Fox’s Chris Wallace Conducts Sycophantic, Softball Interview With Rush Limbaugh
Fox’s Chris Wallace Conducts Sycophantic, Softball Interview With Rush Limbaugh
When the White House snubbed Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace of an interview with President Obama in September, Wallace defended his program by claiming it is a “truly fair and balanced show.” This morning, he had an opportunity to demonstrate his fairness, but failed miserably.
During his 30-minute on-air interview with Rush Limbaugh, Wallace did not ask a single critical question of the hate radio host, nor did he ever seriously challenge Limbaugh’s views at any point in the interview. Wallace relished engaging in a hostile interview with President Clinton in 2006, arguing afterwards that, “My instinct is to go after them with the high hard one.” He showed none of those instincts this morning.
Instead, Wallace teed up a series of softball questions, allowing Limbaugh to offer unchallenged accusations of Obama. Some examples:
WALLACE: This week it will be one year since Barack Obama was elected president. In that time, what has he done for and to the country?
WALLACE: You have now taken to calling Mr. Obama the man-child president. What does that mean?
WALLACE: Let’s talk about a couple of the big issues the president is dealing with now — first of all, Afghanistan. You suggest that he is taking all of this time to decide what to do in Afghanistan to keep his left-wing base on board for health care reform.
WALLACE: But you don’t think that Barack Obama has a profound respect for our soldiers and the families that are giving the sacrifice?
WALLACE: Do you think the individual mandate is constitutional? Do you think the government has the right to tell people, You’re going to get health insurance, and if you don’t get it, you’re going to pay a penalty?
WALLACE: To press my question, why aren’t people turning to the Republicans?
WALLACE: I think you’re a great broadcaster. How can you possibly be worth that kind of money?
WALLACE: If he does win, how is Rush Limbaugh going to handle seven more years of Barack Obama?
Limbaugh took the opportunity to issue screed after screed — calling Obama a “radical” leader who is “destroying” the country, claiming Obama “doesn’t care” about the troops in Afghanistan, and dismissing Obama’s trip to Dover Air Force base to see the fallen soldiers as a “photo op.” Wallace silently went along for the joy ride.
Full transcript of the interview below:
WALLACE: Rush, welcome to FOX News Sunday.
LIMBAUGH: Thank you. Appreciate it.
WALLACE: This week it will be one year since Barack Obama was elected president. In that time, what has he done for and to the country?
LIMBAUGH: I think it’s all to. I don’t think there’s any for. I’m — Chris, I’m — I’m really, really worried. We’ve never seen this kind of radical leadership at such a high level of power in the –in the country.
I believe that the economy is under siege, is being destroyed. Anybody with any economic literacy would not do one thing this administration’s done to try to revitalize the private sector. They’re destroying it.
And I have to think that it may be on purpose, because this is just outrageous, what is happening — a denial of liberty, an attack on freedom.
I mean, just — just a couple days ago, they talked about these 650,000 jobs that they’ve created or saved. There’s no such thing as a saved job. Besides that, they’ve destroyed jobs. They’ve lost 3.3 million jobs in this country since Obama’s stimulus plan, and it’s going to get worse.
WALLACE: But — but wait a minute. How about save the country from a financial abyss, 3.5 percent growth in the third quarter in GDP?
LIMBAUGH: There wasn’t any growth in the private sector. That 3.5 percent came from two things — government spending on Cash for Clunkers — they just moved fourth quarter auto sales into the third quarter — and the first-time home buyer thing.
GDP equals CIG — that is, consumers, the investment of business, and government. And it’s all G. It’s all government. There is no private sector growth. There were no new jobs being created. We’re losing them.
WALLACE: How about kept the country safe for nine months?
LIMBAUGH: I don’t know how safe we are. Iran is nuking up. Everything that we’ve asked them to do they are forgetting. They’re not going to move their plutonium, their enriched plutonium –uranium out of the country like they said so.
We can’t make up our minds what we’re going to do in Afghanistan. We’re dithering there. I don’t — I don’t think we’re any better off in any way it could be measured.
WALLACE: You have now taken to calling Mr. Obama the man-child president.
LIMBAUGH: Right.
WALLACE: What does that mean?
LIMBAUGH: Just — he’s (inaudible) he’s a child. I think he’s –he’s got a — a five-minute career. He was in the Senate for 150 days. He was a community organizer in Chicago for however number of years.
He really has no experience running anything. He’s very young. I think he’s got an out-of-this-world ego. He’s very narcissistic. And he’s able to focus all attention on him all the time. That –that description is simply a way to cut through the noise and say he’s immature, inexperienced, in over his head.
WALLACE: Let’s talk about a couple of the big issues the president is dealing with now — first of all, Afghanistan. You suggest that he is taking all of this time to decide what to do in Afghanistan to keep his left-wing base on board for health care reform.
LIMBAUGH: Well, it’s partly that, but I also don’t think he cares much about it. I think once…
WALLACE: Well, come on.
LIMBAUGH: No, I — no, see, this is — I know this is going to sound controversial, but I don’t think he cares that — if he –Chris, if he cared about — we’ve got soldiers and their families worrying about what we’re going to do. The general on the ground said we need some more troops.
The policy that he implemented in March he now doesn’t like and is trying to figure out how best to make everybody happy here politically on his side of the aisle and also for his image. Democrats have a tendency to be seen as weak on defense, so he’s battling with that.
But again, if he cared about victory — remember, he said about Afghanistan victory is not something he’s comfortable with, the concept. It reminds him of the Japanese surrendering on the USS Missouri. It made him very uncomfortable.
He wants to manage this rather than achieve victory. He says these things. I don’t know if people actually listen and have them register when he does.
WALLACE: But you say you don’t know that he really cares. Do you at least give him credit for going to Dover, Delaware to honor the remains of soldiers, dead soldiers, who came back from Afghanistan?
LIMBAUGH: You know, see, the politically correct thing to say here would be, Oh, yes, I am very impressed that President Obama decided to go show his concern for the remains, troops who’ve given their lives for freedom in this country.
It was a photo op. It was a photo op precisely because he’s having big-time trouble on this whole Afghanistan dithering situation. He found one family that would allow photos to be taken. None of the others did.
And of course, when you have a sycophantic media following you around, able to promote and amplify whatever you want, then he can create the impression that he has all this great concern, but the — Bush did this…
WALLACE: Well, no…
LIMBAUGH: … but no cameras.
WALLACE: I don’t know that he ever went to Dover, Delaware.
