Although both Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) and Sen. Mary Landrieu (D) have publicly condemned Justice of the Peace Keith Bardwell for refusing to issue marriage licenses to interracial couples, Sen. David Vitter (R) has stayed noticeably silent. (ThinkProgress contacted his office, but we did not receive a response.) Blogger-activist Mike Stark caught up with Vitter and asked him about his position. “Have you commented? What did you have to say about it?” asked Stark. Vitter simply smiled, stepped into the elevator, and allowed the doors to close. Watch it:
What a pussy.
October 21st, 2009 at 9:56 amSilence speaks volumes. If he disapproved, he would have said as much.
Coward.
October 21st, 2009 at 9:59 am“Vitter dodges question about interracial marriage in Louisiana.”
– - Vitter has a call in to Rush and is still waiting for instructions on what to say.
October 21st, 2009 at 9:59 amWell I be…a Republican who finally learned to keep its pie hole shut.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:02 amHe ran away!!? What a coward! And he’s leading in the friggin polls! WTF is wrong with the people in Louisiana?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:02 amI think he agrees with that unholy judge’s decision.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:02 amHe’s awaiting Little Mikey Steele’s daily RNC Tip Sheet so that he knows how to respond (like that’s going to help him).
In the meantime, he’s being Palin-esque — “I’ll get back to ya on that”.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:07 amNothing screams “Family Values!” like a sanctimonious hypocrite politician who enjoys the company of prostitutes and endorses anti-miscegenation laws.
And, yeah. He’ll win re-election. Now that SC doesn’t seem as hopeless (they’re starting impeachment proceedings, after all), LA now seems like the most backwards state in the country.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:08 amDiaper Dave.
Family Values.
Perversions & Prostitutes.
Lies & Bigger Lies.
Why would his opinion on anything matter?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:09 amWhat I don’t get is why he’s even still in office. Prostitution is still illegal. Shouldn’t he be in jail right now, showering with his back to the wall? Also, why haven’t they fired this justice of the peace? He’s discriminating against people. It’s not his place to tell anyone they shouldn’t get married and this bullshit about him being concerned for the children is more BS! I guess he hasn’t heard yet but, our current president is biracial. Now, that’s a pretty impressive job for a person of mixed race. Strip this douchbag of his justice of the peace status and send his ass to the unemployment office. He should be fired!
October 21st, 2009 at 10:09 amSurprise, surprise.. another closet, err I mean elevator racist speaks. Be proud Louisiana.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:11 amI have it on good authority that the first thing Vitter considers in any marriage or relationship question is whether or not there’s some hidden provision embedded somewhere that places arbitrary limits on diaper usage. Apparently he hasn’t looked closely enough at the current issue — yet — to speak intelligently (erm, freely?) on the matter.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:12 amActually that smile was just him making a poopie in his diaper…
October 21st, 2009 at 10:13 amroxs@10, The Repugs believe they are above the law. Just look and Ensign and Sanford. Not only were they busted, what they did WAS illegal under the law. Meanwhile, people had no problem throwing Spizter and McGreevey under the bus.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:13 amI wouldn’t say that his silence speaks volumes of the issue, but “no comment” in this case shouldn’t mean that he’s agreeing with Bardwell.
Let’s just keep an eye on this and file it under “Needs Answer At Some Point”.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:14 amvitter is basically an out in the open racist. Nothing more can be taken from this.
Keep them on the ropes. Eventually they will trip on their own bigotry.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:15 amChicken Vitter.
It’s a popular dish down there in Louisiana.
It will be served with a diaper you can use as a bib.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:18 amBravely bold Sir Robin
Rode forth from Camelot.
He was not afraid to die,
Oh brave Sir Robin.
He was not at all afraid
To be killed in nasty ways.
Brave, brave, brave, brave Sir Robin.
He was not in the least bit scared
To be mashed into a pulp.
Or to have his eyes gouged out,
And his elbows broken.
