ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

VIDEO: Lynne Cheney Unhinged On CNN

Lynne Cheney repeatedly attacked CNN for having a liberal bias during a fiery and combative appearance today on the Situation Room.

Cheney said a CNN special that aired yesterday was a “terrible distortion of both the president and the vice president’s position on many issues,” in part because CNN used the phrase “domestic surveillance” to describe the so-called “Terrorist Surveillance Program.” When Wolf Blitzer pointed out that some individuals have been arrested and interrogated despite having no ties to terrorism, Cheney warned, “I think that you might be a little careful” declaring someone has “clean hands.”

Later, Cheney criticized Virginia Senate candidate Jim Webb for including sexually explicit material in his novels. Asked whether her own novel Sisters had “lesbian characters,” Cheney said, “no, not necessarily. This description is a lie. I’ll stand on that.” In fact, her novel did contain multiple scenes describing a lesbian love affair.

Repeatedly, Cheney asked Wolf Blitzer to end his line of questioning and about her new children’s book.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2006/10/lynne.320.240.flv]

Digg It!

Full transcript: Read more

Yglesias

A Question of Fundamentals

David Greenberg writes: “At a time when sympathy for Israel’s plight increasingly comes from the right, many of the signatories are liberals or leftists who remind us that supporting the Jewish state is fundamentally a liberal position, even when its government veers farther to the right than many of us would like.”

I’m a little baffled by this ambiguity-ridden claim. I’m not really sure what it means (“support” in what sense?), but I’m having trouble coming up with interpretations that make it non-trivial yet defensible. Liberals should refrain from criticizing Israel when its policies veer too far right? Should criticize Israel but not too stridently? Should oppose efforts to cajole Israel into ending policies that are too far right? Should support the view that Israel is entitled to $3 billion per year of taxpayer money irregardless of the merits of Israeli government policy? Obviously, the question of which Israeli policies do and do not veer unduly far to the right is a controversial (to say the least!) topic, but I should think the meta-level issue here is easy — Israel should be supported by liberals insofar as the things Israel does are worthy of support.

Politics

McCain Calls For Escalation In Iraq, Wants 20,000 More Troops On The Ground

mccainToday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) called for sending 20,000 more troops to Iraq. The AP reports:

Republican Sen. John McCain, a possible 2008 presidential candidate, said Friday the United States should send another 20,000 troops to Iraq.

A member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, McCain said increasing U.S. forces would require expanding the standing Army and Marine Corps – a step the Bush administration has resisted. [...]

”Another 20,000 troops in Iraq, but that means expanding the Army and the Marine Corps,” he said.

McCain’s call for escalation would exacerbate the deteriorating situation in Iraq and would only further damage U.S. national security. Here’s at least two reasons why:

1) No troops to send. “Sending more troops to Iraq would, at the moment, threaten to break our nation’s all-volunteer Army and undermine our national security.” McCain suggests enlarging the force to send them to Iraq, an idea that is implausible to carry out over the short-term and would damage the military’s ability to recruit over the long-term.

2) The insurgency would grow more inflamed. “A more visible presence of U.S. troops risks further stoking the flames of the insurgency by feeding perceptions of long-term U.S. occupation among many Iraqis.” The recent effort to increase troop numbers in Baghdad has only increased violence. A recent poll of Iraqis indicated that support for attacks on US-led forces has grown to a majority position — now six in ten — a number sure to increase if more U.S. troops are put on the ground.

Phased withdrawal is gaining consensus as the last best option for Iraq. A growing group of experts — including the Iraq Study Group and host of conservative senators — are consolidating behind a redeployment. 63 percent of Americans believe Congress should set a timetable.

Media

Meandering Aimlessly, Carrying Broken Sticks

More from the aforementioned Bush chat with conservative columnists. Why does the president keep saying this: “I am trying to show success. It will affect Iran. A free Iraq will affect Iran. It will affect Syria.”

The administration’s been caught in an infinite loop on this question from day one. As everyone can see, it’s essentially impossible to accomplish anything in Iraq insofar as the governments of two adjacent countries are actively trying to undermine what we’re doing. And yet, the president keeps insisting that one of his long-term goals in Iraq is to overthrow the governments of two of Iraq’s neighbors. So — surprise! — they try to undermine his policies. And then the administration turns around and whines about it, before deciding down the road that he should once again re-iterate his goal of toppling the regimes. Meanwhile, he has no actual means at his disposal to accomplish this. It’s moronic; the kind of thing that it would only take about five minutes of thinking to dissuade you from. But he’s been at this for years.

Politics

Snow: Cheney ‘Is Not A Guy Who Slips Up’

Vice President Cheney is under scrutiny for the following exchange with North Dakota radio host Scott Henen:

HENEN: And I’ve had people call and say, please, let the Vice President know that if it takes dunking a terrorist in water, we’re all for it, if it saves American lives…Would you agree a dunk in water is a no-brainer if it can save lives?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: It’s a no-brainer for me, but for a while there, I was criticized as being the Vice President “for torture.” We don’t torture. That’s not what we’re involved in.

Cheney’s comments were widely understood as an endorsement of a practice called “waterboarding” — a technique where prisoner “who is bound and gagged has water poured over him to make him think he is about to drown.” (In 1947, the U.S. tried and convicted a Japanese officer with war crimes for waterboarding a U.S. civilian.)

Today, Press Secretary Tony Snow insisted that Cheney’s comments did not endorse waterboarding. Snow said that Cheney does not comment on specific interrogation techniques and is “not a guy who slips up.” ABC’s Ann Compton countered that Cheney “did go up and curse a senator to his face on the Senate floor and accidentally shot his friend.” Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2006/10/snowcheney.320.240.flv]

Transcript: Read more

Yglesias

Inequality: So Hot Right Now

Jon Chait has a fantastic article in the new New Republic about how the Bush years’ combination of strong growth and meager, meager wage growth has prompted increasing numbers of center-left economists to develop a renewed interest in inequality and what you might call “political economy” ideas (in contrast to “economics” per se) and thereby move much closer to traditionalist labor-liberal views. In retrospect, I really should have mentioned this in my attack from the left on Jacob Hacker. There’s something especially perverse about liberals rushing to embrace the risk-centric worldview at the expense of our old inequality-centric one at just the moment when old-school liberal ideas are finally gaining some mainstream respectability.

Media

ABC Political Director: ‘Every Elite Politico’ In The Country Knows The Media Has A Liberal Bias

Earlier this week, ABC Political Director Mark Halperin told Bill O’Reilly that members of the “old media” are too liberal and that “we’ve got to fix that” by “prov[ing] to conservatives that we understand their grievances.” Previously, Halperin has called right-wing muckraker Matt Drudge “the Walter Cronkite of his era” and said he “rules our world.”

In today’s Note, Halperin goes further. The Note claims that “President Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Lynne Cheney, Phil Singer, Karl Rove, Elizabeth Edwards, and every other elite Republican and Democratic politico share a set of cherished core American beliefs.”

Among the beliefs Halperin attributes to everyone:

The only way to get a fair message out is through (friendly) New Media, because the Old Media is incompetent, weak, and biased.

You can’t refresh Drudge too often.

It’s one thing to believe in an imaginary liberal bias. It’s another to deceive yourself into thinking that everyone else agrees with you.

Digg It!

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up