ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Pelosi beats back Cheney smear.

Vice President Cheney today on Iraq redeployment: “I think if we were to do what Speaker Pelosi and Congressman Murtha are suggesting, all we’ll do is validate the al Qaeda strategy.” Pelosi responds: “Vice President Cheney continues to question the patriotism of those of us in Congress who challenge the Bush Administration’s misguided policies in Iraq, but his latest attack is beneath the office of the Vice President, especially at a time of war.”

UPDATE: “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday phoned President Bush to air her complaints over Vice President Dick Cheney’s comments. … ‘You cannot say as the president of the United States, “I welcome disagreement in a time of war,” and then have the vice president of the United States go out of the country and mischaracterize a position of the speaker of the House and in a manner that says that person in that position of authority is acting against the national security of our country,’ the speaker said.”

Yglesias

Did This Happen?

I don’t like to trust paraphrases, but Jonathan Singer summary of Tom Vilsack’s appearance at the Democratic candidates’ forum in Nevada says “Final question covers Social Security and Medicare. Vilsack talks about balancing the budget of these programs by reindexing the program to prices, not prices and wages.” Did Vilsack really say that? It’s kind of technical, so people could easily miss it, but that means, over time, very large cuts in Social Security benefits.

My argument against price indexing from early 2005.

UPDATE: Also — I forgot to mention this, but it strikes me as a somewhat bad idea for the Democratic primary calendar to be literally organized around a series of interest group-sponsored dog-and-pony shows (I believe that after this AFSCME forum later in the year we’re going to have an SEIU forum and doubtless more will be coming down the road). It presents a somewhat caricatured view of the Democratic Party and progressive politics. Either the DNC or the state parties should take the lead in organizing a reasonable number of events.

Politics

Bush To Nominate Anti-Regulatory Industry Lobbyist To Head Consumer Protection Agency

mbaroo1.jpg The Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from dangerous consumer products. Currently, the three-person commission has a vacancy. Media reports indicate that President Bush will likely fill the position with Michael Baroody, “executive vice president of the National Association of Manufacturers, a trade group that opposes aggressive product safety regulation” and “has called for weakening the Consumer Product Safety Commission.”

While at NAM, Baroody repeatedly lobbied for looser business regulations, at the expense of public safety:

Asbestos Regulations: NAM opposes tougher rules regulating asbestos and in 2003, teamed up with the asbestos industry and spent $180,000 opposing asbestos reform legislation.

Highway Safety: In 2000, NAM successfully killed a bill in the Senate that would have helped reduce safety risks to motorists by requiring tire manufacturers to report accident data and potential defects to the National Highway and Transportation Safety Board.

Global Warming: NAM’s official position states that scientific data have “not confirmed evidence of global warming that can be attributed to human activities” and calls for “voluntary” measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It “opposes any federal or state government actions regarding climate change that could adversely affect the international competitiveness of the U.S. marketplace economy.” In 2001, Baroody wrote to Bush and personally thanked him for rejecting the Kyoto Protocol.

Occupational Hazards: In 2001, NAM opposed the reduction of occupational hazards by attempting to kill the Occupational Health and Safety Administration’s ergonomics standard. In an attempt to mitigate the “unwarranted litigation” that NAM argued would result from the standard’s implementation, NAM filed suit in federal court.

Bush has repeatedly attempted to weaken regulations that protect the American public. He nominated Susan Dudley, who was formerly director of regulatory studies at the industry-backed Mercatus Center, to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which holds sway over federal regulatory agencies like the EPA. More recently, Bush issued a directive that would give the White House greater control over federal regulations.

Politics

Contradicting Cheney, McCain Says British Withdrawal Not ‘A Good Thing’

This morning, ABC reported that Vice President Cheney views the British phased withdrawal from Iraq as a “sign of progress.” Cheney said, “Well, I look at it and see it is actually an affirmation that there are parts of Iraq where things are going pretty well.”

Contradicting Cheney’s line, Sen. John McCain said today that he believes the British pullout is a negative development. “Do I think it was a good thing?” asked McCain. “No, I wish they would stay longer.” Via CNN Pipeline:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/02/johnmcbrits.320.240.flv]

Also at the press conference, McCain responded to Cheney’s suggestion that he “apologize to Rumsfeld” for calling him the “one of the worst secretaries of defense in history.” McCain told reporters, “I stand by my comment about Secretary Rumsfeld.”

Transcript: Read more

Culture

The Deadline Cometh

Conveniently enough, the Wizards played the Timberwolves the very week of the trade deadline, serving to drive home to the extent to which the basketball universe must demand a Garnett-to-Chicago trade. Garnett is a historic figure, not only one of the best players but literally an integral element of turn-of-the-century Association history; the prime mover in the death of positionality, the return of the high schooler and the subsequent Age Limit Era, the Contract Explosiion and subsequent max salary rule, etc. A guy like that deserves to be on a good team, one that pushes into the playoffs and (who knows?) could play for it all. As of now, all we have was the 2003-2004 run, and — forgetting for a moment what Garnett deserves — we deserve more. This is especially true given that there are a number of perfectly logical Minnesota-Chicago trade scenarios.

