Fox News Reportedly Fires Liberal Analyst Marc Lamont Hill
Fox News Reportedly Fires Liberal Analyst Marc Lamont Hill
Yesterday, Accuracy in Media’s Cliff Kincaid announced that at today’s annual News Corp. meeting, he would urge Chairman Rupert Murdoch to fire Fox News analyst Marc Lamont Hill, whom he called a “left-wing cop-killer apologist.” Hill appears as an on-air contributor on shows such as The O’Reilly Factor.
The Live Feed reports that when Murdoch was asked this question (presumably by Kincaid), he replied that Hill had already been fired:
Rupert Murdoch continued Fox News Channel’s duel with the White House on Friday while also announcing the termination of the network’s left-leaning analyst Marc Lamont Hill. [...]
Murdoch also said that Hill has been fired. He revealed the move after a shareholder had raised the question of how Hill was hired, citing his “reputation of defending cop killers and racists.”
According to the report, Murdoch did not say why Hill had been fired. On his twitter feed, Hill seemed to acknowledge news of the report — saying, “Relax, y’all. Don’t believe the internet rumors” — but he didn’t directly deny that he had been fired. Neither Hill, nor Fox News have responded yet to inquiries from ThinkProgress.
But Hill appeared on the Fox Business Network just yesterday. In fact, just after radical Fox host Glenn Beck led a crusade to oust Van Jones from his position as White House clean jobs adviser, Hill defended Jones on the network:
HOST: We now know that he was involved in signing a petition that asked the question of whether or not the Bush administration had involvement in 9/11. He admits he signed it. He says…he didn’t know what he was signing. Would that have come up if he had been required to fill out this form?
HILL: Probably not, actually, because he — if we believe in good faith that he didn’t do it on purpose — and I believe that he didn’t do it on purpose — then he probably wouldn’t have put that down. And I’ll tell you why I believe he didn’t do it on purpose because he’s been very straightforward.
Hill also criticized the White House for not defending Jones. “[Obama] could have dispensed surrogates on the Sunday shows to defend Van Jones. Instead, they did nothing,” Hill complained.
Also during today’s News Corp. meeting, when asked about recent criticism from White House communications director Anita Dunn that Fox News is the “communications arm of the Republican Party,” Murdoch didn’t exactly deny it, saying her comments have “tremendously increased their ratings.”
We’ll update this post as we learn more.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
It’s only a matter of time before that wonderful channel starts mailing out the black roses.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:20 pmI’ll bet Hill was the only PhD on the foxnews org chart.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pmWhat cop killer did he defend? Mumia?
October 16th, 2009 at 2:26 pmAll that springs to mind is that Shep Smith MUST have naked pictures of Rupert and Roger on Fire Island.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:27 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
same reasons they’d hire you awrongk.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:32 pmhttp://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=3574
I guess FOX won’t be having anyone from the CATO institue on again, huh, aaronk?
No COP KILLER defenders!
October 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pmpete says:
All that springs to mind is that Shep Smith MUST have naked pictures of Rupert and Roger on Fire Island.
Shep. Smith was a HUGE PIMP for the Iraq war; I’ll never trust him.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pmFaux only wants to air leftists who hate leftists.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pmYou just described Beck.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:37 pmI invest my gold in the Fox News channel.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:38 pmYou know the thing that has really been bothering me lately, in regards to some of the statements made this anonymous shareholder and Limbaugh and these other talking heads when it comes to the term ‘racist’. By slinging this word around to apply to every mouthy minority they don’t like, they’re leeching the meaning out of the word. People hear a word often enough and it becomes a buzz word and, sure enough, they begin to tune it out as being something meaningless. And it’s a sly way to get people into thinking what they can dismiss with their over-the-top words: racism can’t really be a problem if it’s always the Word of the Day. Sure, we can point out the ridiculousness of Obama hating white people by his relationship to his family, but if the word is applied incorrectly with a wide paintbrush to enough minorities, then the term will stop sticking when it SHOULD be applicable to guys like Rush, et al.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:39 pmLooks like Faux Snooze doesn’t even bother to pretend to be
October 16th, 2009 at 2:40 pm“fair and balanced” anymore.
This comment has been voted down. Click to read.
What the GOP REALLY means … at 2:38 pm
I invest my gold in the Fox News channel.
Trading gold for toilet paper (Faux News stock certificates)
October 16th, 2009 at 2:42 pmAll conservatives should use that very strategy!
This comment has been voted down. Click to read.
