Family Reserach Council Claims Obama Has A ‘Plan’ To ‘Impose Homosexuality’
Family Reserach Council Claims Obama Has A ‘Plan’ To ‘Impose Homosexuality’
Earlier this month, the far-right Family Research Council (FRC) sent a fundraising action alert fearmongering about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which has been introduced in both the House and Senate and President Obama says he is “pushing hard to pass.” “This law would punish anyone in the workplace who dares oppose homosexual behavior, cross-dressing and other unhealthy behaviors,” said the FRC alert.
In a four-page solicitation letter mailed to supporters this month, which was obtained by ThinkProgress, the conservative organization went even further in its rhetoric, claiming that President Obama wants to “impose homosexuality and silence Christianity in workplaces”:
In the body of the letter, which was signed by FRC President Tony Perkins, Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) is quoted as saying that ENDA legislation would mean that “the federal government would be dictating to religious institutions and organizations whom they must hire.” The letter also claims the law could lead to an “employer telling you to remove the Bible from your desk because it is offensive to the homosexual or cross-dresser he was forced to hire.”
These claims are ridiculous. Despite what Price says, the legislation would not force anyone to be hired. It would only mean that it would be illegal “to fire, refuse to hire, or fail to promote employees simply based on sexual orientation,” as it is currently illegal to do in cases of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Additionally, as the Human Rights Campaign points out, current ENDA legislation “exempts small businesses, religious organizations and the military.”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
What the Hell! Is this bash gay day? What is with this irrational fear of gays and lesbians? I can’t explain it. Don’t these ‘religious’ folks have anything better to do then to demonize gays? The last I heard, millions are losing their homes, losing health insurance AND going hungry. Man, are these people priorities screwed up.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:51 pmOh no…tolerance?!
I guess the GOP has to fight like mad to make sure it’s either LGBT’s or women who still get steam rolled by them by the time Obama leaves office.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:56 pmOh please, Mister Bossman don’t make me suck on that, I’ll cross dress but I ain’t putting that in my mouth.
These cretins sure have active imaginations.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:56 pmIs that before or after he sets gitmo prisoners free and gives them jobs?
They wouldn’t complain if it was the other way around, imposing Christianity and silencing gays. Would they?
December 1st, 2009 at 5:57 pmSoooo, did “Gay Day” at work just get a little more interesting?
;)
December 1st, 2009 at 5:59 pmFamily Reserach Council Claims Obama Has A ‘Plan’ To ‘Impose Homosexuality’
– - Thank God, I need a better fashion sense.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:59 pmOh, freaking SPARE ME from this vile religious BULLSHIT!!!
December 1st, 2009 at 6:00 pmhysterical kooks.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:02 pmIs there any reason cited why this president, whose entire persona is that of a true family man, would want this so-called agenda imposed? Are these people full of wishful thinking about what Obama could do to THEM personally under such an imposed ‘agenda’? Good God, where is Freud when we need him?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:02 pmZooey says:
Soooo, did “Gay Day” at work just get a little more interesting?
;)
You can’t just pray it away now, you know! :)
December 1st, 2009 at 6:05 pmWow. A troll is lurking. They will show up en masse any minute. Trolls love to bash gays. Oh wait, and immigrants and Liberals……
December 1st, 2009 at 6:05 pmCD? got anything?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:06 pmImpose homosexuality? Is this like imposing left-handedness?
And how, exactly, does one “impose” a sexual orientation?
Some people really, really need to get a life that doesn’t focus on sexual obsessions.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:07 pmI’m missing something. Just how are we gonna “impose” homosexuality ?
Will we force them to look at naked pictures till they become gay ?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:07 pmThis is an example of what has gone wrong with Religion. You now have to read the bible yourself and pray for protection against those who use God’s name for greed and evil. I remember many years ago what religion and churches were like as it was nice to go to church on Sunday morning and help out during the week. Now all I hear is lies, hate and give me your money. I also notice how Pasters are driving expensive cars but the churchs get nothing. Oh as for this group of wing nuts while Obama can take care of himself with these wackos
December 1st, 2009 at 6:07 pmBob says
December 1st, 2009 at 5:57 pm
They wouldn’t complain if it was the other way around, imposing Christianity and silencing gays. Would they?
