ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

Bill Clinton hypothetical + lame ABC News blog = mother of all out-of-context quotes

Why the traditional media should not have blogs. Thursday morning, “Senior National Correspondent” Jake Tapper headlined his “Political Punch” blog

Bill: “We Just Have to Slow Down Our Economy” to Fight Global Warming

Stop the presses! An ABC News exclusive — the former President and husband of the Democratic candidate says the only way to fight global warming is to slow down our economy! Needless to say, Drudge ate it up as did the Republican National Committee. As did more than 100 blogs by Thursday night (including Think Progress). And the Clinton campaign even felt obliged to point out that, in fact, “President Clinton was making the opposite point”.

The AP story with the full video is here. Curiously, the AP reporter never mentions the supposedly stunning statement by the ex-prez. Hmm. Maybe this was an ABC News exclusive for a reason. Tapper “reports”:

In a long, and interesting speech, he characterized what the U.S. and other industrialized nations need to do to combat global warming this way: “We just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.”

At a time that the nation is worried about a recession is that really the characterization his wife would want him making? “Slow down our economy”?

I don’t really think there’s much debate that, at least initially, a full commitment to reduce greenhouse gases would slow down the economy…. So was this a moment of candor?

He went on to say that his the U.S. — and those countries that have committed to reducing greenhouse gases — could ultimately increase jobs and raise wages with a good energy plan..

So there was something of a contradiction there.

Or perhaps he mis-spoke.

Or perhaps this characterization was a description of what would happen if there isn’t a worldwide effort… I’m not quite certain.

Hmm. Jake Tapper is not quite certain what Clinton meant. What to do? I know — let’s quickly take the most sensational possible interpretation and splash it all over the web without actually listening closely to what Clinton said or — shudder — asking him what he meant — or even searching the blogosphere to see if Clinton has ever talked about this before (anyone who saw the videos of the Clinton Global Initiative or read my blog on it knows Clinton believes the exact opposite). Nooooo. That would be too easy. Tapper has managed to combine the worst of traditional journalism and the blogosphere. But I digress.

Let’s look at what Clinton actually said, in context, which, strangely enough, Tapper reports:

Read more

Politics

Glenn Beck’s Rants Against ‘Juan McCain’ Would Not Be Welcome At RedState.com

Discussing last night’s GOP debate on his radio show today, Glenn Beck and fill-in host Pat Gray mocked Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) by derisively calling him “Juan McCain.” Beck, who considers McCain’s sponsorship of a comprehensive immigration bill and the Mexican background of his national director of Hispanic outreach to be “an audacious slap in the face to the American people,” proudly advertised the segment in his daily e-mail to listeners today:

beckjuanmccainweb.jpg

During the segment, Beck also commented on a new campaign by the National Council of La Raza that targets him and Lou Dobbs for their rhetoric, which La Raza believes “demonizes immigrants and Hispanic Americans.” Beck suggested that La Raza’s campaign to get him off the air “before the election” may be “connected” to McCain. Listen to the segment:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/01/BeckJuanMcCain.320.40.flv]

La Raza isn’t the only group that doesn’t appreciate Beck’s brand of Latino-phobic humor. On the conservative community blog RedState.com today, Leon H. Wolf posted a message to “commenters,” that it is “not fine, okay, or within the bounds of the rules” to “use Latino names as an insult.” Wolf says users will be “banned for doing it” at Red State:

What is not fine, okay, or within the bounds of the rules, is to use Latino names as an insult. We are speaking, specifically, of “Jorge Arbusto” and “Juan McCain,” although it’s certainly possible that others are floating out there or may yet be invented. Allow me to clue anyone who thinks these names are funny or clever in to something: racism isn’t clever or funny. If you think you’ve really zinged someone by calling them by a Latino name, that’s a pretty reliable (nearly infallible, in fact) indicator that you don’t like Latino people.

Since he can’t help showing his “disdain for Latino people,” CNN host Glenn Beck would apparently be banned from posting on one of the top conservative blogs.

UPDATE: On Beck’s CNN Headline News show last night, Minuteman founder Jim Gilchrist compared La Raza to the KKK while smearing the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Politics

Hours After Siding With States On Emissions Waiver, Romney Flips And Backs The White House

Last month, EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson denied California a waiver that would have allowed 16 states to implement landmark automobile greenhouse emissions reductions.

In last night’s Republican presidential debate, all four candidates said they supported California’s efforts. Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney emphasized that states should “be able to make their own regulations with regards to emissions.” He confirmed again later in the debate:

Q: Just so I’m clear, you said you side with the states. That means you side with Governor Schwarzenegger —

ROMNEY: I side with states being able to make their own decisions, even if I don’t always agree with the decisions they make.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/01/romney65.320.240.flv]

But Romney didn’t want to side with the environment for too long. The AP reports that “[a]fter the debate,” — and after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA) endorsed Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) — “Romney’s campaign issued a statement in which he said that the federal government, not individual states, should set limits on carbon emissions.”