I refuse to get bent out of shape over Fox News. It has a limited audience that share its views. The conservative radio talk shows and tv shows have an overlapping demographic. If you take all of the people who watch or listent to these shows, you will find that the same people. These shows have a limited viewership that can be expanded. The more they pander to the far right, the fewer the viewers that are independent will watch.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:47 pmronky; when we want your opinion, we’ll rattle your chain. Til then, STFU!
October 16th, 2009 at 2:48 pmFox News Reportedly Fires Liberal Analyst Marc Lamont Hill
– - Fox News employees must have given Hill 10 ‘Vote Down’s.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:49 pmI think it’s pretty obvious why this analyst was fired.
He actually analyzed that which he was to speak about.
Who does this guy think he works for? A legitimate news organization?
HAH!
October 16th, 2009 at 2:49 pmIf you defend pedophi|es you get your own show at Faux. See O’Racist for example….
October 16th, 2009 at 2:50 pmHouse of Roberts says:
Trading gold for toilet paper (Faux News stock certificates)
All conservatives should use that very strategy!
Oh, we should! We’d all be secure in our retirements… securely poor.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:50 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
aaronk-
Where the Law Enforcement officers killed at Waco not Cops?
Please explain…
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-395es.html
Cop Killer Defenders!
October 16th, 2009 at 2:51 pmhey awrongk?
what about those who incite cop-killers and other hate-criminals?
you know – like hannity, beck, coulter, et al.?
October 16th, 2009 at 2:51 pmWho was the shareholder. . . . Rush Limbaugh?
October 16th, 2009 at 2:53 pmHis Truth Keeps Marching On says:
He’s black, Obama’s black. Next question.
Must our party profile their way out of every rut?
October 16th, 2009 at 2:55 pmwhere = were… dammit.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:55 pmWe’ve already said 17,000 times that Fox News is a mouthpiece for the republican party. Why should anyone be surprised that they fire people who espouse diverse viewpoints? The point of a propaganda machine is to stay ON MESSAGE.
It’s like the old fable of the scorpion and the frog. Nobody should be surprised when the scorpion stings.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:56 pmCan someone explain this to me and how it pertains to Hill?
left-wing cop-killer apologist.
Or is this just another attempt at slandering without proof?
Kind of like stating that ardonk has oral sex with small domesticated farm animals.
Well, I posted it, so it’s true!
October 16th, 2009 at 2:57 pmThe little punk was on Fox. I’ve always wondered about Fox, who’s side are they really on? And why does Murdoch speak with that accent? Sounds middle-eastern to me.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:59 pmbelaccifer lacca says:
where = were
Now that’s a basic English lesson for my party!
We should be a remedial-English-only nation. Screw the Spanishes.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:59 pmSomeone page B-CUP. Stat! we need his explanation of this.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:59 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
LOL. Get the hint yet, hick?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pmSounds middle-eastern to me.
Do you stand before the toilet bowl and observe your poop’s characteristics?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
No where in that article are the actions of the Branch Davidians defended.
Huh…
October 16th, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Like no one saw that one coming.. I mean, really, it’s Faux News, they have to keep the batsh!t crazy 20% nutballer fringe in the fold, or else who would watch?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:06 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
ardonk at 37
Hope this helps.
As usual, you’ve been pwnd!
October 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
36, I notice it’s look like you.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:08 pmMarshal William Degan… not a cop?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:08 pmI don’t trust Shep either, AIO. But? He does buck the company line with enough regularity to make one ponder what the terms of his contract are, or what dirt he has on his bosses.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:10 pmSo we are supposed to feel sorry that someone who took Rupert’s money to play token liberal on RNC TV lost his meal ticket? Nah. I prefer that joke news station remain pure in its winger insanity. Obama calling their bluff and making Fox own up to being the propaganda wing of the Republics may boost ratings but it kills any remaining vestige of credibility.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pmRon Paul no longer allowed on Fox?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kunZyKGExSQ
October 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pmaaronk, exactly what crimes did the federal government commit at Waco? Give us a reliable source and links.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:13 pmyet another step closer to being “fair and balanced” right, cancervatives?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:14 pmawrongk accepts “the manson defense”, but only when it applies to the right’s swamis.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:18 pmHe has defended pedophi|es several times. But, perverts do stick together. No big surprise:
http://mediamatters.org/research/200702060010
http://crooksandliars.com/2007/07/19/the-falafel-guy-fatwa
October 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pmtombaker says:
——————————————————————————–
hey awrongk?
what about those who incite cop-killers and other hate-criminals?
you know – like hannity, beck, coulter, et al.?