_____________________________________________________________
Are you kidding? That’s their agenda, in a nutshell.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:08 pmSeriously, a lot of the Bible thumper crowd is still smarting that we have to let them Jews and Ay-rhabs practice their religion.
So it is only natural that now we’re gonna make the straights become gay (while the Bible says about paths that he’ll “make the crooked way straight”)
December 1st, 2009 at 6:09 pmOkay, I’m all for gay rights and all that but… if they gonna make me be gay, THAT’S WHERE I DRAW THE LINE.
Where do I send money?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:09 pmmissmolly says:
Impose homosexuality? Is this like imposing left-handedness?
I thought that was one of Sarah Palin’s campaign platforms against Obama.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:11 pm- – I see Negative Numbnuts is courageously voting down on posts, courageous as courageous can be, will soon get courageously smacked down by TP’ers. Courageously,
December 1st, 2009 at 6:16 pmdo I not have a right not to be a christain?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:17 pmFred ♪♫♪ says:
CD? got anything?
Probably why MRS. cd makes him sleep in the shed.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:19 pmToo bad you can’t “impose” a brain on some people.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:20 pmMapleStreet says:
Seriously, a lot of the Bible thumper crowd is still smarting that we have to let them Jews and Ay-rhabs practice their religion.
According to Dana Perino, Jesus slapped Moses to the ground on Mt. Sinai and then became Caesar. Then Caesar Jesus Christo used his military supremacy to defeat the gay gene.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:20 pm14. Miss Molly and 15. MapleStreet (myself):
I should have added, if we’re gonna make them look at naked men, we just have to show pictures of the Sistine Chapel.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:20 pmI see that the Family Research Council has upgraded Obama’s
December 1st, 2009 at 6:20 pmand anybody who’s not a bigot’s status from “liberal” to “radical”.
I see that the Family Research Council has upgraded Obama’s
and anybody who’s not a bigot’s status from “liberal” to “radical”.
And wasn’t Jebus a radical?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:22 pmThe list of suspects?
OSTL = Iamlegend
Tracy__5
STORM
TaosJohn
vigor
LiberalSlayer
conservative guy
Mr. Duke
Fuzzy Slippers
CP
I do hope your Trolls Igno(RED) Day was good for you and calmed most of you down. I hope we can do this more often and hose down some of the nonsense here every now and then.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:22 pmBadmoodman says:
Vote Down | (-1)
– - LOL.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:22 pmNo, because you’re both wrong, and mad.
White Christians are being unaffected at an alarming rate!
December 1st, 2009 at 6:24 pmJebus was a radical liberal socialist,
December 1st, 2009 at 6:30 pmbut the local Christian Taliban gets upset when you point that out.
Also when you discuss if he was married or gay.
For all the suffering in the world, famine, human trafficing, sexual abuse, and social inequaity. These people can only fixate on homosexuality. I would think the plight of homeless and staving children would be number one on their list. I guess they proved me wrong.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:30 pmWere there ever any repug politicians that were caught cheating on their wives? How about repugs molesting little boys like the hundreds of priests that are guilty of doing it.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:32 pmReligion and the fcking wackjobs that actually dedicate their lives to something that cant be proven is a joke. What do you idiots call it? Faith? I will tell you what, heres a gaurantee about the virgin mary, If I meet her she will not be a virgin anymore,and that goes for every hole in the bithes body.
So, why are conservative Christian men so obsessed with homosexuality? Never mind, I know the answer.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:32 pmOK, that’s disgusting and doesn’t really reflect well on the participants in these conversation. I’m not defender of religion, but come on.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:34 pmNew work rules that you have to stick your —– in someone else’s —? I thought that was the Republican platform!
