Think Progress

VIDEO REPORT: Eric Cantor Hosts Another Job Fair That Promotes Jobs Fueled By The Stimulus

On Monday, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) hosted a job fair in his district at Germanna Community College. Like his last job fair in August, Cantor used it as an opportunity to gain positive local press and launch attacks against President Obama.

At the fair, Cantor told reporters that the stimulus has been an “utter failure.” But as the Washington Post has noted, nearly half of the “30 organizations participating” in Cantor’s event “were recipients of the stimulus.”

ThinkProgress attended the event, which attracted more than 600 people. Victor Zapanta produced a video report on Cantor’s stimulus-fueled job fair. Watch it:

So far, the stimulus has injected over $5 billion into Virginia, creating or saving at least 5,900 jobs. The money has helped local governments avoid budget cuts and layoffs, while spurring private investment by funding infrastructure and other critical projects. Many of the employers at Cantor’s job fair were a clear demonstration of the success of the stimulus:

– The Culpeper County School system will have a total of $4.1 million in stimulus funding to work with for the fiscal year 2010. The school system is hiring 7 people and the stimulus is helping to retain the over 700 people employed by the system. In March the Culpeper School Board, which is not authorized to levy taxes, approved a $70.6 million budget. As the Culpeper Star-Exponent reported, “the school budget includes $2.2 million in recently approved stimulus money.”

Higher education institutions at the fair were encouraging job-seekers to go back to school. Many of universities, like Grand Canyon University, touts federal TEACH and Pell grants as a way to attend. The stimulus provided $14 million in Pell Grants.

The Orange County Public Schools received at least $340,000 from the stimulus and is hiring 7 people.

It’s worth noting that among the job fair participants, more than half were from the public sector, including the Department of Veterans Affairs, the CIA, FBI, Army and the FAA –- even though Cantor previously has criticized the stimulus plan for placing too great an emphasis on “preserving jobs in the public sector.” In Virginia alone, the Department of Defense has 83 projects totaling $75.7 million in stimulus money. It’s no wonder Cantor would feature the Culpeper Army recruiting center at his fair, especially since the Army in Virginia has received $61 million in stimulus money.

As the Washington Monthly’s Steve Benen observed, “the job fair at which Cantor trashed the stimulus wouldn’t have been possible were it not for the stimulus.”



126 Responses to “VIDEO REPORT: Eric Cantor Hosts Another Job Fair That Promotes Jobs Fueled By The Stimulus”

  1. lesherb says:

    Is there one original thought between the entire lot of Republicans? Gee Whiz!


  2. EnnuiDivine says:

    Keep pointing out the truth, keep exposing the hypocrisy.

    But it’s ultimately pointless. These Repubs will never admit that the stimulus works and that they’ve benefited from it. Yet again, our MSM fails us.


  3. cd says:

    Oh Cantor in the words of your people; you’re a schmuck.


  4. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre says:

    Eddie Cantor was the good cantor. This Repub. Rep. Eric Cantor (R – Can’t) is the bad cantor. Bad, bad, bad.


  5. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    Another day… another bit of GOOPer hypocrisy…

    In other news, water is still wet, and the sun came up today… in the east… again…


  6. P.D. says:

    I can’t get over how stupid the Repug sheeple are. Can’t they ASK where he got the money? Why are people so clueless? Can’t they read a newpaper? Watch something other than Faux News? I saw some of Saeah’s fans the other day, and they were IDIOTS! ‘I like Sarah because she is real.’ WTF does that even mean?


  7. SoapBox says:

    You can GO HERE and tell him…Thank You! And, how he should stand beside President Obama and thank government for helping the American people:

    http://cantor.house.gov/contact.htm

    or

    Washington, DC
    329 Cannon Building
    Washington, DC 20515
    P: 202.225-2815
    F: 202.225-0011

    Richmond
    4201 Dominion Blvd, #110
    Glen Allen, VA 23060
    P: 804.747-4073
    F: 804.747-5308

    Culpeper
    763 Madison Rd #207
    Culpeper, VA 22701
    P: 540.825-8960
    F: 540.825-8964


  8. JayS says:

    CD @ #3

    I agree, in the words of my people…Eric Cantor, you’re a schmuck!


