<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TP Editor Faiz Shakir discusses Sanford on MSNBC.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:57:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701985</link>
		<dc:creator>Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701985</guid>
		<description>The traditional meaning of &quot;sanfordized&quot; is a trademarked term for pre-wsshing of cotton fabric to minimize shrinkage. 

After seeing a couple pictures of Sanford&#039;s very cute brunette girlfriend, Maria Belen Shapur, (those gossip websites are on the job!), I leaned that she is 43 years old, and lives in a Buenos Aires apartment which is located near the Buenos Aires Zoo. She has two teenage sons that are living at home with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traditional meaning of &#8220;sanfordized&#8221; is a trademarked term for pre-wsshing of cotton fabric to minimize shrinkage. </p>
<p>After seeing a couple pictures of Sanford&#8217;s very cute brunette girlfriend, Maria Belen Shapur, (those gossip websites are on the job!), I leaned that she is 43 years old, and lives in a Buenos Aires apartment which is located near the Buenos Aires Zoo. She has two teenage sons that are living at home with her.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701985', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zooey</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701715</link>
		<dc:creator>Zooey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 05:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701715</guid>
		<description>FAIZ:  &lt;em&gt;I don’t want him to resign because of the affair. I think he should get kicked out of office because he’s been a terrible governor for the state. Their unemployment rate is at its highest rate ever. He’s bankrupted the state. He’s been fighting the Obama administration over unemployment money that his constituents desperately need. So I think on the merits, he’s been a horrible governor.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, to be fair, his mind has been on certain tan lines in Argentina.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAIZ:  <em>I don’t want him to resign because of the affair. I think he should get kicked out of office because he’s been a terrible governor for the state. Their unemployment rate is at its highest rate ever. He’s bankrupted the state. He’s been fighting the Obama administration over unemployment money that his constituents desperately need. So I think on the merits, he’s been a horrible governor.</em></p>
<p>Well, to be fair, his mind has been on certain tan lines in Argentina.  ;)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701715', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluestocking</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701681</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluestocking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701681</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;From the article at The State which discloses the e-mail messages between Gov. Sanford and his Argentinian friend:

&quot;The State has removed the woman&#039;s full name and other personal details, including her address, e-mail address and children&#039;s names...&lt;strong&gt;According to the doorman, the woman has two sons, one a teenager of driving age and the other younger.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

************************************************************

Did anyone else read this and wonder just how much younger the second son might be?  The article doesn&#039;t really provide any further information.  Is it possible that the second son is Sanford&#039;s child?  The news reports state that he and this woman have known one another for eight years even though the affair only started a year ago.  One time is sufficient to get a woman pregnant, after all, if the circumstances are right -- and she could quite easily have been pregnant and given birth within the space of a year.  It might explain why he chose to go down there during Father&#039;s Day weekend -- although the fact that his wife reportedly asked him to stay away from their family might have had something to do with it as well.  Since that supposedly only happened a couple of weeks ago, it&#039;s not impossible that this was one of the reasons why he claims to have been crying during his time in Argentina even though he was with his mistress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From the article at The State which discloses the e-mail messages between Gov. Sanford and his Argentinian friend:</p>
<p>&#8220;The State has removed the woman&#8217;s full name and other personal details, including her address, e-mail address and children&#8217;s names&#8230;<strong>According to the doorman, the woman has two sons, one a teenager of driving age and the other younger.</strong>&#8220;</em></p>
<p>************************************************************</p>
<p>Did anyone else read this and wonder just how much younger the second son might be?  The article doesn&#8217;t really provide any further information.  Is it possible that the second son is Sanford&#8217;s child?  The news reports state that he and this woman have known one another for eight years even though the affair only started a year ago.  One time is sufficient to get a woman pregnant, after all, if the circumstances are right &#8212; and she could quite easily have been pregnant and given birth within the space of a year.  It might explain why he chose to go down there during Father&#8217;s Day weekend &#8212; although the fact that his wife reportedly asked him to stay away from their family might have had something to do with it as well.  Since that supposedly only happened a couple of weeks ago, it&#8217;s not impossible that this was one of the reasons why he claims to have been crying during his time in Argentina even though he was with his mistress.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701681', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katy</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701633</link>
		<dc:creator>katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701633</guid>
		<description>way to go faiz!
...!

hey all - did you see THIS? (i&#039;ve been out of town all day)... 
whodduthunit... so roMANtic!

&lt;strong&gt;Sanford e-mail to mistress: Situation &#039;hopelessly impossible&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/24/south.carolina.governor.emails/

but there&#039;s this:

&lt;em&gt; (CNN) -- South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford told the woman with whom he was having an affair they were &quot;in a hopelessly impossible situation of love&quot; last year when he was thought to be under consideration for the Republican vice presidential nomination, according to e-mails obtained by The State newspaper.