To have his kneecaps split
And his body burned away,
And his limbs all hacked and mangled
Brave Sir Robin.
His head smashed in
And his heart cut out
And his liver removed
And his bowls unplugged
And his nostrils raped
And his bottom burnt off
And his pen–
“That’s… that’s enough music for now lads,
*** there’s dirty work afoot*** ???.”
Brave Sir Robin ran away.
(”No!”)
Bravely ran away away.
(”I didn’t!”)
When danger reared it’s ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
(”no!”)
Yes, brave Sir Robin turned about
(”I didn’t!”)
And gallantly he chickened out.
****Bravely**** taking (”I never did!”) to his feet,
October 21st, 2009 at 10:20 amHe beat a very brave retreat.
(”all lies!”)
Bravest of the braaaave, Sir Robin!
(”I never!”)
Monty Python, of course.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:21 amI can think of a few possibilities for Vitter’s behavior:
1. He owes Bardwell money.
2. He agrees with Bardwell, but recognizes that it would be political suicide to say so.
3. He has sold his soul to special interests, and now can’t even answer no-brainer questions without first getting marching orders from them.
4. He is English language impaired (or deaf), and didn’t understand the question.
5. Vitter truly believes his constituents agree with Bardwell, and he’s afraid of offending them.
6. Bardwell has in his possession incriminating pictures or other evidence of Vitter’s sexcapades.
My money’s on number 3, although his behavior is going to suggest to many that number 2 is true. The media is hoping it’s number 6, because that’s great for ratings.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:22 amDNFP says: #1
What a hypocritical, lowlife, chickenshit pussy. Just thought I’d expand on your opinion.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:23 ammiss@20, LOL! I’m sure all could apply. Lord knows Vitter is a sleaze.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:26 amOff-topic (or maybe not) –
Meanwhile, Glenda BeckyBoy is taking on Moveon.org (ThinkProgress) for “smearing” FoxSnooze on his radio rant-fest right now. lol lol lol lol!
Although racism is clearly a latent, underlying issue still in the U.S., I am beginning to think that the more clear and present danger is “Beckism” and “Rushism” and “Seanism”.
I have no problem whatsoever with the supposed “War on Fox”. I think it has already forced them on the defensive, caused them to basically admit to their editorial/opinion slant and brought the obvious out in the open where it can be dealt with. At some point, I do hope that these other “isms” will be publicly discredited and discounted for what they are . . . hate-mongering, divisive, deceitful, pathetic piles of steaming crapola.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:30 amWhen he smiles like that it means the diaper is being filled
October 21st, 2009 at 10:30 amVitter was in too much of a hurry to answer questions. Bardwell had just given him the phone number of a black prostitute who would change his diaper.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:30 amSanctity of marriage?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:31 amFidelity?
This jerk made a fool of himself, exhibited his own lack of morality as well as his hypocrisy, humiliated his wife and still has the gall to stand in judgment of others, preferring not to oppose the ignorant and racist Bardwell.
Marie@26, Yeah, Vitter had no problem hauling his wife in front of the camera and share in his humilation. I don’t get these wives who stand by their sleazeball husbands, if it were me, I would have kicked him in the balls.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:33 amSomething very wrong has affected the thinking of residents in the southern states — they continue to elect miscreants like Vitter.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:33 amThat sounds like a sure bet that beck and faux are feeling the pressure. Good.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:34 amHow can this judge consider it falls under his jurisdication to protect the as yet unborn children of anyone. Who does he think he is? A God?
This is not applying a law but exercising POWER.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:36 am18. Peter C,
Wow. How did Monty Python get so many down votes? Tough crowd!
Also…I guess I just wasn’t paying attention: the diaper thing. Was that just a rumour or did Ms. Palfrey actually reveal that Dave The Hooker Magnet ride the Luvs Train?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:36 amP.D. says:
——————————————————————————–
He ran away!!? What a coward! And he’s leading in the friggin polls! WTF is wrong with the people in Louisiana?