**********************************************************
Tom Baker truly is a horse’s ass.
Hannity, Beck and Coulter incite cop killers? OK. And Limbaugh was behind the Holocaust and Michael Savage invented AIDS.
Tom Baker- Your lack of moral fortitude is only eclipsed by your stupidity. Please keep enlightening us!
October 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pmHis Truth Keeps Marching On says:
36, I notice it’s look like you.
How very Christian of you, Darryl.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:20 pmNettles 2
Your mother loves my nettles.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pmewe speek gooder engrish.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pmWell, if the stupid trolls want to talk about incitement, one must ask how Mr. Hill “incited” crimes that were committed before he was three years old?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
This comment has been voted down. Click to read.
I own you at .10 a post, b itch.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:24 pmaaronk says:
I have no idea.
Bingo.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:26 pmhey noodles,
October 16th, 2009 at 3:26 pmwelcome back assclown.
want to explain to the nice people how weiner boy savage is such a nice person that he isn’t allowed to step foot in great britain since he’s a “hate speech monger”?
52 – nice to know i prickle you back. you’re welcome, mansonite.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:31 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
aaronk says:
aaronk, exactly what crimes did the federal government commit at Waco? Give us a reliable source and links.
I have no idea. Relevent?
It helps to know what crimes you’re accusing people of committing when you accuse them. Otherwise your “post” is irrelevant. But when is anything you ever post relevant? LOL! ;)
October 16th, 2009 at 3:34 pmaaronk says:
Oddly enough, I don’t work for the government’s internal investigation unit, so I wouldn’t really know if/what crimes were committed.
Then why would you imply there was a “crime”? ;)
October 16th, 2009 at 3:35 pmaaronk says:
what is unreasonable about that? The government and it’s agencies should be held just as accountable as the citizens in which in governs. That doesn’t defend Koresh in any way.
Because it’s a “smear” that says extremists are the victims? That’s what all of you “militia” extremists all whine on about… ZZzzz…
October 16th, 2009 at 3:36 pmTracy-1 says:
If Van Jones doesn’t agree with that what he signed what did he think he was signing?
A petition to investigate 9-11? Especially since Bush was briefed on possible attacks and did nothing? ;)
October 16th, 2009 at 3:38 pmTell me Tracist, why don’t you think 9-11 should have been fully investigated?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:38 pmI implied no such thing. I didn’t even post the article to begin with, but if the author is aware of any crimes, it probably should be investigated. On the flipside, however, Hill defended a person who admitted to shooting a cop in the back of the head execution style….not much argument as to whether or not that is a crime.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:41 pmThanks Bozo-
October 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pmVery kind of you. However I cannot answer your question why Savage is banned from Britain. You may want to pose that question to TomBaker. He seems to know stuff about conservative talk show hosts (like their penchant for inciting cop killers)than the rest of us do not.
I don’t think Parodyll is here.
I do believe it is one of Twajie’s minions who has name jacked Parodyll’s most recent moniker.
And what’s the over/under on when Tracist1 get’s banned?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pmI’ll take 5:26pm with a parlay on him posting the derogatory “c” word.
Fox “News” Fires Reportedly Liberal Analyst
October 16th, 2009 at 3:44 pmThere I fixed the headline…
aaronk says:
I implied no such thing. I didn’t even post the article to begin with, but if the author is aware of any crimes, it probably should be investigated.
So then the actions of the “cop” that mumia killed should be investigated? Sorry, but this entire incident was investigated. What you’re doing is justifying the smears of a lunatic – which makes you a lunatic.
aaronk says:
On the flipside, however, Hill defended a person who admitted to shooting a cop in the back of the head execution style….not much argument as to whether or not that is a crime.
By “defending a person” you imply he defending their crimes as being reasonable. Can you please supply the quote to back up your smear – or did someone tell you to say something that stupid?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:45 pmif there were questionable activities involving that cop, then of course he should be investigated.
Check out Hill’s website…..I believe he has info on there about defending the cop killer. I’m not going to do your freakin research for you, but are you denying that Hill defended this person?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:50 pmTracy-1 says:
“A petition to investigate 9-11?”
Because they believe that the U.S. Governement must have had a hand in 9/11. These people are even more looney than the Birthers.
There are many ways to have a hand. Some intentional, some unintentional. We already “know” that the first WTC attacks were done by people trained by a CIA agent who was protected further by the CIA even after they found out his involvement.