The Columbia-based newspaper, which &lt;strong&gt;acquired the e-mails in December&lt;/strong&gt;, told CNN that the governor&#039;s office had confirmed their authenticity on Wednesday. When contacted by CNN, a spokesman for the governor would neither confirm nor deny the authenticity of the e-mails.

The e-mails between the GOP governor and a Buenos Aires, Argentina, resident named &quot;Maria,&quot; were &lt;strong&gt;exchanged in July of last year&lt;/strong&gt;, according to the newspaper.
[...]&lt;/em&gt;

bastids knew about it for a looong time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way to go faiz!<br />
&#8230;!</p>
<p>hey all &#8211; did you see THIS? (i&#8217;ve been out of town all day)&#8230;<br />
whodduthunit&#8230; so roMANtic!</p>
<p><strong>Sanford e-mail to mistress: Situation &#8216;hopelessly impossible&#8217;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/24/south.carolina.governor.emails/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/24/south.carolina.governor.emails/</a></p>
<p>but there&#8217;s this:</p>
<p><em> (CNN) &#8212; South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford told the woman with whom he was having an affair they were &#8220;in a hopelessly impossible situation of love&#8221; last year when he was thought to be under consideration for the Republican vice presidential nomination, according to e-mails obtained by The State newspaper.</p>
<p>The Columbia-based newspaper, which <strong>acquired the e-mails in December</strong>, told CNN that the governor&#8217;s office had confirmed their authenticity on Wednesday. When contacted by CNN, a spokesman for the governor would neither confirm nor deny the authenticity of the e-mails.</p>
<p>The e-mails between the GOP governor and a Buenos Aires, Argentina, resident named &#8220;Maria,&#8221; were <strong>exchanged in July of last year</strong>, according to the newspaper.<br />
[...]</em></p>
<p>bastids knew about it for a looong time&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701633', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodlebug Shayne</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701573</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodlebug Shayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701573</guid>
		<description>Faiz, you did a great job.  You make us proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faiz, you did a great job.  You make us proud.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701573', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomChaos</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701474</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomChaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701474</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Marital infidelity by elected figures is only an issue when the politician makes &quot;family values&quot; and the &quot;sanctity of marriage&quot; a cornerstone of their political ideology.  Nothing devalues a politician more than sanctimonious rhetoric once they have been caught with their pants down.&lt;/em&gt; l57

Game,Set,Match!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Marital infidelity by elected figures is only an issue when the politician makes &#8220;family values&#8221; and the &#8220;sanctity of marriage&#8221; a cornerstone of their political ideology.  Nothing devalues a politician more than sanctimonious rhetoric once they have been caught with their pants down.</em> l57</p>
<p>Game,Set,Match!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701474', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizard2000</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701472</link>
		<dc:creator>wizard2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701472</guid>
		<description>re: Gov. Mark Sandord:

Weeellll, at least we now know why the Bush administration and Cheney&#039;s office destroyed so many millions of e-mails...all those steamy, sexual Republican messages between top officials in the Bush administration.

I can just see them now....

No, no, no, the Republicans didn&#039;t destroy all those e-mails because torture was discussed as well as how they could somehow paint legal lipstick on that torture pig, nor was there any discussion about stealing elections nor lying about going to war in Iraq nor authorizing illegal warrantless wiretaps nor using the NSA to spy on political enemies nor outing a covert CIA agent nor politicizing Hurricane Katrina (where the Bush administration sent federal disaster relief into Mississippi and Alabama because these two states had Republican governors, while at the same time the Bush administration deliberately withheld emergency federal aid from Louisiana and New Orleans, where elected Democrats were in charge)...it was all that sex, sex, sex in those destroyed White House messages...that was the sole thrust of many of  those &quot;family values&quot; Bush administration communications. Yep! Yep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Gov. Mark Sandord:</p>
<p>Weeellll, at least we now know why the Bush administration and Cheney&#8217;s office destroyed so many millions of e-mails&#8230;all those steamy, sexual Republican messages between top officials in the Bush administration.</p>
<p>I can just see them now&#8230;.</p>
<p>No, no, no, the Republicans didn&#8217;t destroy all those e-mails because torture was discussed as well as how they could somehow paint legal lipstick on that torture pig, nor was there any discussion about stealing elections nor lying about going to war in Iraq nor authorizing illegal warrantless wiretaps nor using the NSA to spy on political enemies nor outing a covert CIA agent nor politicizing Hurricane Katrina (where the Bush administration sent federal disaster relief into Mississippi and Alabama because these two states had Republican governors, while at the same time the Bush administration deliberately withheld emergency federal aid from Louisiana and New Orleans, where elected Democrats were in charge)&#8230;it was all that sex, sex, sex in those destroyed White House messages&#8230;that was the sole thrust of many of  those &#8220;family values&#8221; Bush administration communications. Yep! Yep!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701472', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labman57</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701410</link>
		<dc:creator>labman57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701410</guid>
		<description>Marital infidelity by elected figures is only an issue when the politician makes &quot;family values&quot; and the &quot;sanctity of marriage&quot; a cornerstone of their political ideology.  Nothing devalues a politician more than sanctimonious rhetoric once they have been caught with their pants down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marital infidelity by elected figures is only an issue when the politician makes &#8220;family values&#8221; and the &#8220;sanctity of marriage&#8221; a cornerstone of their political ideology.  Nothing devalues a politician more than sanctimonious rhetoric once they have been caught with their pants down.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701410', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShadowBoxer</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701408</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowBoxer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701408</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have the wherewithal of dbadass to keep a list. Anyone feel up to it? 

