Obama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
Obama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
During an interview with President Obama that aired on CNBC yesterday, chief Washington correspondent John Harwood said, “When you and I spoke in January, you said — I observed that you hadn’t gotten much bad press. You said it’s coming.” Harwood added that since then, Obama still hasn’t received much critical press and wondered if his administration isn’t being “sufficiently held accountable.” Obama, however, disagreed:
OBAMA: It’s very hard for me to swallow that one. First of all, I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration. I mean, you know, that’s a pretty…
HARWOOD: I assume you’re talking about Fox.
OBAMA: Well, that’s a pretty big megaphone. And you’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.
Watch it:
Seeming to undermine the premise of his question, Harwood said after the interview that Obama has “gotten slapped around pretty good on our network for a while” too.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
OBAMA: It’s very hard for me to swallow that one. First of all, I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration. I mean, you know, that’s a pretty…
HARWOOD: I assume you’re talking about Fox.
OBAMA: Well, that’s a pretty big megaphone. And you’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.
Talk about stating the obvious……….
June 17th, 2009 at 9:52 amHARWOOD: I assume you’re talking about Fox.
No, you dumbass, stupid, ass-wiping shitheel, I am talking about WFUK, in East Jesus, PA. Drives me crazy.
June 17th, 2009 at 9:57 amMore useless slop from “correspondents” too ignorant or cowed to recognize the absurdity of their own fookin statements.
June 17th, 2009 at 9:58 amGee, what a surprise – one channel is a mouth piece for the bigots and wignuts and the other is a platform for greedy, money-grabbing, free-market apologists. More money, more greed, more hate would be a more apt motto. Fair and Balanced my ass.
June 17th, 2009 at 9:59 amI’d pay good money to see Obama swat Bill-O and Hannity like the recently deceased fly…
June 17th, 2009 at 10:01 amHARWOOD: I assume you’re talking about Fox.
That is pronounced “Faux”.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:02 amHarwood added that since then, Obama still hasn’t received much critical press and wondered if his administration isn’t being “sufficiently held accountable.”
That was a bullshyte question! Harwood feigning like he doesn’t know how much Fox slams Obama is ridiculous. Obama is getting criticism daily from Fox and almost everyone else.
It’s like Obama is not doing enough. Obama’s doing too much. Obama’s not moving fast enough. Obama uses a teleprompter. Obama this and Obama that! Good GD Grief!
June 17th, 2009 at 10:03 amCongratulations for twisting yourself up in knots Harwood, you blithering sycophantic moron.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:03 amThere was a study done that showed that the positive things that were said about the President, by “news” station. CBS, NBC, and ABC were in the upper fifties to lower sixties respectively, but FOX was somewhere around 13%. That means they are saying 87% negative things about him – and that he’s absolutely right about this.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:04 amThis will keep the bloviators going for awhile. There’s nothing like some push-back from their target to get them excited.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:06 amIt can’t be Fox NEWS…THEY ADVERTISE TO BE “FAIR AND BALANCED”. Sarcasm is intended!
June 17th, 2009 at 10:09 amSpeaking of our corrupt media, I wish the press had covered the 2000 stolen election in the U.S. and the subsequent Iraq “War” as well and as objectively as they have been covering the Iranian election and protests now… More Americans might have been educted on what was going on in our own stolen government if they had.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:10 amThis will give FAUX something to concentrate on instead of their whoremongering hypocrited senator who was outed sleeping with his best friend’s wife while the senator is trying to pass family and marriage restraints on others. Yes, FAUX wouldn’t want to talk about that one any more than they want to talk about the christian taliban terrorists on the right wing.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:10 amCue Fox News to do a token “nice” story about President Obama — which they will then use (in endless clips) to show how “fair and balanced” they are.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:11 amUm…does Harwood ever actually watch the news? Anybody who thinks President Obama hasn’t gotten much critical press hasn’t been paying attention.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:14 amPlease. Even the liberal websites are nailing him to the cross on DADT and the secrecy issues. (Which is a good thing.) I concur : dumb@$$ question.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:15 amWell, coming from an entity that has as it’s core leader, OxyBreath, who wishes that PRESIDENT Obama and the country fail, does it really come as a surprise, Mr. Harwood?
