Washington Times falsely claims Boehner was ‘not invited’ to White House state dinner.
Washington Times falsely claims Boehner was ‘not invited’ to White House state dinner.
Today in the Washington Times, reporters Joseph Curl and Matthew Mosk write a story titled “Top Republican lawmakers not invited to State Dinner.” The article attempts to paint President Obama’s invitation list for tonight’s dinner honoring Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as an example of his partisanship because he did not invite enough Republicans. The article states that House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), like House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA), “didn’t get an invitation to the dinner”:
House Minority Leader John A. Boehner won’t be there; he’s on Thanksgiving break and home in Ohio. His deputy, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, also didn’t get an invitation to the dinner.
However, this simply isn’t true. As Politico reported, Boehner was invited but turned the White House down. Already, Fox News is trying to gin up controversy by reprinting the Washington Times along with the same error.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Since when is the Washington Times to be considered “objective journalism”? It was founded with the explicit purpose of being the conservative alternative to the “liberal” Washington Post. It still running by the freakin’ Unification Church.
Figures that FoxNews would rely so heavily on it.
November 24th, 2009 at 9:57 amOh, and this unmitigated crap was one of the top stories on the Google News page. Can’t wait til Rupert decides to yank all News Corp items from Google…
November 24th, 2009 at 9:57 amI see this is how fox will get around mudocs (spelling) no mistake clause they will simple just use others misleading quotes and film.
November 24th, 2009 at 9:58 amBoehner can’t stay sober long enough to go to a state dinner.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:00 amTo be fair, the Washington Times conveniently omitted any mention that Boenher did or did not get an invitation, as it appears the main focus of the article was John McCain.
However, it is convenient to know that he was the second Republican lawmaker mentioned chronologically in the article. Ergo, by default, the article is meant to hint that Boehner did not get an invite.
Not exactly a Fox News “lie”, but it’s a perpetuation of an incorrect spin.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:00 amMy guess is that Boehner would probably be lost amongst the pumpkin pie at the dinner anyways.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:01 amThe Washington Times is a Moonie, yellow-journalism, rag. Enough said.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:01 amIt was really rude of President Obama to schedule that dinner for the same time as Little Cryin’ Johnny’s standing tanning salon appointment.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:02 amoh for Crhist’s sake – when will this BS end? It’s getting ridiculous. Also, Faux sure is changing there ways, aren’t they – NOT!
November 24th, 2009 at 10:02 amThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
I thought people were going to be disciplined at Faux News for on air inaccuracies. I guess that was just for yesterday.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:03 amThere’s a difference between lying and accurately repeating the lies of others (and calling it “reporting”). That’s a loophole you can be certain Fox “News” will be exploiting.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:04 amLOL! THIS is a story? Poor Boner wasn’t invited? I guess when Bush and his cronies ditched and abused the Dems that wasn’t a hot topic, but this? Was John’s feelings hurt? Did he cry and stamp his feet? What a bunch of girly-men.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:05 amAs Ben Ambruster has already proved, anything is possible in the supernatural world of the right — like 193% of Americans favoring a Republican presidential candidate. A little thing like the leaders of the Party of No saying “no” to a White House invitation & then forgetting they put the fancy invitation in the circular file is nothing. The Washington Times & Fox do not report on the natural universe. Oh, and they fire reporters who do.
The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com
November 24th, 2009 at 10:05 amSo, if this story makes it on the air like this, who gets fired?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:05 amIs it so hard to ask these guys whether or not they got invited?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:05 amFaux is wrong yet again. Shocking. Who gets fired now? Heck, by next week the entire staff will be sh*t canned at this rate.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:06 amWhen I was at college, we had a person who wrote for a conservative rag (and who is now a semi-famous conservative author) on campus who we created a nom de plume which was also a clever play on his name.
