ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Threatening voice from Iran incident may be famous heckler.

The recent controversy over an incident in the Strait of Hormuz involving five Iranian speedboats was punctuated by an allegation that an Iranian voice warned a U.S. ship, “I am coming to you. You will explode in a few minutes.” But the voice “may have come from a locally famous heckler well known to Navy crews.” The Navy Times reports:

In recent years, American ships operating in the Middle East have had to contend with a mysterious but profane voice widely known as the “Filipino Monkey,” likely more than one person, who listens in on ship-to-ship radio traffic and then jumps on the net shouting insults and epithets.

Rick Hoffman, a retired captain who commanded the cruiser Hue City and spent many of his 17 years at sea in the Gulf was subject to the renegade radio talker repeatedly, often without pause during the so-called “Tanker Wars” of the late 1980s.

“For 25 years there’s been this mythical guy out there who, hour after hour, shouts obscenities and threats,” he said. “He could be tied up pierside somewhere or he could be on the bridge of a merchant ship.” [...]

“He used to go all night long. The guy is crazy,” he said. “But who knows how many Filipino Monkeys there are? Could it have been a spurious transmission? Absolutely.”

Media

Goldberg: ‘Conservative Groups’ Don’t Try To Dictate What Sexual ‘Positions You Can Be In’

jonah006.jpgIn an interview today with Salon about his new book, Liberal Fascism, National Review’s Jonah Goldberg is asked if his claim “that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance,” could “just as easily be said of the American right.”

Goldberg concedes that “there are lots of places on the right where this is so,” but then argues that “the equation between liberalism and conservatism” doesn’t go so far because “you don’t have conservative groups” dictating people’s personal sex lives:

That said, I don’t think that the equation between liberalism and conservatism goes as far as you would like to take it. You know, you have environmental groups giving out kits and instructions about how to have environmentally conscious sex. You don’t have conservative groups talking about what kind of condoms you should use or what positions you can be in. That kind of thing doesn’t really go on.

Goldberg’s argument is “head-spinningly absurd.” He claims that “you don’t have conservative groups” prescribing “what positions you can be in.” But this assertion ignores the fact that it was conservatives who sought to continue criminalizing sodomy, which is certainly considered a sexual position.

To be fair to Goldberg, he has written in the past that he is personally “against sodomy laws.” But the same can’t be said for the many “conservative groups” who supported the state of Texas in the landmark Supreme Court case, Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down anti-sodomy laws:

The American Center for Law and Justice, American Family Association, the attorneys general of the states of Alabama, South Carolina and Utah, Center for Arizona Policy, Center for Law and Justice International, Center for the Original Intent of the Constitution, Concerned Women for America, Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, Texas legislators, Liberty Counsel, Pro Family Law Center, Texas Eagle Forum; Daughters of Liberty Republican Women of Houston, Texas; Spirit of Freedom Republican Women’s Club, Texas Physicians Resource Council, Christian Medical and Dental Association, Catholic Medical Association, and United Families International.

In Goldberg’s mind, criminalizing a consensual sexual act apparently isn’t the same as dictating “what positions you can be in.”

Politics

TN unanimously passes resolution honoring Gore.

Yesterday, the Tennessee House unanimously approved a resolution honoring Al Gore and his efforts to curb global warming:

We hereby honor and congratulate vice president Albert Arnold “Al” Gore Jr. on his receipt of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his exemplary efforts to inform and educate the public and promote understanding of the threats posed by global warming and the measures needed to counteract such change.

Gore is a former U.S. congressman and senator from the state of Tennessee. House Republican Leader Jason Mumpower now wants Democrats to vote on a similar resolution praising the late President Ronald Reagan.

Politics

Idea of the Day

Britt Peterson: “Unity08′s founders, old media hands Gerald Rafshoon and Doug Bailey, have just left to work on drafting Bloomberg, taking most of the credibility and experience Unity08 ever had with them and leaving celebrity promoter Sam Waterston to his own devices. Will he form a joint L&O ticket with Thompson?” Sounds good to me.

Politics

Court dismisses Guantanamo torture suit.

A U.S. appeals court ruled today that “four former Guantanamo prisoners, all British citizens, have no right to sue top Pentagon officials and military officers for torture, abuse and violations of their religious rights.” The judge ruled that the defendants — including Donald Rumsfeld — “enjoyed qualified immunity for acts taken within the scope of their government jobs.”

Climate Progress

Confusing short-term variability with a long-term trend

Realclimate.org has a graph that beautifully shows that short-term trends often don’t show the long-term trend.

