ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

The Murtha Plan

Ari Berman describes a clever effort to thread the escalation-halting needle:

When he receives the Bush Administration’s $100 billion supplemental spending request for Iraq on February 5, Murtha says “they’ll have to justify every cent they want.” He’ll insist that no money be allocated for an escalation unless the military can meet normal readiness levels. “We should not spend money to send people overseas unless they replenish the strategic reserve,” Murtha says. He expects to have one hundred and twenty days to act before the Administration deploys the second phase of additional troops to Iraq. “If he wants to veto the bill,” Murtha says of Bush, “he won’t have any money.”

Seems reasonable to me. The trick, obviously, is that the administration can’t meet those standards of readiness consistent with its escalation plan. David Ignatius says Ragm Emannuel’s on board as well.

Politics

House passes prescription drug reform.

The House this afternoon passed legislation to repeal the Bush administration-backed provision of the 2003 Medicare prescription drug law that forbids Medicare from negotiating lower prices for seniors. “The 255 to 170 vote wasn’t enough to override a threatened veto from President Bush, who said he won’t accept the measure in its current form. Supporters said the government could save $96 billion over 10 years by negotiating for drugs bought in bulk.”

Security

Official U.S. Military Dictionary Includes ‘Escalation,’ Not ‘Surge’

The official Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms offers new evidence in the debate over Iraq terminology. As MoveOn.org’s Adam Green notes, the Pentagon’s dictionary has no entry for “surge” but does have an entry for “escalation”:

escalation
(DOD) A deliberate or unpremeditated increase in scope or violence of a conflict.

ThinkProgress has argued that media outlets are misleading Americans when they use the term “surge” to describe President Bush’s new Iraq proposal.

As we documented Wednesday, when “surge” was first adopted by the mainstream media in November 2006, the term was specifically defined as a “temporary,” “short-term” increase in U.S. forces. In fact, the most prominent advocates of escalation all reject a short-term increase in U.S. forces, and the Bush administration will not specify the length of the current policy. “I think no one has a really clear idea of how long that might be,” Defense Secretary Gates said yesterday.

Politics

Donald Trump: Let’s bomb Iran.

Trump today on Bush’s speech: “You know, the one thing I sorta liked was what they were saying about Iran. I believe you have to go in and strike Iran — not with soldiers. You know, it’s not a world of soldiers anymore. It’s a world of air. It’s a world of different kinds of, you know, we’ve changed.”

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/01/donaldiran.320.240.flv]

Politics

After Negotiating India Nuclear Deal, State Dept. Official Gets Lucrative Job Lobbying For India

rademaker.jpg Stephen G. Rademaker, U.S. assistant secretary of state for arms control, is leaving the State Department for a lucrative lobbying job at the firm of Barbour Griffith & Rogers.

While assistant secretary of state, Rademaker negotiated a controversial deal allowing the United States to sell nuclear technology to India, which is not a member of the important nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Critics argued that the Bush administration “abandoned the one incentive states have to stay in the NPT, without providing an alternative framework to sustain the effort to control proliferation.”

Less than a month after that deal was ratified by Congress during its lame duck session in December, Rademaker is leaving the State Department to join Barbour — which lobbied on behalf of the Indian government for the nuclear pact.

In Sept. 2005, Barbour signed a one-year, $700,000 contract with India to work on “developing, refining and expanding relationships between Indian officials and the U.S. foreign policy-making apparatus in the Executive and Legislative Branches.” Mainly though, Barbour was one of two firms hired by the Indian government with the aim of “pushing the [nuclear] deal through Congress.”

The Sunlight Foundation has more on the Bush administration and the revolving door.

Climate Progress

Nobody’s Fuel

SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to start getting Californians off petroleum. He is making that clear in one of his executive decrees that targets the amount of carbon oil refineries allow in their fuel.

The mandate is expected to bring more ethanol and biodiesel into California’s gas tanks and encourage the growth of the alternative fuel industry in general.

That is part of an aggressive effort to cut 10% of the carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles and ultimately reduce California’s total emissions 20% by 2020.

Arnold’s announcement coincides with the enactment of AB 32, for which Californians have spent months preparing. The AB 32 Industry Implementation Group has formed from companies that opposed the regulations. Hopefully everyone can work toward promoting the bigger goals: economic growth and less pollution.

Yglesias

Discipline and Punish

Rich Lowry sees hypocrisy in Silvestre Reyes’ apparent flip-flop on the idea of sending more troops to Iraq. Maybe Reyes had a genuine change of heart after gathering more information. Or maybe not. Either way, or especially in the latter case, this is what we call “party discipline” and the Democrats could use more of it — wayward members learning that they’d better think three or four times before defy the leadership position on key issues.

Yglesias

The Last Honest Man

“Last year, when he was running for re-election in Connecticut, Lieberman was a vocal critic of the administration’s handling of Katrina. He was especially dismayed by its failure to turn over key records that could have shed light on internal White House deliberations about the hurricane, including those involving President Bush,” but now things have changed, and “Sen. Joe Lieberman, the only Democrat to endorse President Bush’s new plan for Iraq, has quietly backed away from his pre-election demands that the White House turn over potentially embarrassing documents relating to its handling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans.”

Thanks, centrists! Not only is Lieberman going to back Bush’s crazy Iraq policy, but he’s so committed to Bush’s war plans that he’ll avoid making difficulties for Bush on any other front as well. What’s more, this is bigger than Katrina. One can expect any number of document requests to come from the new congress and the White House to try to resist compliance. Insofar as the nominally Democratic chairman of the Senate Government Oversight Committee supports the White House position that there’s no need to comply, this will be a powerful GOP-friendly argument in the press.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up