LIMBAUGH: No, he went to see the families.
WALLACE: Yes, he certainly went to see the families.
LIMBAUGH: But he didn’t make photo ops out of it. The…
WALLACE: Well, but the argument would be that it was political of Bush not to be seen with the coffins because he was trying to hide it, hide the cost of war from the American people.
LIMBAUGH: Well, I have the benefit of knowing George Bush a little bit, and I — I — I’ve seen him cry talking about missions that he’s ordered. I think he has a great, profound, deep respect for the families of all military personnel, and those who have died…
WALLACE: But I don’t disagree with that…
LIMBAUGH: … and I — he’s not going to use them.
WALLACE: But you don’t think that Barack Obama has a profound respect for our soldiers and the families that are giving the sacrifice?
LIMBAUGH: Chris, throughout the Iraq war, it was Barack Obama and the Democrat Party which actively sought the defeat of the U.S. military. They convened hearings and accused General Petraeus of lying. They said the surge would not work.
Harry Reid stands up, waves the white flag — this war is lost. Jack Murtha is out saying our Marines at Haditha are guilty of rape. John Kerry is accusing our Marines of committing terrorism acts by going into the homes of Iraqis at midnight in the dark terrorizing, looking for Al Qaida or whoever was there.
Yeah. I mean, look. I hate to be honest with you here, but I do question their commitment to national security. I question their commitment to the U.S. military. They’ll put their political survival and their political power being gained over anything else. They’ll use anybody and throw anybody away in order to achieve it.
WALLACE: You also say that the president should give the generals, the commanders on the ground, as many troops as they need to win.
But a staunch conservative like George Will says, Look, this –Afghanistan has been a dysfunctional country. It’s a corrupt country, and that we can beat the Taliban and beat Al Qaida without this huge commitment of new troops.
LIMBAUGH: Well, I don’t know that. I don’t — I don’t have the benefit of knowledge that George Will has, so I trust the experts, and to me they’re the people in the U.S. military.
But these are — these are — you know, the surge in Iraq — same thing. We went — it worked. The Democrats were the ones opposed to it. They said it would fail, it wouldn’t work. And by all measure it did.
Now the basic same theories are being suggested for Afghanistan and — I don’t know. The thing that bothers me about this is we’re there. You know, it’s — whether we should have gone or what we’ve done heretofore is now irrelevant. There’s only one thing to do, win. you know, what about Afghanistan? Easy. We win, they lose.
WALLACE: Let’s turn to health care reform.
LIMBAUGH: Yeah.
WALLACE: You have made no secret of the fact you oppose the public option, government-run health insurance to compete with private insurers. With tens of millions of Americans still uninsured, do you think that the government has any moral obligation to find some way to cover them?
LIMBAUGH: There is a way to insure the uninsured without doing any of what we’re doing. If that were the objective, then I’d be full for it.
This is not about insuring the uninsured. This is not about health care. This is about stealing one-sixth of the U.S. private sector and putting it under the control of federal government.
And when they get this health care bill, if they do, that’s the easiest, fastest way for them to be able to regulate every aspect of human behavior, because it will all have some related cost to health care — what you drive, what you eat, where you live, what you do.
And there’ll be penalties for violating regulations. It’s going to be the biggest snatch of freedom and liberty that has yet occurred in this country.
WALLACE: And in 30 seconds, how do you insure the insured without this big overhaul?
LIMBAUGH: Well, I’ve run the numbers, and the real number of uninsured that want insurance is 12 million. Take some of the unspent stimulus. We have 85 percent of the stimulus unspent. Take some of it. For 35 to $40 billion a year, you could insure those people, not $2 trillion, not 1.4 — if that’s the objective, do it now.
WALLACE: Do you think the individual mandate is constitutional? Do you think…
LIMBAUGH: No, I don’t think the…
WALLACE: … do you think the government has the right…
LIMBAUGH: No.
WALLACE: … to tell people, You’re going to get health insurance, and if you don’t get it, you’re going to pay a penalty?
LIMBAUGH: I do not think it’s constitutional. Chris, this — this is — these are dark days for the country. This is deadly serious stuff. This is a total attempt to remake the country as founded and constituted. And it — it worries me greatly.
WALLACE: We asked our viewers for some questions.
LIMBAUGH: I love Fox viewers. I love them.
WALLACE: Well, George Heplin (ph) sent this, If President Obama would agree to an interview, what would be your first question?
LIMBAUGH: Why are you doing this? Why? What in — what — what do you not like about this country that makes you want to inflict this kind of damage on it?
WALLACE: Lucille Golman sent this question, Did you vote for John McCain in the 2008 presidential election?
LIMBAUGH: I did.
WALLACE: Really?
LIMBAUGH: Of course.
WALLACE: But you’ve been so critical of John McCain.
LIMBAUGH: Yes, but you weigh the two. I don’t think — there are a lot of people, Chris, that are saying there’s no difference in two parties. I know a lot of people think that, and they’re — and they really, really believe it.
But I don’t know of any Republican who would try to take over one-sixth of the U.S. economy. I don’t know one Republican who would put forth this — this irresponsible cap and trade bill. I don’t know one Republican who would actually do that as something he initiated.
WALLACE: Let’s talk about the state of the GOP. A recent Fox News poll found that the approval rating for the president has dropped to 49 percent, but meanwhile, only 25 percent of people approve of congressional Republicans.
As voters have growing doubts about the president and his policies, why aren’t they turning to the opposition? Is there something that the — that the Republican Party lacks in the way of a positive, affirmative agenda?
LIMBAUGH: The Republican Party needs to learn something. If it goes country club blue-blood moderate, it’s going to lose. If it goes Reagan conservative and commits to it, it’s going to win landslides.
WALLACE: To press my question, why aren’t people turning to the Republicans?
LIMBAUGH: Well, right — right now there’s no central Republican leader to turn to, and there’s no central Republican message. The Republican messages is sort of muddied. What do they stand for? Right now it’s opposition to Obama.
WALLACE: And is that enough?
LIMBAUGH: Well, it may be in 2010. I mean, I — I actually do think that there’s going to be a revolt against the Democrat Party and against Obama, even if voters in 2010 have nothing to vote for.
WALLACE: So do you think that the Republican Party — do you see it as a big-tent party or small-tent party?
LIMBAUGH: Big tent.
WALLACE: But — but you sound like you’re kind of saying to the moderates, the — particularly on social issues, If we lose you, too bad.