December 1st, 2009 at 6:35 pmokie dokie,
I’m pretty sure that Jesus, at least by the standards of the American Psychochristian, was gay.
1. He was obsessed with the food and wine for his guests.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:38 pm2. He wore sandals and a dress.
3. He loved his twelve male disciples above all others.
4. He hung out with hookers and never got laid.
I’m not sure exactly what you are referring to but I will be as civil to them as they are to others.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:38 pmSounds like a skull and bones initiation to me, eyesopen.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:38 pmsscncturn64 says:
December 1st, 2009 at 6:32 pm
That was seriously ugly.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:39 pmAnd most important pete, he believed his mother was a virgin.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:41 pmFred, I was referring to #34.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:47 pm“Family Reserach Council Claims Obama Has A ‘Plan’ To ‘Impose Homosexuality’”
Yup – after that’s done, he’ll require you to marry your dog or a farm animal of your choice.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:48 pmBwahahahahahahahaha!!!
Pete, according to the Book of Thomas and the Book of Mary, both of which were banned, Jesus might have actually been married to Mary Magdaline. She is referred to with a word that sometimes meant “spouse” in that culture. So, I’m really not going to take the Romans’ word on whether or not he had sex.
After all, the Romans would like you to believe that Pontious Pilate struggled with his conscience over executing Jesus, but the Roman histories show that Nero (!?) thought Pilate was so brutal a Governor that he recalled him to Rome. So, you’ve got to take anything the Romans tell you with a grain of salt. They had an empire to run after all.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:52 pmThat was pretty ugly. religion stirs strong emotions in people.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:54 pmYou think so zooey? I am so sick and tired of the uglyness that comes from the right. I can be a nasty fck when it comes to wingnuts and the repug party. These motherfckers destroyed too many lives. I refuse to let them get away with all the destruction and death they have caused all around our world.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:55 pmTHEY CAN FCK OFF AND DIE!!!!!
This touches on one of my problems with the bible. Which interpretation and with who’s agenda ruled translation of the bible.
What does it really say? I think most christains would not like a literal translation.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:57 pmI don’t blame anyone for being angry or even hating religion. Look what they’re up to right now – they’re trying to tank health care reform with their incessant struggle to force women to carry pregnancies to term. Makes me sick to my stomach.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:58 pmWoo-hoo!!!!
December 1st, 2009 at 6:58 pmWill it be a muslim socialist sort of homosexuality or just the regular kind?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:58 pmNinerFan,
Yep. There’s plenty of doubt about what Jesus, if there ever was a single person on which the whole mythology is based, was really like. My post was just an exercise in how one can take a few lines of an old myth and draw any conclusion one wishes.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:03 pmSo, will employers provide special training when they impose teh gay on us?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:03 pmFred @ #48: It’s a huge blind spot for most Christians. Most would rather not think about how the book was put together at a council of Roman officials in 325 AD. The fact is that there were lots of stories which didn’t make it into the book because they didn’t accomplish the list of goals the Romans had in mind. They didn’t want Thomas, because he told of Jesus’ idea that “God was within everyone” and you didn’t really need to go to church to pray. They needed people relying on those church services, so Thomas was cut.
And, translations? Which one do they want. When they say “literal”, they’re usually referring to King James, so what does that tell you? They’re a mixed up lot.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:04 pmPete, I hear you, and I knew it was tongue-in-cheek. And, you’re right. There is still some question about whether Jesus is a single person or a composite drawn from an number of radical Rabbis of the period.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:10 pmI myself look forward to the forced implementation of tasteful decor…
December 1st, 2009 at 7:10 pmNinerFan,
What amazes me is the ignorance of any version of the Bible, or Buybull as I call it when I’m not being PC, displayed by most of our noisy Psychocristians.
And, just to be clear, I do make a distinction between goodly people of Faith and our modern American, right-wing, fundamentalists.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:11 pmAnd, just how does one impose gayness on someone else? How does the state impose gayness on somebody? I mean, somebody can hit on you, but that doesn’t make you gay.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:11 pmWe need bit to explain this process. bit is sure that a gay can be made a straight but bit has never explained how a straight can be made gay through gender identity therapy…
December 1st, 2009 at 7:13 pmpete: “And, just to be clear, I do make a distinction between goodly people of Faith and our modern American, right-wing, fundamentalists.”