One thing about the repugs in Louisiana – they do not care what you have or have not done. If you are not a member of the repug party, you will not be voted for. Period. The repug party there is truly “party before country”.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:37 amI’m sure that all the Louisianans Against Miscegenation are very disappointed that Senator Vitter didn’t come right on out and support with his whole being the good JoP!
October 21st, 2009 at 10:39 amNo wonder why Southern States have the worst educational standards, the highest obesity, worst infant mortality rate, and have the least insured. They keep electing officials like Vitter. What more can you do? These people are sheeple. They refuse to educate themseves. They live in a world of ignorance.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:40 amMissMolly @#20.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:41 amMy money is on 2, 3 5 and 6.
Not necessarily in that order.
folks.. this is OT again.. but I’m sitting here forcing myself to watch ‘102 minutes that changed america’ – the raw footage from 9/11… this is so hard to watch. – I recommend everyone look for the torrent and download it.. it’s important to understand just how tragic it was.. and so we never forget.
as always.. I’m sorry for being so off topic.. but this is so important. – it’s truly heartbreaking.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:49 amWho cares what that whoremonger has to say about anything?
He should be tested for STD’s, and the results should be made public.
After all, aren’t we paying for his goddamned health care?
We are owed some answers.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:51 amThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Alejandro, are you jealous because bush didn’t get nominated?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:54 amThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
This comment has been voted down. Click to read.
We know about war of choice and unfettered free market economy and tax cuts for the rich, though don’t we?
You can’t name a successful program that the gop can claim credit for. Not one. That’s why nothing you say matters.
October 21st, 2009 at 10:56 amtom – taking on Moveon.org (ThinkProgress)
what does that mean?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:57 amalejandro, bush pushed the war button.
Obama is not. see the diff?
October 21st, 2009 at 10:58 amBecause of course I represent the GOP. *eyeroll*
Unfettered free market. Yeah, right. Don’t make me laugh, Fred.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:00 amAlejandro… you’re a fricken idiot. He didn’t dodge the fact that israel has nukes.. everyone is aware of it… We are working towards eliminating them.. us included. everyone. It’s problematic of course.. how can it be verified – but that’s the thing with problems.. you still have to pursue a solution – even when it’s difficult… If you don’t pursue a solution.. we have a name for that – it’s called a Republican.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:01 am“Sen. David Vitter (R) has stayed noticeably silent.”
He’s just doing his doody.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:02 amIs this supposed to make sense? Am I supposed to know what is going on in your brain or did you forget that this is a forum where you type out your thoughts. Cryptic responses usually mean you have nothing.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:02 amThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Alejandro FLAGGED for OT fake progressive trolling. The worst kind.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:06 amP.D. says
October 21st, 2009 at 10:33 am
I don’t get these wives who stand by their sleazeball husbands, if it were me, I would have kicked him in the balls.
____________________________________________________________
In front of the cameras! I bet if one of these political wives gave their philandering/misbehaving husband a swift kick in the nether region during the apology presser, women from all over the country would send her flowers.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:06 amThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
alejandro, I’m not going to follow your mirad of links.
You have to express yourself in words that other humans can understand. I am not interested in trying to solve your mental dysfunctionality.
What do you think?
Is that beyond your ability? Or are you just afraid?
If you have a point, now would be a good time to make it.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:07 amtom – taking on Moveon.org (ThinkProgress)
what does that mean?
Katy, BeckyBoy was going after Moveon primarily but he threw Media Matters and ThinkProgress into his sh!t-stew as well. You know — the usual strategery about throwing enough crap at the wall in hopes that some of it will stick.
It’s the wing-nut version of Alinsky tactics. It’s the Manson approach . . . Helter-Skelter. lol
October 21st, 2009 at 11:08 amOk, so maybe reading isn’t your strong suit.
I’ll type slowly then. Maybe try reading more slowly.
Sound it out.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:10 amalejandro must love him some David Vitter to derail this thread with a totally OT unrelated incident.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:11 am
October 21st, 2009 at 11:13 amBITE ME.