We also know that Bush had warnings. You find it “looney” that we should have an investigation to make sure that we know whether it was incompetence or infiltration or intention that caused this.
Tracy-1 says:
This wasn’t the “fine print” at the end. The entire web site 911Truth.org is about trying to prove the the U.S. government had a hand in planning and/or executing the 9/11 attacks.
A CIA agent had a hand in the first WTC bombing. Why is it so inconceivable that “some” forces in our government were either involved, complicit or “incompetent” in letting this happen?
Tracy-1 says:
TO EXPOSE the official lies and cover-up surrounding the events of September 11th, 2001 in a way that inspires the people to overcome denial and understand the truth; namely, that elements within the US government and covert policy apparatus must have orchestrated or participated in the execution of the attacks for these to have happened in the way that they did.”
But “elements” doesn’t say the entire government. You don’t think “elements” of our government have their own agenda and are even infiltrated by outside or radical groups? LOL! I’m sure the CIA agent involved in the first WTC attacks appreciates your “naivety” and “support”! LOL!
October 16th, 2009 at 3:52 pmTracy-1 says:
#69
“Tell me Tracist, why don’t you think 9-11 should have been fully investigated?”
The 9/11 report wasn’t enough for you?
Nope. Several Democrats on it specifically stated they were blocked from a thorough investigation. You apparently don’t want one though.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:53 pmthis isn’t going to be some extended, self-pitying navel-gaze, is it Tracy?
i don’t think anyone’s inclined to indulge another of those from you today.
October 16th, 2009 at 3:53 pmI suppose Fox is just trying to cut payroll so they can add another high buck right wing extremist like Lou Dobbs to their right wing lineup. Fairly unbalanced indeed!
October 16th, 2009 at 3:53 pmTracy-1 says:
#72
“And what’s the over/under on when Tracist1 get’s banned?
I’ll take 5:26pm with a parlay on him posting the derogatory “c” word.”
So you were the leader of that BS mission? Nothing to say about the hunderds of other derogatory words posted here on a daily basis?
Victim much? Still can’t hold yourself accountable for your own words can you Tracist?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:53 pmaaronk says:
if there were questionable activities involving that cop, then of course he should be investigated.
Hill’s words say the same thing as this guy.
aaronk says:
Check out Hill’s website…..I believe he has info on there about defending the cop killer. I’m not going to do your freakin research for you, but are you denying that Hill defended this person?
No link? Of course not. If you are going to make an accusation, you need proof. Otherwise it’s called a “smear”. How am I supposed to “research” something that’s fabricated again? LOL! You wingnut smear artists are all alike! You haven’t even read it yourself have you loser?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:55 pmaaronk, blacks were being brutalized by whites in the 1960s, and you think that those that stood up against that brutalization don’t deserve some tribute by their own community? You idolize “white” soldiers in Iraq all of the time. Why do you hold a double standard for “blacks” that were defending their own during a time of massive attacks on minority communities by authorities and vigilantes alike? Double standard much?
October 16th, 2009 at 3:58 pmSeriously Tracist1, man up and quit whining!
October 16th, 2009 at 3:59 pmI’m not the one on the radio and the tv with a bullhorn calling the president a racist nazi and calling for armed citizens to gang up and subvert the due course of our democracy – those people are, and you know it, and you know there are plenty of people out there desparate enough and unstable enough to take that as a call to do wrong. It’s already happened in real life, and you know that, too.
You have the questionable morality in play – not me.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:01 pmardonk has oral sex with small domesticated farm animals.
ardonk says:
You have no proof! Show me where I’ve ever blown goats.
I says:
It’s there plain as the pimple on your nose. YOU DO THE RESEARCH!
Don’t be such a lazy arse!
ardonk whines:
October 16th, 2009 at 4:02 pmUmm, errr, well, SQUIRREL!
Educate yourself Tracist. There are some very legitimate reasons to investigate the government and what it knew and when it knew it beyond the GOP blocked “911 commission” which had its hands tied! We needed a “special prosecutor” with unlimited access and Bush blocked that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Mohamed
October 16th, 2009 at 4:02 pminteresting story… obviously, he deserves better than fox news. maybe he’ll actually contribute to a real network instead.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:03 pmMohamed also conducted clandestine military and demolition training through the Al Kifah Refugee Center. While in the United States, he helped train a number of jihadis, like El Sayyid Nosair (who killed Rabbi Meir Kahane, head of the militant, terror linked Jewish Defense League in New York City) and Mahmud Abouhalima, who assisted Ramzi Yousef in his 1993 attack on the World Trade Center. Mohamed associated with clerics like Abdel-Rahman.
