Hannity: Only Fox News Deserves ‘Unprecedented Access’ To The White House
Hannity: Only Fox News Deserves ‘Unprecedented Access’ To The White House
Last night on Fox News, Sean Hannity interviewed Karl Rove about ABC’s upcoming special “Questions for the President: Prescription for America,” which will feature President Obama answering “questions offered by audience members ‘selected by ABC News who have divergent opinions in this historic debate’” on health care. Hannity and Rove — echoing a recent Washington Times piece — raised questions about what they called the “unprecedented access to the White House” granted to ABC for their “infomercial” on health care reform:
HANNITY: Karl, it seems rather unprecedented. You were there in the White House for the better part of eight years. Did this ever happened while George W. Bush was president?
ROVE: You know, look, it’s normal for the networks to want to come in and do an interview inside the White House or to get a glimpse behind the curtain as to what goes on there. This is an unprecedented access to the White House and more importantly an unprecedented use of the White House. I can’t remember a time when the network came in and was going to devote a significant block of time to covering an issue that was on the president’s agenda.
As Media Matters first noted, when Fox News’ Bret Baier was granted “unprecedented access” to the White House in Feb. 2008, the network billed it as a “documentary,” not an “infomercial.” Further, Fox was not only welcomed into the White House, but aboard Air Force One, to Bush’s ranch in Texas, and into the Oval Office. Baier introduced the “documentary” saying, “Fox News has been granted unprecedented access inside the President’s world. … It’s a President Bush you’ve never seen before.” Watch a compilation of Hannity last night and Baier’s special:
Prior to airing the Bush special, Baier hosted a special on the famously-reclusive vice president entitled “Dick Cheney: No Retreat.” Fox billed it as “a rare glimpse into the life of the vice president” and aired the program Oct. 13, 2007. Similarly, on Oct. 30, 2007, Fox’s Greta Van Susteren was granted what she called “unprecedented access” to First Lady Laura Bush’s tour of the Middle East.
In the period leading up to Fox gaining such access to the Bush White House, former Fox News Sunday host Tony Snow was serving as White House Press Secretary, leaving office just weeks before Baier’s first documentary aired.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
So, only the voice of opposition(Faux snooze) should have axis to the White House.
Sounds like the reich-wingnut noise machine overdosed on acid.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:15 amThe professional spinners are in full throat!
They’ve called out the troops on this health care issue. No shore leave until it’s smushed into the ground and the status quo is safely restored.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:18 am“Fox News has been granted unprecedented access inside the President’s world. …”
Ready! Fire!! Aim!!!
June 18th, 2009 at 11:19 amI was told by someone who went to high school on Long Island with Hannity that Seaney was one of the pot smokers hanging out in the boy’s room with the guys.
Methinks young Hannity did not have the right type of mind for smoking the weed, something snapped in his head and he ain’t been right since.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:19 amHannitea’s arrogance & KKKarl’s selective factoids display precisely WHY Faux Noise isn’t granted unrestricted access to the WH.
Sean, call Whine One One. You definitely need a Whaambulance.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:21 amROVE: This is an unprecedented access to the White House and more importantly an unprecedented use of the White House.
– - You guys lost, now go suck rotten eggs.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:21 amA small sneeze would blow out Hannity’s brain power.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:22 amSo this is unprecedented access for a news organization. The Bair pieces can be ordered on DVD from Amazon out of the “fiction/comedy” section.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:27 amDidn’t they have people sitting in the White House giving lengthy interviews with Bush on his proposals all the time? I seem to remember a whole damn string of those.
“Unprecedented” is supposed to mean “has never happened before.” I’m not sure what they think the word means. Something vaguely sinister, I suppose.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:27 amObama and progressives can obviously due what they want to do.
Obama is in a difficult circumstance (and is doing a good job), but is losing some support:
http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090224/NEWS-US-OBAMA-POLLS/
(Republican poll numbers worst ever, BTW – check it out)
Even if you disagree with Fox, I think it’s a mistake to publicly alienate the network and those that watch.