LIMBAUGH: Well, I look at — when I say big tent, I look at the United States of America, so I — I — I’m an American. I love this country. I want everybody in it to do well.
The conservative message is not, OK, Hispanics, we have this plan for you. Women, we have this plan for you. That’s what the Republican Party’s trying to do, and emulate group politics. And the history is that — you know, why be Democrat lite? Let them handle that.
Let’s go after the big tent that is the country, and let’s go get every person in this country — I don’t care what their race is, what their gender is, what their sexual orientation.
If they are told that there is somebody that’s going to lead this country or party that is actually going to strengthen them, give them the tools, get out of their way and let them make this country work, the Republican Party can attract a majority like they haven’t seen since the ’80s.
WALLACE: In the Time Magazine article about Glenn Beck recently…
LIMBAUGH: Oh, yeah.
WALLACE: … they write just as you found your place as the triumphant champion of the age of Reagan, that Beck is tapping into the fear and anger on the right today.
Is that why you think he’s struck such a chord, because he taps into the fear and the anger of the conservatives today?
LIMBAUGH: There is a lot of fear. There’s a — there’s a tremendous amount of fear in the country over what is happening in Washington to individual liberty and freedom. He may well have tapped into that.
The anger — I think that’s — that’s sometimes overplayed, because it’s become a cliche for the left to say angry white men as a way of denigrating conservative energy and ideology. But there’s no question there’s a lot of anger. And if — and if he’s tapped into that, I wouldn’t be surprised.
WALLACE: When you look at Glenn Beck and you see this explosion, what do you feel?
LIMBAUGH: Well, I’m kind of — I’m kind of proud.
WALLACE: No envy, no competition?
LIMBAUGH: No, no, no, no, no. I mean, my radio audience is astronomically high. I’m — look it, in 1988 there was nobody doing what I’m doing. Nobody. You had — CNN was the only cable network, and you had the three networks and the newspapers.
And now look. Now look what’s out — all of this conservative media, conservative talk radio, television, Fox News, the conservative blogosphere. I mean, I — in one way, I could — I could — if I wanted to have my ego to be as big as Obama’s is, I could say, Look what I created.
So any success out there on my side, conservative media — damn, if it’s going to help us get this country back, bring more in.
WALLACE: Let’s talk about you. You said recently, I actually thank God for my addiction to pain pills because I learned more about myself in rehab than I would have ever learned otherwise. What did you learn from drug rehab?
LIMBAUGH: One of the — one of the things that I’d always had trouble with in my life was trying to be what other people expected me to be or wanted me to be, in my personal life, because I wanted to be liked.
And everybody’s raised to want to be liked and to want to be loved. Nobody wants to grow up being hated. Now, interestingly, my radio career — I don’t care. You know, I — I figured that out. It was a tough thing, Chris, to learn to take as a measure of success being hated, you know, by 20 or 30 percent of the country. I mean, that — because nobody’s raised for that.
But in my personal life, what I — the thing I learned most was that the only way to have real intimacy with people, real solid relationships, is to be who you are. That will attract the kind of people worthy of having intimate relationships with, good friendships with.
WALLACE: And without putting you on the couch, are you saying that the addiction came from some sense of personal inadequacy?
LIMBAUGH: Oh, of course. Yeah. It — I wasn’t good enough. I was masking unhappiness elsewhere, not dealing with the real reasons I was unhappy in my personal life. I had — I had never experienced the kind of euphoria that I got from a pain pill.
I think the only time that I really — with all the success I’ve had, the only time I’ve had the kind of euphoria is when I made the high school football team as a sophomore. I was never prouder of myself.
But all my career achievements did not create that for me, because it’s — you’ve got to maintain it every day. It’s not something you earn and that it lasts forever. And I don’t look back. I don’t stop and think about what I’ve accomplished because there’s always tomorrow, so I don’t have time for the euphoria. I don’t have time for that.
Man, am I — it’s — I’m too busy trying to meet everybody’s expectations tomorrow. So the pain pills came along and they masked all these feelings of inadequacy that I had. Now, after just seven weeks of this place in Arizona, I have zero feelings of inadequacy.
It has not been replaced by an irresponsible ego. It’s just a confidence in who I am.
WALLACE: You signed a new contract last year — eight years, reportedly $400 million.
LIMBAUGH: Reportedly, right.
WALLACE: So I’ll — I’ll go to the horse’s mouth. True?
LIMBAUGH: It could be true. You know, I’m a — a guy who earns a percentage of what I generate every year. There are some guarantees, but I’ll tell — the $400 million is not guaranteed. I have to earn that. So far…
WALLACE: But you could earn $400 million.
LIMBAUGH: I could. I’m ahead of schedule, in fact.
WALLACE: And don’t get me wrong.
LIMBAUGH: Right.
WALLACE: I think you’re a great broadcaster. How can you possibly be worth that kind of money?
LIMBAUGH: Very simply. Value is determined by what somebody will pay you to do what you do. I’m probably worth more. I’m not complaining. Do not — do not misunderstood.
But you know, this whole question — see, because I’m a capitalist. You’re worth whatever you can get. You’re worth whatever your value is, and that’s determined by what somebody’s willing to pay you for it.
And the only reason I get that money is because the people who invest in me get results beyond their expectations.
WALLACE: All right. You believe in the free market.
LIMBAUGH: I do.
WALLACE: Let’s talk about the NFL and the decision to drop you as a possible owner. What about the argument, Look, this is a bunch of billionaire owners sitting around and saying, ‘Rush Limbaugh isn’t good for business?’ Is that the free market?
LIMBAUGH: Yeah, but that didn’t happen. It never was allowed to get to that point. My name was leaked as being part of a group. Roger Goodell, the commissioner, goes out and cites a six-year-old quote from — that I made about Donovan McNabb, got it all wrong.
Jim Irsay of the — I call him hearsay because he’s repeating things that weren’t true — the owner of the Indianapolis Colts, joins the chorus. I never got — I never got past first base. I mean, we…
WALLACE: So what do you think that was about? What do you think happened?
LIMBAUGH: Well, I think it’s actually about the fact that the NFL is about to lose its current collective bargaining agreement with the players.
And guess who happens to be the new executive director of the players association? A guy named DeMaurice Smith, who is Obama. He’s part of his transition team. He has — he has suggested that the Congress, the White House, might get involved in stop a player-owner lockout.
So I — I think — and he got involved in this, too, you know. He was out participating in the spreading of quotes I didn’t say, warning Goodell and the owners what might — I think this was a warning shot across the bow, saying to the NFL, Look, we’re going to be close to running this league, not you. We don’t want this guy here.
