was passed by congressional Republicans seven months later and ratified within the year.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:45 am
Those “Democrats” , that were known as “Dixiecrats” , eventually became members of the Republican party that we know today , tool………
June 8th, 2009 at 9:50 am14. ConservativeForProgress Says: This may be a sign of things to come in the US 2010 Republican Revolution.
I think you mean 2010 Republican Revulsion…
It’ll be like 2006 & 2008 deja vu all over again.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:50 amAh, yes, C4Pee, utterly bereft of anything more recent to use to bolster his own sense of self-worth as Republican, reaches back only 165 years.
Excellent work, Pee. Michael Steele surely has you on his radar.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:51 amConservativeForProgress Says:
On this day in 1864, [...] seven months later and ratified within the year.
__________
Gee…
***thoughtful pause…***
That was ONLY 145 years ago…
So… which members of the Republican Party that did that are still active in party politics today? And would Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh approve?
June 8th, 2009 at 9:51 amGiving each Alaskan a share of the money made from their natural resources is quite a bit differnt from
remunerating those Alaskans whose livelihood was permanently taken from them by the Exxon Valdez incident.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:52 amAfter years of court battling, the victims of that corporate greed/irresponsibility got virtual squat.
TRoHS! You missed a hell of a troll hunt this weekend. It was like TP stocked the compound with trolls incapable of flying above our knees.
How’s the shoot going?
June 8th, 2009 at 9:52 amOOPs. It’s a little early to do math, apparently. Pee only reached back 145 years as TRoHS correctly notes.
My apologies, Pee. 145 years is much less pathetic than 165 years.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:53 amThe Republic of Hymenoptera Stupidity Says:
ConservativeForProgress Says:
” through punitive taxation of the financially successful”.
While you’re at it, please qualify the use of the word “punitive” in that statement.
That would be nice. I don’t know of anyone wanting “punitive” taxes — just that everyone pays their fair share.
Remove the excessive “tax breaks”, eliminate the abused “tax shelters”, and definetley tax all monies sent into overseas accounts. For starters.
Not “punitive” — rather, “fair”.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:53 am24.ConservativeForProgress Says: And so, Republicans entered the 1864 presidential campaign determined to defeat the Democrats’ pro-slavery policies once and for all. The 13th Amendment was passed by congressional Republicans seven months later and ratified within the year.
And to celebrate, let’s toast the current black republican members of congress….
*crickets…chirping* (’cuz there are none…)
June 8th, 2009 at 9:55 amI’m sorry, but my history is a little fuzzy.
Which party did the “Dixie-crats” become?
And of those descendants, whom do they normally vote for?
Thanks.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:56 amC4Pee,
President Obama is much more like Lincoln than any Republic President since then.
How’s that working for you?…
June 8th, 2009 at 9:58 amDRxJapanese Beetle Says:
——————————————————————————–
I’m sorry, but my history is a little fuzzy.
Which party did the “Dixie-crats” become?
And of those descendants, whom do they normally vote for?
Thanks.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:56 am
The Republican party ……..
June 8th, 2009 at 9:58 am+
Complete assh0les
Do you suppose C4Pee posted his daily talking points about the Repubs in 1864 then realized what a complete and total idiot he made of himself and left?
Me neither.
PEACE
June 8th, 2009 at 9:59 amhe never realizes what a complete and total idiot he is
June 8th, 2009 at 10:00 amhanshiro the antlion Says:
But…. isn’t that Steele guy in charge of something or other? I mean, with Limbaugh’s approval, of course. And that Steele fellow, why he’s extremely interested in protecting the white males who might come before the SCOTUS…..
hmmmm………? …… ??
June 8th, 2009 at 10:00 am> This may be a sign of things to come in the
> US 2010 Republican Revolution.
Bwhahahah. Most “Right wing” europeans would fit in well to the left of the democratic party of this country…I think its hilarious you have to look to foreign shores to see any hope for your pathethic party of religious kooks and corporate wh@res…you guys love to oursource jobs and now you have to outsource your hope to “right wing” europeans..
June 8th, 2009 at 10:01 amgood luck with that, if you want some indicia of things to come, look at demographics..the 2012 youth vote is not getting any smaller and its not tending republican..
>And to celebrate, let’s toast the
>current black republican members
> of congress….
Here here,,a toast to Senator Ruckus (R) from the great state of Denial
June 8th, 2009 at 10:03 amPalin likes federal money that is “free”, no obligations – no responsibilities. I can handle that hypocrisy. Its typical of a state GOP official.
However, the sanctimonious “this weakens us” crap is too much. Hey Sarah, last time I checked the possibility of Bin Laden launching an ICBM attack was pretty slim. Probably the same odds of Bin Laden executing a naval / land invasion of the lower 48. In your eyes, all war is conventional war. You are such a putz!