I won’t mention this author’s name (should be easy to figure out), but I think it’s an appropriate title for the entire tone of what the conservative meme is in the media: Distort D’New-sa
November 24th, 2009 at 10:07 amBoehner probably has an appointment at his tanning salon anyway.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:08 amInteresting, you’d think there’d at least be a VDT floating around with all the FOX bashing going on.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:12 amSo the Washington Times is staffed by reporters from Faux News?:::
November 24th, 2009 at 10:12 amI cancelled the subscription to my local newspaper when they refused to count the votes from the 2000 Presidential election. A few months later, I cancelled my subscription for cable tv. A few months later, I gave away my television set. All I have left is a 50″ plasma monitor for movies and my computer.
Don’t want to watch television or read the newspapers no more.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:12 amRT
Whos watching you??
—-
November 24th, 2009 at 10:17 amWho cares?
@1. So the Washington Post is a liberal newspaper? Huh, and here I was reading it because it seemed unbiased. Who woulda thunk? :)
November 24th, 2009 at 10:17 amBoner declined because he thought Indians shouldn’t be invited to the White House, and should stay on the Reservation.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:18 amA White House dinner? Why are these Republicans lining up for a Socialist Big Government handout like that? Can’t Boner and Can’tor feed themselves without leeching off of the hard-working American taxpayers?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:21 amThat is why I swim in the ocean…
November 24th, 2009 at 10:22 amLet’s face, Obama is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t and this is a perfect example of the lunacy of the right wing.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:22 amNow how come this freedom pool of yours is so uptight about who someone marries?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:23 amAre individuals free to choose death with dignity in your freedom pool? Something tells me it is time for “adult swim”
November 24th, 2009 at 10:24 amDoes this mean the White House now has super secret guest lists to its dinner functions?
Or that the Times was too lazy to check?
Now there is a real tough call to make.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:24 am@27, Real Mature. Why don’t you call us Pee pee pants?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:25 amIt helps if you look at America as a giant swimming pool of freedom.
You mean the one you wouldn’t let those black kids into?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:25 amOSTL, care to clarify your remark?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:27 amNo OSTL, You are the babyruth floating around in the pool.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:27 amOh yeah. It’s so liberal they have George Will AND Charles Krauthammer as columnists! In all seriousness, most metropolitan area newspapers have a slight left-lean to their editorial boards, due to the demographics they serve. On news reporting, though, the Post is pretty damn unbiased.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:27 amChyron@34, Yeah. People like OSTL would be afraid ‘It would change the complextion of the club.’
November 24th, 2009 at 10:28 amNow the Republicans are a poisonous dangerous chemical with noxious hazardous properties.
Sounds about right.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:28 amWaTimes and Faux News: one lies and the other swears to it.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:29 am@37. Phew, at least I have one source of primarily unbiased news available to me. I work in a military hospital, and the only news netwirk we seem to get is FAUX.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:29 amChlorination is inferior water treatment on at least two counts.
1. Although it has greatly lowered infectious waterborne diseases in the U.S. and Canada, chlorination fails against a variety of water problems including parasites and can seriously harm people who use the water.
2. Its cost is unnecessarily high.
Yup – that about wraps up the righties-as-chlorine analogy!
November 24th, 2009 at 10:29 amOTSL admits it: conservatives are a metabolic poison, responsible for the deaths of thousands.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:31 amThe thing about these sorts of errors is the damage they do. Sure, the Times could (and probably will) issue a retraction: buried deep inside in some small box. But does that really make up for the damage caused by the initial article? Hardly.
Same with Fox. For all their hype about “firing” people, the damage is already done. They’re feeding exactly what the right-wing wants to hear and helping to steer the dialog, not just reporting on what is taking place.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:32 amgreat analogy, olby sucks.
but why is it you guys are rejecting those who are capable of cleaning the pool?
you really want to call ronald reagan a brat?
:/
November 24th, 2009 at 10:32 amMaybe now we can get the EPA or FDA or OSHA to require that Republicans be fitted with childproof lids and wear large clear labels stating the hazardous nature of the contents.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:35 amWhat? Fox mislead the public??
Fox is supposed to FIRE people who don’t tell the truth!
Integrity of reporting is their mission isn’t it?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:36 am@46, and what are you battling?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:36 amThis battle is about courage and commitment.