Vitter is so unimportant it’s ridiculous. If you care so much about Vitter, then fine. I’m out of this lame thread.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:14 amtom says:
Katy, BeckyBoy was going after Moveon primarily but he threw Media Matters and ThinkProgress into his sh!t-stew as well.
i see… what i actually thought you meant, but wondered if somehow – other that values – they were related…
thanks.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:15 amOr does he LUVS him some Vitter? Maybe wants to give him a big “Huggie”? “Pamper” him a little?
OK – I’m done now.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:15 amalejandra… he did answer the question. It wouldn’t be constructive to answer Helen’s baited question the way she wanted.. would it? Are you trying to solve problems.. or create them? What we want is to slowly remove nuclear weapons in countries that have them and to not allow countries which are trying to develop them to continue. Do you think answering the question the way you wanted would have helped the cause of peace and the furthering of nuclear disarmament? . or is it you – like the press – are just seeking some sort of political scandal? Would you sacrifice the goal of peace for some ideological argument?
October 21st, 2009 at 11:16 amalejandro, I see you still can’t grasp the concept of expressing your point so others can understand.
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. It’s not like you brought anything to the table so you can leave emptyhanded just as you arrived.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:17 amalejandra.. if you read my last statement – and if you were to fully understand it.. you would realize why Obama won the peace prize.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:17 amHe was just looking for a phone booth so he change into his white robes and become Super Klansman.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:18 amthan, not that (i do that a lot)…
October 21st, 2009 at 11:21 amI don’t get it. You know good and well he would be asked about this and needed to prethink an answer.
Even if he things the JOP was morally right, he could have simply said a couple of different things that leave him in a somewhat positive light:
1) The office of the JOP is more a state matter and out of my venue
2) From what I understand, the JOP’s actions don’t seem consistent with current law.
etc.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:32 amAs one of only 100 senators only a Repub hack would think what he said by his “no comment” was unimportant.
October 21st, 2009 at 11:32 amI recognize that smile from when my boys were babies….Vitter had a diaper to fill.
October 21st, 2009 at 12:04 pmDon’t hold your breath waiting for Vitter to say anything. Like the magistrate, many people in the South (and everywhere else) still hold the prejudices, but do not vocalize them.
October 21st, 2009 at 12:04 pmIn Louisiana, the only thing more verboten than inter-racial marriage is cross-party marriage because the kids might be raised as Democrats.
October 21st, 2009 at 12:35 pmYOU can GO HERE and tell him he needs to answer the question:
Email Page:
http://vitter.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
or
Write, Call or Fax any of his offices:
Washington, D.C. Office
516 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Main: (202) 224-4623
Fax: (202) 228-5061
Central Louisiana Office
2230 S. MacArthur Dr., Suite 4
Alexandria, LA 71301
Main: (318) 448-0169
Fax: (318) 448-0189
Northeast Louisiana Office
1217 N. 19th St.
Monroe, LA 71201
Main: (318) 325-8120
Fax: (318) 325-9165
Northwest Louisiana Office
920 Pierremont Road, Suite 113
Shreveport, LA 71106
Main: (318) 861-0437
Fax: (318) 861-4865
Southeast Louisiana Office
2800 Veterans Blvd., Suite 201
Metairie, LA 70002
Main: (504) 589-2753
Fax: (504) 589-2607
Southwest Louisiana Office
3221 Ryan St., Suite E
Lake Charles, LA 70601
Main: (337) 436-0453
Fax: (337) 436-3163
Acadiana Office
800 Lafayette St.
Suite 1200
Lafayette, LA 70501
Main: 337-262-6898
Fax: 337-262-6373
Baton Rouge Office
October 21st, 2009 at 12:37 pm858 Convention St.
Baton Rouge, LA 70802
Main: 225-383-0331
Fax: 225-383-0952
Apparently vitter hadn’t received his gop talking points memo from rupert murdoch yet. What a chicken hawk, prostitute loving hypocrite.