I’m sure it plays well with the progressive base and I’m sure the hope is that openly criticizing the network will make it less credible and less relevant.
But, the potential downside is losing whatever fence sitters that tune into the network.
Lambasting the tea baggers in the way it was done, didn’t help Obama’s support:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAiXkw-7PxQ
And attempting to alienate Fox viewers is a similar mistake. LIke it or not, there are a lot of Americans that tune into Fox.
Some of those Americans want to support Obama’s policies. If they are pushed to decide to be with him or against him, some will stick with Fox.
Progressives may not like the people that tune into Fox, but the problem is, they may need them.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:28 amCome on folks, have a little sympathy. Fixed News is feeling a little lonely these days as they are sliding into obscurity.
Perhaps Mr. Rove can explain why Fixed News should have any access to the White House considering the fact that they bash our President 24×7, lie, obfuscate and cherry pick to make their propaganda points.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:28 amWhat do you expect from faux news guys that use pig-boy kkkarl as an “analyst”.
He should be in jail – of course, we can thank the dems for not taking action of 2 subpoenas for that…
June 18th, 2009 at 11:29 amJesus christ, Shut up and F UCK OFF, BACKUP!
Flagged for being off topic.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:30 ambackup – we gain nothing by the lie of “bipartisanship, that somehow, when American’s overwhelmingly reject a political party and their agenda, that we must capitulate to that agenda.
You cannot reach out to the “backwash” all you get is spit on.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:32 amMore white noise from idiotic bobbleheads speaking only to their loyal idiotic bobbleheads. I know of no one who doesn’t share Fux’s views who watches anything on that station.
PEACE
June 18th, 2009 at 11:32 ambackup Says:
And attempting to alienate Fox viewers is a similar mistake. LIke it or not, there are a lot of Americans that tune into Fox.
Some of those Americans want to support Obama’s policies. If they are pushed to decide to be with him or against him, some will stick with Fox.
Progressives may not like the people that tune into Fox, but the problem is, they may need them.
You’re delusional.
Fox “News” is a propaganda network in direct opposition to all things Democratic, progressive, liberal or even middle of the road. Progressives will never ever “need” their audience because Fox is in no way a network for “fence sitters.”
This is the silliest thing you’ve ever written here.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:33 am“Sinister” Hannity the bully at it again. HA,HA, Hannity is upset that Fixed News is not granted unprecedented permission to the White House.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:33 ambackup Says:
Even if you disagree with Fox, I think it’s a mistake to publicly alienate the network and those that watch.
And what purpose would it serve the White House to allow Fixed “unprecedented access” when all they do is bash our President? Why should he give them a platform to lie about him? That makes no sense whatsoever.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:34 ambackup Says:
Even if you disagree with Fox, I think it’s a mistake to publicly alienate the network and those that watch.
BTW, why should he care about the brain dead people who watch Fixed News? They are never going to support him or any of his policies. They are so full of propaganda they would know the truth if it hit them upside the head with a two-by-four.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:35 amBut, the potential downside is losing whatever fence sitters that tune into the network.
“Well, sure, I strongly identify with the network that says Obama is the Muslim Socialist Antichrist, but I consider myself a fence-sitter.”
June 18th, 2009 at 11:35 amCarl Rove gave a tremendous amount of media access to the White house in the form of James Dale Guckert aka Jeff Gannon the male call guy for men. One on one, you go Carl. Carl knows all about it. Tell them Carl.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:35 amgummble-bee-itch Says:
June 18th, 2009 at 11:33 am
What gummitch said.
Let’s not allow backup to dominate another thread with his bizarre mental masturbation, eh people?
June 18th, 2009 at 11:36 ambackup,
Do you think for one minute that I’m going to believe a GOP poll?
Fixed News has alienated it’s own viewers not the other way around?
June 18th, 2009 at 11:37 ambackup Says:
Some of those Americans want to support Obama’s policies. If they are pushed to decide to be with him or against him, some will stick with Fox.
Sorry bcup. If those Americans want to support Obama, they would not be watching the RNC propaganda network.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:37 amThanks for your concern, b-cup.