And I am hoping they will have those commitment papers finalized real soon.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:37 amGo ahead and vote me down urinators. This battle is about courage and commitment. We have it. You don’t.
—
November 24th, 2009 at 10:37 amWell as you know I have a no vote down policy so maybe we should just move on to the second aspect of this. Are you prepared to support this bold thesis with any sort of cogent argument? Yes or no courage boy?
USNclerk says:
@46, and what are you battling?
Looks as if its a peeee fetish,,,,,, smiles
November 24th, 2009 at 10:38 amBoner’s handlers must surely realize that the potential of his making himself a fool by becoming drunk in a public setting with so many people as witness would be difficult to explain.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:39 amwell, if you insist, olby sucks.
everyone, pee on olby sucks!
he seems to really like it!
:)
November 24th, 2009 at 10:40 amLooks like OSTL/Jeffy Bovine had a little accident this morning. Studies have shown that bedwetting/enuresis is a serious problem for trolls.
“Other issues were raised with such surprising regularity that one must conclude that virtually all Malicious trolls have both erectile dysfunction and suffer frequent enuresis The average IQ of this group was 83.”
Poor Jeffy.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:40 amOSTL, I have asked two questions now, neither one of them offensive insofar as I can tell, why won’t you answer them?
November 24th, 2009 at 10:41 amMark Koldys wets his bed only on the nights he doesn’t have a dream about Olbermann.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:42 amAahhh, the Mooney Times as an integral part of the right-wing hate machine grinding at 110% all the time now days…Can’t get that Dick Armey Kool-Aide distributed fast enough…Get Darth out there to give them a pep talk and threaten them a couple of times.. That’ll fix it..
November 24th, 2009 at 10:45 amUSNclerk@49, He is probably battling the demons inside of his head. Just like his hero beck.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:49 am@59, either that, or he’s gutless and incoherent. And if that’s the case, OSTL, don’t let me catch you talking about courage again, you obviously lack the courage to make a simple reply.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:55 am@60. So, you are the victim now? Do you want a tissue? Maybe you should leave if you can’t handle us Big Bad ‘Liberals’
November 24th, 2009 at 10:55 amOSTL says: “It helps if you look at America as a giant swimming pool of freedom”
Actually, OSTL, a better analogy is to look at America as a giant gene pool. You and your FoxSnooze, radio rant-jockeys and republican politicians are in the shallow end.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:57 amI came here to debate openly and honestly.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:58 am—
Well how do you explain 27 and 46?
You came here to debate openly and honestly? By accusing us of peeing in the “pool of freedom”? LOL
Attention-seeking was why YOU came here. Admit it.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:59 amCan we see a little commitment to your ideas at 46 please…
November 24th, 2009 at 10:59 amOSTL, never explains himself. He just throws out random assertions which he uses to fool himself into thinking that he (and right-wingers in general) have some sort of special virtue unavailable to humans.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:59 amThe perfect image of an aggrieved and courageous troll. Standing in a puddle of pee crying you guys are picking on me.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:00 amChildren and right-wingers often act like brats in order to get the attention of grownups.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:04 amOSTL says:
Go ahead and throw your insults at me. I came here to debate openly and honestly.
zzzzzzip.
don’t mind me, olby sucks.
keep debating with those you want to debate with.
i just drank a ton of coffee.
:o
November 24th, 2009 at 11:04 amAnd what do you want for Christmas little boy?
November 24th, 2009 at 11:07 amThat’s funny… I thought it was about the best ways to move the nation forward. That’s what most Democrats are focused on.
But since Republicans seem to think the battle is about “courage and commitment”, neither of which have anything to do directly with intelligence and insight, that explains why their efforts are so often concentrated on boisterous opposition and protests, rather than on creative and effective solutions.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:07 amHey attention whore. Can we spot playing this made up either or game? “secular atheism”?
November 24th, 2009 at 11:07 amDamn. I have to head off-site for a job today. And just when Olby Sucks Long Time is in “the zone”.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:08 amWe see the wonder and the glory in Christmas.
