<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gingrich On Private Health Insurance Companies: &#8216;They Have It Done Well&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:02:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JYD</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-3/#comment-5710444</link>
		<dc:creator>JYD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5710444</guid>
		<description>How can Newt say just change insurance companies.  I have insurance through my employer,  satisfied or not , I have to stick with the insurance company my company has chosen. 

So satisfaction has nothing to do with staying with my current insurer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can Newt say just change insurance companies.  I have insurance through my employer,  satisfied or not , I have to stick with the insurance company my company has chosen. </p>
<p>So satisfaction has nothing to do with staying with my current insurer&#8230;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5710444', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanshiro the antlion</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-3/#comment-5710095</link>
		<dc:creator>hanshiro the antlion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5710095</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;94. barfly Says: I could have quessed that you&#039;d try a reversal. Next time, don&#039;t use overblown hyperbole. That&#039;s the only thing I have problems with. You could have made an unassailable case, if you&#039;d only used precise wording to get your view across.&lt;/em&gt;

History is on my side, barfly. You want to chide anyone for claiming the House dems aren&#039;t as bad as the Senate dems.

Really? That&#039;s your position and disagreement?

&lt;strong&gt;Because the House dems have already sold us out by removing single payer, there&#039;s really not much defending you can do.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;The bill is and will be industry-conciliation&lt;/em&gt;, as I said. In fact, it already is since the industry stands to not only benefit, but collect subsidies in the dems effort to &quot;require&quot; (read enforce) all people to purchase insurance.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Insurers do not embrace all of the healthcare restructuring proposals. &lt;strong&gt;But they are fighting hard for a &lt;em&gt;purchase requirement&lt;/em&gt;, sweetened with taxpayer-funded subsidies for customers who can&#039;t afford it, &lt;em&gt;and enforced with fines&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;

Such a so-called individual mandate amounts to a huge booster shot for health insurers, which would serve up millions of new customers almost overnight.
...

&quot;I think that&#039;s why we&#039;ve seen the industry basically trying to play the administration&#039;s game,&quot; said Jane DuBose, an analyst with industry tracking firm HealthLeaders-InterStudy. &lt;strong&gt;&quot;They really could be licking their chops over the potential here.&quot;
&lt;/strong&gt;
Still, industry observers say, &lt;strong&gt;private insurers need the government&#039;s help to transform some of the nation&#039;s 45 million uninsured residents into paying customers.&lt;/strong&gt;
...

For insurers, getting &quot;run over&quot; would be the adoption of a so-called single-payer plan, in which the government pays all medical bills. &lt;strong&gt;Such a plan, though widely viewed as politically unfeasible this year, would wreak havoc on the private insurance market.&lt;/strong&gt;
...

&lt;strong&gt;The best way for the industry to preserve the private insurance market -- and derail the campaign for a single-payer system -- may be to go along with more palatable proposals on the table now,&lt;/strong&gt; said Jeffrey Miles, a healthcare analyst and president of the Miles Organization, a Los Angeles insurance brokerage firm.

&quot;If healthcare goes down this year, you are going to end up with single-payer care much sooner than anyone expected,&quot; he said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Let me clarify: &lt;em&gt;You&#039;ve already been screwed, barfly.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;You&#039;re defending the House for keeping the insurance industry in control of the problem. &lt;strong&gt;The very people who have caused the disaster are still calling the shots&lt;/strong&gt;, with a few marginal concessions. You&#039;re having the dems impose, with penalties, an edict &lt;strong&gt;which demands that you buy into the idioti who run the insurance industry.&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve been looking into this for so long, I&#039;ve forgotten, frankly, that there are still people like you who really don&#039;t understand what is happening or what the industry-owned majority party; both House and Senate, are doing.