And I think — I don’t — I don’t really take this personally, but I do think it was a bunch of cowardice all the way around.
WALLACE: Let’s do a lightning round — quick questions, quick answers.
LIMBAUGH: All right.
WALLACE: You started talking about Vice President Biden this week, and you said to your producers, Now, get the bleep button, because I may go over the line, and then you censored yourself. So I’ll ask you, what do you think of Joe Biden?
LIMBAUGH: Pompous, a bit of a windbag and wrong.
WALLACE: About?
LIMBAUGH: Pretty much everything. I mean, he was a guy in July who says, Well, we — we guessed wrong on the stimulus jobs. We guessed wrong. Anybody with a brain could have told you the stimulus plan wasn’t going to work. I mean, he’s a walking comedy of errors.
WALLACE: Sarah Palin — you say that you admire her backbone. Do you really think she’s ready to be president?
LIMBAUGH: Well, yes, I do. See, I am a — one thing I do not do is follow conventional wisdom, and the conventional wisdom of Sarah Palin is she’s not smart enough, she needs to bone up on the issues, she’s a little unsophisticated, she — Alaska, where’s that? — doesn’t have the pedigree.
I’ve seen — she’s the only thing that provided any kind of a spark for the Republican Party. This is not an endorsement, but I do have profound respect for Sarah Palin.
There are not very many politicians who have been through what she’s through — been put through and still able to smile and be ebullient and upbeat. I mean, this woman, I think, is pretty tough.
WALLACE: Finally, some politics. You predict a possible blood bath for Democrats in 2010.
LIMBAUGH: I really do. I know that there is an eruption waiting to happen at the ballot box. I know that a majority of the people in this country are opposed to every single major agenda item that Obama has proposed and is trying to get passed.
The mainstream media doesn’t do it, doesn’t know it. They think they need a visa to go to Missouri. You know, they — they’re not in touch with what’s happening out — and in fact, if they find out that there’s this kind of angst, they look at the voters with contempt –
Well, you’re not sophisticated to understand how brilliant Obama is and how magical his agenda — they don’t want any part of it.
And it’s going to be bigger than anybody thinks, especially –especially — if health care gets passed, and if they get cap and trade, and they start going down this global warming fiasco track and get something passed on that. There will be a revolt at the polls.
WALLACE: If you had to bet now, does Barack Obama win re- election in 2012?
LIMBAUGH: If I had to bet now, he will not.
WALLACE: Have you got a name of somebody who’s going to beat him…
LIMBAUGH: No.
WALLACE: … can beat him?
LIMBAUGH: No. I have no clue about that.
WALLACE: If he does win, how is Rush Limbaugh going to handle seven more years of Barack Obama?
LIMBAUGH: You know, I’m glad you asked me that, because one of the questions I always get is, Rush, isn’t Obama — aren’t these Democrats in power good for your business? The way I go about my business, I’m out to get the highest ratings I get every day.
I’m going to attract the largest audience I can regardless the news. It’s my — it’s my talent that draws the crowd. The news is incidental to it. No. I’m worried, seriously worried, about the future of the country.
I would never put my personal success in front of what I think is something that’s disastrous for the country.
WALLACE: And seven more years of Barack Obama would…
LIMBAUGH: Well, it would be painful. It would literally be painful. This is — every day you get up and there’s a new potential threat to liberty and freedom being launched by this man and his administration.
And it’s kind of — be — I mean, I — some days I’m in — I’m in radio and some days I feel like I’m in the trenches in a war — no bullets being fired, but trenches in a war. I mean, it’s really –it’s really intense when — you know, I love this country.
To have this kind of passion, and my — you know, I want — Paul Revere. I want as many people to hear what I think the problems are, because I believe the people of this country eventually will make it — make it work and get what they want. I do believe in the Democratic process and the vote.
WALLACE: Rush, thank you.
LIMBAUGH: Thank you, Chris.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
what, no questions about all the hillbilly heroin and whether he misses it? no questions about his probation officer? no questions about falling off the wagon?
last week, that douche bag congressman from my district in iowa steve king had the gall to get on the NFL commissioners ass about his perceived need to apologize to this titanic asshole for besmirching his good name by the mere mention of all his racist republican antics. i was waiting for goodell to mention the whole heroin thing, but he was too nice. i would have mentioned it first.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:08 pmNice ass-tonguing, Chrissie.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:10 pmThere was so much love between these guys that they must share the same bed.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:11 pmFox’s Chris Wallace Conducts Sycophantic, Softball Interview With Rush Limbaugh
– - Notice that Wallace is dressed exactly like Rush? Do you remember Wallace’s ass-kissing interview with Cheney a while ago. the one where Chrissy dressed exactly like Cheney? Whadda prissy little prig of a fop Wallace is.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:12 pmWallace and Limbaugh should get a room
November 1st, 2009 at 1:13 pmHe does his father a very great journalist a dishonor.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:14 pmWallace and Fox would have gotten a better story if they interviewed a pig about it’s opinion of Swine Flu. Really.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:17 pmah the Faux opinutainment continues.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:19 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Media Matters notes that on his video blog, Wallace reflects on his Limbaugh interview, calling him “very nice, very sweet,” and “vulnerable.”
– - Ugh, I just vomited-up a little breakfast.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:28 pmWALLACE: I think you’re a great broadcaster.
“I think you’re a great fraud-caster.” There, Chrissy, I fixed it for you!
Re: Limpballs and Chrissy being dressed the same, I think Chrissy was wearing socks. And, of course, he also was wearing a condom . . . it was his turn.
p.s. — speaking of fraud-casters, be sure to tune in to the next “FoxSnooze Sunday” when Chrissy has an exclusive interview with Becky Doody
November 1st, 2009 at 1:31 pmLIMBAUGH: I think Obama’s got an out-of-this-world ego. He’s very narcissistic. And he’s able to focus all attention on him all the time.
Right Obama is the narcissist
Btw its you and Faux News and all the other right wing loons who are focusing all your attention and irrational hatred on the President 24/7
November 1st, 2009 at 1:31 pmTrolls,
November 1st, 2009 at 1:32 pmWhy do you still have to listen to Rush? Don’t you already know what he is going to say? This is so boring and repetitive. Like Teletubbies for politically impotent adults.
As I’ve said before – a disgrace to his father.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:33 pmThere are no bigger narcissists than right-wing hate opinion merchants like Limbaugh, Beck, O’Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, etc.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:35 pmQuestion -
WALLACE: If he does win, how is Rush Limbaugh going to handle seven more years of Barack Obama?