I’m sure Obama will get right to work on winning back those Faux News viewers that his policies have alienated.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:40 amElBruce Says:
“Unprecedented” is supposed to mean “has never happened before.” I’m not sure what they think the word means. Something vaguely sinister, I suppose.
Good one ElBruce. It’s like a movie on TV billed as a “Premier”
June 18th, 2009 at 11:41 amgum, you may be rigt.
b-cup has written some exceedingly silly things, but this just might be the silliest. of course, b-cup is frequently at his silliest when he’s in “concern troll” mode.
Good call.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:41 amRight. If FAUX is the only network to interview, I don’t watch. FAUX is not real. I do not get my comedy fix from FAUX. I watch Jon Stewart.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:41 ammaybe so. Again, Obama and progressives can and should do whatever they want.
I just think there’s more potential downside than upside by publicly alienating a large group of people; whether you agree with them or not. And regardless of how you believe they are treating you. Like it or not, you may need their support, or at least, their apathy.
I’ll move on. Have a great day.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:42 amLittle Seanie Vanity could have unprecedented access to the White House, too.
For him, the price of admission would be to make good on his commitment to submit to waterboarding. That’s all the little chickenhawk needs to do. But it’ll never happen because he’s a wuss.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:42 amOops. Submitted before finishing.
It’s like a movie on TV billed as a “Premier” when it’s been on other channels many times before.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:42 amMore delusional victimization from the party with little influence, no ideas, and nothing to contribute to the national conversation.
It’s quite sad, actually. The once mighty “permanent majority” reduced to whining about reporters being inside the White House. Is that really the best they have? The answer is, for them, an unfortunate “yes.”
And I thought consveratives had no sense of humor when in reality they should be applauded for making us laugh on a daily basis with stunning insights such as this!
June 18th, 2009 at 11:42 amOnly Faux News.. lmao what a joke. What demension are these rightwing nutballs living in? The sense that they are the center of the political environment is ludicrious. Fair and balanced my ass.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:43 amHannity is not a journalist! Hannity dropped out of Community College to become a construction worker and got a gig as a radio voice. He is a liar and he is STUPID! Hannity is on the same IQ level as Joe the Plummer or Sarah Palin.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:43 amI just think there’s more potential downside than upside by publicly alienating a large group of people
Like when the Neocon’s call liberals anti-american for opposing Bush!
June 18th, 2009 at 11:43 amThe FAUX viewer ship is made up of the christian domestic terrorists, teabaggers, Ku Klux Klan, and the chickenhawks. We do not need any of them. They are a small minority.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:45 amflavorino Says:
I was told by someone who went to high school on Long Island with Hannity
Long Island eh? That explains a lot.
From the Daily Show:
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2009/06/secession-of-long-island-redux.html
June 18th, 2009 at 11:45 amFAUX is Fake. Wingnuts can’t handle the truth so they have their alternate reality to cling to. It is fact.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/06102009/postopinion/opedcolumnists/how_fox_news_opened_america_173419.htm
June 18th, 2009 at 11:47 amI’m a Fox News viewer as is my father and hundreds of thousands of other Americans that watch ironically. The only thing better than the crazy is the sweet tears of Hannity.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:48 amIt’s quite possible that the President is pointing out to the other media outlets that they can stand up to the slanted nues that fox pumps out.
The american people are capable of listening to the facts and determining for themselves what is important. fox pushes a biased and slanted view to the right. That will conflict with facts when the facts don’t go there way. MSNBC does slant to the right but will more freely speak out against this current administration.
let fox whine. I just hope that news outlets turn the page and concern themselves more with the facts than with ideological and demographical quests.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:49 amhellinabucket Says:
Agreed!
June 18th, 2009 at 11:52 am… is it possible to know if any other network was turned down by the bush administration?
surely there were others who wanted to do some kind of special…
June 18th, 2009 at 11:52 amabc did enough withOUT that inside access, but just wondered…
I would bet you that if FAUX conducted itself as an adult, professional, news organization, they would be treated as such. They make no bones about their goal of being against and to be an alternative to real news. Only crazies really believe their non-sense.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:55 amObama is not “alienating” faux viewers.