June 8th, 2009 at 10:04 amPee is biologically determined to see taxes as “punitive”.
That’s how wingnuts frame everything in public life — as a moral choice between punishment and reward.
And they tend to favor punishment as a means of achieving their goals. They want to get Iran or North Korea to do their bidding? Their approach is to bomb the shit out of them.
They want to eliminate abortions? their approach is to “punish” women who get pregnant by forcing them to have children they may be ill-equipped to raise.
They want to combat the drug trade? Their response is to punish the small-time users by filling up our prisons with them, meanwhile raising the stakes for the traffickers, making the trade more lucrative and attracting the most dangerous characters to it.
They want to combat poverty? Their response is to cut social programs to “force” people to find menial minimum-wage jobs to feed and house their families. That’ll teach ‘em.
The only ones the want to reward are rich Republicans.
Go figure.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:05 amRUCeriousMaggot! Says:
Yes, the Republican party originally stood for good stuff.
Not the corporatist fascist party of today.
well… until the Democratic Party / Johnson actually DID something about Equal Rights… then the ’southern democrats’ turned tail and ran to the republican party…
history is complicated… even nuanced, at times…
June 8th, 2009 at 10:06 am>Giving each Alaskan a share of the money made
>from their
>natural resources is quite a bit differnt
So you wouldnt be against giving ALL americans a share of money made from their natural resources? That wouldnt be welfare, right? Only if it comes in the form of healthcare?
June 8th, 2009 at 10:07 amI wonder if us texans could get some of that neato “non-welfare” type money from our share of the natural resources..its kinda weird that the only texan getting money from the federal government to fix his house is the successionist governor..
June 8th, 2009 at 10:08 amTo spencers mom,
As much as I hated Nixon, his administration also initiated some environmental measures that were fairly advanced for their times–so advanced that Dumbya tried some 30 years later to reverse or do away with them. He also almost accurately predicted that same sex marriage would be an issue for around 2000.
You’re too kind to CfP, whose only recourse for praising the
G(ang)O(f)P(erverts) is to use a fact dating back 145 years ago. Pathetic.
spencers mom Says
June 8th, 2009 at 10:10 amC4Pee, the Republican Party of the 1860s forward bears no resemblence to the racist wingnuttery that calls itself Republican today. Lincoln would be tagged “empathetic”, Teddy Roosevelt would be considered a tree hugger, hell, even Nixon would be considered an appeaser for talking with communist China.
But nice try.
PEACE
CFP continues to display his ignorance
One wonders if his ignorance is a result of his fear of research or is his cowardice a result of his ignorance
June 8th, 2009 at 10:11 amHanshiro,
Thanks for my second laugh of the day. (The first has nothing to do with politics or this site.)
Hanshiro the antlion says:
June 8th, 2009 at 10:14 amAnd to celebrate, let’s toast the current black republican members of congress….
*crickets…chirping* (’cuz there are none…)
And this is an often-repeated obfuscation.
The “Dixiecrats” referred to were not restricted to politicians, as you’d like to do. It essentially refers to the voting populace.
In order to claim that the vast majority of Dixiecrats remained in the Democratic Party, you would have to either
a) claim they all moved to the Northeast or the Pacific Coast
or
b) claim that the Republicans don’t OWN the South.
Truth is, Pee, the Dixiecrats were CONSERVATIVE Democrats. Always were. Once LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, they all started abandoning the Democratic Party, a shift that Nixon strategist Kevin Phillips made great use of in 1968 and 1972.
Incidentally, there used to be liberal Republicans, too, back then.
Those days are over.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:17 amcfpee, is now a music critic. Wow! you really are talented. I’m sure RantingTommy is really impressed…NOT.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:27 amlol, CFP must have been offended because he thought the song was about him
park that SUV and learn how to drive, you silly redneck
June 8th, 2009 at 10:28 amConservativeForProgress Says:
——————————————————————————–
June 8th, 2009 at 10:07 am
You’re going to claim Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond were always stupid Republicans , ConservativeExceptInMen’sRooms ?
June 8th, 2009 at 10:28 amit’s ok angel, if my song offends people like CFP, I must be doing it right
it’s kind of like a country “musician” complaining about the 9th Symphony having too many notes
June 8th, 2009 at 10:29 amjust like when CFP posts his nonsense here, we get to point and laugh at him
June 8th, 2009 at 10:30 amWell CFPee, you really know your racists, seeing as you are one. I hope your party like’s being only a southeren states party. Have fun.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:32 amhey CFP, just checked the album sales for last week
sold 106 copies of the album with You Drive Too Slow on it
how many copies did your latest album sell?