Answer -
LIMBLOB: Simple Chris. Fistfuls of Oxycontin and frequent, Viagra-fueled junkets to dirt poor Caribbean nations in search of under-aged, sexual gratification.
Just saying . . .
November 1st, 2009 at 1:35 pmThis week it will be one year since Barack Obama was elected president.
Of course, the Republican Messiah, Bush, was still President from November 5, 2008 through January 20, 2009, but that doesn’t count.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:37 pmMedia Matters notes that on his video blog, Wallace reflects on his Limbaugh interview, calling him “very nice, very sweet,” and “vulnerable.”
In a Man Loves Boy type of way.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:41 pmWALLACE: To press my question, why aren’t people turning to the Republicans?
Uh, because Republicans aren’t offering ANY solutions to our problems, Chris.
Every person with an IQ above room temperature has already connected the dots on the GOP — which readily explains why Wallace hasn’t.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:43 pmMedia Matters notes that on his video blog, Wallace reflects on his Limbaugh interview, calling him “very nice, very sweet,” and “vulnerable.”
I think they call it a “bro-mance” in a strap-on dildo sort of way.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:48 pmProject much Rush? Geez…
November 1st, 2009 at 1:54 pm“My instinct is to go after them with the high hard one.”
Seems Wallace got his instincts confused and went after Rush with a hard-on
November 1st, 2009 at 1:57 pm“Wallace reflects on his Limbaugh interview, calling him “very nice, very sweet,” and “vulnerable.”"
Disgusting.
The RushPig is so full of hate and division…he’s a money grubb’n piece of sh*t. He’s a liar and a hypocrite. He wants to tell YOU what you can do at all times…and then, he will do whatever HE wants, whilst flipping you the finger.
Disgusting.
November 1st, 2009 at 1:57 pm“…why aren’t people turning to the Republicans?”
Um- not voting for them is a type of turning on the R’s. And most people are NOT voting for the R’s
November 1st, 2009 at 2:15 pmI thought it was an added bonus that they dressed alike for the interview as well.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:18 pmThey were both dressed like ‘two peas in a pod!’I wonder who picked out their coats,pants,shirts and shoes? They were dressed the same except Chrissie had on dark socks!
November 1st, 2009 at 2:19 pm“We distort you comply “
November 1st, 2009 at 2:20 pmLimbaugh is the Emperor of the Repiggies.
Wallace pays him homage.
Limbaugh and Murdoch want the same things – more for themselves, nothing for us.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:28 pm“Man-child” is Limbaugh’s clunky way of calling the President a “boy.”
As racist code words go, it’s hardly subtle.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:33 pmIt appears for Linbaugh the results are not as important as the ideology. Obama will never be given credit for managing the country around the financial abyss.
Limbaugh will never accept the Republican’s ownership of the last 8 years.
Sounds to me Limbaugh and the Republicans are suffering from a mixture of elitism and denial.
Who are the narcissists?
November 1st, 2009 at 2:37 pmLIMBAUGH: Just — he’s (inaudible) he’s a child. I think he’s –he’s got a — a five-minute career. He was in the Senate for 150 days. He was a community organizer in Chicago for however number of years.
He really has no experience running anything. He’s very young. I think he’s got an out-of-this-world ego. He’s very narcissistic. And he’s able to focus all attention on him all the time. That –that description is simply a way to cut through the noise and say he’s immature, inexperienced, in over his head.
And yet Sarah Palin is fully qualified to be President, according to this pompous idiot. She was the mayor of Moose Fart, Alaska and then didn’t even get through one term as governor, and rarely showed up for her job when she was in office. Way to show that mighty brain, Rushbo.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:37 pmWhy does Fox insist on asking college drop outs like Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and barely-made-the-sheepskin-pageant person Palin whether or not any proposed legislation is Constitutional? Have you all ever heard any of these people try to give their butchered opinions and twisted analysis (term used very loosely) on the subject? They quite obviously have never even passed a basic civics test. yet they bellow that xyz is “unconstitutional.” That’s wingnut-speak for “we don’t like it.”
November 1st, 2009 at 2:41 pmWhat do you make of the phrase “man-child”?
Isn’t there an advocacy group that promotes sex between men and boys?
Limbaugh’s choice of words seems odd.
Just saying.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:42 pmI think Palin would be, if elected, the only person that could possibly beat GWBs vacation record.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:45 pmI agree with Trollspotter.
Limpy calls the President a “man-child,” because he wouldn’t get away with calling him BOY.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:46 pmWhat do you make of the phrase “man-child”?
I think its someone who uses cereal box secret decoder ring words like crumb cruncher.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:46 pmNo surprise here. Did he swallow, or spit?
November 1st, 2009 at 2:48 pmLimbaugh talks about Obama’s ego? This from a guy whose radio tagline is “talent on loan from God”.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:48 pmI think they call it a “bro-mance” in a strap-on dildo sort of way.
Bwah Bromance never heard that b4
November 1st, 2009 at 2:49 pmI wouldn’t say this was totally a softball interview. However, the fact that Wallace had to interview Limbaugh one year removed from Obama’s election…that tells you he is desperate for ratings in his clunker of a Sunday roundtable.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:51 pm“talent on loan from God”
Im thinking not. Why would GOD denigrate other people for profit?
November 1st, 2009 at 2:52 pmLimbaugh’s choice of words seems odd
Everything about Limpballs is odd.
His sex tourism trips to the Dominican Republic are odd.
His three failed marriages and the silence of his ex-wives is odd.
The fact that he can even muster an audience of one is odd.
His ability to even look at himself in a mirror is odd.
And so on and so on.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:53 pmOf course Limbaugh would appear to be “vulnerable” from Chris Wallace’s point of view, as Rush bent over and grabbed his ankles to offer Wallace a place to rest his head.
November 1st, 2009 at 2:54 pmWallace reflects on his Limbaugh interview, calling him “very nice, very sweet,”
Well, jeez, how hard is to be “sweet” to someone who’s giving you a sponge-bath?
November 1st, 2009 at 2:54 pmIm surprised Wallace didnt cough up a hairball after that pylonidal licking.
/its a joke!
November 1st, 2009 at 3:08 pmBromance…*snort*
November 1st, 2009 at 3:11 pmRecovering degenerate junkie experiences sudden weight loss and starts spouting more phantasmagorical hate gibberish that usual…
I smell RELAPSE.