June 17th, 2009 at 10:16 amAside from Fox giving George Bush 100% favorable coverage for 8+ years (they were cheerleaders of his campaign as well), I wonder what the coverage of CBS, NBC and ABC was of Bush?
#9 Unbelievable reports that around 60% of coverage on network TV is favored to Obama — but I seriously suspect that favorable coverage of Bush in his first term approached the 80% mark.
Between the networks and Fox, that would average out to pretty high percentages of favorability in reporting the news for GWB — the media shares a great deal of blame for the condition we find ourselves in today.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:16 amAdj. 1. fauxfaux – not genuine or real; being an imitation of the genuine article; “it isn’t fake anything; it’s real synthetic fur”; “faux pearls”; “false teeth”; “decorated with imitation palm leaves”; “a purse of simulated alligator hide”; Fox (pronounced “Faux” ) News
June 17th, 2009 at 10:17 am“I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.”
__________________________________________________________
I think you’re understating, Mr. President. It’s not just one television station — it’s an entire cable network.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:23 amObama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
– - Sounds like whining, Mr. President. Stop it now. Move on….
June 17th, 2009 at 10:24 amSpeaking of our corrupt media, I wish the press had covered the 2000 stolen election in the U.S. and the subsequent Iraq “War” as well and as objectively as they have been covering the Iranian election and protests now..
If USers had risen to protest the installation of the Chimp, either by the Brooks-Brothers riot in Miami, or by the phucking Supremes, and taken to the streets in our MILLIONS, we might have gotten some coverage, while the police were mugging us for our temerity.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:25 amMaureen Dowd had a column in today’s NYTimes, taking Obama to task because he occasionally goes into “greasy spoons” and has a French fry! So even his eating choices are fair game.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:26 amI say, let Obama bring back the Fairness Doctrine. It might put a lid on Faux News and Limbaugh. And give him a break. He can occasionally dine at Five Guys.
Obama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
While I realize he is speaking of Fuax News, he may as well drop MSNBC in there. Especially the Morning Joe show and Mika.
I don’t ever want to hear them say another word about Obama and the teleprompter again since she had so much trouble reading hers this morning.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:28 amWith all that’s going on right now, this is what he chooses to ask the POTUS? “Maybe people love you too much…” That is about as worthless as a line of questioning gets.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:30 amBadmoodman Says:
Obama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
- – Sounds like whining, Mr. President. Stop it now. Move on….
He wasn’t “whining”, he was correcting Harwood’s false premise. He could have said much worse, but President Obama is bigger than Fox News Channel (as are most of us).
June 17th, 2009 at 10:31 amPennsylvanianne Says:
Maureen Dowd had a column in today’s NYTimes, taking Obama to task because he occasionally goes into “greasy spoons” and has a French fry! So even his eating choices are fair game.
Speaking of greasy spoons, Dowd should get an f’n life. She thinks her & her ramblings are ‘cute’. I think it’s fluff journalism at best. Maureen, you’re not 20 something anymore. Get over it & get on with it.
Maureen Dowd: Gossipist turned faux journalist.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:33 amAnd he has 120 other stations kissing his ass 24 hours a day. Now ABC has set up shop two doors down from his office. So please stop the whinning about 1 station!
June 17th, 2009 at 10:35 amGiving Harwood the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he was wise enough to recognize that (1) Fox isn’t really a news network and (2) that CNBC’s ratings are pathetic this setting up the existential question “if a cable show slams the president and the only people watching are greedy traders does it really matter?”
By the way kasinca, any truth to the rumor that Sen. Ensign is now sponsoring a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between a man and two women?
June 17th, 2009 at 10:35 amWhaaaambulace!
June 17th, 2009 at 10:36 amThe President is right, it is bash Obama all day every day.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:40 amThey are a pulpit for the far right, not a news channel.