&lt;strong&gt;Grow up, barf-ly. You could not be more wrong. The House just made a huge effort to kill single payer, and to consign the public to dealing with the same monstrous private insurers for decades more.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>94. barfly Says: I could have quessed that you&#8217;d try a reversal. Next time, don&#8217;t use overblown hyperbole. That&#8217;s the only thing I have problems with. You could have made an unassailable case, if you&#8217;d only used precise wording to get your view across.</em></p>
<p>History is on my side, barfly. You want to chide anyone for claiming the House dems aren&#8217;t as bad as the Senate dems.</p>
<p>Really? That&#8217;s your position and disagreement?</p>
<p><strong>Because the House dems have already sold us out by removing single payer, there&#8217;s really not much defending you can do.</strong> <em>The bill is and will be industry-conciliation</em>, as I said. In fact, it already is since the industry stands to not only benefit, but collect subsidies in the dems effort to &#8220;require&#8221; (read enforce) all people to purchase insurance.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Insurers do not embrace all of the healthcare restructuring proposals. <strong>But they are fighting hard for a <em>purchase requirement</em>, sweetened with taxpayer-funded subsidies for customers who can&#8217;t afford it, <em>and enforced with fines</em>.</strong></p>
<p>Such a so-called individual mandate amounts to a huge booster shot for health insurers, which would serve up millions of new customers almost overnight.<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I think that&#8217;s why we&#8217;ve seen the industry basically trying to play the administration&#8217;s game,&#8221; said Jane DuBose, an analyst with industry tracking firm HealthLeaders-InterStudy. <strong>&#8220;They really could be licking their chops over the potential here.&#8221;<br />
</strong><br />
Still, industry observers say, <strong>private insurers need the government&#8217;s help to transform some of the nation&#8217;s 45 million uninsured residents into paying customers.</strong><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>For insurers, getting &#8220;run over&#8221; would be the adoption of a so-called single-payer plan, in which the government pays all medical bills. <strong>Such a plan, though widely viewed as politically unfeasible this year, would wreak havoc on the private insurance market.</strong><br />
&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>The best way for the industry to preserve the private insurance market &#8212; and derail the campaign for a single-payer system &#8212; may be to go along with more palatable proposals on the table now,</strong> said Jeffrey Miles, a healthcare analyst and president of the Miles Organization, a Los Angeles insurance brokerage firm.</p>
<p>&#8220;If healthcare goes down this year, you are going to end up with single-payer care much sooner than anyone expected,&#8221; he said.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Let me clarify: <em>You&#8217;ve already been screwed, barfly.</em> </strong>You&#8217;re defending the House for keeping the insurance industry in control of the problem. <strong>The very people who have caused the disaster are still calling the shots</strong>, with a few marginal concessions. You&#8217;re having the dems impose, with penalties, an edict <strong>which demands that you buy into the idioti who run the insurance industry.</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been looking into this for so long, I&#8217;ve forgotten, frankly, that there are still people like you who really don&#8217;t understand what is happening or what the industry-owned majority party; both House and Senate, are doing.</p>
<p><strong>Grow up, barf-ly. You could not be more wrong. The House just made a huge effort to kill single payer, and to consign the public to dealing with the same monstrous private insurers for decades more.</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5710095', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJJ</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-3/#comment-5710010</link>
		<dc:creator>CJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5710010</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the fact is, overall, 71 percent of Americans are relatively satisfied with the health insurance.&quot;

Stupid Americans. What do they know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the fact is, overall, 71 percent of Americans are relatively satisfied with the health insurance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stupid Americans. What do they know?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5710010', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark701</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709957</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark701</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709957</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, Gingrich is such a prick! I wonder how he&#039;d feel if he and his family members were one of the 43,000,000 uninsured. But of course, as a Republican whose got his, he never thinks of that. Is there any greedier, more self centered, egotistical bastards than Republicans like these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, Gingrich is such a prick! I wonder how he&#8217;d feel if he and his family members were one of the 43,000,000 uninsured. But of course, as a Republican whose got his, he never thinks of that. Is there any greedier, more self centered, egotistical bastards than Republicans like these.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709957', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHRED</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709758</link>
		<dc:creator>SHRED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709758</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why isn&#039;t Newt giving up his Gov&#039;t health insurance first before opening his filthy mouth?&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why isn&#8217;t Newt giving up his Gov&#8217;t health insurance first before opening his filthy mouth?</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709758', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barfly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709718</link>
		<dc:creator>barfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709718</guid>
		<description>hanshiro the antlion Says: 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

&lt;em&gt;barfly, if you want clarification or disagree with how something is stated, calling someone a liar is the last selection that will guarantee you a civil discourse, not to mention any furthering the discussion.