October 21st, 2009 at 12:43 pmMichael Steele, a black man is the chairmen of the RNC. I wonder what he thinks about this issue??
October 21st, 2009 at 12:50 pmEntirely appropriate on Vitter’s part. He should STFU already on everything and resign.
Like everyone else in our great country, he’s entitled to his opinion, and like every other lying hypocrite in the Republipimp party who’s been caught out of bounds, he should keep his fracking opinion to himself and take his lying ass out of the US Congress.
October 21st, 2009 at 1:40 pmHe’s as big a pussy as aaronk.
October 21st, 2009 at 1:42 pmMaybe Vitter was in a hurry to go get his diaper changed?
October 21st, 2009 at 1:47 pmThing is, in a civilized world, there would be absolutely no political price to be paid for saying that this justice of the peace has no business being in his job. That Vitter feels that he has to be silent tells me that he thinks there is a political price to be paid for condemning this guy, which speaks volumes about the people voting for him.
October 21st, 2009 at 1:53 pmI should be outraged, but sadly I am not. Nixon, Reagan, and more recently Rove, made the decision to lay down with the proverbial dogs that are racists and religious zealots and have become over-run with fleas.
One would think after the blanket rejections in 2006 and 2008 of all their party stands for that perhaps a new strategy would be a sound idea. But even when one of their own expresses a mainstream opinion they shout them down or run them out of the party. The world has passed these people by and as they retire/die, they will be replaced with more progressive representatives on the whole and we all will be better for it.
October 21st, 2009 at 2:27 pmWhy would anyone in Louisiana vote for Vitter, a married man with young children, who says he’s for “family values” but runs around in houses of prostiution wearing a diaper?
I don’t understand.
October 21st, 2009 at 2:54 pmAt least, when he runs away we don’t have to hear him whine.
October 21st, 2009 at 2:58 pmSave for the trolls, most everyone blogging here gets it.
The big picture.
Today’s GOP “leaders” have their GOD in their pocket and only THEY know his will. Everyone else be damned.
And if that is not good enough, these same Christian-right GOP thugs are feverishly RE-WRITING their Bible that they pretend to hold so dear to rid it of “liberal tendencies and liberal bias”. Bye Bye Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. “We’re today’s GOP! Good Christians all! – just ask us! And you boys are toast”.
That is the big picture when it comes to the GOP.
Lesson: Self proclaimed Christian GOP “leaders” like Vitter
haven’t any shame what-so-ever. He/they have no sense of the abject hypocrisy they represent and absolutely no empathy for anyone who is not like them.
Because of their twisted and perverse understanding of GOD, they have the rational to commit acts of devastating depravity, hate, intolerance, hypocrisy and vice. All with a smarmy, greasy smile on their faces and a gun in their hands.
What remains is to ask how long it will take reasoned peoples everywhere to understand this?
October 21st, 2009 at 3:25 pm71. SoapBox says:
YOU can GO HERE and tell him he needs to answer the question:
Soapbox thank you for the info about Sen. Vitter’s office. Tomorrow morning I will be going by his office here in Shreveport to say that he does need to answer the question.
October 21st, 2009 at 3:36 pmMaybe he would be more comfortable answering whether tax dollars should be used to pay for interracial prostitute encounters.
October 21st, 2009 at 9:26 pmHis diaper must’ve needed changing. “Is there a whore in the house?”
October 22nd, 2009 at 2:42 amThank you for the opportunity to comment,
I was saddened, hurt and above all, ‘embarrassed’ by Justice Bardwell’s understanding of what is acceptable and unacceptable. Never the less, I think I can understand what helped to put his thinking so far out of the ball park. As well, I fully understand that there’s going to be those out there who strongly disagree with what I’m about to say.