Whaaaambulace!
Chuckle, teehee, guffaw.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:43 amfrances Says
June 17th, 2009 at 10:35 am
And he has 120 other stations kissing his ass 24 hours a day. Now ABC has set up shop two doors down from his office. So please stop the whinning about 1 station!
____________________________________________________________
In the first place, Fox News isn’t a “station”, no matter what the President called it. But since both you and President Obama want to call it a “station”, I assume that the “120 other stations” you mention are actually 120 other networks with a reach comparable to that of Fox News.
Would you care to provide both A) a list of these 120 “stations”, and B) some credible evidence that they’re “kissing his ass 24 hours a day”?
And as far as ABC setting up shop two doors down from the White House — that doesn’t translate to butt-kissing of any kind. It does translate to ABC’s desire to provide White House coverage, which can be either positive or negative.
Oh, and it’s “whining”, not “whinning” — and President Obama was doing neither. He was merely rebutting an incorrect point his interviewer brought up.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:44 amfrances Says:
And he has 120 other stations kissing his ass 24 hours a day. Now ABC has set up shop two doors down from his office. So please stop the whinning about 1 station!
You need to call Whine One One immediately!
June 17th, 2009 at 10:44 amAnd he has 120 other stations kissing his ass 24 hours a day.
It’s true! In the “alternate reality” Republicans proudly inhabit, Cartoon Network, VH1 and the Bass Fishing Channel are all mouthpieces for the Obama administration.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:46 amCan’t wait for Bill, Sean and Glenn to get ahold of this!
June 17th, 2009 at 10:50 amThe myth about the MSM being enamored with President Obama is just that, a myth. If that was the case, the TV talking head programs wouldn’t have right wingers on daily trashing Obama and his administration. Even MSNBC does it through Morning Joe and it’s so-called news programs.
I loved it that the guy contradicted himself in the end.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:53 amAmerican Patriot:
Did you feel like a pawn when you served?
Not that anyone as dumb as you and your sister francis (the talking jackass) could tell since you both are pawns to your right wing leaders desires to phuck over the USA.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:54 amQuestion: Why do FOX Network and Rupert Murdoch (Zionist-Israel) demonize President Obama 24/7 while they treated George W. Bush as the Son of God?
Hint: The day that George W. Bush walked into the White House is the same day that Israel began its eight year campaign of terror against Palestinians. The day that George W. Bush left the White House is the very same day that Israel stopped its massacre of civilians in Gaza.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:58 amBadmoodman Says:
Obama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
- – Sounds like whining, Mr. President. Stop it now. Move on….
So what would you have had him do? Do you think that he should have agreed with the guy? He was calling BS when he saw it.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:58 amWatchdog has a flea infestation in her head. It came from the crap she got in her ears listening to faux news.
June 17th, 2009 at 10:59 amwatchdog Says:
What an irresponsible prospect. How dare a news organization criticize the chosen one. Hopefully they will come around to popular sentiment and learn how to repeat white house talking points.
Then perhaps you can explain why Fox reported 100% positive on ex President Bush. And it isn’t just a matter of criticizing President Obama, they lie about him on a daily basis. Progressives criticize President Obama when it is justified, unlike you Borg Republics who never once criticized Bush even though he was in the process of destroying this country.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:01 am“He said our name, he said our name!!!!”
June 17th, 2009 at 11:02 amWait, I thought you reich wing nuts thought it was treasonous to criticize a president during war time.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:04 amAnd, when the interview was reviewed by Maria Bartiroma after the interview, she accused Obama of not making himself available to the media as he claimed because he would not come on “The Closing Bell” with her. Since she is ssssoooo
June 17th, 2009 at 11:06 amimportant. It was not humor, though it should have been.
American Patriot Says:
Can’t wait for Bill, Sean and Glenn to get ahold of this!