Richard Dawkins makes a very uncomfortable point that “good people of faith” make it possible for right wing fundamentalist wackos to exist partly because they so rarely speak up against them. I think I agree.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:14 pmAnd silencing the FRC’s version (aggressive, rabid, illogical, and basically unhinged) of Christianity would be a bad thing?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:14 pmNinerFan says:
And, just how does one impose gayness on someone else?
I think it starts with being forced to drive a fuel-efficient car. Then they enforce vegetarianism and the rest follows from there. Oh yeah, I think that some think that Jesus might get confused if they aren’t allowed to beat, kill, or fire whoever is “hitting on them”.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:17 pmMake no mistake about it, the Family Research Council wants to impose their version Christianity on the United States and they are 2 elections away from doing so.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:17 pmSoy. It is definately going to involve lots and lots of soy
December 1st, 2009 at 7:17 pmpete: “I think it starts with being forced to drive a fuel-efficient car.”
I don’t know… unless that Ed Begley Jr.’s marriage is all for show… Better warn Woody Harrelson.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:19 pmEvening vote down baby. Good day was it?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pmpjkool, the FRC isn’t going to be imposing anything on anybody. If they were going to, it would have happened when religious fanatic Repubs controlled all three branches of government, but it didn’t.
Their membership and influence is falling, not rising.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:22 pmSo vote down baby, are you looking forward to being gay or are you already gay?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:22 pmNinerFan,
I think Dawkins makes a valid point.
I live just a few blocks outside Crazy Shelly’s (InsaneR-Mn,) District so I’m all too familiar with good people who vote for a dangerous whack-job because their Pastor called her a “good Christian lady”.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:23 pmdbadass, we’re still ignoring Trolls for the day.
Night’s still young.
Let Olby Sucks pout. He didn’t say an (audible) thing all day!
December 1st, 2009 at 7:23 pmSorry, I didn’t see the vdb on the list. Done and done…
December 1st, 2009 at 7:25 pmThe individuals that give credence to anything the Family Research Council has to say – don’t have two brain cells to rub together.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:25 pm*
why are religious organizations so terribly threatened by harmless homosexual people? Its appalling how insecure the religious zealots are that they are so compelled to rail against homosexuals.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:25 pmlatency?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:26 pmI don’t know about how this voting thing works, but I think it’s funny that somebody voted down a comment of mine where I was asking for a little civility. I think there’s some voting down without reading going on.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:28 pmSexual repression and regression on the right is so thick and pervasive you can SMELL it.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:28 pm*
I need to by stock in that amylnitrate company down the roas asap!
December 1st, 2009 at 7:29 pmI still remember when they had their panties in a bunch because of “The Last Temptation of Christ.” At the time, I thought, wow, way to show how shallow your beliefs are to have them so deeply affected by a film.
And, of course, when I was a kid, they wanted to burn Beatles albums because of Lennon’s tongue-in-cheek off-hand remark that the group was possibly more popular than Jesus.
They’re very easy to offend and fire up.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:31 pmoh noez…I better get laid as much as I can before Obama passes the mandatory homosexuality act of 2010..
god, this stuff is so ridiculous.. you couldn’t make it up.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:36 pmNinerFan says:
I don’t know about how this voting thing works
It’s quite simple. Click on “Vote Up” and the total goes up click on “Vote Down” and it goes down. Negative votes are displayed as negative numbers until (-10) at which point the comment is hidden.