Citing an initial version of a House bill is naive.&lt;/em&gt; 

Perhaps, if you didn&#039;t do it repeatedly.  That makes it hard to believe that your assertion isn&#039;t an attempt to make all democrats in both houses look bad.  And saying that I am naive for citing an original house bill, when we both know the conciliation process will ensure much of the house bill will remain intact, makes you look like a concern troll.  We also have other posters who occasionally let their rhetoric outpace reality, and I call them on their non-objectivity as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hanshiro the antlion Says:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><em>barfly, if you want clarification or disagree with how something is stated, calling someone a liar is the last selection that will guarantee you a civil discourse, not to mention any furthering the discussion.</p>
<p>Citing an initial version of a House bill is naive.</em> </p>
<p>Perhaps, if you didn&#8217;t do it repeatedly.  That makes it hard to believe that your assertion isn&#8217;t an attempt to make all democrats in both houses look bad.  And saying that I am naive for citing an original house bill, when we both know the conciliation process will ensure much of the house bill will remain intact, makes you look like a concern troll.  We also have other posters who occasionally let their rhetoric outpace reality, and I call them on their non-objectivity as well.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709718', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barfly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709717</link>
		<dc:creator>barfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709717</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I think barfly is seeking to score on semantics, not reality. I&#039;ve no love or trust for House dems after the capitulations of the past 8 years. &lt;/em&gt;

I could have quessed that you&#039;d try a reversal.  Next time, don&#039;t use overblown hyperbole.  That&#039;s the only thing I have problems with.  You could have made an unassailable case, if you&#039;d only used precise wording to get your view across.  You don&#039;t have to tar all democrats with the senate brush, which you seem to do, perhaps without realizing it.  Waxman in the House isn&#039;t going to buckle under to pressure from the Senate, and conflating the two, when that really isn&#039;t the case, weakens your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I think barfly is seeking to score on semantics, not reality. I&#8217;ve no love or trust for House dems after the capitulations of the past 8 years. </em></p>
<p>I could have quessed that you&#8217;d try a reversal.  Next time, don&#8217;t use overblown hyperbole.  That&#8217;s the only thing I have problems with.  You could have made an unassailable case, if you&#8217;d only used precise wording to get your view across.  You don&#8217;t have to tar all democrats with the senate brush, which you seem to do, perhaps without realizing it.  Waxman in the House isn&#8217;t going to buckle under to pressure from the Senate, and conflating the two, when that really isn&#8217;t the case, weakens your point.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709717', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Anax junius -1</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709679</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Anax junius -1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709679</guid>
		<description>.

&lt;strong&gt;I 
W A N T 
C O N G R E S S 
C A R E !&lt;/strong&gt;

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p><strong>I<br />
W A N T<br />
C O N G R E S S<br />
C A R E !</strong></p>
<p>.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709679', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marwick</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709653</link>
		<dc:creator>marwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709653</guid>
		<description>How much more are the people writing comments here willing to pay per month to cover the uninsured?  $500 a month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much more are the people writing comments here willing to pay per month to cover the uninsured?  $500 a month?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709653', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MapleStreet</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709648</link>
		<dc:creator>MapleStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709648</guid>
		<description>And may I add Hawkeye, what country pays more per capita for healthcare but has poor outcomes ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And may I add Hawkeye, what country pays more per capita for healthcare but has poor outcomes ?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709648', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiley</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709647</link>
		<dc:creator>wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709647</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve done &lt;em&gt;what&lt;/em&gt; well? &lt;em&gt;What&lt;/em&gt; have they done &lt;em&gt;well&lt;/em&gt;? Pushed more of our hard-earned money uphill to the economic rentiers making money off of their money than Medicare or the V.A.?