Don’t get too excited there Pee, or you will have to change your panties again.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:06 amIf Ms. watchdog had any concept of math she would show just 1 faux report criticizing Bush to disprove the 100% positive reporting statement, but she can’t even produce 1 negative thing faux ever said about Bush.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:12 amoh hey…
isn’t that network thats devoted to attacking this administration the same that was devoted to defending the last one.
how fair
and balanced
what a joke
June 17th, 2009 at 11:15 amDoesn’t matter. You guys set the ground rules that it’s treasonous to criticize a President during wartime.
We’re still at war.
Obama is President.
Ergo, you are not allowed to criticize President Obama or else you’re a traitor.
Sorry. Your rules.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:19 amNo, no — not a joke at all.
See, they balance the positive coverage of the previous president with negative coverage of this one.
Perfectly “balanced”, right?
June 17th, 2009 at 11:21 amMany of us voted AGAINST the McCain/Palin ticket.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:23 amI thought Obama was supposed to end the war? Isn’t that why you voted for him? What happened there?
Doesn’t matter.
by ralphy
Party before country.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:23 amHere’s 100% positive reporting on Bush.
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/search?q=George+W+Bush
Now show 1 negative report.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:24 amCome on AP, answer my question…
Did you feel like a pawn when you served?
You are a chicken hawk.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:25 am“Party before country.”
Now that’s funny coming from a dittohead who would vote for the two dumbest people ever to share a ticket.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:27 amPachydiplax de St. Augustine Says:
Socky, your link proves nothing.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:28 amCould you guys please leave the trolls alone?
June 17th, 2009 at 11:28 amI had an unpatriotic dog that used to chase its tail all the time, liked to lick himself too, it kind of aroused me and made me jealous, so I put one of those funnel cones on its head and then my TV reception improved so now I can get Jerry Springer.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:29 amAP, your posts here prove you are a scared chicken hawk punk who can’t think for yourself.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:30 amAttack before comprehension.
Nice work, Pee.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:34 amSounds like a call for a Flag n Freeze to me.
I’m in.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:36 amFox Criticizes Bush’s Research Decision. August 10.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:36 amSorry watch puppy, that is a story about the results of a poll of how Americans felt. Show me a story where your beloved O’Lielly, Insanitty, or other mouth pieces thought Bush was wrong. You can’t because they ALWAYS spin their stories to show that Bush was right.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:36 amMike Huckabee Criticizes Bush Administration for ‘Bunker Mentality’ on Iraq,
“Fox News anchor slams Bush’s SCHIP double standard.” Buckie Boy Says: … “Criticism of Bush is not all that rare on Fox.”
June 17th, 2009 at 11:37 amAre you implementing Operation FnF? I’ll agree.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:38 amAre you implementing Operation FnF? I’ll agree.
Translation: you’ve had your ass handed to you, again!
June 17th, 2009 at 11:39 amI thought we had an agreement that we would only swat the trolls but not address them directly? Did I miss the latest memo?
June 17th, 2009 at 11:42 am2 stories out of 66264 is about 3/1000th (.003) percent.
Show me at least 663 negative stories to drop the percentage to 99%.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:45 amPachydiplax de St. Augustine Says:
Now show 1 negative report.
———————–
Pachydiplax de St. Augustine Says:
Show me at least 663 negative stories to drop the percentage to 99%.
——————
Backpedal much?
June 17th, 2009 at 11:47 amAre you implementing Operation FnF? I’ll agree.
Yes, I am. Apparently that’s the only way I’m gonna get to post on a regular basis until school starts again.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:48 amBuckie Boy Says: … “Criticism of Bush is not all that rare on Fox.”
June 17th, 2009 at 11:49 amIgnoranceIsNotBliss Says:
Obama: ‘I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration.’
While I realize he is speaking of Fuax News, he may as well drop MSNBC in there. Especially the Morning Joe show and Mika.
I don’t ever want to hear them say another word about Obama and the teleprompter again since she had so much trouble reading hers this morning.
I flipped over for two seconds this morning just to hear Mika stuttering and flubbing it and I shut her off.