June 8th, 2009 at 10:32 amConservativeForProgress Says:
——————————————————————————–
We are all music critics, angels. When he posts his music site as his link, he volunteers himself for such criticism.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:29 am
And what exactly is it that you “play” ?
The lottery ? The radio ?
June 8th, 2009 at 10:32 ambtw, that album is called “Seriously”
it’s a bit of snark that is obviously over the head of small thinkers like CFP
June 8th, 2009 at 10:33 amCFPee, but you have no talent for it. You know, tin ear, tin head.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:33 amhe’s a right winger, the radio plays him
June 8th, 2009 at 10:33 amIf you had any intellectual integrity you would recognize that the Civil Rights Bill of 1964 was opposed by CONSERVATIVES, many of whom were Democrats, and supported by LIBERALS, many of whom at that time (until Reagan began the successful campaign to demonize them and Newtie finished it off).
The Civl Rights struggle was a defining moment in American politics, and it split the parties even further down ideological lines — liberals to the Democrats and conservatives to the Republicans.
You’re certainly welcome to celebrate the historical stands taken by your party’s once-liberal wing. Just be sure you know what point you’re making.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:34 amnotice how CFP skips right over the jazz link (the ACTUAL link to my main music) and cherry picks a song I did as a novelty
typical of his dishonest style
and STILL the song went over his head
June 8th, 2009 at 10:35 amON Pee’s advice (when Pee states an opinion, one can reliably assume it’s wrong) I checked out Tommy’s site. I didn’t hear the track that Pee disparaged (and so, in a right-thinking world, praised) but I checked out some other stuff. Really good work, Tommy. Congrats.
Thank Pee for creating another fan for ya.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:39 amMuch like Pee skips right over the arguments we post refuting his lame talking points and cherry picks his next lame talking point.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:40 amthanks ralph
if people like CFP start liking my music, I’ll have to change it
of course, I don’t play country & western, so it may never happen
June 8th, 2009 at 10:41 amApparently Palin cribbed much of her speech from an old one by Newt.
.
ConservativeForProgress Says:
Giving each Alaskan a share of the money made from their natural resources is quite a bit differnt from “redistributing the wealth” through punitive taxation of the financially successful.
Conservatives hate it just about as much, and in many economists eyes it’s the same thing.
What do you think is the one real, substantive reason y’all hate Hugo Chavez so much? Because he claimed the oil and gas reserves instead of letting Exxon having it all, and socialized the profits from those natural resources. In short, he took them from being an exploited imperial subjugated state to working like Alaska does.
In nearly every place where there are lots of natural resources, the “free market” method is to allow corporations to just take the resources away and make as much profit on them as they want; although the state might make a fee or tax revenue, it does not have ownership of the contents of its own land. In the capitalist mindset, this is the only right and just approach to it. To assume that the state owns its own resources is a socialist tenet: “control of the means of production.”
Resources = profit. Profit to the people is exactly what you’re against.
.
ConservativeForProgress Says:
I just listened to the worst song I have ever heard in my life.
Since you’ve led us to respect your opinions so much, I’m sure your word as a music critic will carry just as much weight…
June 8th, 2009 at 10:41 amConservativeForProgress Says:
——————————————————————————–
If they played that song at Gitmo, it would be considered torture.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:39 am
If you were allowed to speak there , everyone would be in absolute agony …….
June 8th, 2009 at 10:42 amralph the wonder locust Says:
TRoHS! You missed a hell of a troll hunt this weekend. It was like TP stocked the compound with trolls incapable of flying above our knees.
How’s the shoot going?
_____________
I peeked in a couple of times, ralphie… pretty impressive.
Ever hear of “The Marianas Turkey Shoot” from WW II?
Shoot’s going well. We’re in Day 5 now (of the actual shooting…).
June 8th, 2009 at 10:43 amwow, I guess I should thank CFP for getting more people to hear my music, in his attempt to put it down
just another right wing plan that backfired
June 8th, 2009 at 10:44 amCFPee, you know you really are a pig. You come on a political site and attack a poster for the music he makes and his talent. What the f**k have you ever done? I wish I had the mans talent, but a sorry peice of sh*t like you would never understand what its like to be a person with talent.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:46 amIf CFP would stay out of the left lane, he wouldn’t have so many people behind him singing “You Drive Too Slow”
he thinks “Slower Traffic Keep Right” is a political instruction, so, being slower traffic, he veers to the right politically
why are right wingers so slow?
June 8th, 2009 at 10:46 amralph the wonder locust Says:
You’re certainly welcome to celebrate the historical stands taken by your party’s once-liberal wing. Just be sure you know what point you’re making.