As for the unread posts being voted down? That’s the invisible “Vote Down Troll”, VDT for short, who tries to annoy us by voting the whole thread down. It’s amusing in a pathetic and sad kind of way.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:36 pmarugula futures are looking promising as well…
December 1st, 2009 at 7:37 pmI think there’s some voting down without reading going on.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:39 pm–
That’s my little buddy the vote down baby. It is sort of sad but this is how they manifest their social alienation and isolation which has resulted fro traumatic life experiences the rest of us can only imagine…
The “invisible Vote Down Troll”??!!! You’ve got to be kidding. What does this unfortunate person think he/she is accomplishing?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:39 pmWhat does this unfortunate person think he/she is accomplishing?
December 1st, 2009 at 7:40 pm—–
I have been asking that for weeks but they have been too shy to respond. Normal people use their words to try and persuade others…
as a gay man, i’d like to “impose” something upside each and every FRC’s member head (all two of them)…a set of knuckle prints.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:43 pmAnd here I am having dinner. We need a warning label.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:44 pmpluege says:
why are religious organizations so terribly threatened by harmless homosexual people?
Every Supreme Court case that involved sexual freedom issues has been decided in favor of the individual. These cases have chipped away the religious authority over a secular society and losing that power is a major setback for the religious community. The purported “gay” issues are just more of the religious community trying to reassert itself over the secular society. This is a power issue and not morality.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:45 pmsome rather offensive anti-religion comments..
but for the record.. I haven’t voted anyone down.
I forgave you =)
December 1st, 2009 at 7:46 pmI think that the VDT is just a child, intellectually or chronologically, who still spits in the fries if his sister gets more than him.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:47 pmpluege says:
“why are religious organizations so terribly threatened by harmless homosexual people?”
because the frame of reference for gay people these religious organizations have are their priests who fondle the little children of the parish.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:48 pmI welcome having Christians in the workplace. They are wonderful people, warm, giving, full of joy,thoughtful and decent.
–what, those guys? No no no. I’m talking about Christians.
I’ve met about a dozen Christians in my life, and am much the better for it.
Can’t tell you the number of bigoted Pharisees I’ve met, though.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:52 pmIs the Family Research Council truly as homophobic, hateful, dishonest & totally stupid as they appear to be? If there were ever a poster “child” for pushing for more equality, this “Council” is the best thing ever– a lying, hateful group that abhors equality. “Impose homosexuality”??? Are they really that incredibly moronic? It seems so. And they honestly think Obama will impose homosexuality?? I’m sorry, but loathesome, stupid, ignorant, lying groups like this must never- ever- be given any credibility whatsoever. They are anti-Bible, anti-Jesus, anti-American, & racist. They make me sick. We must ridicule them as the lying, racist, idiots they are. They are everything that is anti-American & anti-Constitution.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:56 pmNinerFan
as far as Richard Dawkins statement -
I speak against right wing ‘christians’ every single day..
right here.
And for that matter I speak against anyone no matter where I’m at who is blatantly cruel and immoral.. I have no need to make a distinction based on religion.. or anything else – as I’ve said.. that’s stereotyping
- I speak out against a$$holes.. plain and simple.
December 1st, 2009 at 7:57 pmNinerFan says:
And, just how does one impose gayness on someone else?
I thought Pat Robertson knew this answer when God told him how Glenn Beck was the new Goldfinger.
December 1st, 2009 at 8:00 pmThis comment has been voted down. Click to read.
Well with this law, just think of the new jobs that will be available. I can think of new jobs in Human Resources that will teach employees how to be gay.
I can see it now -
The Manager of Conversion to Gay calls Johnny from the mail room to his office:
“Well Johnny, it is time for you to be converted to being gay. Take off your clothes and bend over the desk. This won’t hurt at all!”
I think I’ll beat the rush and send my resume off to all of the businesses in my area before all the good positions are gone .
December 1st, 2009 at 8:06 pmI appreciate that, lux. And, I think Dawkins is pretty dogmatic himself. I grew up in a very Christian family, so I know you can’t paint with too broad a brush.
December 1st, 2009 at 8:07 pmbit my man, just how is this mass gayness thing gonna go down? Tell the truth even you think these people are whackjobs don’t you?