This teleprompter thing is SO ridiculous. They either cannot think down the road for even a few years, OR they apparently don’t think that they will ever regain the White House. Because if they ever were to get the W/H back will that person will never be able to use a teleprompter? So dumb.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:49 amTranslation: you’ve had your ass handed to you, again!
Hilarious, coming from the guy who got punked by Reza, and the corpulent Lord Sidious. You do know you’re a punchline around here, right?
June 17th, 2009 at 11:50 amIt’s kind of a loose agreement. Sometimes that’s the best policy. An outright FnF is the way to go when they’re really just wanking, but sometimes they really need to be smacked down directly.
It’s a judgment call.
Of course, one benefit to calling an FnF is that they try to convince themselves that they’ve “won” in some way and their little pathetic “victory dance” is really funny to watch.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:51 am“Whoever has the best facts on the table wins with the audience,” says Michael Clemente, senior vice president for editorial at Fox.
Fox is the second highest-rated cable network in prime time after USA Channel and the highest rated cable news network overall, beating all of its rivals combined. Not unsurprisingly, Fox’s news executives see the ratings as confirmation of the credibility and believability of its news team, as fronted by Smith.
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09168/977789-51.stm#ixzz0Ihg37LPz&C
June 17th, 2009 at 11:56 amHopefully they will come around to popular sentiment and learn how to repeat white house talking points.
–watchdog
Oh, I see, you mean like this?:
Skeptics counter that there is much evidence to refute Mr. Snow and that Fox, a favorite of conservatives, has long had a unique status in the Bush White House.
When Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot a hunting companion and set off an uproar in February, he gave one television interview, to Brit Hume of Fox. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has given very few television interviews lately, but he gave one last week, to Bill O’Reilly of Fox. (This week he is to talk to Larry King on CNN.)
Televisions in the West Wing are regularly tuned to Fox. Televisions on Mr. Cheney’s plane and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s plane are tuned to Fox. Televisions in Mr. Cheney’s hotel rooms must be tuned to Fox before his arrival. Until last month, the television in the press cabin of Air Force One was tuned to Fox.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/washington/22letter.html
June 17th, 2009 at 12:03 pmwatchdog sez: 04/20/06 FOX Poll: Gloomy Economic Views; Bush Approval at New Low
Oh, boo frikkin hoo! What was it, 80%? Check out the link below: 20 out of 28 Rethug commentators, strategists, blowhards graded Obama’s First 100 Days a C or below with 9 giving him “Fs” and the “community”, which I take to mean the deranged Faux viewers, almost to the man, gave him “Fs”. I hardly call that favorable.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/report-card.html
June 17th, 2009 at 12:04 pmApparently, some observers of questionable judgment figure that it counts as “balance” when Faux News doesn’t outright lie about poll results.
After all, they have that right, to lie. They went to court to prove it.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:06 pmcovered_10 Says:
sock alert
June 17th, 2009 at 12:07 pmralph the wonder locust Says:
Chirp!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:08 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
Can’t wait for Bill, Sean and Glenn to get ahold of this!
Me too, archie/habib! Those three idiots will surely show the world the proper way to whine!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:08 pmFox News wants simultaneously to be the national leader in news coverage and not part of the mainstream media. Fox News is the only network which allows its ideology to influence every story to the extent that they really never do straight news coverage at all.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:08 pmbarfly Says:
Lie much?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:09 pmFox News is the only network which allows its ideology to influence every story to the extent that they really never do straight news coverage at all.
Coming from an olbyloon that’s rich!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:10 pmSmith1 Says:
sock alert
June 17th, 2009 at 12:11 pmObama says: “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration”
He forgot to add: But I’ve also got this lardass with a radio program that thinks he speaks for the free world… he really gives us a good laugh in the oval office, I mean really, who listens to this guy? I thought radio was 20th century. Excuse me I have to get my Blackberry.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:11 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
Hey Marc:
How’s the weather in California?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:12 pmFox “news” LIES and SUED for the RIGHT to LIE.
