ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Former top general rips Bush’s Iraq policy.

Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez blasted the Bush administration today for a “catastrophically flawed, unrealistically optimistic war plan” and denounced the current “surge” strategy as a “desperate” move that will not achieve long-term stability. The New York Times reports that Sanchez is “the most senior in a string of retired generals to harshly criticize the administration’s conduct of the war.” More:

“There was been a glaring and unfortunate display of incompetent strategic leadership within our national leaders,” he said, adding later in his remarks that civilian officials have been “derelict in their duties” and guilty of a “lust for power.”

UPDATE: Sanchez said that in Iraq the United States is “living a nightmare with no end in sight.”

UPDATE II: In Nov. 2003, Bush hailed Gen. Sanchez’s “strong leadership.”

Politics

White House Embraces Right-Wing Blog That Called For ‘Destroying’ Graeme Frost

graemeMuch of the far right’s smear campaign against 12-year old SCHIP recipient Graeme Frost was driven by the right-wing blogosphere. One blog in particular, Redstate, featured especially vitriolic comments. A poster there wrote of the Frost family:

If federal funds were required [they] could die for all I care. Let the parents get second jobs, let their state foot the bill or let them seek help from private charities. [...]

I would hire a team of PIs and find out exactly how much their parents made and where they spent every nickel. Then I’d do everything possible to destroy their lives with that info.

Rather than distancing themselves from the smear campaign, the White House today decided to embrace RedState and reward the blog with an official White House posting.

In a post entitled “Democrats’ SCHIP Budget Gimmick,” Nicholas Thompson, a staffer in the White House’s Office of Strategic Intiatives, rallied the conservative troops around Bush’s hard-line stance, reminding them that “we are less than one week” from Congress’ veto override vote.

In today’s New York Times, columnist Paul Krugman writes:

All in all, the Graeme Frost case is a perfect illustration of the modern right-wing political machine at work, and in particular its routine reliance on character assassination in place of honest debate. [...] Leading conservative politicians, far from trying to distance themselves from these smears, rush to embrace them.

The White House’s tacit endorsement of a blog that promoted baseless attacks against a 12-year old boy serves as a perfect illustration of Krugman’s point.

UPDATE: According to RedState, the poster who smeared Graeme was actually a respected voice in the right-wing blog. “As it turns out, it was the well-known contributor mbecker who posted that now famous comment.”

Culture

Gossip Girl

I’m glad to see a show that tries to dramatize the decadent weirdness of the Upper East Side private school world (and they even added in a doesn’t-fit-in character with an aging hipster dad), but where have all the Jews gone? The New York City elite hasn’t been that kind of WASP preserve for decades. . . .

Yglesias

Backfire

Via Greg Djerejian, Robin Wright reports that “More than two dozen Iranian American and human rights groups have launched an appeal to Congress to reduce or eliminate new financial support of up to $75 million aimed at promoting democracy inside Iran.” Predictably, the Bush administration’s efforts to co-opt the Iranian democracy movement and fold it into the American right’s bizarre geopolitical schemes has tended to backfire and displease actual Iranians and human rights advocates.

Yglesias

Lolschip

lolschip.jpg

Today in child-hating comes, via Garance, this graphic on the subject of S-CHIP and the Republican Party’s merciless war against sick children. Some readers have objected to the shrill nature of my posts on this subject, insisting that George W. Bush and his allies among congressional Republicans aren’t, in fact, motivated by a desire to see sick children suffer. And, of course, that’s technical true. The real point is that Bush and the GOP want to make sure that sick people in general don’t get public sector health care and remain, instead, at the mercies of insurance companies or else are just left to their own devices. The sick kids are, basically, just innocent bystanders — hostages to Bush’s fealty to private health insurance.

Yglesias

Education and Inequality

Inequality day continues with a link to Larry Mishel and Richard Rothstein noting that even wages for people with college degrees are lagging way behind average productivity growth. Consequently, while there’s no doubt that some good would come from having a higher proportion of the population graduate from college and acquire more skills, there’s no reason to think this would seriously impact the inequality situation.

Politics

‘Dear Abby’ agrees with Cheney for the first time ever.