In the early 1990s Mohamed returned to Afghanistan, where “he trained the first al-Qaeda volunteers in techniques of unconventional warfare including kidnappings, assassinations, and hijacking planes, which he had learned from the American Special Forces.” According to FBI special agent Jack Cloonan, in one of Mohamed’s first classes were Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and other al-Qaeda leaders.
That’s right folks. A “CIA” agent trained Al Qaeda on hijacking. Do you remember reading about that in the “911 commission” reports Tracist?
October 16th, 2009 at 4:04 pmHe joins the ranks of Neal Gabler and Eric Burns.
How can anyone who claims to be a journalist work with that network?
For a long time, I’ve felt that pressure should be put on NPR to fire Juan Williams and Mara Liasson. It’s a violation of every journalistic code of ethics to work for a political party–Fox–while working for a legitimate outlet–NPR.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:04 pmFox News Reportedly Fires Liberal Analyst Marc Lamont Hill
I have listened to Marc lots of times. He is no liberal. He is a Marxist.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:26 pmThinkProgress Editors: The link in the update to Hill’s Tweet is broken.
As for the firing…I think it was inevitable. Hill got what he deserved for swimming across a river with a scorpion on his back.
I hope this lesson carries through to anyone else who thinks it’s OK to appear on Fox.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:28 pmTracy-1 says:
Because if there was an real evidence eight years after the attacks with all the investigative technology something would have come out by now.
LOL! I pointed to “real” evidence, and it doesn’t even show up in the commission reports. All “real” investigations were blocked by the GOP, and Nancy and the rest of the Democrats are too busy “fixing” the failures of the GOP to spend the time necessary to investigate your incompetence/complicity or whatever it was.
Tracy-1 says:
But “elements” doesn’t say the entire government.”
Of course the “entire” government wouldn’t have been involved.
So you agree that ‘elements’ could have been? Like the CIA agent we already know that was involved?
“You don’t think “elements” of our government have their own agenda and are even infiltrated by outside or radical groups?”
Tracy-1 says:
I am sure there are. Just look at Van Jones someone who Obama obviously didn’t vet. I think you need to investigate by grabbing some of your buds and go out these “elements”. If the Bush administration was this cleaver to keep these “elements” secret all of these years then you need to retract anything you ever said about him being a dope. Right?
LOL!, another teabagger who’s just pissed at Van Jones because he took down Beck advertisers for his racism. Grow up prissy.
Cleaver? You mean “clever”? Who ever said they were clever? I said it’s “obvious” some elements of the government were involved, and those weren’t investigated. I personally believe it was “incompetence”, but we’ll never know since the GOP blocked a “real” investigation.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:29 pmTracy-1 says:
#80
“Nope. Several Democrats on it specifically stated they were blocked from a thorough investigation.”
Oh well….
Spoken like an unpatriotic fool…
October 16th, 2009 at 4:29 pmTracy-1 says:
“i don’t think anyone’s inclined to indulge another of those from you today.”
Depends on what other BS the Truthers wish to bring up here.
Talking about yourself in the 3rd person again – tracist the lunatic?
October 16th, 2009 at 4:30 pmTracy-1 says:
#83
“Still can’t hold yourself accountable for your own words can you Tracist?”
Accountable? I am not going to apologize for using them and I won’t and have not whinned to TP by using the “vote” button or “reporting abuse”. I will leave that up to the cowards here.
Then you shouldn’t “whine” about the consequences – loser.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:31 pmTracy-1 says:
“Seriously Tracist1, man up and quit whining!”
Whining about whiners?
LOL! Whiners always think that! LOL! ;)
October 16th, 2009 at 4:31 pmTracy-1 says:
“ardonk has oral sex with small domesticated farm animals.”
Your boyfriend?
You think “domesticated animals” are “boyfriend” material? That must explain that fat pig husband/wife of yours! LOL! ;)
October 16th, 2009 at 4:32 pmkwsventures says:
Fox News Reportedly Fires Liberal Analyst Marc Lamont Hill
I have listened to Marc lots of times. He is no liberal. He is a Marxist.
The opinion of a Nazi Fascist like you matters how?
October 16th, 2009 at 4:32 pmjust the bleepn facts says:
kwsventures says:
Fox News Reportedly Fires Liberal Analyst Marc Lamont Hill
I have listened to Marc lots of times. He is no liberal. He is a Marxist.
The opinion of a Nazi Fascist like you matters how?