Rinse…repeat over and over.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:13 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
LOL! You’re funny os/archie/habib. Going around calling others “sock” when your latest sock is about your 900th on this site alone.
And I see you’re getting your ass kicked and handed to you, yet again!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:13 pmHey AP! Did you see your favorite man-crush Olbermann last night? Wasn’t he AWESOME?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:14 pmPachydiplax de St. Augustine Says:
Now show 1 negative report.
———————–
Pachydiplax de St. Augustine Says:
Show me at least 663 negative stories to drop the percentage to 99%.
——————
Backpedal much?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:15 pmAP,
STFU you are pathetic and a waste of time.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:16 pmRandomChaos Says:
sock alert
June 17th, 2009 at 12:17 pmHow would you know if we were at war? This site completely stopped reporting on the war after the election. Why is that? I know this site is made up of very compassionate and caring people. Do you think its political or just an over site?
Iranian soccer games are much more important.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:18 pmMaybe our pathetic trolls will learn something trying to prove faux is not a right wing propaganda tool, but I doubt it.
The slime troll American Patriot still hasn’t answered whether it felt like a pawn when it served. It’s a chicken hawk.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:18 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
Sock Alert!
WTF?
Yet again, pathetic waste of time.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:19 pmPachydiplax de St. Augustine Says:
Hey! It’s the backpedaler!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:20 pmTime for Obama to use Cheney’s hit squad on Fox propagandists.
Fcuk the Republic Fascist Party
June 17th, 2009 at 12:22 pmTp is an over site, meaning it is a website that is far and away over and above any right wing web site. I guess the misuse of the terminology comes from never having seen oversight under Bush/Cheney.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:23 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
Proud Says:
Pathetic Sock Alerts!
Shockeeeeeeer
pffffft
June 17th, 2009 at 12:24 pmBuckie Boy Says: … “Criticism of Bush is not all that rare on Fox.”
heheh
June 17th, 2009 at 12:24 pmFox is just red meat for conservatives. What makes it so insidious is its persistence in broadcasting under the “fair and balanced” mantle. Even my conservative relatives will admit that.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:24 pmFnF AP. It’s just grasping at straws now. I’m sort of finding it amusing now :)
June 17th, 2009 at 12:25 pmHow would I know we’re at war? Are you serial?
Um.. this may come as a shock to you, but most of us on the left get our news and information from multiple sources. I don’t rely on TP alone to stay informed. In fact, I mostly rely on it to provide entertainment in the form of uninformed trolls like yourself.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:28 pmAmerican Patriot is neither American or a patriot.
Fcuk off loser.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:30 pmkdgamergirl Says:
FnF AP. It’s just grasping at straws now. I’m sort of finding it amusing now :)
It’s as though he keeps hoping that the next straw will be longer! But nope, they keep coming up short.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:31 pmwell, in fairness to Pee, he doesn’t let the straws go to waste.
He uses ‘em to build his straw man arguments.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:37 pmProud Says:
Easy on the bold button, just makes you look silly.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Yeah! Proud never uses the bold button, and looks silly all the time.
No need to gild that lily, eh Proud?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:38 pmA glimpse into the mind of the average Republican:
72. Buckie Boy Says: … “Criticism of Bush is not all that rare on Fox.”
June 17th, 2009 at 12:39 pm81. Buckie Boy Says: … “Criticism of Bush is not all that rare on Fox.”
104. Rinse…repeat over and over.
120. Buckie Boy Says: … “Criticism of Bush is not all that rare on Fox.”
American Patriot Says:
I thought Obama was supposed to end the war? Isn’t that why you voted for him? What happened there?
Doesn’t matter.
by ralphy
Party before country.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:41 pmChyron HR Says
sock alert
June 17th, 2009 at 12:41 pmA glimpse into the mind of the average Pathetic SockPuppet Projectionist:
There, fixed it for you Chyron;-)
June 17th, 2009 at 12:42 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
Whaaaambulace!
