She thought they were talking about putting the cap back on toothpaste.

It’s Sarah Palin…
… What do you expect?

.

No, I think when she heard the words: “capping carbon emissions’ she thought it meant to breaking air or fart, and she instinctively reply: “I didn’t do it!”

To borrow some Winston Churchill words: Never in the history of menkind has so much bullshit been spread around by so few.

Republicanism have become a joke in America.

Unfortunately, the MSM only gives her extreme softball interviews, and never gets to ask her about the uncomfortable truths. She is PATHOLOGICAL.

Here’s a link to Andrew Sullivan’s compilation of “The Odd Lies of Sarah Palin.”

Read it and weep.

I couldn’t read it all. I just skimmed it.

But you’re a teacher, right? Or used to be? Did you know that people’s taxes go to pay your salary? And that public education is a “government service?”

BTW. Thanks for teaching. My mom was a career school teacher.

Is McCain now opposing “climate change legislation” or just the way it is addressed in the current measure being considered? TP quoted him on 6/29 as saying, “In its present form, which is cap-and-tax. … It’s really terrible, because I believe that climate change is real, I believe it is something that we need to address, and I’m sure that a lot of Americans do, but to do so with a bill like this?”

TP, you’re doing the same thing in this post that you criticized others for doing:

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/26/dccc-ads-war-funding/

Great analogy misscoleopteramolly. Can I put that up as a guest post at TheZoo?
___________________________________________________________

Oh, absolutely — go for it! I also found a link to some articles written about her:

http://www.maxbass.com/Florence-Foster-Jenkins.htm

Plus, she has a Wikipedia entry.

they were questions of your true intentions and you failed the test. the liberal agenda in plain view for all to see.

I’m pretty sure the “liberal agenda” doesn’t involve rendering sense from nonsense. It does, however, involve explaining opinions and ideas in a coherent manner supported by facts, data and evidence — a test you have failed repeatedly, even when given an open invitation.

And “questions” have a particular structure in the English language, a structure that appears to baffle you entirely.

For those of you unfamiliar with FFJ (and I only know of her historically, since she died before I was born), she was a woman who had always wanted to sing, and once she had inherited a sum of money that allowed her to pursue her dream, she went for it. God love her, she was so talentless that listening to cats fighting in an alley was probably a better musical experience than listening to her. But she never allowed anything to discourage her, and categorized herself with the other (genuine) great sopranos of her day.

Her popularity was due to people finding the way Mrs. Jenkins murdered the classics to be highly entertaining. Tickets to her recitals were highly sought after, and her single Carnegie Hall performance in 1944 was sold out weeks in advance. Her performances were delivered in serious earnest, and she seemed quite oblivious to the fact that she provided her audience with comic instead of musical entertainment.

And here we have Sarah Palin. A woman so completely unfit for national office that it’s laughable. This laughter keeps her in the public eye, of course, but her popularity appears to have given her the idea that she’s statesmanlike, politically intelligent, and a leader of her party.

She really doesn’t have a clue that her party regards her only as a token woman when they needed one, an attention-getter who could draw a crowd, someone who looks good on the teevee, and a sock puppet for the PNAC and other party power.

And the rest of us regard her as an endless source of entertainment — a guilty pleasure. Because a Sarah Palin interview (or speech, or column) makes as many people laugh today as an aria sung by Florence Foster Jenkins did over 65 years ago.

—-

they were questions of your true intentions and you failed the test. the liberal agenda in plain view for all to see.

Hoodathunktick says:
Gumble, my apologies, I accidentally hit a down on your comment.

I’ve done that a couple times already. In fact, I may have done it to one of your comments, Hooda. Sorry.

We’ve still gotta get used to this new system.

WillowOrchid says:
…when asked if she knew what carbon was, Palin said “I don’t”

“In what respect, Charlie?”

Gumble, my apologies, I accidentally hit a down on your comment.

Hey, no worries.

I hope she starts “winking” on a regular basis, also, too!