____________
One could also ask him what DID happen to the GOOP… how did they ever morph into a bunch of clown like Mike Steele, Newt Gingrich, Twitterin’ Chucky Grassly, and perhaps the biggest… no, literally the BIGGEST of ‘em all… Rush Limbaugh.
What does the party of Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt have in common w THAT pathetic mob?
June 8th, 2009 at 10:48 amCFP must have left to finish writing his latest symphony
June 8th, 2009 at 10:50 amRepublicans entered the 1864 presidential campaign determined to defeat the Democrats’
And thus began a the party of hypocrisy.
Anything to win an election.
Going against your “core” principals for solely partisan reasons.
Yea, we know your party better than you do, dum-bass.
June 8th, 2009 at 10:57 amLater all!!!
Love to stick around and play Whack-A-Troll™ w/ ya, but got to get to work…
June 8th, 2009 at 10:58 amjust another right wing plan that backfired
No! According the conprog, the right-wing is full of blacks, cuz everybody knows the regressives FREED the slaves, therefore their party is supported by a majority of them.
R I G H T . . .
June 8th, 2009 at 11:00 amCommentary: World’s biggest fish are dying
By Ted Danson
(CNN) — Today, Monday, June 8, we recognize the first U.N.-sanctioned World Oceans Day. The event comes after years of pressure from conservation groups and thousands of activists who clamored for everyone to know and understand what’s happening in our oceans.
I became an ocean activist in 1987. It was the fifth year of “Cheers” and my family moved into a neighborhood that was on the water, in Santa Monica, California. One day I took my daughters to the beach to go swimming, but it was “closed” and I couldn’t answer my daughter’s question why.
That’s really how it started. That and “Cheers” was paying me a lot of money and I felt I had better be responsible with it. So, I started to get involved.
It turned out in our new neighborhood there was a fight to keep Occidental Petroleum from drilling 60 oil wells on Will Rogers State Beach in Los Angeles. They wanted to slant drill into the Santa Monica Bay. The fight was led by a man named Robert Sulnick and we became great friends and found a way to beat them.
LINK
June 8th, 2009 at 11:19 amI think if more people read the first few pages of the book Aquariums of Pyongyang: Ten Years in the North Korean Gulag that we would see a prompt end to the trouble in North Korea. How we can sit idly by and let these people continue to suffer is beyond me!
June 8th, 2009 at 11:52 amFrom an AP article:
The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a challenge to the Pentagon policy forbidding gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military, granting a request by the Obama administration.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:36 pmangels81 Says:
This coming from the women who says she can see Russia from her kitchen window.
June 8th, 2009 at 9:07 am
Just to set the record straight, I don’t think Palin ever phrased it that way. I think that was how SNL Tina Fey phrased it. Palin said something about how from some parts of Alaska one can see Russia. But that is only true of the two isolated Diomede islands in the middle of the Bering Strait, far from mainland Alaska.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diomede_Islands
June 8th, 2009 at 12:43 pmHey, you guys gotta read this article on the Iranian election. Interesting stuff going on there.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:51 pmActually, the real “show of weakness” is the outward expression of fear being issued by Alaska’s state Executive office. We may live in “perilous times” but let’s be realistic about for whom these times are perilous. Not included in those persons are citizens of a country whose government spends more on defense than all other nations combined.
Alaskan upper lips should be quivering only because of the cold weather. Perhaps those of its leaders also have just cause for lack of a substantive policy for their constituents in lieu of abject fearmongering.
June 8th, 2009 at 2:00 pmRahm Emanuel had dinner with Carlyle Group co-founder David Rubenstein last week. Did Rahm share President Obama’s penchant for private equity underwriters? Or did they talk about the good ole days, before Carlyle purchased LifeCare Hospitals from Rahm’s old client, GTCR Golder Rauner?
http://peureport.blogspot.com/2009/06/rahm-rubenstein-break-bread.html
http://stateofthedivision.blogspot.com/2008/12/political-links-to-hurricane-katrinas.html
June 8th, 2009 at 3:26 pmAlaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) “admonished the Obama administration on Saturday for proposing cuts to Alaska’s missile defense network….
But wasn’t the missle defense network spurred on by the Cold War with Russia (and Russia since collapsed) ?
Not to mention, look at how unprotected the North Dakota border is from Canadian missle attacks.
Admittedly there are countries working on having better missles. The question is, is the Alaskan defense shield the best defense for the current situation !
June 8th, 2009 at 4:55 pmAnd let us not forget that the current Alaskan missle shield isn’t so much there to protect Alaska.
Instead, it is there to intercept missles aimed at the more populated targets in the lower 48.
June 8th, 2009 at 4:56 pm