December 1st, 2009 at 8:14 pmThe Family Research Council’s creation in 1983 would lead me to believe its purpose was always political, and started by entrenching the conservative agenda into the politics of Christian voters.
December 1st, 2009 at 8:18 pmAs a result, Reagan was re-elected by a landslide, Mondale winning only one state.
The Repubs picked up 16 seats in the house, as well.
So which is more likely to actually occur forced gayness or the Rapture?
December 1st, 2009 at 8:22 pmdbadass says:
So which is more likely to actually occur forced gayness or the Rapture?
Wow, that is a tough question, but since gayness is real and the Rapture is a complete fantasy, I would say that forced gayness is slightly more likely.
December 1st, 2009 at 8:30 pmUh oh, I just remembered, a couple of months ago, wasn’t there some sort of news item on a proposed military weapon that made you gay ?
Now Obama is the President and thus could order the weapon used.
Uh oh……..
;-)
December 1st, 2009 at 8:31 pmbitblt says:
Bowers was overturned. From Wiki:
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law that criminalized oral and anal sex in private between consenting adults. Seventeen years later the Supreme Court directly overruled Bowers in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), and held that such laws are unconstitutional. In overruling Bowers v. Hardwick, the 2003 Court stated that “Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today.”
December 1st, 2009 at 8:33 pmOMFG!
M’kay now I will go back through the posts. I just had to get that out first.
Is it still Troll Ign(oRed)Day?
December 1st, 2009 at 8:37 pmWell I won’t miss those Monster Truck Rallies and smokeless tobacco…
December 1st, 2009 at 8:57 pmOMFG!
M’kay, read through majority.
Still the same reaction.
December 1st, 2009 at 9:14 pmThis is more than fearmongering; it’s a shitload of goddamn lies.
These people are emotionally and intellectually disturbed.
December 1st, 2009 at 10:06 pmResearch is spelled incorrectly.
December 1st, 2009 at 10:35 pmI noticed that typo myself, judson.
December 1st, 2009 at 11:33 pmI was embarrassed to point it out because of my own gross misspelling on another thread.
yes TEH Homo-Sex-You-All Agenda is so dangerous that we had to disguise the spelling so it’s only homosexual…See such a harmless term, it means Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex. See how harmless is that? Now, compare it to homo-sex-you-all and you can see that truly this agenda is truly the most dire threat that America has ever faced…
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:02 amThe lies continue from the christian right, because it creates fear among the faithful who are members of “group think” and want to be dictated to. If we did not have a democratic government, the religious right would have no problem dictating what people believe and how they are to live. It is easier to follow, than to lead. I am very concerned about the law against GAYS being introduced in Uganda. It would execute GAYS and would imprison those who know someone who is gay, but does not turn them into authorities. Uganda, according to 2004 stats is 42% Catholic. Once again the “inquisition” is being implemented by Ugandan leaders who are known to and familiar with the C Street Family. This is a “crime” against the people of Uganda. We cannot let the Rick Warren’s, and Catholic Bishops get away with this type of violation of human rights and the Jesus message.
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:20 amDear Family Research Center,
As a spy working on your behalf amongst the ranks of TEH HOMOSEXUAL agenda, I am here to reinforce your dire warnings about the imminent threat our nation faces from the nation’s first HOMOSEXUAL president, Barack Obama. You truly believe that Obama wants you to hire only homosexuals and that Obama will force employees to remove Bibles because they are offensive to homosexuals. I am afraid that it is much more serious than that. That is only the icing on the caking. I am afraid that the true meaning of the agenda can be found in the word homosexual.
On the outside, it seems very innocent. I mean homo comes from the Greek root meaning same. Literally, we can take homosexual to mean of the same sex or gender. Much like homogenous, it seems like a harmless word. After all, these people just claim that they are people who associate with the same sex.