Delusional people often see strange unexplained things. They also have tend to babble nonsense when wearing their posterior for a chapeau because they haven’t a clue what a topic is.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:08 amSeems you have neither courage nor commitment well unless you are committed to negative attention seeking. I call bullshit on your courage and your alledged principles.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:09 amIf the shoe fits pal, if the shoe fits
November 24th, 2009 at 11:10 am– So you are acknowledging you attention whoring?
Olby Sucks Long Time, what’s it like having a pinball machine inside your head instead of a brain?
November 24th, 2009 at 11:11 amolby sucks,
go christmas!
go kwanza!
go chanukah!
go new years!
go watersports!
:I
November 24th, 2009 at 11:13 amYou only demean yourself with your dirty curse language
November 24th, 2009 at 11:13 am—-
Whatever. You are beyond lame. I feel sort of bad for you. Do you show the stupid shit you post to family? Are they proud? Be honest you hide what you do from family and friends don’t you?
“He just throws out random assertions which he uses to fool himself into thinking that he (and right-wingers in general) have some sort of special virtue unavailable to humans.”
Thanks, shoeless. That’s the perfect description of what I refer to as Trollette’s Syndrome. Most cases of this disease are benign though aggravating. OSTL has progressed to the later stages of this malady, however, which are most often fatal.
His bouts of magical thinking and mindless babbling are increasing in frequency. They will soon lead to a total shut-down of his CNS and loss of autonomic functions. Unfortunately, Trollette’s Syndrome is considered a pre-existing condition and not covered by most private insurance plans.
We should all pray for OSTL…pray that he expires soon and as painlessly as possible.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:14 amHoly crap, when did Jeffy Bovine (admirer and secretly desires Mr. Olbermann) swim further off the deep end?
And what the hell is the topic of the thread again?
Oh well, Happy Holidays Mr. Jeffy!
November 24th, 2009 at 11:15 amFox needs to make up stories because they don’t have real reporters therefore they don’t have any real news to report. In order to fill up their 24 hour news cycle, they need to create news.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:18 amdbadass says:
Be honest you hide what you do from family and friends don’t you?
Ummm I think Jeffy boy has no friends, and more than likely his mom has no clue of what he is doing on her computer, working late at nights on “the pole” and all.
Just sayin’…
November 24th, 2009 at 11:18 amone hundred years from now?
you’ll be remembered well, olby sucks.
remembered as that guy that loves getting it from urinators.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:28 amOSTL says:
One hundred years from now when real Americans gather in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the lighting of the national Christmas tree at the Ten Commandments Monument you people will be nothing but a small and unpleasant memory.
and you are going to be around then as well?
you are a basket short of a picnic and the rest of your trolls friends.
but in a way you are right 100 years from now, you and the rest of your kind will be one big joke on mankind.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:30 amto celebrate the lighting of the national Christmas tree
You do realize that the Xmas tree is a pagan symbol? You can tell because it is usually stuffed up an angel’s azz.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:31 amOne hundred years from now when real Americans gather in Washington, D.C.
I don’t think you quite understand the Rapture, Timmy. WE’LL stay here, YOU’LL go away forever.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:31 am100 years from now conservatism will be compared to Nazism.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:32 amOSTL says:
We conservatives are the chlorine that keeps it safe and healthy.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:21 am
____________
So what you’re saying is that conservatives are a toxic, noxious element that can be fatal at high concentrations, is implicated in the destruction of the ozone layer, has been used as a chemical weapon by insurgents in Iraq, and has a characteristically offensive odor?
Yeah, sounds about right.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:33 amOSTL says:
Go ahead and vote me down urinators.
November 24th, 2009 at 10:35 am
_____________
Ok, done. Voted down every comment.
So do I take it from your statement that you do not urinate? How do you rid your body of liquid waste and excess water, then? Catheter and a bag? Do you have a beer tap sticking out of your pelvis? Or do you just hold it till it leaks out your eyeballs? I’m ever so curious…
November 24th, 2009 at 11:37 amOSTL = Mark Koldys
November 24th, 2009 at 11:41 amOSTL says:
88 and 89 is the same pos.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:40 am
___________
As 96, 97, and 98? Yes, we knew that.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:42 amoooooh.
guess what, olbykins?
totally wrong.
i’m actually joe c*ntwell.
can’t you tell?