I think Justice Bardwell and I were raised to feel secure in the notion that we were ‘good people’; free of any racial prejudice what so ever. In Bardwell’s case the proof is shown in his totally unapologetic reasoning concerning interracial marriage, set side by side with his bold proclamation, “I have piles and piles of black friends.” (Associated Press quote)
I suspect that Bardwell like myself, was raised by parents who said one thing (all races are equal) and clearly exhibited another (not one real friend or acquaintance of another race to be seen). In other words, instructed in a very subtly, very subliminal form of racism.
So that would be the ‘parental’ conditioning; but as we all know, as a child grows up there are others in a position of trust who have an opportunity to ‘confirm’ or ‘challenge’ the teachings of the child’s parents. In my case the most influential would have to be the clergy and laity of the many different churches I attended. My father was Baptist, my mother was Catholic and I was encouraged to attend both of their churches and allowed to spend as much time as I cared to with any other recognized Christian base denomination. Thus during my adolescents, I was a ‘card carrying member’ of not only my parent’s churches but Methodist, Presbyterian and Lutheran as well (somehow missed Episcopalians).
And what ‘confirmation or ‘challenge’ of my parent’s subtle teachings of racial bias did I get from these varied denomination? My personal experience was: Seldom if ever did I see a person of another race at a religious service. I ‘never’ saw a person of another race at a social function such as a young people’s dance, pot luck dinner, bingo game or church picnic. Thus, everything I was subtly taught at home was just as subtly reinforced at every church I named above. “We’re all equal in God’s eyes”—yes, I heard that from one and all but when I looked around I only saw white faces. I see that as the subtly, subliminal reinforcement of my parent’s subtle, subliminal racism.
So then, as an adult do I still see all Christian denominations as allowing subtle racial prejudice to exist within their congregations? Again, using personal experience as a standard of measure, I would have to say the only internationally recognized religious organization that I have found to ‘openly insist’ that racial prejudice is totally unacceptable in the eyes of God and therefore totally unacceptable among His worshipers has been Jehovah’s Witnesses. You only have to attend one of their meetings or look through one of their magazines to see for yourself to what extent they truly practice interracial blending.
Race would never be a factor in accepting a marriage partner among Jehovah’s Witnesses. If the couple later chose to have children the parent’s, grandparents and congregation as well, would consider the children a wonderful blessing to be enjoyed by one and all.
So then, if you’d care to check yourself for the existence of the subtle, subliminal racial bias that Justice Bardwell is so obviously influenced by you might choose to ask yourself how happy you would or would not be with racially mixed grandchildren to cuddle. If in your heart of hearts you find ‘not happy’ as your honest answer, that would be a serious problem.
October 26th, 2009 at 1:45 pmCheck out this incredible video of Louisiana’s’ Republican Senator David diaper-Dave Vitter estetik, running away from mrcawguy when asked about his inability to denounce a Louisiana justice of the peace after he denied an a marriage license to an interracial couple burun estetigi: According to the reporters over at TalkingPointsMemo.com gögüs büyütme ameliyatlari, Senator David Vitter is the only senior eleted offiial from Louisiania that hasn’t denouned the magistrate that denied a marriage license to inter-racial applicants gögüs estetigi. I gave him the chance to denounce the judge. He clammed up gögüs küçültme ameliyatlari. var addthis_pub=”thejoshuablog”;Here’s the original story (via the AP/Yahoo): NEW ORLEANS – A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have vajina daraltma ameliyatlari. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long lazer epilasyon. “I’m not a racist. I just don’t believe in mixing the races that way, karin germe estetigi” Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. “I have piles and piles of black friends estetik. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else. karin germe estetigi” Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple saç ekimi. If they are, he does not marry them, he said. Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites gögüs büyütme estetigi, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. gögüs diklestirme estetigi He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said gögüs küçültme estetigi. “There is a problem with both groups accepting a child from such a marriage,” Bardwell said vajina daraltma ameliyati. “I think those children suffer and I won’t help put them through it. gögüs estetigi” If he did an interracial marriage for one couple, he must do the same for all, he said.
October 28th, 2009 at 4:25 am