Oh, and to add to the current list: 

He was crying because his &quot;stimulus package&quot; was lost at the airport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the wherewithal of dbadass to keep a list. Anyone feel up to it? </p>
<p>Oh, and to add to the current list: </p>
<p>He was crying because his &#8220;stimulus package&#8221; was lost at the airport.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701408', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodeskawler</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701389</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodeskawler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701389</guid>
		<description>When does this guy get his standing ovation from the GOP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When does this guy get his standing ovation from the GOP?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701389', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluestocking</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701371</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluestocking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701371</guid>
		<description>Someone at Crooks And Liars made a very interesting and pertinent point earlier today.  When the media made contact with Sanford&#039;s wife over the weekend about her husband&#039;s whereabouts, this is what she had to say:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;I am being a mom today. I have not heard from my husband. I am taking care of &lt;strong&gt;my children.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;&lt;/em&gt; (emphasis mine)

Hardly anyone in the mainstream media picked up on that particular choice of words -- even though a clue suggesting that all was not well in the Sanford household was right under their noses the whole time.  Granted, it&#039;s not unusual to hear a woman use the word &quot;my&quot; rather than &quot;our&quot; when speaking of her children -- but I think you have to admit that when a woman uses that particular pronoun when her husband is the topic of conversation, it&#039;s usually not an accident and often indicates that she&#039;s extremely upset with him.  The fact that she didn&#039;t seem to be terribly worried about him even though it was Father&#039;s Day and nobody seemed to know where the father of her children had gone or why, well...that should have spoken volumes, but it didn&#039;t.  At the very least, it should have been enough for some reporter to make a connection and realize that on this one occasion, two plus two equaled three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone at Crooks And Liars made a very interesting and pertinent point earlier today.  When the media made contact with Sanford&#8217;s wife over the weekend about her husband&#8217;s whereabouts, this is what she had to say:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I am being a mom today. I have not heard from my husband. I am taking care of <strong>my children.</strong>&#8220;</em> (emphasis mine)</p>
<p>Hardly anyone in the mainstream media picked up on that particular choice of words &#8212; even though a clue suggesting that all was not well in the Sanford household was right under their noses the whole time.  Granted, it&#8217;s not unusual to hear a woman use the word &#8220;my&#8221; rather than &#8220;our&#8221; when speaking of her children &#8212; but I think you have to admit that when a woman uses that particular pronoun when her husband is the topic of conversation, it&#8217;s usually not an accident and often indicates that she&#8217;s extremely upset with him.  The fact that she didn&#8217;t seem to be terribly worried about him even though it was Father&#8217;s Day and nobody seemed to know where the father of her children had gone or why, well&#8230;that should have spoken volumes, but it didn&#8217;t.  At the very least, it should have been enough for some reporter to make a connection and realize that on this one occasion, two plus two equaled three.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701371', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: had enough</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701366</link>
		<dc:creator>had enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701366</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://movies.apunkachoice.com/titles/out/outrage/mid_26053/videos/moytid/XKZE2qPaXIQ/closeted-gay-politicians--outrage-movie-trailer.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Trailer to the movie Outrage&lt;/a&gt;

About the hypocrisy of closeted gay republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://movies.apunkachoice.com/titles/out/outrage/mid_26053/videos/moytid/XKZE2qPaXIQ/closeted-gay-politicians--outrage-movie-trailer.html" rel="nofollow">Trailer to the movie Outrage</a></p>
<p>About the hypocrisy of closeted gay republicans.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701366', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane E. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane E. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701361</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Or he was crying because his mistress didn&#039;t have the &quot;equipment&quot; he really wanted.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

&quot;Baby better come back, maybe next week, &#039;cause you see I&#039;m on a losing streak&quot;, he &quot;can&#039;t get no satisfaction.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Or he was crying because his mistress didn&#8217;t have the &#8220;equipment&#8221; he really wanted.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>&#8220;Baby better come back, maybe next week, &#8217;cause you see I&#8217;m on a losing streak&#8221;, he &#8220;can&#8217;t get no satisfaction.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701361', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbeeg</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701359</link>
		<dc:creator>pbeeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701359</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s the difference between acting like a goat and acting like a prince.
Bill Clinton got a blow job from someone at the office.
Eliot Spitzer hired a call girl.
But Sanford vanished for 5 days and expected his staff to actively run interference for him. He felt he could just take a flight to Argentina on the sly.
He expected to be shielded by his subordinates to an amazing degree.
That&#039;s the arrogance of power, and it speaks volumes.
Democrats do this too, but this feeling that one&#039;s subordinates are personally loyal flunkies who will facilitate whatever they want is something that goes a ways beyond just plain rutting and cheating.Bill Clinton always struck me as a guy who would just seduce the woman at the car-rental desk if there was no one else around. 
Spitzer just struck me as the kind of guy just gets paralyzed the moment the right buttons are pushed.
But Sanford--he thought he was a prince with a retinue.
That goes more with a republican mind set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s the difference between acting like a goat and acting like a prince.<br />
Bill Clinton got a blow job from someone at the office.<br />
Eliot Spitzer hired a call girl.<br />
But Sanford vanished for 5 days and expected his staff to actively run interference for him. He felt he could just take a flight to Argentina on the sly.<br />
He expected to be shielded by his subordinates to an amazing degree.<br />
That&#8217;s the arrogance of power, and it speaks volumes.<br />
Democrats do this too, but this feeling that one&#8217;s subordinates are personally loyal flunkies who will facilitate whatever they want is something that goes a ways beyond just plain rutting and cheating.Bill Clinton always struck me as a guy who would just seduce the woman at the car-rental desk if there was no one else around.<br />
Spitzer just struck me as the kind of guy just gets paralyzed the moment the right buttons are pushed.<br />
But Sanford&#8211;he thought he was a prince with a retinue.<br />
That goes more with a republican mind set.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701359', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane E. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane E. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701357</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;If he was married in 1989, his oldest can not be more than 20 years old.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Well, technically, his oldest &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; be more than 20.  Can anyone say Sarah Palin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;If he was married in 1989, his oldest can not be more than 20 years old.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Well, technically, his oldest <em>could</em> be more than 20.  Can anyone say Sarah Palin?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701357', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701352</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701352</guid>
		<description>ShadowBoxer Says:


Good one, we should start a Top Ten List of the reasons he was crying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ShadowBoxer Says:</p>
<p>Good one, we should start a Top Ten List of the reasons he was crying.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701352', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShadowBoxer</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701331</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowBoxer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701331</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Jane says
Reggis says &lt;/em&gt;

Or he was crying because his mistress didn&#039;t have the &quot;equipment&quot; he really wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Jane says<br />
Reggis says </em></p>
<p>Or he was crying because his mistress didn&#8217;t have the &#8220;equipment&#8221; he really wanted.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701331', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: had enough</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701327</link>
		<dc:creator>had enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701327</guid>
		<description>Anyone know how old Sanford&#039;s 4 children are?  If he was  married in 1989, his oldest can not be more than 20 years old.

&lt;strong&gt;What kind of a father would ditch his minor age children for an affair on Father&#039;s Day?&lt;/strong&gt; 

The family value&#039;s of the Party of NN has hit an all time low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know how old Sanford&#8217;s 4 children are?  If he was  married in 1989, his oldest can not be more than 20 years old.</p>
<p><strong>What kind of a father would ditch his minor age children for an affair on Father&#8217;s Day?</strong> </p>
<p>The family value&#8217;s of the Party of NN has hit an all time low.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701327', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbadass</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701317</link>
		<dc:creator>dbadass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701317</guid>
		<description>Okay I admit it. I was wrong about the malbec, the grilled meats, and the chimichurri.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay I admit it. I was wrong about the malbec, the grilled meats, and the chimichurri.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701317', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/faiz-sanford-affair/comment-page-2/#comment-5701315</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=47551#comment-5701315</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;This made me LOL. Somehow, I doubt he went there to &quot;cry&quot;.&lt;/em&gt;

Maybe he was crying all weekend because he forgot his  Cialis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This made me LOL. Somehow, I doubt he went there to &#8220;cry&#8221;.</em></p>
<p>Maybe he was crying all weekend because he forgot his  Cialis<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5701315', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