:U
November 24th, 2009 at 11:43 amYou’re saying you were namejacked? I was somewhat encouraged by your claim as it implies that you think a comment was out of line up there somewhere. But, then you ruined it by calling as “far left loons”.
Do you care what we think of you? If so, why would you call us names?
November 24th, 2009 at 11:43 amOSTL says:
You kow you’ve really handed a far left loon his fat ass on a silver platter when he’s resorted to namejacking. LOL!
November 24th, 2009 at 11:43 am
__________
Got any proof of this alleged namejacking? It all looks like the same lunacy to me…
November 24th, 2009 at 11:44 amOSTL says:
THAT WAS A NAMEJACKER! EVERY TIME I SAY SOMETHING STUPID IT WAS ACTUALLY A NAMEJACKER, REALLY! WAAAAAH!
Of course it was, Timmy. And now you’re going to start posting intelligent conversation, right?
Oh, what’s that? You’re going to be “namejacked” for the forseeable future? Big surprise.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:45 amYou’re right, #88 doesn’t have nearly enough insults and nonsense to have been you OSTL.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:45 amI don’t know which party is weaker the part about honest debate or that goofy shit about 100 years from now… Actually the courage and commitment part is still my favorite…. So much crap so little substance….
November 24th, 2009 at 11:45 amooh! more of the tweeker!! fun!!!
does he read that Moonie newspaper??
i bet he does.
when he gathers, in the future, in a mass-patriot wedding of “real americans” conducted by the Korean Jesus-Grandpa, we won’t even be there to bother him, or the special patriot-bride he ordered online.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:47 amOSTL says:
96, 97, 98, 101, Namejacking, atheist pos. Ignore.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:46 am
___________
Perhaps OSTL is right – maybe he is getting namejacked. We’d better vote down all “OSTL” posts, just to be on the safe side.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:48 amOSTL!!!
you’re still here.
good.
do you subscribe to the Moonie newspaper, or just buy copies at the newsstand??
November 24th, 2009 at 11:48 amostl is absolutely lost.
must be all that chlorine.
:/
November 24th, 2009 at 11:49 amostl is playing kids games, ignore.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:49 amActually, upon further review it (#88) certainly classifies nonsense-wise but the lack of juvenile name-calling does make me wonder if it could have been you.
I gather you’re claiming ownership of all the other comments though. Too bad.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:50 am113 – you like that homoerotic imagery, dontcha??
most hardcore righties do.
i wonder why that is?
November 24th, 2009 at 11:50 amNo, no, Bovine. You “kow.” It’s actually “cow,” spelled with a “c.”
November 24th, 2009 at 11:51 amOSTL says:
108, swallow your gun, soon.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:49 am
____________
Ooo the conserva-clones are fighting again. This is gonna be better than the second Matrix movie when Neo was fighting all those Agent Smiths.
Of course, pretty much anything could be better than the second Matrix movie, so that isn’t really saying much.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:51 amyou got me, ostl.
i’ve yet to be banned from here.
you?
dozens?
oh, and i’m not really joe.
another example of the “gotcha” media!
have a drink on us.
:o
November 24th, 2009 at 11:54 am120
got any gop candidates that live up to that list??
y, didn’t think so.
why don’t you go pray about it, and get back to us after the 2012 election.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:56 amOSTL says:
I out of here.
November 24th, 2009 at 11:56 am
____________
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
November 24th, 2009 at 11:56 amAnother swing, another miss!
November 24th, 2009 at 11:57 amjust a “p” and an “a” away from pOSTaL.
gun control makes more sense all the time…
November 24th, 2009 at 11:59 amI’m a little slow today…I actually though the Mooney paper picture accompanying this article was today’s for a moment and someone had let Bush express an opinion on Iran. Scared me for a minute.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:04 pmSo, what the heck is secular atheism? Is there a non-secular form?
OSTL says:
“I’m outta here, except I’m not because I need more attention.”
