Sesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Sesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Sesli kent
SesliChat
SesliSohbet

Oh boy how I love that the Independents even post how REDICULOUS TP is!!!

There’s nothing “independent” about your wingnut site.

24Ahead.com offers no-nonsense coverage of topics such as immigration, national politics, media bias, and multiculturalism and we’ve been doing so in over 8000 posts since 2002.

The coverage leans somewhat to the “right” on many issues, but this site gives no quarter to Party hacks, no matter the Party. This is an archive/news and opinion/advocacy/activism site that occasionally does original reporting.

Bold added by me – all right-wing code words. This is not politically “independent” at all. Change “right” to “left” in the second paragraph and it could be describing TP.

If it’s really “independent,” then the site owner should be some organization with a reputation for “independence.” But nope, it’s just some guy from Hollywood.

Domain name: 24ahead.com

Registrant Contact:
Chris Kelly ()
4470 Sunset Blvd. #377
Hollywood, CA 90027 US

Administrative Contact:
Chris Kelly (ck_domain_mgmt@yahoo.com)
+1.3237182319
4470 Sunset Blvd. #377
Hollywood, CA 90027 US

What makes this particular individual’s website “independent?” As far as I can tell he’s just another wingnut. So why cite this guy’s blog as an “independent” news source?

The site you reference itself oddly cites this post, which merely supports Amanda Terkel’s conclusions regarding the Hannity/Turner relationship. And yet, your site calls it a “smear” to point out that Hannity and Turner are linked, saying that we should dig through the comments at Huffpo for proof:

…pointing out that Hannity’s radio producer has noted a series of holes in Turner’s account (choose “HuffPost’s picks” on the comments popup at huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/23/sean-hannity-confronted-o_n_92961.html and do a find for PhilBoyceWABC).

Digging through a comments thread on a website is not an appropriate journalistic citation. Not even for a wingnut. It’s over 8 pages, and I’m not going to click through them all anyway. Fortunately, HuffPo updated that item to include/explain PhilBoyceWABC’s comments:

Update: Newhounds has updated its Hannity/Turner post, pointing out a comment signed by Phil Boyce, Program Director of WABC, Hannity’s radio station, disputing many of the facts, especially the dates, in Turner’s account (Boyce’s comment has been posted here as well. See first comment below). Newshounds responded to Boyce’s criticisms, saying: “the real issue is what was Turner allowed to say on the air, how often and what was Hannity’s reaction? We have an article in a national magazine plus one of the parties involved who say that Hannity was a welcoming, friendly and encouraging host for Turner’s views for a good while. Neither Boyce nor Hannity has specifically denied that.”

Here’s Newshounds’ response. It makes for a fascinating read, too fascinating for me to quote a portion of. Well OK, maybe one; I can’t resist:

In his post (Warning: not for the faint of heart) that reveals just what kind of guy he is, Turner writes:

In my opinion, based on my first hand experience, I believe Sean Hannity is, in fact, a Hal Turner sort of guy. It seems to me that a big difference between Sean and me is that I am willing to say publicly what I think about savage Black criminals, diseased, uneducated illegal aliens and the grotesque cultural destruction wrought by satanic jews while Sean and many others keep quiet to protect their paychecks.

So your “independent” website is lambasting Terkel for reporting (as they say, “smearing”) that Hannity and Turner have a relationship which (although disputed by Hannity’s program director) has been thoroughly documented by Newshounds. Not very “independent” after all, is it?

The moral of the story: learn to traceback your links before marching in here and telling us what the Interwebs say. If I have to do your homework for you, then things aren’t going to go well for you at all, you stupid wingnut.

ROTFLMAOOOOOOOO

right-leaning is not independent…although it’s probably because Republican these days is a toxic brand…Independent, it’s the new libertarian…

Why would Republicans love something they have never had a use for?

I had never heard of the beer guy but I’m sure gummitch has.

Actually met him a couple of times and sat on a board with him. A terrific man. Not just “beer guy”; he wrote some of the best guides to single malts.

isn’t he ploanning to retire?

i was hoping he would find it in himself to end his legislative carreer on a high(er) note but going along with doing the right thing…
as in the CORRECT thing… for the people, against the “right”…

by Larry Wohlgemuth
Share this on Twitter – Olbermann = Piece of Crap = Rush Jr. Wed Jun 24, 2009 at 06:57:24 PM PDT
Yeah, you heard what I said and I will scream it at the top of my lungs.

Ah, this is what you were talking about. OK. Here’s the link. You do realize that anybody who registers at DailyKos can post their own blog (or “diary”) there, right? You can go there now, register an account and say whatever you want also. Then come back and tell us all about what “DailyKos said.” It’ll be awesome. Go!

.

flight Says:

Conformation of Koh may be the realization that they are fighting windmills and/or they are losing the base support as well as the independents.

Well, they could only have delayed it for so long. Time ran out. And they don’t have the votes to really stop anything without a pretty good reason.

.

flight Says:

I hope Obama’s stalling concerning the torture issues may have been the fact that he did not have a point man. Now he does!

Here’s hoping. Of course there’ll be a huge amount of paperwork to do before they can announce everything, seeing how much of a mess Bush/Cheney left everything in.