Get raped and killed, tool.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:45 pmIsn’t it sad when a poor, attention-starved creature pushes folks away with its desperation, and then is reduced to repeating the behaviors that led everyone to shun it in the first place?
Just pathetic.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:47 pmDo I see some idiot trying to make us believe that Fox News Channel’s ratings reflect the quality of its news coverage? Does that moron not know that the reason Fox News Channel has more viewers is because it’s free to cable providers, so customers like us do not have to pay extra for it (like we do for CNN or MSNBC, in many places in the country)? Is this fool so ignorant that he believes making the “Fox News has more viewers” argument will persuade knowledgeable people with IQs in the three-digit range?
How wrong can one person be?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:49 pmProud Says:
You are all correct, no negative coverage of the “Messiah Barack” can or should be tolerated.
Since we are fighting two wars, you MUST support Obama. STFU and stand in line, treasonous twat!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:50 pmThe Republican Strategy:
1) Type “sock alert” a thousand times a day.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:50 pm2) ??????
3) Win elections!
reduced to repeating the behaviors that led everyone to shun it in the first place?
Like handing you your ass? LOL!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:50 pmThe trolls are so stupid that they confuse the ratings for “American Idol” House” etc. in primetime as legitimacy for Fox News. Here’s a flash, 20th Century Fox was around a long time before Faux News. Yes they know how to do entertainment. It’s news they have a problem with. Only those too stupid to know lies when they hear them would listen to that drivel.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:51 pm… and Prod demonstrates the dysfunctional analytical process so typical of the right-wing mind…
Sadly, it’s that flawed analytical ability that has led the G-NO-P right into the wilderness in which it now finds itself. Let’s hope it can read a GPS as well as it can analyze foreign policy or the economy.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:52 pmFox News Channel has more viewers is because it’s free to cable providers
Is that why I have to pay extra for it?
June 17th, 2009 at 12:53 pmWow this is amusing. Here I thought my break before grad school would be boring! AP is loosing it!
June 17th, 2009 at 12:53 pmBesides Wayne the actual amount of viewers for any program are not that easy to access and many times you have to go by what the PR department of any corporation tells you. Unless you are a media buyer for an ad agency that pays for those subscriptions you can’t get proof of anything.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:54 pmStupid bible thumping trolls don’t think everybody believes in the concept of a “messiah”. It ought to be illegal to own a computer when you’re that stupid.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:55 pmOMG, the trolls are so stupid they would pay extra for Faux News. Everybody knows it’s available with basic cable everywhere but dumba$$ pays extra. He probably has a pay toilet in his double wide.
June 17th, 2009 at 12:58 pmProd’s not doing too well, either, if you’ve noticed…
June 17th, 2009 at 1:00 pmArn Gunnutes, I believe what got Bush and Cheney so despised by the American public was that they only watched the sycophants at Fox lying to them and ignored the feelings of the thinking people of the country.
June 17th, 2009 at 1:02 pmOh there’s always some stupid troll hanging around if you need something to laugh at. :=)
June 17th, 2009 at 1:03 pmSOCK ALERT, SOCK ALERT, BAWK, BAWK, BAWK ….
/troll
June 17th, 2009 at 1:04 pmIs that why I have to pay extra for it?
– Why have tv at all?
June 17th, 2009 at 1:12 pmBecause the ethernet is liberally-biased, silly.
June 17th, 2009 at 1:18 pmHey Barack, you’ve got one political party that is entirely devoted to attacking your administration.
June 17th, 2009 at 1:22 pmAmerican Patriot Says:
Whaaaambulace!
Considering you wingnuts call for the Whaaaambulance at the slightest offence when it comes to the “liberal media,” I’m surprised you have the gall to even say that…
June 17th, 2009 at 1:31 pmAmerican Cheese Says:
Fox News Channel has more viewers is because it’s free to cable providers
Is that why I have to pay extra for it?
No, that’s because you’re a chump.
June 17th, 2009 at 2:57 pmRead ALTERNET today!!!!
