ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Oh the Stories They Tell

There is a proverb that states, “As long as the hunter is telling the story, the lion will never win.” This observation proves true when one considers the 2005 Republican Freedom Calendar, a revisionist history of the Civil Rights Movement. This government publication is another example of taxpayers’ money funding conservative propaganda. But one still can’t help but be shocked by the claims made in this latest pandering production.

One “fact” of interest is the labeling of Jackie Robinson as a Republican. However, Robinson’s political alliances were not clearly defined. After campaigning for Democrat Hubert Humphrey in the presidential primary, Robinson voted for Nixon in the 1960 general election but declared that “he voted not for the party but for the candidate.” However, his “fears disappeared with the news of Kennedy’s public objections to the persecution of Martin Luther King,” and Robinson went on to support the Democratic administration of John F. Kennedy. Additionally, in 1964 and 1968, he supported the Democratic Party candidates for president.

From his writings and letters, available through the Library of Congress, it is clear that labeling Robinson a Republican is inaccurate. But as long as the hunter is telling the story…

Politics

Inaugural Investments

The big spenders behind President Bush’s inauguration festivities have taken a major PR hit in recent days. We thought it only fair to present their side of the debate.

Take Mercer Reynolds, co-chair of the Presidential Inaugural Committee and President Bush’s so-called “fundraiser-in-chief.” Mercer can’t understand all the griping about special interest cash being showered on the Bush administration. “It’s such a broad-based group of corporations that are giving,” Reynolds explains, “I just don’t think anyone could tie in giving to the inaugural with access to the presidency.” So really, more corporate money really just means higher ethical standards.

Ed Lewis, a spokesman for Ford Motor Co., takes a different stance. Ford donated $250,000 for the inauguration, and Ed plainly admits the automaker has “a number of interests in Congress and the Bush administration.” Still, he can’t help but laugh at the idea that the money is paying for access to the president — as if he needed it! “We get our phone calls returned,” Lewis gloats. “That’s not a big issue for us.”

Then there’s D.C. lobbyist David Girard-diCarlo, who personally threw down $50,000 on top of the $200,000 his firm contributed. Speaking to the New York Times, Girard-diCarlo admitted the sad truth: “If you are playing in a sport, you’ve got to play in the sport.” And Girard-diCarlo clearly knows how to play the sport — sometimes he even plays in his pajamas. After the Homeland Security Dept. was created in 2002, Girard-diCarlo invited Secretary Tom Ridge over for two slumber parties at his Arizona estate, then hired Ridge’s aides to lobby the department on behalf of his clients.

Politics

Cognitive Dissonance

“Listen, I want to thank all the entertainers who were here today. How about Hilary Duff. She was fantastic. Thank you, Hilary. JoJo — JoJo is here — yeah. Rubin Studdard — you talk about a success story. Ryan Cabrera, I appreciate Ryan being here. How about Three Doors Down? Pretty cool guys, right? Seem cool to me.” — President Bush, 1/18/05

“Five car bomb blasts rocked Baghdad today as suicide bombers hit targets that included the Australian Embassy, the latest attacks in an intensified campaign of violence…. The American military reported that 26 people were killed and at least 21 were wounded.” — New York Times, 1/19/05

Security

Fun With Homeland Security Dollars

A county in Texas bought a trailer to carry lawn mowers to “lawn mower drag races.” Lake County in Tennessee “bought a defibrillator to keep on hand at college basketball games.” The bad news is they used precious homeland security funds to pay the tabs. The White House has consistently underfunded top security priorities like firefighter and police departments, ports, borders and trains. Making matters worse, the disorganized Department of Homeland Security has provided little to no oversight on how these scarce funds are being spent. Other ways Homeland Security funds are being spent across the country:

$30,000: The amount Madisonville, TX spent on a custom trailer for its annual mushroom festival in October.

$27,000: The amount one county director in upstate New York spent on a brand new pickup truck for himself.

$76: The amount spent in Baton Rouge, LA for “Skittles, York Peppermint Patties and other candies.”

$12 million: The amount of Homeland Security money the White House is forcing Washington, DC to spend on President Bush’s inaugural party.

Security

The Runaround on Geneva

Just a quick review of Condoleezza Rice’s statements yesterday on the Bush administration’s position regarding the Geneva Convention:

    1.) President Bush determined that al Qaeda detainees should not be protected by the Geneva Convention: “We did not want to afford to people who did not — shouldn’t enjoy certain protections those protections. And the Geneva Conventions should not apply to terrorists like al Qaeda. They can’t or you will stretch the meaning of the Geneva Convention.”

    2.) But President Bush determined that all detainees should be treated consistently with our “international obligations”: “the president has been very clear that he expects everyone to live up to our international obligations and to American law.”

    3.) Then, President Bush determined that our “international obligations” are consistent with “the principles” of the Geneva Convention: “I believe that the president, as a policy matter, decided that in order to protect American interests but also in order to live up to our obligations internationally…that the right policy call was to treat the detainees, even al Qaeda detainees, consistent with our obligations or consistent with the principles of Geneva.”

So, to recount, the Bush administration treats all prisoners — even al Qaeda detainees it does not consider protected by the Geneva Convention — consistent with our “international obligations” and those obligations are “consistent with the principles of Geneva.” It all sounds reassuring, but is basically meaningless. The Geneva Convention is a contract — it doesn’t consist of “principles,” it consists of laws. By pronouncing those laws “quaint,” the Bush administration has opened up a legal (and moral) “black hole” whereby virtually anything can be construed as “consistent” with “our obligations.”

The ambiguity of the situation was evidenced yesterday by Rice’s inability answer one specific question about detainee treatment: Did methods such as forced nudity and water boarding constitute torture?

If the new secretary of state can’t answer that question, you can imagine the position those less versed in the complexities of the Bush administration legal code are in.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up