Today, CNN hosted “Dear Abby” author Jeanne Phillips, who recently publicly declared her support for gay rights and received the first-ever “Straight for Equality” award from Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays. “I guess I just have a sense of fair play,” Phillips told CNN. “I have some wonderful gay friends and I think they should be entitled to all the civil rights everyone else has.” Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/dearabbylgbt.320.240.flv]

CNN also showed Phillips a recent clip of Lynne Cheney saying that people “ought to be able to enter into the relationships they want” because it is a “free country.” Phillips responded, “I never thought I’d agree with the Cheneys on anything.”

Politics

State Dept. not giving ‘honest answers’ on Iraq corruption.

Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and John Tierney (D-MA) introduced a resolution today chastising the State Dept. for “withholding from Congress and the American people information about the extent of corruption in the Maliki government.” Waxman writes:

“The resolution further condemns the State Department for retroactively classifying documents that had been widely distributed previously as unclassified, and [for] directing its employees not to answer questions in an open forum that call for ‘assessments which judge…the ability/determination of the Iraqi government to deal with corruption.’”

Earlier today, several House Chairmen wrote to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice calling for “honest answers” about corruption in Iraq.

Yglesias

At the Speed of CAFE Standards

Brian Beutler speaks up for CAFE as opposed to a gas tax:

When gas prices go up, but not way up, people keep driving. It has, as we’ve seen, a marginal impact. If, on the other hand, you double CAFE standards, which I think most Democrats would like to see happen, then ceteris paribus you something like halve auto emissions. What actually happens is more complicated, but one it’s certainly true that you undo some of the incentives people had to drive less to save money. As we’ve seen, though, unless the price of gas is really very high, those incentives aren’t all that effetive.

I think there’s a double-standard here that you see all-too-frequently. It’s true, of course, that increases in gasoline prices don’t have much short term impact on fuel consumption. That’s because the main things one could do to reduce one’s fuel consumption are things like “buy a more fuel efficient car” or “live someplace else” that are hard to alter. But in the short-term, doubling CAFE standards doesn’t “something like halve auto emissions.” Instead it does . . . almost nothing. The new regulations don’t make the cars already on the road any more fuel efficient, and they don’t create incentives for people to buy new cars.

That’s not to say it’s a bad policy — the relevant horizon is the long run. But then that’s the standard against which taxes should be judged as well. Under either scenario, you can make the desired long-run outcome occur sooner by offering people financial incentives to trade in older, less efficient cars for newer, more efficient ones. That, though, requires revenue. And a gas tax provides revenue, which CAFE doesn’t.

Media

Fox News: Gore’s Never ‘Actually Done Something For Peace;’ Give Petraeus The Prize

Earlier today, after Al Gore was named a co-winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Fox News kicked off the right-wing smear attacks on the former Vice President, comparing him to “Yasser Arafat and that crazy Jimmy Carter.”

But the cable network’s efforts to undermine Gore’s message and achievments began long ago. Yesterday, after suggesting that Gore has never “actually done something for peace,” Fox ran a chyron advocating that a different American be awarded the peace prize: Gen. David Petraeus.

In the segment, Neil Cavuto hosted New York Sun editor Seth Lipsky, whose paper ran an editorial this week saying that Petraeus deserved the prize for his attempts to “save the nation of Iraq.” Lipsky said that Petraeus “deserves” the award “as a representative of G.I. Joe” because American troops “go overseas to liberate, they go overseas to make peace.” He then added that the use of “fighting” in a war doesn’t undermine the “idealism” of the Nobel Prize:

LIPSKY: I can’t think of anything more directly responsive to the idealism of the Nobel Peace Prize itself than the kinds of liberation and peacekeeping that our G.I. Joe and G.I. Jane has had as a mission since World War II.

CAVUTO: So, you say Gen. Petraeus, not Al Gore?

LIPSKY: I say Gen. Petraeus, not Al Gore.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2007/10/PetraeusNobel.320.240.flv]

When Alfred Nobel established the Peace Prize in his will, he specifically outlined the criteria by which the recipient should be chosen:

The prize for peace was to be awarded to the person who “shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses.”

Petraeus is the architect of Bush’s surge, a plan that has increased the number of forces in Iraq.

So to recap: Alfred Nobel’s definition of peace: reduction of standing armies. Fox News’ definition of peace: war without end.

(HT: Newshounds)

UPDATE: In an interview at Science Progress, Joe Romm explains how Gore’s environmental work is directly related to peace and security issues.

Digg It!

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up