However, we must dive beyond such trivial dead languages to discover the true intent of this insidious agenda. Homosexual. Say it out loud 5 times. After you have done so, please say it slowly, enuciating each syllable. Do you see it? Homosexual becomes Homo-sex-u-al, right? Now, this may seem like an exercise in nonsense and futility, but bear with me. U is internet lingo for you and so homo-sex-u-al becomes homo-sex-you-al. Now for al: al sounds like all. Put it all together and what do you get? Homo-Sex-You-All…as in the Homos want to HOMO SEX you all, with you all being the direct object. You can imagine what would be next…instead of Silent Sustained Reading, we will have Sodomizing Sustained Ramming. Instead of SQ3R, we will have Sex, Quickie, Rimjobing, Ramming, and Rites of Venus…
You are wondering why I have written TEH HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA instead of THE Homosexual Agenda. You may have heard that those in the left use TEH to mock those who claim that this is all an insidious plot to brainwash our children into becoming the homo agenda’s newest orgy participants. Nothing could be farther from the truth. By the grace of God, He has made it so that those who claim to have such a dangerous agenda out themselves because they are unable to write The. By His grace, we are given a chance to identify which agendas are dangerous by the spelling of THE.
I pray that you act upon this information, as time is short. Already I can feel myself getting sicker and sicker as I fall prey to the HOMO-SEX-YOU-ALL urges. I may be a lost cause, but in my last communication before my soul is damned, please, I beg you. Act upon this before it is too late. You are our last bastion of hope against the nation’s first HOMO-SEX-YOU-ALL president.
Sincerely,
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:32 amKitty
Right on Tracy! I feel like I am succumbing to my homo-sex-you-all urges every time I hear Obama speak…I am thankful that I may be saved by your help and the help of the FRC.
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:46 amTracy__5 says:
Right on FRC. I know many gay people (both men and women) who point to Washington when asked to identify the source of their queerness.
How many times a day do you go the dumb well?
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:55 amRight on, Tracy! Did you know that Elitist is a code term in TEH HOMO-SEX-YOU-ALL agenda for ally? Seek out these people and bring them to the light!
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:10 am“President Obama wants to “impose homosexuality “. Yeah, Tony. When this bill passes I hope someone rolls it up into a nice long tube and shoves it right up your bigotted ass!
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:22 am.
I fear that someday I will be “required” to wear a pink triangle so that all “REAL” ‘Murkins will see which side of the street I walk.
.
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:44 amI hope it doesn’t come to that…but judging from the talk and irrational fear about homosexuality, we might have people who want to segregate them much as they did for lepers…
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:59 amWatching Religion being played out is like having many interpretation of the same. Christians seem to have a loud microphone and bring their interpretation to many that still question.
We hear so much about extremist. They seem to have the answer on the Truth. When Religion can turn a man to kill infidel’s and enjoy many virgins in heaven is just as absurd.
CERN; “Particle Separator” in Europe has now advanced to gaining the information we all are waiting for. How the World Began.
A question “Did God make Man or, Did Man Make God”? will be a test for Religions around the World.
Let us hope that the Church does not stand in the way of the search for the truth.
I watched that day when a terrorist was in the news when Pat Robertson said “They should Kill him”
Watched Hagge when a Book by Author: Brown was popular explorer of the history of search for the “Holy Grail” A Novel…Hagge through a tantrum and threw the book to the floor and condemned any one that reads it.
Feel good about not having religions beliefs guiding my life.
December 2nd, 2009 at 2:48 amThe path to spirituality is a personal one, not one taken via committee.
GF42
December 2nd, 2009 at 5:07 amTheir position drips with irony, given the sheer volume of closet cases and “bi-curious” within their own ranks.
December 2nd, 2009 at 7:52 amdidn’t ya’ll know? teh gay is the new swine flu and obama wants to infect you and your children with it.
in other news: you can’t make up this type of stupid.
honestly though, do these trolls just sit in a circle all day and beat each other in the head with the stupid stick?
December 2nd, 2009 at 9:02 amSounds to me like this group has way too much spare time on their hands.
RT
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:25 amhttp://www.web-anonymity.de.tc
There sure are a lot of smart people in America. God bless our great nation.
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:01 amLooks like Bitbit is just not up-to-date on his law review data.