&lt;em&gt;What&lt;/em&gt; else, that can reasonably be describe as &quot;well&quot;, in the context of corporations being given charters, and subsidies by the government, a.k.a. &lt;em&gt;we the people&lt;/em&gt;, have they done &quot;well&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve done <em>what</em> well? <em>What</em> have they done <em>well</em>? Pushed more of our hard-earned money uphill to the economic rentiers making money off of their money than Medicare or the V.A.?</p>
<p><em>What</em> else, that can reasonably be describe as &#8220;well&#8221;, in the context of corporations being given charters, and subsidies by the government, a.k.a. <em>we the people</em>, have they done &#8220;well&#8221;?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709647', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawkeye</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709537</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawkeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709537</guid>
		<description>This just shows how horribly out of touch with America Newt has become. Apparently he&#039;s fine with 1 in 6 American citizens not having good health care...what a classy guy. It&#039;s no wonder the Republican Party is considered to be a joke by the vast majority of people in America today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just shows how horribly out of touch with America Newt has become. Apparently he&#8217;s fine with 1 in 6 American citizens not having good health care&#8230;what a classy guy. It&#8217;s no wonder the Republican Party is considered to be a joke by the vast majority of people in America today.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709537', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pags2</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709535</link>
		<dc:creator>pags2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709535</guid>
		<description>Newt and the other Republicans find themselves in the unenviable position of trying to derail health care reform. There are 40 million uninsured and that represents a lot of votes. You don&#039;t need to speculate which party these people will vote. If Republicans fight health care they will surely get beaten up so badly in the next few elections that it will be comparable to FDR in 1932. If they don&#039;t fight health care they lose their campaign contributions. Kind of damned if you and damned if you don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt and the other Republicans find themselves in the unenviable position of trying to derail health care reform. There are 40 million uninsured and that represents a lot of votes. You don&#8217;t need to speculate which party these people will vote. If Republicans fight health care they will surely get beaten up so badly in the next few elections that it will be comparable to FDR in 1932. If they don&#8217;t fight health care they lose their campaign contributions. Kind of damned if you and damned if you don&#8217;t.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709535', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanshiro the antlion</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709521</link>
		<dc:creator>hanshiro the antlion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709521</guid>
		<description>barfly, if you want clarification or disagree with how something is stated, calling someone a liar is the last selection that will guarantee you a civil discourse, not to mention any furthering the discussion.

&lt;strong&gt;Citing an initial version of a House bill is naive.&lt;/strong&gt; Watch what happens to that &#039;resolve,&#039; when the Senate slices it to ribbons and sends it back to the House.

If the House fights and substantially defends their initial version (even despite their craven surrender on what the public actually wants), I&#039;ll wholeheartedly apologize; 

&lt;em&gt;however,&lt;/em&gt;

If they capitulate to giveaways and accede to Senate additions that favor the industry, then you owe me an apology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>barfly, if you want clarification or disagree with how something is stated, calling someone a liar is the last selection that will guarantee you a civil discourse, not to mention any furthering the discussion.</p>
<p><strong>Citing an initial version of a House bill is naive.</strong> Watch what happens to that &#8216;resolve,&#8217; when the Senate slices it to ribbons and sends it back to the House.</p>
<p>If the House fights and substantially defends their initial version (even despite their craven surrender on what the public actually wants), I&#8217;ll wholeheartedly apologize; </p>
<p><em>however,</em></p>
<p>If they capitulate to giveaways and accede to Senate additions that favor the industry, then you owe me an apology.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709521', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MapleStreet</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709519</link>
		<dc:creator>MapleStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709519</guid>
		<description>They have done well according to the neocon definition of good capitalist company:

They&#039;ve taken exhorbitant amounts of money for the company while returning a pittance to those who are paying the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have done well according to the neocon definition of good capitalist company:</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve taken exhorbitant amounts of money for the company while returning a pittance to those who are paying the money.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709519', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uosdwis</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709498</link>
		<dc:creator>Uosdwis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709498</guid>
		<description>Actually, dummy, you have 260 million LESS those on Medicare/Medicaid, less those who are dependents and don&#039;t buy their own insurance, and less those on state plans and so on and so on. I haven&#039;t looked up the numbers, but USA Today says only 67% of non-elderly have private insurance (down from 80%), and another source says 1/3 of Americans are already on a &quot;public&quot; plan. Bottom line, Newt&#039;s 260million figure is way off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, dummy, you have 260 million LESS those on Medicare/Medicaid, less those who are dependents and don&#8217;t buy their own insurance, and less those on state plans and so on and so on. I haven&#8217;t looked up the numbers, but USA Today says only 67% of non-elderly have private insurance (down from 80%), and another source says 1/3 of Americans are already on a &#8220;public&#8221; plan. Bottom line, Newt&#8217;s 260million figure is way off.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709498', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoodathunktick</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709488</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoodathunktick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709488</guid>
		<description>All I can say is if two progressives (barfly and hanshiro) can raise holy hell with each other over details, no wonder we have Republican control.

I give up, you two just chew on each other while the toads laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is if two progressives (barfly and hanshiro) can raise holy hell with each other over details, no wonder we have Republican control.</p>
<p>I give up, you two just chew on each other while the toads laugh.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709488', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanshiro the antlion</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709480</link>
		<dc:creator>hanshiro the antlion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709480</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;79. Hoodathunktick Says: And barfly, hanshiro is making noise because he feels Congress is backing away from universal health care. Don&#039;t you want that? Do you want to keep paying insurance companies for piss poor care?&lt;/em&gt;

Exactly.