What is an ElRushbo nodscape like?
To borrow a phrase from William S. Burroughs, I think it safe to say it would probably fall into the category of UNPARALLELED HORRORS.
November 1st, 2009 at 3:11 pmOT
November 1st, 2009 at 3:18 pmScozzafava in upstate New York has thrown her support to the Democrat in the race, Owens.
In every aspect of his fatass, child-prostituting, thrice-divorced, drug-addicted, s***-smeared life, Limpy is the personification of the modern ‘pukelican party.
November 1st, 2009 at 3:19 pmWait, Limbaugh is saying the government is responsible for private growth [or lack of] while also saying that government shouldnt regulate markets?
November 1st, 2009 at 3:23 pmMarie,
That one will leave a mark!
November 1st, 2009 at 3:25 pmMore of a suck up interview. If anyone thought that Fox Nutwork would do a real interview and as tough questions to the racist of hate and gas bag host El Rushbo, then they must be sniffing glue.
November 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pmHis ego knows no bounds! He compared himself to Paul Revere. Rush has a horse?
November 1st, 2009 at 3:31 pmFox does mainly info-mercials for the right wing and political groups. This is well established fact now. So in this atmosphere, whether or not they report “fair and balanced” facts, opinion, spin, or outright lies, the truth is, it doesn’t matter, AS LONG AS EVERYONE IS AWARE THAT WHAT THEY SPEW IS NOTHING MORE THAN PAID PROPAGANDA. But I have yet to see the words “PAID PROGRAMMING” on my channel listings. THAT’s THE BIG LIE.
November 1st, 2009 at 3:42 pmMedia Matters notes that on his video blog, Wallace reflects on his Limbaugh interview, calling him “very nice, very sweet,” and “vulnerable.”
Maybe he’s trying to ingratiate himself with Rush so he can get in on one of Rush’s ‘guys only’ tropical getaways to chase those hot young boys.
Rush will bring the viagra.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:00 pmThis Limbaugh guy is a lame ’70s TV “movie of the week” plot. He can’t even come up with an original way to be a disgrace.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:05 pm55 flavorino says:
Ya. But don’t let them forget Rush’s Oxicotin. He’s not the same without it. You know – miserable – that’s what i see. A miserable, agitated, most unpleasant man.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:09 pmWALLACE: I think you’re a great broadcaster. How can you possibly be worth that kind of money?
Gee that’s one step from, “I think you’re so great. Can I suck your…”
November 1st, 2009 at 4:14 pmDoesn’t he know the rule, no white pants after Sept. 1 and what’s the deal with no socks? He isn’t cool, lest he thinks he is.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:15 pmWhat’s the purpose of this interview? The nuckledragging repugs lap it up and all the sane people see it as a love fest. Chris Wallace, EPIC FAIL
November 1st, 2009 at 4:21 pmI think Wallace was hitting on him.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:21 pmThis guy is just ripping off Archie Bunker.
Limbaugh – man of the ’70s.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:48 pmLimbaugh thought Archie Bunker was right. That’s when the trouble began. Since that initial exposure to his own alter ego, Limbaugh’s brain has continued to shrink until it has become the completely atrophied and dysfunctional organ we see today.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:54 pmWallace is just the frump for Fox and Limbaugh is what he is. Limbaugh was rejected by the players of the sport they love to play. Those guys put up with all kinds of human frailties, but Limbaugh is a loud mouth, bigot who spews his hatred over the airwaves daily. It is hardly a one time offense. Limbaugh crossed the line.
November 1st, 2009 at 4:57 pmWhat’s with the French kissing? I thought the French were cheese eating surrender monkeys. The Cons are throwing everything they can dream up at Obama. Fox giving that fat doper 30 minutes to smear Obama certainly destroys any shred of legitimacy to the “fair & balanced” claim. Blatant extreme right wing propaganda, nothing more, nothing less.
November 1st, 2009 at 5:03 pmEnriched plutonium ? 150 days in office ? global warming fiasco ? No such thing as saving a job ? The Haditha Marines
are inocent of rape ? America can win in a country that defeated the Roman, British, and Russian empires ? PALIN IS
READY TO BE THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD ? Dimbulb is a constitutional scholar ?
To borrow from Barney Frank, What planet is he on
November 1st, 2009 at 5:30 pm@ 33. flight says: What do you make of the phrase “man-child”?
Isn’t there an advocacy group that promotes sex between men and boys? Limbaugh’s choice of words seems odd. Just saying. November 1st, 2009 at 2:42 pm
It’s mockery; he’s engaging in a little mockery of 60s-70s hipsters (NOT hippies) and lefties. The reference is to this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchild_in_the_Promised_Land
The book was popular on the left-liberal side of quite a few campuses, the side where Blimpo’s attitude would draw Bronx raspberries and other flatulent noises.
The man’s(?) ignorance never fails to amaze, and his capacity to carry a grudge is close to awesome, too.
November 1st, 2009 at 5:39 pmNothing more than an informerical for the limpydic.
November 1st, 2009 at 5:43 pm@ 67. And ‘man-child’ does have a history of racist connotation going back to the notion that African-Americans were less than fully human. In that context, man-child is short for “a man’s body with a child’s mind”, or the more usual construct, ‘child’s mind in a man’s body’.
So, it’s both mockery and racism. It’s a way to put President Obama down without popping off with what he knows he’d be yanked off the air for saying, and it’s blowing ceegar smoke at the Bill Ayer’s generation of radicals at the same time.
November 1st, 2009 at 5:46 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
ick.
who’d watch one pasty white guy toss the salad of another pasty, fatter, white guy????
nasty.
November 1st, 2009 at 6:12 pmBeefeater says:
——————————————————————————–
$400 million dollar contract and Rush can’t afford socks? What an A-Hole!!
See, you got a brain cell left.
November 1st, 2009 at 6:22 pmBeefeater says:
$400 million dollar contract and Rush can’t afford socks? What an A-Hole!!
He’s going for the Don Johnson look. Not very convincing with the slick jet-setter style, is he?
November 1st, 2009 at 6:22 pmFirst of all, I’d like to state the obvious; Chris Wallace is an a s shole. Second, he gave Rush Limbaugh a hickey on his a s s during this so called interview. I mean come on man, if the President had given him an interview, he would have been criticizing him like a mad dog. If this pinhead (Chris Wallace) wants to be taken seriously, then he needs to stop sucking the rights a s s and start being “fair and balanced”. I can claim to like Chris Wallace, but it’s clear to anyone who reads my comments, that I can’t stand that bastard. His dad should be ashamed of the abortion he turned out to be. The world would be a fair better plance without these to idiots in it.
