ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Drudge Invents Story for DeLay

The Drudge Report (a popular website run by right-wing activist Matt Drudge) has posted an image of an offensive t-shirt, along with a headline “Liberals Sell ‘DeLay Suicide T-shirt.’” It’s clearly a vicious, organized effort to demonize Tom DeLay.

Or not.

The “liberals” selling the shirt are actually…just one random guy named Christopher Goodwin. Christopher runs “Ye Olde Christopher Goodwin Art Shoppe,” an online store
(hosted for free by CafePress.com) where he sells drink coasters, tote bags, and throw pillows emblazoned mostly with images of his own “abstract and representational art”; only two of his featured items are political in nature, the DeLay shirt and a set of shirts that say “Bush Is Vile”. Christopher’s profile explains that he lives in Washington and “enjoys attending Small Claims Court hearings, interrogating his cats, and taking brisk walks on the roof.” According to Alexa.com, Christopher Goodwin’s website is the 2,071,537th most visited site on the Internet; to put that in perspective (and to make clear Goodwin’s profound obscurity) consider that the homepage for Chicken of the Sea tuna is ranked 163,081.

In other words, Drudge made a concerted attempt to find absolutely anything to take the heat off Tom DeLay’s various corruption charges, and the very best he could come up with was a stupid t-shirt from “Ye Olde Christopher Goodwin Art Shoppe.” Lame.

Politics

The Hidden Corporate Tax Cut

Interesting findings in a new study by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC:

- Just one in five large corporations (assets of $250 million or more) in the financial services industry were subject to IRS audit in 2002, 2003 and 2004.

- In 2004, only 0.65 percent of all corporations were subject to a face-to-face audit.

- The IRS refuses to release the number of total audit hours for corporate audits. (The information is available for individual audits.) This makes it impossible to know how much time the IRS is spending making sure corporations comply with tax laws.

This data suggests that that the administration has given large corporations, especially in the financial services industry, a hidden tax cut. Not only are the rates lower and the loopholes expanded, but enforcement has been relaxed.

Politics

Take Action: Tell American Airlines To Drop The Hammer

American Airlines gave $5,000 to Tom DeLay’s legal defense fund, and, unlike some Congressional Republicans, the company has not yet dropped its support for the ethically challenged House leader.

Here’s how American Airlines’ Spokesman Tim Wagner explained the donation to NPR: “We were told that Mr. DeLay, a member of Congress from our headquarters state was facing substantial legal bills that he was unable to pay personally because of their size and his limited resources.”

There are millions of ordinary Americans that have bills to pay and limited resources. American Airlines should be helping those folks, not an ethically-challenged Congressman like Tom DeLay.

TODAY’S ACTION ITEM

Call senior American Airlines officials and ask why they gave money to defend Tom DeLay’s unethical behavior and demand that they ask for their money back:

Tim Wagner, Spokesman, Corporate Communications — (817) 967-1577
Dan Garton, Executive Vice President, Marketing — (817) 931-9351
Ralph Richardi, Senior Vice President, Customer Service — (817) 967-2000

Give them a call, then come back to Think Progress and comment on your experience.

Politics

Thrown the Ball, Bolton Still Drops It

After extolling the virtues of the United Nations during testimony at his nomination hearing, Ambassador nominee John Bolton stated that actualizing the full potential of the international body must include “putting to rest skepticisms that so many feel about the U.N. system.” If there ever was a perfect time for him to reject all the statements that he has made about the U.N., then would have been the time. But tough-minded, unapologetic Bolton again did not — and has yet to — recant on any of his previous remarks.

Security

Bolton’s Non Defense

The Wall Street Journal shills for John Bolton today in an editorial which dismisses as “political smoke” accusations that Bolton misused intelligence in a 2002 speech about Cuba. Here’s how the Journal defends him:

In May 2002, Mr. Bolton told an audience at the Heritage Foundation that he believed Havana had “a limited offensive biological warfare research and development effort” and has “provided dual-use technology to other rogue states.” As is usual, the speech was cleared by intelligence authorities prior to delivery. If they had done their homework, the critics would know that Mr. Bolton wasn’t the first U.S. government official to use such language.

That’s all well and good; the problem is the Journal misstates the accusation. Nobody says the speech Bolton actually gave included bad intelligence. The accusation, stated in today’s Washington Post, is that Bolton wanted to use flawed intelligence in the speech, then threw a fit when intelligence officials told him he couldn’t:

In spring 2002…Using evidence described by three knowledgeable intelligence officials as ambiguous, Bolton planned to announce the existence of a secret bioweapons program in Cuba during a speech that May to the Heritage Foundation.

But he was blocked by Christian Westermann, the chief bioweapons analyst at the State Department, who refused to clear the speech unless the language more accurately reflected the intelligence assessments. Bolton summoned Westermann to his office and berated him, officials with knowledge of the encounter said, and then tried to have him fired….When [Carl] Ford backed up Westermann, Bolton refused to speak with him again.

Note: Bolton must have read the WSJ editorial – he just used the same argument in his hearing, claiming the Cuba speech was cleared by the intelligence community. Unfortunately, that is an answer to a charge no one has leveled. He then admitted he tried to have Westermann “removed from his portfolio” after the incident.

Politics

McCain Opposes “Nuclear Option”

Overshadowed by the nascent “Shay’s Rebellion” was Sen. McCain’s major statement yesterday opposing use of the “nuclear option.” Though some conservative senators have already declared their reluctance to go along with Sen. Frist’s plan to override the filibuster and ram through President Bush’s radical judicial nominees, McCain is no doubt the most high-profile conservative senator to declare his explicit opposition (pdf):

Sen. McCAIN: …I think that there’s a problem with a slippery slope. I think that there’s a problem with really changing the environment of the Senate and we are different from the House and if we don’t protect the rights of the minority, someday history shows that we won’t always be in the majority. …

SCHIEFFER: Well, can I just ask you the direct question? Are you opposed to doing away with the filibuster, Senator?

Sen. McCAIN: Yes.

Media

More CrackerJack Reporting By Bob Novak

“Contrary to claims on leftist Web sites, no Republican member has called for the majority leader’s resignation.” — Robert Novak, 4/11/05

“Rep. Christopher Shays said Sunday that fellow Republican Rep. Tom DeLay should step down as House majority leader because his continuing ethics problems are hurting the GOP.” — ABC News, 4/10/05

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up