This is of great and pressing importance. It is one thing which is missing in TP since ObaOba took office…
Shame: The ‘Anti-War’ Democrats Who Sold Out
ALTERNET
June 17th, 2009 at 4:33 pmSeriously. Is there not a way to curb Fox’s daily delivery of snide remarks and anti-Obama rhetoric? I have stopped watching, but that’s just one person. I understand freedom of speech, but they are scaring people.
June 17th, 2009 at 4:47 pmAnd Think Progress has one station that it attacks.
June 17th, 2009 at 4:56 pmHey dstankass…what happened to B.O.’s thread…about him not allowing the press to see the WH visitors log? I asked you great input you have on the fact that Body Odor has been lying to all of you. He like about transparencies…about putting bills on line prior to passing…about DADT and many other promises.
Sucks when you can’t trust your pussy leader who speaks like a scared idiot around the rest of the world. He has the ovaries (because they sure are not balls)….to complain about Fox not kissing his azz…like the rest of the Medias! Crybaby
June 17th, 2009 at 5:27 pmcoloradocrenshaw Says:
Seriously. Is there not a way to curb Fox’s daily delivery of snide remarks and anti-Obama rhetoric? I have stopped watching, but that’s just one person. I understand freedom of speech, but they are scaring people.
What scares me is the way the other 4…CNN, CBS,ABC & NBC…totally give the B.O….slobby knobbers all the time….and don’t ask the tough questions!
What about ABC’s day long infomercial next week about healthcare…from the WH. Talk about propaganda TV.
June 17th, 2009 at 5:29 pmGolly good show guys! I read a few of the responses and almost bump my head laughing so hard. This thread is good popcorn reading material. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
___________________________________________________________
Why do repugs believe we believe they are slick, clever, serious? Why do these tenacious teabagging idiots insist on insulting our President of the United States?
harwood, you’d confused wit with being a dimwit. Don’t act as if you asked President Obama the Pulitzer Prize question.
Who could miss the around the clock advertisement/promoting for their racist teabagger party? Another bad idea from the club of starched sheets and no ideas (or proven failed ideas.)
repugs are milking the hell out of their “wonderful” teabags, aren’t they?
June 17th, 2009 at 5:43 pmcoloradocrenshaw Says:
Seriously. Is there not a way to curb Fox’s daily delivery of snide remarks and anti-Obama rhetoric? I have stopped watching, but that’s just one person. I understand freedom of speech, but they are scaring people.
Freedom of speech has nothing to do with telling lies.
June 17th, 2009 at 5:46 pmFair and Balanced.
Fair to rich people while performing a balancing act of fact and fiction.
June 17th, 2009 at 6:24 pmPachydiplax de St. Augustine
June 17th, 2009 at 10:47 pmFox was going after Bush about his stimulus package. There is the one you have been asking for. and they had more than one night on it
This is pretty dumb…. No matter what point of view any station has (and we all know both sides of the spectrum are well represented on our dial)they have the right to voice their opinion. MSNBC has just about crawled in bed with Obama… but they have the right to do it… you can twist news, and show links, conspiracy theories, etc… just don’t LIE when you report the news. Fox does not LIE, and neither does CNN… I don’t really watch MSNBC, but when I have, the bias seems to be on commentary. They have the right to do it. All of them do. Obama is saying Fox is aiming at him? Well, Bush had every station aiming at him… you may think it is OK that they were aiming at that administration and not this one, because you agreed with what was being said, but I don’t see any of these networks really standing up and asking obama the hard questions. He seems to get a pass all the time, and he won’t even come on Fox. Anyway, I think all stations have a right to air what opinions, editorials, etc… Our media is our watchdog. They should all be doing the same job now they were doing during the last administration.
June 17th, 2009 at 11:10 pmFox follows the three C’s: Corporations, Conservatism, and Caucasians.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:40 amThank you..
Sesli Chat
June 23rd, 2009 at 11:30 amSesli Sohbet
Sesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Seslikent
SesliChat
SesliSohbet