The other big name possibility is Jason Kidd going to the Los Angeles. Obviously, if the Lakers really do somehow manage to snag Kidd without giving up Odom or Bynum, they’ve got to pull the trigger on that, but as a fan, I don’t really want to see it. For five season the Lakers were a delightful Evil Empire, the team I Loved to Hate. And, like many people, I found Kobe more loathsome than Shaq, and though the Lakers per se became less loathsome following the Shaq trade (how could you hate such a devastated squad) the Black Mamba became even more so. In the 2004-2005 season, however, Kobe voyaged to the underworld and appeared to re-emerge the stronger for it in his 2005-2006 campaign. Now, from the vantage point of this year, I actually believe Kobe might win another championship at some point. Not this spring, to be sure. But next year or the year after? If Bynum keeps developing? If everyone stays healthy? It would be . . . redemption. I’m not sure I could root for him, but (barring an Eastern Conference Championship for the Wizards, of course) I certainly couldn’t root against him.

A return to contention through the deus ex machina of a one-sided trade for aging star Jason Kidd, however, is not the path of redemption. What makes the emerging Kobe Bryant story so unlikely is the way the Lakers dependence on development-from-within depends on precisely what we Kobe-haters never thought he could do — become a leader, a teacher, a mentor — and lucking into Kidd would rob what we’re seeing of all its appealing qualities. The trade I’d like to see would be Andre Miller for Kwame Brown or something.

Politics

8th helicopter downed in Iraq.

The Pentagon believes that small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades brought down a Black Hawk today north of Baghdad, CNN reports. It is the eighth U.S. helicopter to have crashed or been forced down by hostile fire since January 20. Watch CNN’s report:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/02/copter24.320.240.flv]

The AP has more.

Politics

UK withdrawal shows progress in Iraq war?

Vice President Cheney says the UK’s withdrawal plans are “a sign of progress in Iraq.” Juan Cole responds:

This is a rout, there should be no mistake. The fractious Shiite militias and tribes of Iraq’s South have made it impossible for the British to stay. They already left Sadr-controlled Maysan province, as well as sleepy Muthanna. They moved the British consulate to the airport because they couldn’t protect it in Basra. They are taking mortar and rocket fire at their bases every night. Raiding militia HQs has not resulted in any permanent change in the situation. …

Blair is not leaving Basra because the British mission has been accomplished. He is leaving because he has concluded that it cannot be, and that if he tries any further it will completely sink the Labor Party, perhaps for decades to come.

Media

Scarborough Smacks OReilly for Ignoring Iraq to Focus on ‘NBC Jihad’

For several weeks, Joe Scarborough has been fighting back against Bill O’Reilly’s petty attacks on MSNBC and NBC News. The battle continued yesterday as Scarborough’s production team took a page from Think Progress and tracked the relative importance O’Reilly has been placing on two issues: NBC and the war in Iraq.

According to Scarborough’s figures taken from one week of The Factor, O’Reilly referenced NBC 47 times and mentioned Iraq only 20 times. (11 of those Iraq mentions came during anti-NBC segments.) “While the war in Iraq rages halfway across the globe,” Scarborough asked, “what does Bill O’Reilly spend night after night talking about? NBC News, of course.” Scarborough went on to scold O’Reilly: “Stop being self-righteous.”

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/02/scar_final.320.240.flv]

Transcript: Read more

Yglesias

No Doves Here!

“Contrary to popular belief, international relations scholars are not doves,” according to a new survey of IR scholars (Foreign Policy article here; full results here; hat-tip Daniel Drezner), “most believe that military force is warranted under the right conditions.”

What do the others believe? That it’s warranted under the wrong conditions? Unwarranted even when the conditions are right?

As Dan remarks, the really interesting result has to do with this bit of realist convergence with liberal thinking: “we found realists to be much more supportive of military intervention with a U.N. imprimatur than they are of action without such backing. Among realists, in fact, the gap between support for multilateral and unilateral intervention in North Korea is identical to the gap among scholars of the liberal tradition, whose theories explicitly favor cooperation.” Dan Nexon comments, “I don’t believe this is because realists have suddenly turned into Wilsonsians; rather, I suspect the data reflects how a broad cross-section of realist scholars have come to the conclusion that international legitimacy greases the wheels of power and makes counterbalancing less likely.” I’m no professor, but it seems to me that reaching that conclusion substantially constitutes turning into a Wilsonian.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up