ThinkProgress Logo

Security

Administration Rebuffs Maliki’s Timetable As ‘Artificial,’ Questions Whether Media Made Transcription Error

bushmaliki2.jpgPresident Bush has long maintained that if the Iraqi government wants the U.S. to leave Iraq, then the U.S. would do just that, as he said in May 2007:

We are there at the invitation of the Iraqi government. This is a sovereign nation. Twelve million people went to the polls to approve a constitution. It’s their government’s choice. If they were to say, leave, we would leave.

Today, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki suggested having a timetable for the withdrawal of coalition troops. “The direction we are taking is to have a memorandum of understanding either for the departure of the forces or to have a timetable for their withdrawal,” Maliki’s office quoted him as saying.

But the administration has rebuffed Maliki’s request for a timeline. Asked about the prime minister’s comments today, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman hedged on whether the administration would follow the Iraqi government’s request, criticizing timelines as “artificial“:

WHITMAN: [I]t is dependent on conditions on the ground. … But timelines tend to be artificial in nature. In a situation where things are as dynamic as they are in Iraq, I would just tell you, it’s usually best to look at these things based on conditions on the ground.

The State Department also hedged on whether the Bush administration would listen to Maliki. In a briefing today, spokesperson Sean McCormack said the remark may have been a transcription error:

McCORMACK: Well, that’s really the part — the point at which I would seek greater clarification in terms of remarks. I’ve seen the same press reports that you have, but I haven’t yet had an opportunity to get greater clarify as to exactly to what Mr. Maliki was referring or if, in fact, that’s an accurate reporting of what he said.

As multiple press accounts – as well as Maliki’s office — have indicated, Maliki did indeed suggest a timeline for withdrawal in negotiating a security agreement with the United States.

I’ve got confidence in him,” Bush said in 2007 about Maliki’s leadership. But despite its rhetoric, it seems the Bush administration could care less what the Iraqi people or the Iraqi government want.

Politics

CREW files bar complaints against former loyal Bushies at DOJ.

Last month, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report finding that former Bush DOJ officials Esther Slater McDonald and Michael J. Elston “broke civil service laws by rejecting scores of young applicants who had links to Democrats or liberal organizations.” Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed bar complaints against the two lawyers, arguing that their actions violated bar rules against engaging in conduct involving dishonesty and conduct that “seriously interferes with the administration of justice.”

Yglesias

McCain and Crocs

I think the fundamental case against John McCain may be his strident endorsement of Crocs:

You’d think that the conservative candidate — an old man no less — would be able to stand up for the sanctity of traditional footwear.

Politics

Librarian with ‘McCain=Bush’ sign charged with trespassing at public campaign event.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) was in Denver, CO, today for a town hall meeting. The event, at the Denver Center for the Performing Arts, was billed as “open to the public.” Yet Carol Kreck, a 61-year-old librarian carrying a “McCain=Bush” sign, was taken away by police for trespassing. A police officer told Kreck:

You have two choices. You can keep your sign here and receive a ticket for trespassing, or you can remove the sign and stay in line and attend this town hall meeting.

Watch it:

Kreck received a ticket for trespassing and her court date is July 23. McCain has apparently taken a page from the Bush playbook. In 2005, the White House had three activists expelled from a Denver public forum with President Bush because it was the administration’s policy “to exclude potentially disruptive guests from Bush’s appearances nationwide.”

Digg It!

Climate Progress

Senate GOP: “balance” = climate-destroying shale, RNC: “balance” = “a climate in crisis”

humpty2.gif“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”

The Republican National Committee just launched an ad called, “Balance” claiming we have “a climate in crisis,” as noted here. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell introduced the Climate Destruction Gas Price Reduction Act of 2008 late last month that would repeal the congressional moratorium on shale development. In a press release today titled, “A Balanced Approach to Reducing Gas Prices for Americans,” he claimed that “Our western states are sitting on a sea of oil three times as large as the oil reserves in Saudi Arabia.”

Actually, the shale ain’t a sea of anything. It is a clay-like rock, organic marlstone, containing very little energy — per pound, it has one tenth the energy of crude oil, one fourth that of recycled phone books, one-third that of Cap’n Crunch. Turning it into a usable liquid fuel would require a massive amounts of energy and probably release more carbon dioxide than even liquid coal.

The best analysis of the climate risks of unconventional oil, “Risks of the oil transition,” coauthored by the late Alex Farrell, has an outstanding figure that shows that from a climate perspective, shale is probably worse than liquid coal (which is pretty damn bad) –

Read more

Economy

McCain’s Trickle-Down Economics

Our guest bloggers are Robert Gordon and James Kvaal, senior fellows at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Sen. John McCain calls his new economic policy Jobs for America, but its centerpiece remains help for corporations, not workers. Apparently McCain’s theory is that cutting corporate taxes by $175 billion will (1) make American corporations more competitive, which (2) will help American workers. But — as Gene Sperling and Jared Bernstein pointed out at McCain University last week — both of these steps are on shaky ground.

First, U.S. corporate taxes are in line with the rest of the world’s, according to a recent U.S. Treasury report. The effective tax rate on equipment financed by equity is 24 percent, the same as the G-7 average. The rate on equipment financed by debt is minus 46 percent, meaning that the government actually subsidizes these investments rather than taxing them.