  9. ralph the wonder llama says:

    I have no problem with Republican lawmakers touting opportunities that can be traced to the stimulus. That’s a proper activity for legislators — look after the needs of their constituents.

    What i have a problem with is hypocritical, disingenuous lawmakers who badmouth things like the stimulus and then turn around and pretend that they had something to do with the opportunities it provides.

    THAT’S what I have a problem with.


  10. Fred says:

    As the Washington Monthly’s Steve Benen observed, “the job fair at which Cantor trashed the stimulus wouldn’t have been possible were it not for the stimulus.”

    hello Americans, can you sort out something this simple?


  11. Tired Of Fighting says:

    It’s not like someone, anyone from the so-called mainstream media is going to call him or any of the Republicans out on any of their lies. Hell, even my President is allowing scum like Joe Lieberman (the man who’s chairmanship he saved) to do and say whatever he wants with not one word of defense.

    All of this “LYING” coming from the non-supporters of decency, dignity, and respect, are being allowed to spew BS without any resistance from anyone. I for one am TIRED of defending those who cant or wont defend themselves. And I am damn TIRED of FEAR, IGNORANCE and STUPIDITY driving the debate on everything. People are dying due to lack of basic services, and I’m supposed to give a ish about where some civilian who quit her job as Governor is selling her book, and you wonder why people think our coountry is so damn dumb, because it is.

    RIP
    SGT Stephen R. Sherman
    C CO 1-5 IN (STRYKER)
    KIA 3 Feb 2005
    Mosul, Iraq


  12. har5125 says:

    When Victor asked Cantor’s staffers about stimulus providing half of the jobs at the job fair, their silence spoke volumes. Whoever runs against him next year needs to use this in a commercial.


  13. pags2 says:

    And, of course, the Dems are going to let this opportunity to embarrass Cantor go by. If I were a VA Dem I would be out raking Cantor over the coals so that he would be afraid to make any public statements, lest he get caught in more of his own hypocrisy. The Dems do not need to be running for office to tear down some of these vocal Republicans. It is a wise strategy to keep them off balance as much as possible. This would pave the way for the elections in 2010. Campaigns do not start with the primaries; the seeds of doubt need to be planted early.


  14. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  15. Marie says:

    It just doesn’t stop does it — hypocrisy reigns.

    They are such fools, but their lemmings don’t ever see the inconsistency, the lies, and the hypocrisy.


  16. belaccifer lacca says:

    FVNY says:

    Why are you so desperate to distract us from Cantor’s hypocrisy?


  17. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  18. EnnuiDivine says:

    JayS says:

    ——————————————————————————–

    CD @ #3

    I agree, in the words of my people…Eric Cantor, you’re a schmuck!

    And, in the immortal words of some random ancestors of mine…he’s not just a schmuck, he’s a putz, to boot!


  19. Perry logan says:

    When did a Republican ever ask where the money came from? ;)


  20. EnnuiDivine says:

    FVNY,

    What an excellent point. There’s no question that the stimulus has brought a great deal of opportunity to small businesses, which was one of the bill’s intended effects. Of course, since Cantor voted against it, he’s intent on sinking small business owners under a mountain of debt incurred by the banking industry. Which Cantor receives quite a bit of campaign cash from…


  21. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  22. Fred says:

    fvny(aaronk)
    because there were only a few there and they represented only a handful of jobs dumbass……

    because of the economy that you and your’s created there are many people looking to fill a few jobs.

    Those in the private sector, including the Boar’s Head Inn of Charlottesville and Bankers Life & Casualty Co., had thick stacks of résumés from potential recruits.

    Both businesses are in the process of filling a handful of jobs.

    any more stupid questions?


  23. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  24. Fred says:

    aaronk, you think that money spent in an area doesn’t help business? Really? How do you rationalize that bit of nonesense?

    You think that if one of these governmental agencies needs a building or a road that they will do in with dept. people.

    Keep trying troll. You make this easy.


  25. Fred says:

    aaronk, why is it that you don’t want to talk about cantor?

    do you have an agenda?


  26. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  27. Fred says:

    How about cantor aaronk? Don’t you think it’s dishonest to behave the way he is?


  28. Tundra says:

    The Boars head Inn and Bankers Life and Casualty make Roads and buildings?

    I am so confused….


