ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Adding Insult to Illigitimacy

Iraq’s upcoming parliamentary election will face some serious challenges.

Iraqis don’t know where to vote. They don’t know the candidates on the party slates. A major portion of the electorate has boycotted the entire proceeding. Foreign election monitors will do their work from Jordan. “It is stunning in this situation that we are representing any idea this is legitimate,” Rep. Ellen Tauscher told the Washington Post, before acknowledging the election is the “lesser of all evils” and must proceed.

Just as stunning, however, is that the United States is helping to strip away what little legitimacy remains.

The Associated Press has published photos of U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopters flying interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi to campaign stops around Iraq. Given deteriorating security conditions and the recent assassinations of several candidates, this protection is an invaluable asset. As University of Michigan Middle East expert Juan Cole points out, “There is no campaign. Publicly identified candidates are limited to people with good security.” Already Allawi has the advantage of incumbency, albeit one determined not by Iraqis but by the White House, which handpicked Allawi for his current position.

If President Bush is indeed interested in “the Iraqi people’s capacity to self-govern,” he should take care to ensure that the United States is not unfairly assisting one election slate over the others. U.S. forces should either offer protection to a set number of prominent candidates from all of the slates, or refuse to provide protection to Allawi while he is campaigning.

Media

Deja DiRita

DiRita is at it again.

On Sunday, the Washington Post published an article reporting that Rumsfeld has created a secret intelligence unit — called the Strategic Support Branch — which he has sent to hot spots around the world without informing Congress.

Pentagon spokesman Larry DiRita issued a response. Here is the key section:

There is no unit that is directly reportable to the Secretary of Defense for clandestine operations as is described in the Washington Post article of January 23, 2005, entitled “Secret Unit Expands Rumsfeld’s Domain.” Further, the Department is not attempting to ‘bend’ statutes to fit desired activities, as is suggested in this article.

It is accurate and should not be surprising that the Department of Defense is attempting to improve its long-standing human intelligence capability.

As Atrios notes, this is basically an admission that the entire story is true. DiRita doesn’t deny that the unit exists, only that such a unit isn’t “directly reportable” to a certain Pentagon official. It’s clear that DiRita purposely writes statements that make it sound like the Pentagon is denying the story, without actually denying the story. (Most likely because the story is true.)

Worse, USA Today bought into DiRita hook, line and sinker. The headline of the nation’s most widely read newspaper: “Pentagon denies news report of new spy unit.”

Politics

A Number of Explanations

In recent days, high level officials in the administration have made it clear that not only have we fallen far short of our goals on troop training in Iraq, but also that they have literally no idea how many troops are actually trained.

For purposes of review, here’s Donald Rumsfeld last September:

RUMSFELD: We have gone from zero to 95,000 Iraqis that are fully trained, fully equipped, providing their own security. They’ll be up to about 145,000 Iraqis by the end of this year, fully trained, fully equipped. There are some another [sic] 50,000 of them that are not fully trained or fully equipped yet but that have been recruited and are capable of doing some things.

Now, from Meet the Press on Sunday:

MR. RUSSERT: Senator Joe Biden, Delaware Democrat, said this week in Washington that there are only 4,000 fully trained and capable Iraqi soldiers in the Iraqi armed forces. Is that accurate?

U.S. AMBASSADOR TO IRAQ, JOHN NEGROPONTE: Well, I think that really understates the accomplishments of the Iraqi army and police forces. They’ve had a number of successes in the past several months in Najaf, in Samarra, in eastern Baghdad. There are some 75 or 80 Iraqi battalions that are currently trained and operating, so I think that that 4,000 figure understates the progress that has been made by Iraq’s armed forces in the past six months.

MR. RUSSERT: Where would you put the figure? What should the American people know? How many fully capable and trained Iraqi soldiers are there?

AMB. NEGROPONTE: I’d be — I’m not certain what number to put on the number trained.

From Condoleezza Rice’s confirmation hearing last Thursday:

SEN. BIDEN: Now, how many do you really think are trained that Allawi can look to and say, “I can rely on those forces”? What do you think that number is?

RICE: Senator, I have to rely on what I get from the field…We think the number right now is somewhere over 120,000. We think that, among those people, there clearly continue to be questions about on-duty time, that is, people who don’t report for duty. And so this is being looked at…

But I do want to note, Senator, that the Iraqis are making a lot of sacrifices here.

BIDEN: Well, I thank you for your answer. I think you’ll find, if you speak to the folks on the ground, they don’t think there’s more than 4,000 actually trained Iraqi forces. I strongly urge you to pick up the phone or go see these folks.

Note that Rice and Negroponte don’t just exaggerate, they fail to answer the questions at all. Rice hedges (“I have to rely on what I get from the field”), then vaguely exaggerates (“somewhere over 120,000″). Negroponte doesn’t even hazard a guess, admitting he’s “not certain” about numbers, then directs our attention to “progress” made in the past six months. Meanwhile, even Rice’s high estimate would place us well short of where the Secretary of Defense said we’d be — not in 2003, not early last year — but in September, three months ago.

Update

Meanwhile, even Rice’s high estimate would place us well short of where the Secretary of Defense said we’d be — not in 2003, not early last year — but in September, three months ago.

Featured

Note that Rice and Negroponte don’t just exaggerate, they fail to answer the questions at all.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up