Second, corporate gains are not trickling down to workers. Corporate profits are now near all-time highs: In 2005, they exceeded 13 percent of the economy for the first time since 1966. But the median household income fell by $963 between 2000 and 2006, even after inflation. And the long-term trend suggests that profits and earnings often don’t move together: from 1997 to 1999, earnings rose while corporate profits fell, and from 2000 to 2004, the reverse happened.

profits3.jpg

McCain’s economic policy is aimed at promoting American businesses. But it’s workers, not companies, who are struggling in the Bush economy.

Politics

Retired Senior Military Officers Call For End To DADT: Gays Serving Openly Pose No ‘Risk’

dadt.jpg A new report released today by four retired senior military officers endorses a repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT). The study, sponsored by the Palm Center in California, marks “the first time a Marine Corps general has ever called publicly for an end to the gay ban.” From its findings:

The law locks the military’s position into stasis and does not accord any trust to the Pentagon to adapt policy to changing circumstances.

– “Don’t ask, don’t tell” has forced some commanders to choose between breaking the law and undermining the cohesion of their units.

– “Don’t ask, don’t tell” has prevented some gay, lesbian, and bisexual service members from obtaining psychological and medical care as well as religious counseling.

– “Don’t ask, don’t tell” has caused the military to lose some talented service members.

Military attitudes towards gays and lesbians are changing.

– Evidence shows that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly is unlikely to pose any significant risk to morale, good order, discipline, or cohesion.

The Palm Center’s report also notes that DADT is outdated, as many “gays, lesbians, and bisexuals are serving openly” in the military already. The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network reports more than 500 U.S. soldiers who are “out” to their colleagues and continue to serve. A December 2006 survey of servicemembers who had served in Iraq or Afghanistan found that 73 percent of those polled were “comfortable with lesbians and gays.”

General John Shalikashvili, the former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who previously favored DADT but reversed course last year in an op-ed in the New York Times, endorsed the study, saying it “ought to be given serious consideration by both Congress and the Joint Chiefs.”

In the past year, there has been increased interest in repealing DADT. Former senator Sam Nunn, once a powerful advocate for the ban, recently said that it may be “appropriate” to consider repealing it. In May, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen told graduating cadets at the U.S. Military Academy that the military was ready to accept gay servicemembers if Congress repeals the law.

Yglesias

Revisiting July 4

I suppose I shouldn’t get too upset when people have overheated reactions to my annual bout of July 4 skepticism. Let me just make this one point, though, namely that to say it would have been better “had English and American political leaders in the late 18th century been farsighted enough to find compromises that would have held the empire together” is perfectly consistent with the belief that the English authorities bare the bulk of the blame for the split.

Indeed, my diffidence about independence stems in part from the recognition that war and separation wasn’t by any means the first option of most of the men who wound up leading the movement for independence. But their efforts at compromise weren’t welcomed in London and the result was a costly war. If you think that mistakes were made exclusively on the English side, I think you’re being a bit naive, as these sorts of things never happen without a mutual lack of trust and some errors on both sides. But I don’t think that the founders were wrong, sitting in Philadelphia in 1776, to think that under the circumstances independence was their best option. I only think — as they themselves did — that it was unfortunate that the course of events had taken them to that position, rather than to some form of compromise.

Politics

Koppel: U.S. needs to stay in Iraq for the oil.

Yesterday on ABC’s This Week roundtable, Ted Koppel said the U.S. needs to stay in Iraq because of the “huge amount of oil and natural gas there”:

KOPPEL: U.S. troops are in a part of the world that produces a huge amount of oil and natural gas. We will have U.S. troops in that region for years to come, whether we want to or not. … And with the price of oil going up to a 4.5 dollars a gallon, imagine what would happen to the price of oil if we precipitously pull troops out of the Persian Gulf. It’s not going to happen.

Watch it:

Koppel also suggested that the U.S. stay in Iraq to contain Iran. “You talked a little bit about Iran, and the dangers of Iran. This is not a time to say we’re going to pull all the U.S. troops out of there,” he said.

Digg It!

Update

In Feb. 2006, Koppel penned an op-ed in the NYT entitled “Will Fight for Oil.”

Economy

McCain Could Eliminate 10 Cabinet Agencies And Still Not Balance His Budget

Although his Jobs Plan today promises “Leadership, Courage and Choices,” Senator McCain unfortunately offered none of the above when he pledged today to balance the budget and cut taxes by 2013.

The Congressional Budget Office projects that, with the extension of expiring tax cuts, the budget deficit will top $400 billion that year. In addition, McCain has called for some $300 billion in new tax cuts. McCain has not identified specific spending reductions that save much money; earmark reductions, for example, would save only $9 billion, according to the Heritage Foundation. A generous estimate of the savings from McCain’s proposed spending freeze would be $50 billion. This leaves McCain with a budget hole of about $650 billion.

This is an astonishing amount. To put it in perspective, McCain could eliminate the following 10 Cabinet agencies and still come up $100 billion short:



Agency
2013 Projected Outlays

Agriculture $120 billion
Commerce $9 billion
Education $86 billion
Energy $30 billion
HUD $66 billion
Interior $14 billion
DOJ $32 billion
Labor $14 billion
Transportation $87 billion
Treasury $84 billion
EPA $9 billion
TOTAL $551 billion

We will have a more comprehensive analysis later this week.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up