  29. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  30. Fred says:

    look aaronk, I run a small business. I borrowed money from the nsba and the funds came directly from the stimulus.

    I was told that without it the money would not have been available.

    next.

    Thanks tundra for showing your ignorance.


  31. The Dogfather says:

    Well, as we Virginians know, there’s only two things that come from Orange and Culpeper counties, and that’s steers and … Ah, never mind…

    But it is very amusing to see stimulus money being used for so much good in the heart of wingnut country here in our Commonwealth. These are the same people who, after they take on a government-stimuluated new job arising from this job fair, will no doubt be at the next teabagger rally waving a “Don’t Tread on Me” flag and screaming about how they want the gummint out of their lives…


  32. Fred says:

    why don’t you trolls tell us again how trickle down works….

    that seems to be where you are going with this.


  33. belaccifer lacca says:

    How exactly did the stimulus help those businesses you just cited?

    Here’s how:
    http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2009/11/21/business/21stimulus_graphic.html


  34. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  35. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  36. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    Well i am sure you thank Bush for having that put in there then.

    Wrong, the money wasn’t available until recently. Bush did the bank bailout with no strings attached, remember.

    President Obmama did the stimulus for Americans.

    When you get your head out of your ass, come back and see us.


  37. Fred says:

    cantor’s hypocricy. Do you have a problem with it or do you admire liers? question is mute for aaronk and tundra.


  38. Fred says:

    tundra and fvny(aaronk) show thier colors.

    Talk about anything but a crooked, lying republican.

    Yet they always claim not to be republicans…..oiy.


  39. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  40. Fred says:

    The bottom line for cantor and the trolls is that the stimulus is working and it will be evident looking back.

    How will you guys rationalize that? What lies will you tell?

    How will you give credit for it to a republican.

    So many lies to compose and spew and so little time. You better get busy.


  41. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    I think the word you were looking for is “Moot”

    heh, no, it was intended to imply truth deafness on your part.


  42. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  43. ebbAndflow says:

    Tundra says:

    “… I am so confused….”

    November 25th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
    ~~~~~~~~
    No truer words were ever spoken!


  44. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  45. Fred says:

    FVNY says:
    So the NY Times publishes a graph with no other data and you’re convinced that the stimulus is a success?

    You ignore all the real evidence that it is working and you’re convinced it’s not….

    Wonder where we would be right now without it…..

    You just keep posting aaronk. You do my work for me.


  46. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre says:

    Rep. Cantor, just another hypocritical Repubican’t.

    O/T:
    I just started reading Joan Walsh’s comments on Salon and learned that President Obama will be speaking at West Point next Tuesday on his criminal escalation of the imperial occupation of Afghanistan. Just like god-damned Bush, hiding behind the troops: how cowardly… President Obama, why don’t you speak before the public in any non-military setting in Anytown or Anycity, USA? Afraid of the public? Afraid of some anti-war hecklers? Afraid? Just another gutless war-monger…


  47. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  48. ralph the wonder llama says:

    Tundra says:
    look aaronk, I run a small business. I borrowed money from the nsba and the funds came directly from the stimulus.

    Well i am sure you thank Bush for having that put in there then.

    Anyone else notice how the trolls demanded to be told how the stimulus helps private businesses, then when Fred explains, this one immediately shifts his focus, without acknowledging that his previous challenge had been met and bested?


  49. Fred says:

    t and a,

    just for you trolls:

    Jobless claims dip, spending up in sign of rebound

    In the face of reality it seems to be you two trolls who tow the party line. You guys must like cantor.



  50. belaccifer lacca says:

    FVNY?
    Some more…

    http://www.economy.com/default.asp

    http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~nroubini/WEBLINKS.HTM

    Go ahead and look at the data yourself… you may have to register for a ‘free trial’ at some of the sites but go-ahead… and then get back to us with your analysis… okay?


  51. P.D. says:

    Tundra, You’re an idiot. I’ve been reading your posts, and you are all over the damn place.


  52. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    I’m sure we can find a mythological graph to tell you that very thing!

    Everything seems to be mythological to you unless rush tells you different.


  53. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  54. Fred says:

    belaccifer lacca, tundra will say they are “mythological”

    rush didn’t acknowledge their existance…..