Romney’s alleged support of California’s emissions waiver is further discredited by the fact that on Jan. 4, he was skeptical of states’ efforts in an interview with the Detroit News Editorial Board:

[The energy bill] does maintain the distinction between light trucks and automotive (standards), which is encouraging, although it leaves open the door to states putting in place tougher standards and the EPA putting in place additional regulations.

For Romney, every problem has multiple answers.

UPDATE: Romney’s statement below: Read more

Politics

$3 million per minute hour.

Royal Dutch Shell “reignited anger over excessive profits today” after revealing it made $27.6 billion in 2007 – “a new record for a UK company.” AmericaBlog notes that this number is the equivalent of $3 million per minute hour.

UPDATE: Commenters have noted that the rate is $3 million per hour, not minute. The correct per minute rate is roughly $51-52K per minute. We regret the initial error.

Politics

State Dept. Official: Prioritizing Wars Is Like Choosing ‘Which One Of Your Kids You Like Best’

Last month, Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen said, “In Afghanistan, we do what we can. In Iraq, we do what we must.”

Today in a Senate hearing, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) asked Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Richard Boucher about Mullen’s comment and “whether or not we’ve neglected Pakistan and Afghanistan because of our overemphasis on Iraq.”

Boucher, however, refused to prioritize Afghanistan or Iraq. He instead compared having to choose between Iraq and Afghanistan to Feingold having to choose between one of his children:

Boucher: Sir, I mean, which of your kids do you like best?

Feingold: I’m sorry.

Boucher: Sir, I mean which of your kids do you like best?

Feingold: I think it’s more, I think it’s really more, I don’t, I don’t, think it’s as simple as that. I think — this is the core question of whether we can get our priorities right in this country about this war.

Boucher: Here’s the way I would explain it.

Feingold: These are not identical.

Watch it:

[flv http://video.thinkprogress.org/2008/01/feingobouch.320.240.flv]

Boucher’s equation comparing war with children underscores why this administration can’t pull out of Iraq and focus on Afghanistan — it is so emotionally invested that it views the Iraq war as its baby.

Officials have clearly pushed aside Afghanistan for Iraq, although admitting so isn’t politically popular. “[P]riorities matter and in order to determine priorities one has to determine where is the greater concern,” said Feingold.

A report released this week by the Atlantic Council concluded, “Afghanistan remains a dangerously neglected conflict in a Washington transfixed by Iraq.” Two other reports also put out this week came to similar conclusions.

Transcript: Read more

Media

ABC Publishes Hit Piece Against Bill Clinton, Peddles Right-Wing Misinformation On Global Warming

This morning, ABC’s Jack Tapper published this sensational headline: “Bill: ‘We Just Have To Slow Down The Economy’ To Fight Global Warming.” The Republican National Committee quickly latched onto the story, claiming that a “‘tax-it, spend-it, regulate-it’ attitude would really bring the economy crashing down.” Matt Drudge peddled the article on his site.

drudgemer.gif

The problem is, Bill Clinton never said that. In fact, he said just the opposite. Clinton said, “The only places in the world today in rich countries where you have rising wages and declining inequality are places that have generated more jobs than rich countries because they made a commitment we didn’t. They got serious about a clean, efficient, green, independent energy future.”

Even conservative blogs the Corner and Hot Air recognized Tapper’s article as shoddy journalism. Instead of apologizing, Tapper is now defending his egregious post by insisting that addressing global warming will in fact slow the economy, whether Clinton said it or not:

This is the much more important issue here. Any serious effort to reduce greenhouses gases will have an impact on the economy and, initially, that impact could be negative.

Unfortunately, Tapper has run aground of the facts yet again. In reality, the cost of doing nothing far exceeds the necessary cost of addressing climate change. And addressing climate change has already been proven that it can also energize the economy:

Green Technologies Have Already Created Jobs: In 2004, the ethanol industry created 147,000 jobs in all sectors of the economy and provided more than $2 billion of additional tax revenue. There are 1,500 current and promised jobs in the wind energy industry in Iowa. [Daniel M. Kammen, Testimony to US Senate Environment and Public Works Commte, 9/25/07; AP, 12/31/07]

Increasing Fuel Economy Standards Creates Jobs: Increasing the average fuel economy of America’s new autos to 35 miles per gallon by 2020 would would save consumers $25 billion at the gas pump and increase U.S. employment by 170,800 jobs in the year 2020. [Union of Concerned Scientists]

Renewable Electricity Standard Saves Consumers Money: A 20 percent national renewable electricity standard by 2020 would save consumers $10.5 billion on energy bills through 2020, growing to 31.8 billion by 2030. [Union of Concerned Scientists]

Tapper appears to have neither the time nor the policy background to figure out the facts.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up