I defy anyone to listen to Marc talk about economics and not say he is a Marxist. He has been on Fox Business dozens of times. He doesn’t hide his philosophy at all.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:37 pmHey aaronk-
Can pussies and welchers be fired? No? Bummer, guess we’ll have to let them drown in their own pee.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:45 pmOf course Fox is firing Hill. They only allow phony “Fox News Democrats” like Dick Morris and Tammy Bruce who rant about liberals non-stop, write anti-liberal books, and appear on anti-liberal movies.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:54 pmHill is literally a marxist,
and that’s why fox hired him and paid him.
brilliant deduction kws. of course fox hires obvious and avowed marxists with PhDs from US Universities all the time…
if you had any brains you’d be dangerous, sonny.
October 16th, 2009 at 4:59 pmHell, this is easy. If you believe the Fox side of the issue–support its sponsors. If you don’t, boycott them and let them know why!
October 16th, 2009 at 5:46 pmOlby Sucks says:
You like the Cato institute? okay…
October 16th, 2009 at 7:13 pmmr. sucks has all the comedic and satiric talent of slappy b., only somewhow dumber-sounding…
yawn, dude. seriously.
have an awesome friday night waving your little green boogers at people.
i’m sorry.
October 16th, 2009 at 7:38 pmpags2 says:
I refuse to get bent out of shape over Fox News. It has a limited audience that share its views.
That’s what most people don’t understand. Fixed likes to brag that they are the number 1 news station and they frequently leave out the important part “on cable”. Cable news has an infinitesimal number of viewers compared to the number of viewers on the network stations. There are 350 million people in this country. When 3 million watch Fixed News or O’Lieley on any given night, that’s less than 1% of the people in this country.
October 16th, 2009 at 8:51 pmkwsventures says:
I defy anyone to listen to Marc talk about economics and not say he is a Marxist. He has been on Fox Business dozens of times. He doesn’t hide his philosophy at all.
So he doesn’t believe in “private property” and that the “government” should own “all” assets? LOL! You fascist lunatics are all alike! You don’t know crap about the “words” you use! ;)
October 16th, 2009 at 9:29 pmFoxNews actually had a “liberal” analyst?
Who knew?
I don’t waste my time on that crap network, so I had no inkling of this young man’s gig on FoxNews.
October 16th, 2009 at 9:44 pmHistruth
You are a racist and you are a MORON. STFU
October 16th, 2009 at 11:10 pmDang, Flatulent Noise Channel makes another contribution to jobs lost in the last month.
But hey, they won’t blame it on the conservatives. The poor conservatives just couldn’t stand it any more. Anything coming out of a pundit’s or poltroon’s mouth that isn’t somewhere to the right of Roger Ailes is just some liberal poison that makes puny little weeny conservatives whine and whimper, and sheeyit, if one of those common tator dudes accidentally pronounces a truth, why the little weeny conservative diarrhea just leaves brown stains and runny crap all over the place.
(snark)
October 18th, 2009 at 1:13 pm“Oops. That’s kind of like the opposite of what Ellen claimed. (By the way, we searched Think Progress for their article praising Fox for hiring Dr Hill. There wasn’t one.)”
October 18th, 2009 at 9:25 pm***
Fox Haters Week in Review: Part One
http://homepage.mac.com/mkoldys/blog/sre277596936.html
Incompetence remains a code word whites use in dealing with professional blacks whose philosophy they disagree with. burun estetigi It becomes an unchallenged conversation ender. gögüs büyütme It was used against the president during the campaign and has resurfaced as he faces difficulties in office. gögüs estetigi Dr. Hill was no less qualified to speak to world issues than Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh or the other on air personalities at FOX. gögüs küçültme To suggest that he is only qualified to speak to urban black issues is insulting. vajina estetigi If you want to end a discussion about the merits of a white person, label them a racist. lazer epilasyon If you want to do the same to a professional black person, label them incompetent. karin germe estetigi I always thought having Hill on FOX to promote his liberal race card viewpoints was kind of unfair to actual African American scholars. estetik His arguments are so weak and illogical, and his ability to articulate them so unhelpful, he’s like a living straw man. karin germe estetigi But now that he’s “fired” he will become a hero on the liberal guilt circuit and he can go on tour with Ward Chamberlin and Cindy Sheehan. saç ekimi He’ll be fine. I’ve noticed a trend on right wing talk shows.
October 23rd, 2009 at 5:49 amThank you for your sharing.!
October 23rd, 2009 at 5:47 pm