  55. pete says:

    Just like his Reichwing brethren and sistern, Cantor has no sense of irony or hypocrisy. Most of them are, I suspect, just so stupid and self-absorbed that they truly don’t realize they are doing it.


  56. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  57. Fred says:

    FVNY says:
    whether its the GOP or the Dems.

    just another convenient lie. If everone who said that here were telling the truth we would never have had a second bush term.

    aaronk, you are a known, proven liar.


  58. belaccifer lacca says:

    A graph that goes well into 2010 “assuming” what the job market would be like. Also “Assuming” what it would have been like without the stimulus.

    Ahh, so your argument is that economic projections have no value… got it.

    So in your opinion the whole field of economics is just so much ‘assuming’

    Awesome… not sure I disagree with you but I struggle to see why you think this means that Republican ‘projections’ and ‘theories’ are more reasonable, especially since we’ve seen them in action and they FAILED.


  59. Fred says:

    Tundra, you stuck your nose in and got it chopped off.

    What happened to your ethics? Oh yeah, they are republican ethics. Say things but not really mean them and then ignore it when called on your lies…….pattern?


  60. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  61. belaccifer lacca says:

    Show me that same graph in 2010 with real data in it and it will be PROOF.

    Ahh, so your real argument is that there is no way to appease you now.

    Got it.

    So why did he ask? (I think we both know why, don’t we?)


  62. Chyron HR says:

    Tundra says:

    projections
    projections
    projections
    projections

    Oh, wow. The idea that people could project future activity based on current data is completely alien to you, isn’t it? Do you think it’s a form of witchcraft? Is that why you’re so upset?


  63. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  64. P.D. says:

    Chy@63, LOL! I think tundra is pulling an Ann Coulter moment. When she doesn’t like what she hears, she sticks her fingers in her ears and refuses to listen.


  65. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  66. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    projections
    projections
    projections
    projections

    troll, where we are today is not a projection. Where we would have been today without the stimulus was not a projection.

    You live in la la land.


  67. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  68. Fred says:

    tundra, so many Americans believed that we were headed for a depression that they turned their backs on you.

    We saw a little taste of what was in store for us if you and cantor had your way and it isn’t funny or cute and neither are you.


  69. Fred says:

    Jobless claims dip, spending up in sign of rebound

    How do you rationalize this bit of reality fool? How is this projection?

    Finish your dinner and go do your homework.


  70. ralph the wonder llama says:

    FVNY says:

    Sorry but I like to question the motives behind and results of government programs that cost the American people trillions of dollars, whether its the GOP or the Dems

    Bullshit. You simply like to deny that government programs can have beneficial impacts on the people they’re meant to serve, and you cloak your cynicism in some half-hearted pretense at “even-handedness”.


  71. ralph the wonder llama says:

    I’m a little taken aback by the utter incomprehensibility that stimulus spending seems to hold for our trolls.

    I mean, do they think that once spent by the government, a dollar of stimulus money simply evaporates, like cell phone minutes that expire?

    Do they imagine that the weekly paycheck of a worker on a road construction project is not returned to the local economy in the form of rent, or groceries or school clothes for the kids?

    Is this money trail too complex for them to understand?

    Or is it rather, that as conservatives, they simply recoil from any suggestions to follow a money trail?


  72. FVNY says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  73. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  74. Fred says:

    hey dumbass, yeah you, arronk, these companies recieved stimulus money and they were there and they are not government:

    Comcast and Terremark


  75. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  76. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    Suppose we should get out the champagne and host a country kegger. Less people are getting fired!!!!!!

    Where would we be without the stimulus? Be honest….oh yeah. You will disiminate and regurgitate and avoid the issue because you are a party liner….


  77. Fred says:

    tundra and aaronk, you guys have a balls, I’ll give you that.

    You’re suggestions for solutions are what got us into this mess and still you have the gall to suggest that you have answers to the problems we face.

    I would rather follow a little common sense than be like you two d ick lappers.


  78. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  79. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    Where would we be without the stimulus?

    Just like everybody else, I don’t have an answer for that. Although you can claim that your sexy little crystal ball holds the answer, it doesn’t.

    Keep posting fool. You make my case for me.

    Progressives predicted and economic collapse because of gop financial policies.

    It happened.

    You on the other hand promised a new era of prosperity in exchange for tax cuts for the rich and deregulation…..