Faux viewers ARE Faux viewers because they already have no affinity for the President, his policies or his party.
There is no active ‘alienating” going on here. That work is done.
Your pretense that there’s some support left to salvage among Faux viewers is absurd and, as gummble-bee-itch notes, really silly.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:56 amdeebaser Says:
————————————————————–
I’m a Fox News viewer as is my father
June 18th, 2009 at 11:57 am========================================================
You can’t get your own television? Geez, I would go hit balls at the driving range to not have to put up with the crazy.
You want to talk about “unprecedented access”, Little Seanie?
How about the brown noses that all the FoxSnooze “reporters” got from kissing GDumbya’s and Darth Cheney’s putrid little arses for eight years? Now that’s what I would call “unprecedented access”.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:57 amHelen Thomas became inivisible to the Bush administration but the plant of “Johnny the wad” would be called on.
June 18th, 2009 at 11:58 ambackup Says: …
I just think there’s more potential downside than upside
by publicly alienating a large group of people
you’d think the lying obstructionist republiCONs in congress
June 18th, 2009 at 12:06 pmwould get that too…
backup Says:
I just think there’s more potential downside than upside by publicly alienating a large group of people; whether you agree with them or not. And regardless of how you believe they are treating you. Like it or not, you may need their support, or at least, their apathy.
Sorry bcup, Obama doesn’t need the support of the 20% who still call themselves Republics. He also doesn’t need the support of the brain-dead Fixed viewers. They are all so brainwashed there’s nothing that President Obama could say or do that would get through to them, so why should he even bother trying?
June 18th, 2009 at 12:07 pmTP – why even report on this? It’s like TP is surprised a rabid dog bit somebody and feels the need to report it. That’s what rabid dogs do…they bite people.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:09 pmI guess Rove doesn’t consider FNC as a real network.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:09 pmFox is a news station? Could have fooled me, it sounds like ignorant drivel to me.
Bcup thinks we should care what the 20%ers think, nope, fcuk em, they lost and we don’t need to deal with the idiots anymore.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:10 pmbackup sez: And regardless of how you believe they are treating you. Like it or not, you may need their support, or at least, their apathy.
It’ll be a cold day in Hell when the propagandized, brain-dead Faux Noise watchers ever support Obama or any democratic/progressive politician. They all have indeed drunk the kool-aid and are never comin’ back. Better use of our time is just to ignore them and go about our business…soon they will atrophy and maybe MSM will go back to being “News” instead of “Views”.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:15 pmOr how about the several infomercial powder puff pieces on Fox News from Great & Hannity on Alaska Gov Sarah Palin???
June 18th, 2009 at 12:23 pmFox News seem like a snake that attempted to eat a GOPig too large for its intestine.
The snake embraced and coiled around the pig, ate 95% of it, only to realize it killed the pig and now it is chocking with it.
Thank you Fox News and GOPiggies.
Now, could you please stop your whining and show the rubes more soft porn.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:25 pmb-cup also thinks that it’s a bad idea for black folk to alienate racists.
After all, they may need their support.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:26 pmAre we talking about alienating the same Faux viewers who thought that Saddam Hussein had masterminded 9/11?
That ship of fools has already sailed…
June 18th, 2009 at 12:29 pmkasinca
gratefully – joe the WHO?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Enough said…
June 18th, 2009 at 12:32 pmbackup Says:
And attempting to alienate Fox viewers is a similar mistake. LIke it or not, there are a lot of Americans that tune into Fox.
1. Obama didn’t call FAUX out by name. The fact that everybody knew who he meant proves his point.
2. He was responding to a “media goes soft on you” line of questioning. That left FAUX open to say “yeah, we’re the only network that’s tough on him, we hold his feet to the fire” which would have been perfectly reasonable. That is to say, it didn’t have to be taken as criticism unless they chose to take it that way.
3. There is nothing Obama could say or do that would win over FAUX or its viewership. It’s not like they already kinda like him as long as he isn’t mean to them. They hate him with a passion, and let it be known all the time.
.
backup Says:
Lambasting the tea baggers in the way it was done, didn’t help Obama’s support:
Your link goes to Olbermann and Garafolo. Obama didn’t lambaste anybody.
Also, go cry to your mommy, teabagger. I’m not here to wipe away your fcuking tears.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:36 pmSilly Fascists keep forgetting – Americans are voting them OUT in larger numbers each and every election.
Time to stick a fork into these fascist war-mongering Rethug party.
Never let them steal another election ever again.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:36 pmIf I was Obama, I would have signs on the white house lawn saying Faux news not allowed.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:38 pmkasinca Says:
Hannity is not a journalist! Hannity dropped out of Community College …
Most of the resumes of people who work there are like that. If you’re devoutly right wing and you screen test well, they pour you into an off-the-rack suit and shove you in front of a camera. No journalism required.
.
KaneJeeves Says:
TP – why even report on this? It’s like TP is surprised a rabid dog bit somebody and feels the need to report it. That’s what rabid dogs do…they bite people.
The problem is that people keep voting for some of the rabid dogs. So pointing out that they’re rabid dogs and reporting on them biting people continues to be a necessary service.
.
Luis Chapulin M Says:
That ship of fools has already sailed…
Way to put a song in my head, thanks.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:41 pmYep, I sure of it, Rupert Murdock has put on his front lawn, exact replicas of Insannity Hannity and Korksucker Karl, replacing the stable boy figurine that had once been the proud symbol of his idealogy.
June 18th, 2009 at 12:43 pmUnprecedented!!?? Didn’t “special reporter” Jeff Gannon have unlimited back door access to the deep “inner workings” of the Bush mal-Administration? I guess Karl forgot about all those late night “interviews” that they shared. As to FOX and their inscessant whining, GO LOOFA YOURSELVES YOU PACK OF REGRESSIVE AMERICAN PROGRESS HATING FOOLS! They must just be peed off over President Obama having the FOX hotline disconnected on January 21st. It must have been so much easier during the Bush years around the FOX offices. 9am, turn on the lights. Check fax machine for daily WH talking points. Warm up the coffe pot and propaganda machine for another day of GOP lies. Practice reading your lies with a straight face. I mean now they have to actually wait for the WH to release info to the press and some FOX intern needs to translate the GOP position into Orwellian speak for their hungry sheep.
June 18th, 2009 at 1:04 pmI have reached the point where I cannot watch any Faux Noise clips. Especially with clowns like Rove on there. For future reference, please provide text transcripts for those of us that cannot tolerate nails on a chalkboard.
June 18th, 2009 at 1:05 pmOh look, the conservatives are whining again.
June 18th, 2009 at 1:08 pmWhat a bunch of babies…
Thay chryon (is that the right word to use?) should say: Karl Rove, Former Bush Advisor and War Criminal.
June 18th, 2009 at 1:19 pmFEIGN News
Feigned Whining
Feigned Anger
Feigned Compassion
Feigned Journalism
June 18th, 2009 at 1:26 pmFEIGN News
Feigned Whining
Feigned Anger
Feigned Compassion
Feigned Journalism
June 18th, 2009 at 1:26 pmHopefully, in out life times, Hannratty and Turdblossom will NEVER be back at the White House…
They deserve more like a garbage dump…at best.
June 18th, 2009 at 2:01 pmIn the period leading up to Fox gaining such access to the Bush White House, former Fox News Sunday host Tony Snow was serving as White House Press Secretary, leaving office just weeks before Bair’s first documentary aired.
Bingo! There’s your answer. Sean Insanity, BillO the Clown, and the rest of the clown network from Planet Wingnuttia are simply pissed because they don’t have any insider within the WH or a Tony Snow wannabe to give them the inside scoop of WH gossip and info. Obama Administration is the new sheriff in town and Faux News has been simply dethoned as the King of media for 8 years and shut out from the current Administration and the WH press gaggle.
June 18th, 2009 at 3:39 pmThe Hannity/Rove show sounds like something that ought to be on Comedy Central.
June 18th, 2009 at 7:32 pmMore seriously, if “journalism is dead,” as Sean Vanity claims, then he and his Faux News colleagues should take full responsibility.
Rove dismisses ABC’s coverage of the debate on healthcare reform as “an issue that was on the president’s agenda”. No, Karl, it is the PUBLIC’S agenda. That’s one of the reasons that Obama won. You and Hannity will probably never have to worry personally about healthcare costs, but we the majority do! You and your ilk are losing elections for damn good reason. Keep spewing your sour-grapes nonsense, we love it!
June 18th, 2009 at 9:47 pmBurbank Bill Says:
it is the PUBLIC’S agenda.
I call BS on this remark. It is not the public’s agenda…it is the leftest agenda…and last I heard…B.O. only got 52% of the vote…of Americans who voted! What that means is that a lot of people did not vote…especially Republicans…who had issues with McCain being a moderate.
What B.O. is now doing is removing any doubt…that the people he is trying to shut out of this debate…that they will rebound…and come after the leftest in this country…strong at the voting booths and remove this black stain on our country! Sad really that you are so overplaying your hands…and couldn’t even try to really work with us people caught in the middle of your wars among the two extremes!
June 19th, 2009 at 2:47 pmI have been reading the comments on here about Fox News and the people on it and I have to laugh.
You people are bashing the Fox News network calling it bias and broadcasting nothig but republican propaganda and yet not a one of you has a clue that it is the top news network and has been since 2005.
That being said that means that a lot of your cool aid drinking liberals are watching it to which means you are helping it be number one.
If Fox was so wrong all the time than why is it still number one?
If ABC, NBC, and CBS where actually putting news that people wanted to see on than maybe they might be up there close but since they want to put crap on and call it news I would say that is why they are still at the bottom and sinking.
Oh and for those of you that want number they are from the Nielsen Rating.
And as far as any republican or conserative hating Obama you people are on that as well. Not all of them hate him what they hate are the things that he is trying to get passed. And if any of you cool aid drinking braindead liberals had enough brain power to think on your own you would know that Obama’s health Care and Stimulus package are going to Bankrupt this country. Right now just the stimulus is going to cost the US.
President Obama’s economic recovery package will actually hurt the economy more in the long run than if he were to do nothing, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.
CBO, the official scorekeepers for legislation, said the House and Senate bills will help in the short term but result in so much government debt that within a few years they would crowd out private investment, actually leading to a lower Gross Domestic Product over the next 10 years than if the government had done nothing.
CBO estimates that by 2019 the Senate legislation would reduce GDP by 0.1 percent to 0.3 percent on net. [The House bill] would have similar long-run effects, CBO said in a letter to Sen. Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican, who was tapped by Mr. Obama on Tuesday to be Commerce Secretary.
As for his Helath Care Bill it is dead right now because of this.
the Congressional Budget Office announced that not only would the Democrat plan for nationalized health care cost $1 trillion, that it would push more than 15 million people on to government health care and only create access to health care for about 1/3 of Americans who don’t have it already.
Today the Democrats retreated by announcing that the push for nationalized health care is off, for now.
Oh and for those of you that can’t do math that would be about $62,000 per person. I don’t know anyone that pays that much in health care per year. Come to think of it that is more than a lot of people make in one year and the dems say they are for the people of this country. Yeah right they are for them as long as they can control them.
June 20th, 2009 at 1:42 pmYou libs keep calling the Republicans all those names but it is because of them right now that this country isn’t going to go bankrupt.
Oh and for those of you that still think that the country going bankrupt because of that bill isn’t true than answer this.
WHERE IS THE GOVERNMENT GOING TO GET THE MONEY FOR THAT PROGRAM?
Lets see since the government doesn’t have any money unless the people of this country pay taxes than i guess they wont get it. But hey you cool aid drinking libs just keep supporting that socialist pres of yours and he will do you just fine. After he has control of all your rights
Thank you..
Sesli Chat
June 22nd, 2009 at 3:09 amSesli Sohbet
Sesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Seslikent
SesliChat
SesliSohbet