ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Bush Appointee Used Taxpayer Resources For His Personal Horse Racing Operation

The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) is the federal agency responsible for all U.S. government international broadcasting, including Voice of America and U.S. broadcasts into countries like Iran and Cuba.

President Bush appointed “staunch conservative” Kenneth Tomlinson to the board of the BBG in 2001, and nominated him to serve as Chairman in 2004 2002. Today, a State Dept. inspector general’s report was made public showing that Tomlinson has abused his position and effectively defrauded taxpayers. Among the lowlights, Tomlinson:

– used BBG resources to support his personal horse racing operation;

– requested the hiring of a personal friend as a contractor without the knowledge of other board members or staff, and signed invoices providing almost $250,000 in compensation even though the contractor provided no written reports or other supporting documentation required by the contract;

– requested and received compensation that exceeded the maximum allowed by law;

If this story sounds familiar, it is. Tomlinson resigned last year from the board of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting after the CPB inspector general found Tomlinson had used “agency money to hire consultants and lobbyists without notifying the agency’s board,” among various other offenses.

Today, Reps. Howard Berman (D-CA) and Tom Lantos (D-CA) and Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) wrote President Bush urging him to immediately remove Tomlinson from his position. (Read the full letter HERE.) Hopefully Tomlinson has the decency to resign first.

Digg It!

Politics

Report: Climate Change Severely Threatens International Economic Growth

Picture of droughtGlobal warming, of course, is a serious economic problem. According to a new report released today by the World Bank, it’s also a problem that threatens economic growth worldwide.

The range of economic impacts of global warming is astounding. From the World Bank summary:

The report says that the consequences of such changes include decreased water availability and water quality in many arid and semiarid regions; an increased risk of floods and droughts in many regions; reduction in water regulation by snow and glaciers in mountain habitats; decreases in reliability of hydropower and biomass production in some regions; increased incidence of vector- and waterborne diseases such as malaria, dengue, and cholera; increased heat stress mortality; increased damages and deaths caused by extreme weather events; decreased agricultural productivity with almost any warming in the tropics and subtropics; adverse impacts on fisheries; and adverse effects on many ecological systems.

The World Bank stresses that we are already suffering from the economic impacts of climate change. According to the report, “in the absence of adaptation, the annual costs of climate change impacts in exposed developing countries could range from several percent to tens of percent of gross domestic product (GDP).” Worse, “much of this damage would come not gradually and incrementally through the years but in the form of severe economic shocks.”

Global warming deniers frequently focus on the cost of doing something about about the problem. But they never mention the cost of doing nothing.

For much more on global warming, check out Climate Progress — our new sister blog dedicated to the issue.

Yglesias

The Rain in USA Falls Rarely on the Plain

An amusing conclusion to today’s “Today’s Papers”:

Finally, the NYT reefers a big piece on arid conditions in the Great Plains, which have left “farmers and ranchers with conditions that they compare to those of the Dust Bowl of the 1930′s.” It’s the worst drought since … well, maybe 2003, “an extremely dry summer that … brought back memories of the 1930′s Dust Bowl” (NYT, Sept. 5, 2003). Or maybe 2002, when “farmers shrug[ed] and wonder[ed] if a new Dust Bowl [would] soon be upon them” (NYT, May 3, 2002). Or 1998: “a dry spell that officials say shows signs of developing into the costliest and most devastating the region has seen since the Dust Bowl years” (NYT, Aug. 12, 1998). Or 1996: “Coming after two years of low rainfall and a number of other weather problems, the ferocity of this year’s drought has slowly begun to evoke memories for some here of the Depression-era Dust Bowl” (NYT, May 20, 1996). Or 1988: “Since the spring’s dry weather evolved into the worst drought since the Dust Bowl, the farm policy has been turned upside down” (NYT, July 10, 1988). Or 1982: “And when the winds come, turning the sky dark with dust and burying fence rows under shifting dunes of soil and thistle, those who are old enough remember the bleak days of the Dust Bowl.” (NYT, May 14, 1982). Or 1980: “Is the nation in for a new Dust Bowl or at least a succession of scorching summers?” (NYT, July 17, 1980).

The thing of it is that before some clever rebranding, the area we currently know as the “Great Plains” was called “The Great American Desert.” It’s not genuinely a desert, but it really is quite dry. And, of course, an area that’s dry-ish most of the time is going to be subject to frequent droughts. Many Native American practiced agriculture, but the ones who lived on the plains/deserts generally didn’t and this was not a coincidence. The local climate has its ups and downs, but it’s a fundamentally marginal area that already stays viable mostly because of federal protections for domestic agriculture products. It seems a bit perverse to just encourage the empty-ish part of the country to get emptier at a time when housing is becoming increasingly expensive, but it got empty-ish out there for a reason. Before it was flyover country, that’s the part of the country you would try and pass through in a covered wagon before reaching the more promising terrain in Oregon.

Yglesias

Fear of a Ninth Planet

New column from me at The American Prospect Online, “Fear of a Ninth Planet” makes the case against denying Pluto it’s rightful status as a planet. I should perhaps note that despite enjoying the “reality-based community” phrase, I actual adhere to a fairly Kuhnian line about the nature and history of science which some folks would regard as unduly relativistic.

Politics

The Bush Record: More Poverty, More Uninsured

President Bush says “the foundation of our economy is solid, and it’s strong.” That’s true, for some: corporate profits have now climbed to their highest share of GDP since the 1960′s.

But new Census Bureau data show the real state of the current economy. The Bush record on combating poverty and insuring more Americans is an undisputed failure.

Poverty, All Races (Millions)
Number of Uninsured (Millions)

More on the new census data HERE.

Digg It!

Media

TIME Reporter Falsely Claims Magazine Hasn’t ‘Touched’ John Mark Karr Story

Over the weekend on The McLaughlin Group, host John McLaughlin brought up the JonBenet Ramsey story, asking his guests — including TIME’s Jay Carney — whether the media were over-covering it:

MCLAUGHLIN: Is the media hyping this story because of its lurid qualities? Jay Carney.

CARNEY: As opposed to? Of course it’s hyping it because of its lurid qualities.

MCLAUGHLIN: You’re crowding out stories on the environment.

CARNEY: We actually are not at Time. We haven’t touched it.

But TIME’s website currently has FIVE articles (here, here, here, here, and here) all offering extensive coverage of John Mark Karr.

TIME isn’t alone in its obsession with the 10-year-old murder case. Even today — after the district attorney dropped the charges against Karr — many papers nationwide chose to lead with Karr coverage:

paperkarrarrow.jpg

Editor & Publisher notes that a Google search for “John Mark Karr” came up with 10.8 million results. “John Mark Karr” with “Ramsey” produced 6.7 million stories.

UPDATE: Jay Carney has responded HERE.

(HT: Bill in Portland Maine)

Politics

Ahmadinejad challenges Bush to televised debate.

“President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday challenged President Bush to a televised debate and voiced defiance as a deadline neared for Iran to halt work the West fears is a step toward building nuclear bombs,” Reuters reports. “The White House said Ahmadinejad’s call for a presidential debate on global concerns was a ‘diversion’ from international concerns over Iran’s nuclear program.”

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up