    Who was wrong.

    See why you look so ignorant every time you post?


  80. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    Where would we be without the stimulus?

    Just like everybody else, I don’t have an answer for that.

    coward. You know this is a lie.


  81. majii says:

    ralph–it’s obvious that they recoil from any suggestions to follow a money trail because they have no clue that Palin is milking them for all they’re worth with her “book tour,” so it takes no great leap of the imagination to believe that they don’t believe the stimulus data. It’s just their nature.

    If McCain had won and republicans in Congress (assuming they had a majority) had decided to stop all government spending, unemployment would have been at 30%, or higher. It’s difficult for them to understand that bringing spending to a complete standstill causes the economy to come to a standstill and begins a steady decline into a deep depression. It’s also more difficult to bring an economy out of a deep depression than it is to bring it out of a deep recession.

    Although I’m glad it didn’t happen, it would make for an interesting study if an economist were to develop a model to see whether McCain would have been Hoover II.

    We definitely dodged a bullet in the last election.


  82. trishaking78 says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  83. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  84. Fred says:

    trishaking78, what do you think of Cantor’s hypocricy?


  85. belaccifer lacca says:

    You can make a guess on where we would be, you can use all sorts of data, but tiny variations of things you can’t be sure of have drastic differences.

    Ahh, so economic projections are stupid ‘crystal ball gazing’ because you read a best-seller on Chaos theory ten years ago?

    Let’s just stop making projections because we will never really ‘know’ the ‘truth.’

    Sounds like you have a strange understanding of how science works…


  86. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  87. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  88. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  89. ralph the wonder llama says:

    belaccifer lacca says:

    Let’s just stop making projections because we will never really ‘know’ the ‘truth.’

    Sounds like you have a strange understanding of how science works…

    Belac, I think you encapsulated our friend’s view of Democratic-backed economic proposals quite well.


  90. ralph the wonder llama says:

    Name-jacking ain’t cool…


  91. Fred says:

    tundra, I think we did show that you are a republican who follows the party line against all evidence to the contrary.

    You can run from your lies but you can’t hide.


  92. Fred says:

    trishaking78, does your link really teach people how to steal games? Is that ethical?


  93. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  94. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  95. Marie says:

    Tundra seems confused.
    Bush passed the wall street bailout package.
    Obama passed the stimulus package.

    Repulsive as it is, we’d be in Depression now if it had not passed.
    As for the stimulus – there have already been several hundred thousand jobs created or saved in the first 6 months, and the rest is to occur over the next 18 months, as planned from the start.
    New unemployment numbers are down for the first time since September 08. Employment is slowly improving, but there will be dips along the way. By 2011-12, the unemployed are expected to be around 7%, which is still not great, but better than today.
    Stimulus funds are in use around here, lots of construction jobs in Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania. New housing starts are being seen here and there.


  96. belaccifer lacca says:

    Heck you want to hang the mission accomplished banner up.

    Nope.

    But since you admit that there is no ‘Proof’ (BTW- I find it interesting that you capitalized ‘Proof’ as if it were a proper noun… what can that mean?) that you or FVNY would accept at this point in time, I wonder what is the point of asking for it?

    Can you tell me?


  97. ralph the wonder llama says:

    Tundra says:

    I say you can’t call it a success or failure yet, but you are hell bent on it being perfect and a complete success.

    This is as big a straw man as the one you’re complaining about. Actually bigger.

    Credibility: shot.


  98. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    I say you can’t call it a success or failure yet

    You will never call it a success. Fact it that it has prevented us from falling into a serious depression. Even conservative economists agree.

    That is a success. Maybe not to you and your loser buddies because any success for dems is bad for you.


  99. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  100. Marie says:

    Trolls and repugs do not understand stimulus funding, nor are they capable of admitting that republicants are the primary reason we are where we are today (deregulation, tax cuts, two unfunded wars, squandered surplus) and that the repairs will take YEARS to effect.


  101. belaccifer lacca says:

    Well Tundra… from what we are able to see it looks like having a stimulus was better than NOT having a stimulus.

    That’s what our current data shows… that’s why I provided ‘what it looks like’ now.

    And while you are correct to say that this is not ‘TRUTH’ it IS the best we have available… and that’s why I wonder what you think it is that science provides exactly?