GIS Land-Ocean Index

Gavin Schmidt and Stefan Rahmstorf explain:

The red line is the annual global-mean GISTEMP temperature record (though any other data set would do just as well), while the blue lines are 8-year trend lines — one for each 8-year period of data in the graph. What it shows is exactly what anyone should expect: the trends over such short periods are variable; sometimes small, sometimes large, sometimes negative — depending on which year you start with.

The data clearly shows that short-term comparisons don’t tell us anything. The rest of their article goes on to look at the reaons why this is so.

– Earl K.

Related Posts:

Culture

Is MIMS Affirming the Consequent?

Brendan Nyhan accuses Mike Huckabee of a logical fallacy:

Mr. Huckabee, for his part, responded with trademark humor. “The Air Force has a saying that says if you’re not catching flak, you’re not over the target,” he said. “I’m catching the flak; I must be over the target.”

This is basically a form of affirming the consequent. If you’re over the target, you’ll catch flak and Huckabee is catching flak “therefore” he must be over the target. Nyhan says that MIMS makes the same error in “This is Why I’m Hot”:

In particular, he thinks “I’m hot ’cause I’m fly / You ain’t [hot] ’cause you’re not [fly]” is an example of the fallacy. I disagree. Nyhan’s reading depends on construing MIMS as trying to make a logical inference with “’cause” as a material conditional but there’s no need to do that. Interpretive charity suggest that we should understand MIMS to be making two logically independent causal claims: (1) he’s hot because he’s fly and (2) you’re not hot because you’re not fly. Perhaps MIMS believes that x is hot if and only if x is fly, or perhaps he doesn’t. I don’t, however, see a fallacy here.

Security

Worldwide Protests Mark Sixth Anniversary Of Guantanamo Bay

Six long years ago today, “the first orange-clad, shackled and blindfolded prisoners arrived at Guantanamo’s Camp X-Ray.” Since that “dark day in recent American history, more than 700 people have been detained without due process and not a single trial has been completed,” notes the ACLU.

Today, people worldwide marked this anniversary with protests. More than 70 people were arrested at the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently considering “whether prisoners still detained at Guantanamo Bay have a right to challenge their confinement in U.S. courts.” In London, Amnesty International organized an all-night vigil outside the U.S. embassy. A look at some of the protests around the globe:

gitmoprotest3.gif

President Bush continues to resist calls to close Guantanamo and has found a strong backer in Vice President Cheney, who has expressed objections to shutting down the facility. Some of the conservative voices who have urged Bush to close it:

Gen. Colin Powell: “[W]e have shaken the belief that the world had in America’s justice system by keeping a place like Guantanamo open. … We don’t need it, and it’s causing us far more damage than any good we get for it.” [6/10/07]

Defense Secretary Robert Gates: “In his first weeks as defense secretary, Robert M. Gates repeatedly argued that the detention facility at Guant¡namo Bay, Cuba, had become so tainted abroad that legal proceedings at Guant¡namo would be viewed as illegitimate, according to senior administration officials. He told President Bush and others that it should be shut down as quickly as possible.” [New York Times, 3/22/07]

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice: “I fully agree, we would like nothing better than to close Guantanamo.” [10/9/07]

Sign the ACLU’s petition to close down Guantanamo HERE.

Politics

Bush: If I ran for President, I’d be an ‘agent of change.’

In an interview with NBC aired today, President Bush dismissed the notion that presidential candidates’ messages of “change” are a rebuke of his presidency. Bush said he would do the same right now if he were one of them:

Q: Do you see this message of change as anything other than a rejection of your presidency?

BUSH: No, listen. If you’re running for office, you can’t run for office and not say ‘I am an agent of change.’ It’s just American politics. If I were running for office at this point, I’d be saying, ‘Vote for me. I’m gonna be an agent of change.’

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/01/agentofchange2.320.240.flv]

UPDATE: Tim Grieve notes that Bush 41 thought differently than his son. At the Republican National Convention in 1988, George H.W. Bush said:

Now, after two great terms, a switch will be made. But when you have to change horses in midstream, doesn’t it make sense to switch to one who’s going the same way?

Digg It!

Yglesias

No Fixed Address

In local news, Washington DC is abuzz with a horrifying case in which police found a woman living with the skeletal remains of her four children, apparently killed by their mother who explains they were possessed by demons. Mayor Adrian Fenty revealed today that the city’s social services agencies had been looking into intervening on behalf of the children when a nurse reported that the family was living in a van and one or both parents had substance abuse problems. At this point they decided to close the interview because . . . the family had no fixed address. Because that, of course, is always great news.

It’s just terrible stuff; in a country with as many resources as this one, we really ought to be able to stop kids from falling through the crack like this. A banal sentiment, yes, but it’s true nevertheless.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up