I think barfly is seeking to score on semantics, not reality. I&#039;ve no love or trust for House dems after the capitulations of the past 8 years. Claiming I should not include the House dems in the majority that is slowing progress in healthcare is to, imo, claim a car isn&#039;t a piece of sh¡t when it breaks down again and again;

...after all, the tires still have air, the windshield isn&#039;t broken...etc. The unfortunate fact is, all that is irrelevant if the car doesn&#039;t function properly, and &lt;em&gt;the majority is still necessary to get to the destination.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>79. Hoodathunktick Says: And barfly, hanshiro is making noise because he feels Congress is backing away from universal health care. Don&#8217;t you want that? Do you want to keep paying insurance companies for piss poor care?</em></p>
<p>Exactly.</p>
<p>I think barfly is seeking to score on semantics, not reality. I&#8217;ve no love or trust for House dems after the capitulations of the past 8 years. Claiming I should not include the House dems in the majority that is slowing progress in healthcare is to, imo, claim a car isn&#8217;t a piece of sh¡t when it breaks down again and again;</p>
<p>&#8230;after all, the tires still have air, the windshield isn&#8217;t broken&#8230;etc. The unfortunate fact is, all that is irrelevant if the car doesn&#8217;t function properly, and <em>the majority is still necessary to get to the destination.</em><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709480', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: researcher</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709481</link>
		<dc:creator>researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709481</guid>
		<description>wecome to america

yoyo

your own your own

and most of these folks call themselves christians

christianity died on the cross

profits over people the american way

“Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty which are embodied in one maxim: the fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate” Bertrand Russell.

as the country self destructs with its cherished capitalism that americans worship at the altar at they whine about a bab economy

46 millions americans without health care insurance does not faze most americans as long as they have insurance.

folks that is capitalism in action

capitalism by its very nature creates a selfish materialistic society. ie greed is good

with communism man exploits man with capitalism it is the other way around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wecome to america</p>
<p>yoyo</p>
<p>your own your own</p>
<p>and most of these folks call themselves christians</p>
<p>christianity died on the cross</p>
<p>profits over people the american way</p>
<p>“Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty which are embodied in one maxim: the fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate” Bertrand Russell.</p>
<p>as the country self destructs with its cherished capitalism that americans worship at the altar at they whine about a bab economy</p>
<p>46 millions americans without health care insurance does not faze most americans as long as they have insurance.</p>
<p>folks that is capitalism in action</p>
<p>capitalism by its very nature creates a selfish materialistic society. ie greed is good</p>
<p>with communism man exploits man with capitalism it is the other way around<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709481', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barfly</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/01/gingrich-private-insurance-well/comment-page-2/#comment-5709478</link>
		<dc:creator>barfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/?p=48668#comment-5709478</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;barfly, I know you aren&#039;t a troll, so why are you acting like one?&lt;/em&gt;

Well excuse me for pointing out factual inaccuracies which call into question a poster&#039;s assertions, especially when they pertains to political issues.

I&#039;ve been here at least as long as hanshiro, and I don&#039;t like to see people trying to present a false case, while assuming a progressive personna.  Wingnuts tell half-truths, and refuse to acknowledge inaccuracies, and I attack them as well.  Hate me for my stance, I really don&#039;t care; but this former carny has a finely attuned bullshit detector after having spent time with short-con grifters, and felons on the run, and my progressive viewpoint precludes me from remaining silent, when I see another &quot;progressive&quot; bullshitting the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>barfly, I know you aren&#8217;t a troll, so why are you acting like one?</em></p>
<p>Well excuse me for pointing out factual inaccuracies which call into question a poster&#8217;s assertions, especially when they pertains to political issues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been here at least as long as hanshiro, and I don&#8217;t like to see people trying to present a false case, while assuming a progressive personna.  Wingnuts tell half-truths, and refuse to acknowledge inaccuracies, and I attack them as well.  Hate me for my stance, I really don&#8217;t care; but this former carny has a finely attuned bullshit detector after having spent time with short-con grifters, and felons on the run, and my progressive viewpoint precludes me from remaining silent, when I see another &#8220;progressive&#8221; bullshitting the board.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5709478', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