  102. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  103. Fred says:

    Tundra, bush still ran fiscal policy. He decided when and where the money was spent.

    You conveniently want to blame Obama for everything but give bush a pass.

    Your slip is showing.


  104. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  105. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  106. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    Where did I ever say Bush got a pass, he has a “majority” of the blame.

    post #103

    You can’t blame any of the economic collapse on democrats. They had a slim majority for 2 years and bush vetoes the majority of what they did try to pass.

    You can pretend or admit that you are ignorant. Either way, I don’t care.


  107. Fred says:

    t, here’s the veto’s. Be sure to look at them and point out where they caused or assisted in the runaway spending of the bush admin……be sure to note the dates….they are relevant to sane people.

    1. July 19, 2006: Vetoed H.R. 810, Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005, a bill to ease restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Override attempt failed in House, 235-193 (286 needed).

    2. May 1, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 1591, U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007. Override attempt failed in House, 222-203 (284 needed). A later version of the bill that excluded certain aspects of the initial legislation that the President disapproved of… H.R. 2206, was enacted as Pub.L. 110-28 with the President’s approval.

    3. June 20, 2007: Vetoed S. 5, Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007.

    4. October 3, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 976, Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 (”SCHIP”). Override attempt failed in House, 273-156 (286 votes needed).

    5. November 2, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 1495, Water Resources Development Act of 2007. Overridden by House, 361-54 (277 votes needed). Overridden by Senate, 79-14 (62 needed), and enacted as Pub.L. 110-114 over President’s veto.

    6. November 13, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 3043, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2008. Override attempt failed in House, 277-141 (279 votes needed).

    7. December 12, 2007: Vetoed H.R. 3963, Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007.[20] Override attempt failed in House, 260-152 (275 votes needed).

    8. December 28, 2007: Pocket Vetoed H.R. 1585, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008[21]. A later version of the bill that changed a minor provision of which the President disapproved was quickly passed by Congress (H.R. 4986) and was enacted with the President’s approval as Pub.L. 110-181 on 28 January 2008.

    9. March 8, 2008: Vetoed H.R. 2082, Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008.[22][23] Override attempt failed in House, 225-188.

    10. May 21, 2008: Vetoed H.R. 2419, 2007 U.S. Farm Bill.[24][25] Overridden by House, 316-108 (283 votes needed). Overridden by Senate, 82-13 (64 votes needed). Enacted as Pub.L. 110-234 over the President’s veto. Due to a clerical error, this act was repealed by Pub.L. 110-246.

    11. 18 June 2008: Vetoed H.R. 6421, 2007 U.S. Farm Bill, re-passed by Congress to correct a clerical error in HR 2419.[26] Overridden by House, 317-109 (284 votes required). Overridden by Senate, 80-14 (63 votes needed). Enacted as Pub.L. 110-246 over the President’s veto.

    12. July 15, 2008: Vetoed H.R. 6331, Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act.[27] Overridden by House, 383-41 (283 votes required.) Overridden by Senate, 70-26 (64 votes required). Enacted as Pub.L. 110-275 over the President’s veto.


  108. belaccifer lacca says:

    I personally “Believe” we are in a better place because of it, however I can’t prove it.

    Well, I personally believe that it did as well and so do the groups that did the projections that showed how… and FVNY asked how exactly it did, which is exactly why I posted the chart with the projections… to show HOW it helped.

    Your insistence that this is not ‘ABSOLUTE PROOF’ or ‘ABSOLUTE TRUTH’ seems odd since I never really represented them as such
    and even odder since you seem to recognize that such a thing is impossible…

    Which makes me wonder why you and FVNY would ask for the impossible unless your real goal was to disparage, detract and distract from the apparent success of the stimulus so far?


  109. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  110. Tundra says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  111. Fred says:

    see dumbass, no huge deregulation or military spending bills.

    I am honestly disgusted by your bush apology attitude.

    Yet, you blame Obama and Obama alone for things not being repaired in 10 months.

    How fair minded you are…….not.


  112. Fred says:

    Tundra says:
    Really, seeing as he had 8 successful vetoes his entire presidency. Looks like they didn’t try to do a whole heck of a lot then. But don’t give them any of the slack. Somehow I’m the ignorant one.

