Sesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Sesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Seslikent
SesliChat
SesliSohbet

Crickets…..Nice diversion, ‘reggie.’

I do believe some intern used the seminal word because they thought it meant something else. And Faux went with it because they did as well.

Why don’t you act like an adult, quit stalking and try joining the reality based universe.
You’re never going to be taken seriously while using that juvenile nickname and posting unintelligible gobbly goop.
What’s with the obsession with Mr. Olbermann, it seems rather creepy?
If you happen to run into Jesse Waters, would you please be kind enough to inform him that I’m still waiting for an answer to my question regarding his foolish stalking of Ms. Terkel.

ROFFLMFAO!!!!

olbermannwatch.com

Read and weep!

“You really to find it incumbent on yourself to take your own network to task…” by ko

Name one instance where this has happended!

You are not welcome.

Please stop showing up here to promote your porn site. If you’re looking to increase your traffic, then I suggest you post this at some of the right wing sites. You’ll find a greater and more grateful audience there.

Now, politely, for the last time, GO AWAY!

Any questions?

Yes.

First, why did you choose your Olby Sucks sockpuppet to post this rant about what both CNN and MSNBC are not covering? It’s the weekend, so Olbermann wouldn’t have been on anyway. You could have used one of the other names you post under to make this snotty comment.

Second, so what? I assume that you are referring to the protests in Tehran. If so, how is reporting live on a volatile situation helpful? Most of the time, you can’t really know what’s happening or, more importantly for a “news” organization, why it’s happening. Western journalists have been kicked out of Tehran, and the videos we’ve been seeing are, at best, several hours old. There is no live information coming out of Tehran, so why report on it live?

Third, what is your obsession about Keith Olbermann? Do you realize that to an outside observer, your constant focus on Olbermann could be seen as pathological? I won’t argue that he can be as pompous as Bill O’Reilly, but there’s an important difference between the two that clearly doesn’t matter to you: Olbermann strives to give truthful information while O’Reilly is content to repeat falsehoods and outright lies in a pathetic attempt to prove he’s right. Like most liberals, I am less interested in what people are saying and more interested in what is actually true. After all, you can’t decide what would be the best thing to do if the information you’re basing your decision on is not connected to reality.

To be perfectly honest, I don’t expect you to give me a rational answer. You might answer, but I doubt there would be any thought to what you post.

On topic?

I only have this identity at Think Progress.

Where? Under what name?

As a matter of fact I have. Anyway, why are you here tonight, are things a little dead at the stalker site?

Have you made a single post on topic other than “trolls”, today? Think, before you post, please!

Can’t Troll Central send any trolls that are better than these three stooges?

Any questions?

Says who?

Sock alert…

************
Agreed.

Nice try skippy, but when I say none I mean NONE.