November 1st, 2009 at 6:33 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
What is that brown stuff on Chris’s nose and top of his head?
November 1st, 2009 at 6:42 pmarmand says:
————————————————————–
He scares you leftist Progressives to death. Look at the hate and ignorance on display here.
November 1st, 2009 at 6:44 pm==============================================================Shaking in our boots, Vern. A drug addled, lard assed, gas bag who dropped our or flunked out of college after one year and makes his living screaming hate to the KKK and religious taliban. You nailed it, Vern. Keep on believeing but never question why you idjuts lost the last two general elections.
What a bunch of whiners you all are. All the power in the world and still whining. I love it.
Know what you mean pal. Wish I had one thin dime for every ‘tard who whines about the “librul” media. I’d be a freakin’ gazillionaire by now.
November 1st, 2009 at 6:45 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Hate, hate, hate, hate. Got your undies in a knot? Quit your whining.
Screech all you want, pissant. It’s the nature of a ‘pukelican pot to call the kettle black.
November 1st, 2009 at 6:58 pmYou idiots are making him rich.
Yeh, so he cant get into heaven.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:07 pmArmand is an idiot, who drinks Rish Limbaugh’s
November 1st, 2009 at 7:08 pmp i s s and calls with wine. Wake up moron and smell the bull s h i t they have been feeding you. You don’t have a mind of your own, so you just keep eating sh i t and loving it.
About a month ago it seemed like Rupert Murdoch took Chris Wallace behind the woodshed and explained how things are done at Fox News because Wallace has been toeing the line with a number of less than stellar programs since that time.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:08 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
So much for journalistic standards. A freshman intern could have conducted a better interview. Its no wonder that Wallaces’ program is consistently in last place among all the others on Sunday.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pmHate, hate, hate, hate.
I dont recall wishing any harm upon this person yet his ideology places blame [judgement] on others because of love?
Got your undies in a knot?
Yes. Now take them off.
Quit your whining.
I read many complaints from the one you defend.
You’re all a bunch of babies, afraid of one man.
A baby would be right to fear such a person
He has you right where he wants you and you’re too stupid to know it.
Where, pray tell, is this?
November 1st, 2009 at 7:24 pmInterview was very tough.
Being called vulnerable is harsh.
He was challenged repeatedly.
By asking to define what man-child means?
November 1st, 2009 at 7:28 pmHe scares you leftist Progressives to death
But but but he is a sweet sweet vulnerable man, who would fear that?
November 1st, 2009 at 7:37 pmarmand is jealous that he didn’t get to tongue Rush’s ass before Chrissie got there.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:41 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Again with the Fannie Mae sockpuppet, Duke? Oy. One might think you had moved on to something with a little substance. Like, say… ACORN.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:47 pmLimpballs doesn’t scare me. I think of him as a disgusting pig and that there is something wrong with those who listen to him. That’s it.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:55 pmYou know, I used to think if was hyperbole to suggest that his listeners would eat Limpballs crap but now, I really do think they would–no kidding.
November 1st, 2009 at 7:58 pmI think you may be right, Mr. Cobb.
November 1st, 2009 at 8:02 pmWALLACE: Rush, may I get down on my knees and give you a bl*w job?
LIMBAUGH: Why, yes, thank you, Chris.
November 1st, 2009 at 8:05 pmHow many times will they play this rerun? They trot out some Right Wing Crazy and interview them with a phony phox “journalist” who lends a contrived air of credibility. Remember Jeff Gannon pitching soft balls to that wacko the wingers shoehorned into office?
November 1st, 2009 at 8:19 pmJust catapultin’ the propaganda, fillin’ up the ole coffers for Rupert and Roger.
November 1st, 2009 at 8:33 pmMore White House economic madness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfuiNjvH9_c&feature=fvw
November 1st, 2009 at 8:41 pmDeputty Dawg; lives up to his fan fare; a clown.
November 1st, 2009 at 8:54 pmCNN has a summary. In it he claims to have invented conservative talk radio. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/01/limbaugh-questions-if-obama-democrats-care-about-america/#comments
I wonder how Gabriel Heater and Paul Harvey before him would feel if they were still alive. Limbaugh has carried hate to a new level, however, so maybe he is claiming to have invented conservative hate but even that is a stretch.
November 1st, 2009 at 9:37 pmSocks vs no socks mean limpydic goes bare back while chrissy uses protection.
November 1st, 2009 at 9:53 pmWhy are there five, extreme right wing, one hour, political talk shows on television every Sunday morning and not one liberal/progressive talk show?
I don’t understand.
November 1st, 2009 at 9:54 pmbradshaw88 says:
This comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Interview was very tough. He was challenged repeatedly.
Yes he was challenged because Chris didn’t ask him for the honor of giving him a blowjob…
November 1st, 2009 at 10:01 pmCHRIS WALLACE says, “You don’t think that Barack Obama has a profound respect for our soldiers and the families that are giving the sacrifice?”
Um, wasn’t it Rush Limbaugh who said that he wanted our Commander-in-Chief and our troops to fail in Afganistan, Pakistan, and Iraq? Isn’t that disrespect for our troops?
November 1st, 2009 at 10:01 pm@ 29. Trollspotter…
Well, yeah, man-child is a little clunky, but Pudge is trying to be slick and sarcastic, and he’s just smart enough to want to avoid overtly racist language – but he does screw the pooch now and then, and he does use man-child as a snarky euphemism for ‘boy’.
Here’s a link to an earlier documented use of ‘man-child’ by Blimpo in reference to President Obama, from last year – when BHO was still just the candidate;
http://mediamatters.org/print/research/200808200009
And here are some references to his program where he’s used both ‘boy’ and ‘man-child’;
http://mediamatters.org/research/200910270044
November 1st, 2009 at 10:07 pmThis should end any discussion about the fair and balanced myth regarding Chris Wallace. What a farce! This interview along with having to listen to Wallace tee it up for Kristol and Hume make you wonder why they even try to carry on the charade.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:18 pmall while wearing his Dominican republic underage prostitute outfit and on his knees servicing Rush Blimpblob high on oxy, not a pretty picture but a true one.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:57 pmUSCKitty says:
WALLACE: I think you’re a great broadcaster. How can you possibly be worth that kind of money?
Gee that’s one step from, “I think you’re so great. Can I suck your…”……..flabby man boobs?