“The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to strike down the Texas law, with five of the justices holding that it violated due process guarantees, and a sixth justice, Sandra Day O’Connor, finding that it violated equal protection guarantees. The majority opinion, which overrules Bowers v. Hardwick, covers similar laws in 12 other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion; Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined. Kennedy spent most of his opinion casting doubt on the factual findings of the court in Bowers, that homosexual sodomy is a widely and historically condemned practice. For example, Kennedy cited a 1981 European Court of Human Rights case Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, as part of its argument against the Bowers court’s finding that Western civilization condemned homosexuality (the case led to homosexuality being de-criminalised in Northern Ireland, having been decriminalised in the rest of Britain before: England & Wales 1967, Scotland 1980). Chief Justice Burger, concurring in Bowers, had held that “Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western civilization”; Kennedy’s citation of European law was in part a response to this blanket citation of the values of “Western civilization.”
The Court concluded that, “Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today. It ought not to remain binding precedent. Bowers v. Hardwick should be and now is overruled.”
The majority decision found that “the intimate, adult consensual conduct at issue here was part of the liberty protected by the substantive component of the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process protections.” Holding that “the Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual,” the court struck down the anti-sodomy law as unconstitutional. Kennedy’s opinion crucially grounded the right of consenting adults to have sex on how intimate and personal the conduct was to those involved, not on the conduct being traditionally protected by society (as in Bowers), procreative (as in Eisenstadt and Roe), or conducted by married people (as in Griswold). This opened the door in theory to protection of a whole host of sexual activity between consenting adults not protected by other decisions. Kennedy was careful however not to extend the opinion to include governmental recognition of such relationships.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas
According to Bitbit’s logic, slavery should be allowed as it was once upheld by the Supreme Court. In other words, Bitbit’s logic states “once a decision is made, it can never be reconsidered.”
Luckily for everyone in the US, Bitbit’s logic is incorrect, and wrong. (Yes, there is a difference between those two words, and Bitbit’s logic meets them both.)
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:07 amThis anti-equality group of religious folk want to impose their particular brand of extreme fundamentalism on the rest of us through legislation and the judiciary. Their ultimate goal is to set up a theocracy so they can impose it.
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:24 am127. Democrat Soldier,
Interesting sideline is that in Missouri law, sodomy is defined as almost any sexual contact other than in the “missionary position.” So even if a married man and woman engage in other positions, they could be charged.
One of the shames is that it could potentially bypass the equal protection objection you mentioned.
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:34 am@129. Mapelstreet. I don’t think that the MO law would be enforceable considering the SCOTUS judgement in Lawrence v. Texas. There are a lot of laws still on state books that are now what is called “not enforceable”, but they just haven’t been stricken by the state legislatures (lazy legislators).
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:52 amJesus, the FRC has lost what little mind it might have had. I am sick to death of people like them. Fear, hatred, paranoia, and bigotry are the only things these whack-jobs understand. They are very, very sick, people who should all be committed to the nearest psychiatric facility. Keep in mind that this level of homophobia is generally used as a smokescreen to hide from themselves and others the fact that many of them are closeted homosexuals or lesbians.
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:15 pmAnd this is a good example of why I’m not a supporter of the GOP, because their views on Christianity conflict with mine ( I think that we should spend more time and energy helping the homeless,work on social justice, etc). If they spent half as much energy fighting world hunger or poverty, or even AIDS as they do fighting homosexuality and abortion, then AIDS wiuld be cured and everyone would have enough to eat.
December 2nd, 2009 at 3:57 pm* sorry, I meant to say would* Stupid typo.
December 2nd, 2009 at 4:01 pmTracy
You ignorant pile of dogshit. Where do YOU point when you want to blame your monumental stupidity on someone?
December 4th, 2009 at 3:22 amTracy
Did you call someone an elitist? See you have to understand that you are very VERY stupid. So the fact someone says something you dont understand really doesnt mean very much. You are so stupid ICE is still a mystery to you
December 4th, 2009 at 3:24 am