    Now you’re just lying. You said they were complicit. You even give bush a free ride for those two years. The two years when all of bush’s veto’s happened. Sounds like they were doing something bush didn’t like….

    Yes, you are the ignorant one.


  113. belaccifer lacca says:

    there you are associating me with him asking again. i didn’t ask you for anything. I simply remarked on your attempt to provide something he asked for.

    And if you look you will see that he neither asked for ABSOLUTE PROOF and I never said I had provided it… the only one who mentioned PROOF of any kind was you.

    So tell me again how you aren’t involved in this ridiculous attempt to derail us from the success of the stimulus and Cantor’s hypocrisy about it?


  114. Leftside Annie says:

    Hypcrisy, thy name is REPUBLICAN.


  115. ralph the wonder llama says:

    Tundra says:

    You can’t blame any of the economic collapse on democrats. They had a slim majority for 2 years and bush vetoes the majority of what they did try to pass

    Really, seeing as he had 8 successful vetoes his entire presidency

    All but one of them in the last two years of that presidency… and all four of the vetoes that were overridden came in those final two years.

    Just thought that might have been relevant, considering you were talking about the impact of the “Democrat controlled Congress” on Bush policy, but chose to attribute his small number of vetoes to his entire eight years in office.

    Seemed a little disingenuous to me.


  116. barfly says:

    Really, seeing as he had 8 successful vetoes his entire presidency.

    And a republican senate, that threatened the “nuclear option” over threatened democratic filibusters. Remember the prescription drug legislation, passed in the dead of night? Or all those off budget war appropriations? He didn’t have to use his vetoes becuse the rubberstamps gave him all he wanted, and more.


  117. Jackie says:

    If the voters can’t see Britney Cantor for who he really is well it’s truly sad. A smart person would hold a job fair but not use the word Stimulus which Cantor strongly objected to and voted NO.


  118. Marie says:

    Bush had 8 vetoes — they all occurred when the Dems had the slimmest of margins in congress — so Bush vetoed anything they tried to push through with their one-vote majority.

    It’s hard to reconcile the disaster that was George Bush and still be a republican – I understand.

    It’s very sad that a democrat is expected to repair all that damage in a very short period of time.
    When one thinks of the surplus Bush inherited and the cost of the two wars he did not fund, it is apparent we would have the funding for the health care crisis as well as putting Social Security on a sure footing for the future.


  119. pags2 says:

    The Republicans and the teabaggers insist that the proper action to take during this economic recession is to cut government spending. That would require the government to cut public aid, unemployment assistance and a host of other social services programs. It is agreed by economists that further tax cuts will not help the jobless situation. So using the conservatives logic, we would have to assume that the poor and unemployed are going to disappear (I don’t where) when the benefits disappear. Right?


  120. TRIATHLON says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  121. Fred says:

    TRIATHLON, Will Rogers was a democrat who made fun of republicans like you.

    His story is as true today as it was in 31 and for exactly the same reason.

    Republicans have been in power the last decade and our country is facing a financial emergency because of it, again.

    put that in your teabag and smoke it bub.

    Oh, and independent doesn’t fool anyone. You are a republican.


  122. jb says:

    How much does Cantor’s haircut cost and who pays for it?


  123. www.fikrinne.blogspot.com says:

    What an excellent point. There’s no question that the stimulus has brought a great deal of opportunity to small businesses, which was one of the bill’s intended effects. Of course, since Cantor voted against it, he’s intent on sinking small business owners under a mountain of debt incurred by the banking industry. Which Cantor receives quite a bit of campaign cash from…


  124. linzloo08 says:

    And in other news… Fog is cold and the sun rose this morning!
    Seriously, how dumb can these people get?


  125. EdgeOnIt says:

    Contrarian, points of view, can be thought through, toward more stable foundations, consequently, others will more fully appreciate the other side. At the end of every day, redacted policies are ethically judged: either ’socially positive’, or ’socially negative’. For example, the policy of ’stimulus monies’ is socially positive, as it may accrue social alterations equalling, less than the aggregate of social structures within the social system; what works, is left unchanged. Inversely, ’stimulus monies’ would have negative social impact, because slowing down the normal operating of the social system, must eventually have none, or zero lasting effect upon the wokings of all, concurrent societal (and individual) processes.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2010 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll