ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Bankruptcy “Reform” Act: Deforming the System

Many of you are aware of the bankruptcy “reform” bill now barreling through the Senate. This credit industry wish-list does nothing to address the causes of spiraling bankruptcy rates in America, like predatory lending practices, stagnant wages and a lack of health care. Instead, it cynically caricatures bankrupt families as “deadbeats” who must be punished by higher costs and less protection from creditors–never mind the fact that about 96% of all bankruptcies are caused by medical emergencies, job loss, divorce or a death in the family.

The bill itself is bad enough. (More on specific provisions here, here and here.) But for my money, the most depressing aspect of this whole affair is how clearly it illustrates Senators’ slavish and cynical devotion to big donors. The credit and banking industries are among the nation’s largest campaign contributors–and it’s paying off.

In the last few days, the Senate has beat back common sense proposals to exempt military service members and veterans from a harsh means test; give relief to people forced into bankruptcy by medical bills; discourage predatory lending practices by credit companies; and allow elderly people to protect their homes from seizure. Even a bi-partisan proposal to curb bankruptcy abuses by big corporations is being blocked because Senate leadership fear such a “controversial” notion might stall the bill. Read more

Security

Busting the NPT

Today is the 35th anniversary of the the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The NPT, at its most basic, requires states without nuclear weapons to not acquire them, and those states with weapons to commit to eventual disarmament. Article VI of the treaty sensibly calls for a “cessation of the nuclear arms race.” Described as “the cornerstone of global efforts” to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, it has been signed by 188 countries (though North Korea withdrew in 2003) and will undergo a five-year review this May. While the Treaty is in need of a review and some strengthening, a good start would be simply to have the United States comply more fully.

In its 2001 Nuclear Posture Review–the core document for official U.S. nuclear strategy–the Administration emphasizes the importance of coming up with new, more “usable” nuclear weapons such as a nuclear “bunker-buster.” It strongly supports research into this weapon, and is poised to battle Congress over getting funding for nuclear bunker-buster research back into the federal budget. This research makes U.S. calls for strengthened global nonproliferation measures seem hypocritical, and dramatically undermines America’s capacity to exercise essential leadership on combating nuclear threats.

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up