Rush’ll bring the viagra and the oxycotin.
He’s a real American hero.
Why back in his youth when he was serving his country in Vietnam ………..er, um, never mind.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:58 pmObama “doesn’t care”
if that were true, then how did we get “obamacare”?
Just kidding. I see fox still has that show on where two artificially tanned guys play trumpets with their butts.
November 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 amWow did Wallace blow LimbAUGH before or after this conversation?
November 2nd, 2009 at 1:20 amThe scariest thing about what is going on in this country is the number of uninformed, non thinking people making comments like the ones I have just read about the interview. It is you that are causing the demise of our freedoms No matter what you think of Rush, at least try to pay attention to what he is saying, even Beck has not lied about one thing, so before you start spouting off , check the facts for yourself, and do something about it, because this country has been taken over by radical extremists, and only we the people can stop it, but we need to do it NOW !! So read your history books, see what Hitler, Chavez,Marx,Castro and others did at the beginning of there take overs and how they got away with it, It is identical to what Obama is doing,IDENTICAL !!!educate yourselves and then determine for yourself who is lieing and what is really happening here.I’m not a fan of any news organization or any political party.. But I do love this country and the constitution on which it was founded, and our constitution is being trampled on and dismissed by this administration, and yes also by the previous one too.
Please Educate yourselves before it is to late.
Thank you
God Bless America
November 2nd, 2009 at 2:23 amLimbaugh took the opportunity to issue screed after screed — dismissing Obama’s trip to Dover Air Force base to see the fallen soldiers as a “photo op.”
George W. Bush had shameful photo ops on a daily basis while he occupied the White House. I remember when Bush crawled into Iraq under the cover of darkness one Thanksgiving Day. And what did Bush do? He held a plastic turkey dinner in hands while he used our troops as a backdrop for one of the most shameful photo ops ever commited by an American President (Bush lied about WMDs in Iraq and over 6,000 U.S. GIs have died so far because of Bush’s lies).
November 2nd, 2009 at 3:27 am“even Beck has not lied about one thing” ?
I suggest you take a stroll over to mediamatters.org
November 2nd, 2009 at 3:28 ambradshaw88 says:
This comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Interview was very tough. He was challenged repeatedly.
Chris Wallace’s line of questioning is nothing compared to the line of questioning Rachel Maddow would’ve asked him in any interview. Maddow would’ve been a much better challenge for Limpy. He wouldn’t stand a chance against her.
November 2nd, 2009 at 4:39 amturns out you CAN go thru life fat and stupid.
November 2nd, 2009 at 7:48 amWanda better watch out. This is pure comedy.
November 2nd, 2009 at 8:57 amLimbaugh is a Freudian’s wet dream. He seems to enjoy being photographed with that huge cigar stuck in his mouth. He’s fascinated by the “man-child” relationship. One of his favorite illustrative phrases is “bend over and take it”. His own self-describing catch phrase is “harmless, lovable little fuzzball”, a John Wayne Gacy come-on line, if I ever heard one. Couple that with multiple, failed marriages and repeated cycles of addiction and you’ve got a seriously sick puppy.
November 2nd, 2009 at 9:39 amDo what I do shut the idot box off and save electric.
November 2nd, 2009 at 12:18 pmI accidently stumbled into this site…I now know what a Left-Wing Circle-Jerk looks like in print! And what’s even more laughable is how you morons vote down any opposing views! This is your vision of a brave new world? You’re pathetic.
November 2nd, 2009 at 12:32 pmGBinSD @ 119
That post seems as spontaneous as your other coincidence.
Did you enter “circle jerk” in Google?
November 2nd, 2009 at 1:53 pmI hope Rush at least buys him dinner after that.
November 2nd, 2009 at 2:03 pmThe Interviewer has a “Man Crush” on Limpballs.
Notice all that brown stuff on the Rethug’s nose and lips. Disgusting.
November 2nd, 2009 at 2:04 pmGive them hell Rush.
November 2nd, 2009 at 3:00 pmGreg Alan
My GOD you are stupid. Telling others to educate themselves when you are obviously so ignorant it is painful and so brainwashed you would embarass a PARROT is just precious. Yes Beck has lied about many things including that Obama is racist and hates white culture and that he is a marxist. Only the stupidest people on the planet could possibly take either statement seriously. It isnt our fault that YOU are just that stupid. Ignorant MORONS like YOU are the scariest thing going on in this country. Only someone as monumentally stupid as YOU would tell us to listen to Rush. He ADMITTED being a propagandist. He is a liar and a racist fool. Why in the world would I listen to him. Look you are stupid. That is your problem. Thinking that the rest of us are anywhere NEAR as stupid as you is just a symptom of that problem
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:24 amKstreetMORON
You are a VERY stupid, VERY brainwashed moron. STFU the adults are trying to talk here
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:26 amGBinSD
You are far too stupid to know ANYTHING. Your ignorance is palpable. It isnt our fault you are too stupid to even RECOGNIZE higher brain function. Just kill yourself. The world will cheer
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:27 amConservativeMORON
Bite my bag you ignorant brainwashed punk
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:28 amOMG…you can tell that Boss Limbaugh hasn’t moved into the 21st century because NO ONE wears their shoes without socks…at least since circa 1985.
November 3rd, 2009 at 4:54 am@ 83. bradshaw88 says: This comment has been voted down. Click to read. Interview was very tough. He was challenged repeatedly. November 1st, 2009 at 7:09 pm
ja, ja, bradshaw and 88 to you too. ja, it’s hard to hit that softball on a t-ball post when you hammered yourself with a crank ‘n’ hill-billy heroin speedball in the green room just before air time.
or do you mean it was a challenge for Mr. Limpdick to refrain from asking Wallace for the Monica Lewinsky special?
November 3rd, 2009 at 11:41 am@ 129. oh, you mean the interview was tough for Wallace ’cause he had to speak with Mr. Limpdick’s member in his mouth.
November 3rd, 2009 at 11:44 amEugeneDebs
I left for 24 hours and that’s the best you could come up with? You forgot to call me ‘poopy-britches’ and ‘big, fat fatty’! I think my parting words from yesterday were imminently confirmed by your post…I will now depart for good (and, believe me, it will be good to depart this sorry cesspool of Loony-Leftist crackpots) and let you all go back to fondling each other’s genitalia (a reference to yesterday’s characterization regarding how you all seem to get orgasmic pleasure from agreeing with each other).
November 3rd, 2009 at 8:01 pm