November 24th, 2009 at 12:05 pmSo much for FOX News’ “zero tolerance” for factual errors in their news stories…
November 24th, 2009 at 12:11 pmIt is interesting to see the troll using the edited version of the Commandments. When I was growing up it said Thou shalt not kill.
I’m sure their god is real happy about all this editing of his words to serve political and ideological agendas.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:13 pmI just went to the Washington Times web site. Wow.
There’s a column by that awful man Cal Thomas (our local paper used to publish some of his nasty stuff) entitled, “The United Socialist States of America”.
Near the end of the over-the-top piece he actually, apparently without intentional irony, says, “Like members of a cult, whatever the leader says, goes.” meaning Obama of course.
This from a publication funded by the main Moonie himself. Unreal.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:19 pmHoodathunk says:
It is interesting to see the troll using the edited version of the Commandments. When I was growing up it said Thou shalt not kill.
I’m sure their god is real happy about all this editing of his words to serve political and ideological agendas.
Good catch! Conservapedia seems to prefer that edit (see under, ‘Is it right to kill?’). Do you think it’s to allow for Christian military actions? Or crazy Christian anti-choicers?
November 24th, 2009 at 12:29 pmNotice that the right-wingers who love the Washington Times will never acknowledge that it is owned by Rev. Sun Myung Moon.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:32 pmCertainly Boehner will correct this error immediately & admit that it was he who turned down the invitation. Won’t he?
November 24th, 2009 at 12:38 pmDo you think it’s to allow for Christian military actions? Or crazy Christian anti-choicers?
It is just proof that the 3rd Commandment is probably the one most violated. All of these people claiming to interpret the word of their god for personal gain invalidates the entire religion. And displays their fear that they have been duped.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:43 pmThey already have a Turkey there, why have two?
Fcuk Boner and Can’tor, total POS scum bags.
November 24th, 2009 at 12:58 pmWhy would someone with “3 degrees” have to clean fish for a living?
—
November 24th, 2009 at 1:03 pmYou are making the assumption that I have to….
trollspotter, dbadass, same loser
—
November 24th, 2009 at 1:04 pmwrong again…
Why would someone with “3 degrees” have to clean fish for a living?
I can’t speak for dbadass but I can see where cleaning fish (literally) or gutting trolls (figuratively) would provide a personal sense of accomplishment. It is a good thing to have a purpose in life, beyond academic achievement.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:12 pmI would think that about the only thing you’d accomplish from gutting fish all day is successfully repulsing your spouse.
Why spend $50,000 for one degree, let alone three, just to gut fish? If you want a sense of accomplishment, try Habitat for Humanity instead of participating in an environmentally catastrophic industry like the fishing trade.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:21 pmOh, forgot to add:
Both options, however, are better than batting at trolls. :)
November 24th, 2009 at 1:23 pmWere Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright invited, too?
November 24th, 2009 at 1:27 pmWhy spend $50,000 for one degree, let alone three, just to gut fish? If you want a sense of accomplishment, try Habitat for Humanity instead of participating in an environmentally catastrophic industry like the fishing trade.
——-
November 24th, 2009 at 1:45 pmWhat if part of what you do is consult on sustainability. Sea based protein is a reality. Educating the consumer is the issue…
No.
November 24th, 2009 at 1:46 pmThere is very little gutting involved. It is all about skilled knifemenship and experience….
November 24th, 2009 at 1:46 pm“the same ‘error’??!! HA!
November 24th, 2009 at 1:50 pmMy guess is that the mail guy couldn’t find Boehner to deliver the invitation, he was standing too close to the paneling and just blended in like a chameleon. As for Cantor, he just didn’t get invited cause’ he’s a d*ck
November 24th, 2009 at 2:23 pmSo FAUX’s claim that they will fire anybody that report false news lasted all of ONE DAY (if that)?
I was giving them 10 minutes to report something falsely.
November 24th, 2009 at 2:39 pmAlready, Fox News is trying to gin up controversy by reprinting the Washington Times along with the same error.
The same error? Tell it like it is…the same LIE!
November 24th, 2009 at 3:04 pm