ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Photo of the day: Bush ‘warmly’ acknowledges indicted Sen. Stevens.

Today, President Bush stopped at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska and spoke to soldiers. The White House included Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) in the event, despite his recent indictment on corruption charges. The AP reports that Bush “acknowledged Stevens briefly and warmly, saying the military has no stronger friend. Josh Bolten, the president’s chief of staff, was seen chatting with Stevens after the president spoke.”

stevensclap.gif

The White House has continued to stand by the embattled Stevens. When pressed by reporters last week on whether Stevens would still travel with Bush on his Alaska trip, press secretary Dana Perino stood firm, stating that the invitation “did not change” with Stevens’s indictment.

Politics

Fiorina: ‘McCain Has Consistently Said’ He Will ‘Balance The Budget By 2013′

On CBS’ Face the Nation yesterday, host Bob Schieffer asked McCain economic adviser Carly Fiorina how the newly announced projection of “a $480 billion deficit” would affect Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) economic plans. “The deficit is a huge problem,” admitted Fiorina.

Fiorina then claimed that “McCain has consistently said that he will make sure that we balance the budget by 2013.” Watch it:

In reality, McCain and his campaign have been anything but consistent in his promise to balance the budget:

February 15, 2008: At a campaign rally in Wisconsin, McCain “promised he’d offer a balanced budget by the end of his first term.”

April 15, 2008: In a news conference, McCain said that because “economic conditions are reversed,” he “would have a balanced budget within eight years.”

April 20, 2008: In an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, McCain first claimed that he hadn’t abandoned his first term pledge, but when pressed, later said “we’re going to be on a path to a balanced budget” by the end of his first term.

July 7, 2008: Releasing his Jobs for America plan, McCain pledged “once again to balance the budget by the end of his first term in 2013.”

July 7, 2008: In a conference call with reporters, McCain’s top economic adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, said that “the senator has always pledged to balance the budget by the end of his second term.”

Apparently Fiorina considers a “consistently” muddled message to be the same as having a consistent message. But as former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle said yesterday, the more McCain talks, “the less certain we are about any of the positions he’s taken.”

Health

California To Provide Greater Access To Individual Health Insurance

arnold3.JPGCalifornia wants to take on the largely unregulated individual health insurance market — a system within which insurance companies impose waiting periods for pre-existing conditions, offer less comprehensive benefits than employer-based coverage, charge higher premiums and deductibles, successfully exclude high-risk individuals form coverage, charge higher rates to higher-risk patients, offer a limited range of benefits, and spend a relatively small proportion of premiums on actual medical care.

California is proposing new rules to regulate the ‘wild-west‘ environment that is the individual health insurance market:

- The new rules “would set a maximum amount patients would have to pay each year toward their bills” and “restrict insurers’ ability to cancel policies retroactively.”

- Another proposal would “limit cancellations to the first 18 months of coverage and require insurers to obtain approval from regulators before revoking a policy.”

- Schwarzenegger would have “independent arbitrators decide whether an insurer could cancel a policy.”

- State regulators “would sort policies into categories based on the benefits they offer and establish minimum benefits for each category. Presumably, that would allow consumers to compare what competing companies offer.”

- Insurers may be “be required to spend at least 85% of the premiums they collect on medical care, limiting the amount they keep as profit and for administrative expenses.”

The new rules come out of necessity, not regulatory zeal. Nationally, 89% of applicants are unable to find an individual health care plan that meets their needs.

The new rules would provide patients “with preexisting conditions and other medical problems” greater access to quality, affordable health care” and begin to establish the individual market place as a viable source of insurance for the millions of Americans who are currently denied coverage.

Politics

Cheney’s argument for not releasing innocent detainees: ‘They’ll all get lawyers.’

In his New York Times review of Jane Mayer’s new book, The Dark Side, Alan Brinkley describes how by the end of 2005, torture advocates within the Bush administration were fighting to continue their extreme detainee program “because they feared being prosecuted should the program be halted and exposed.” In one White House meeting described by Mayer, Vice President Dick Cheney argued against releasing innocent detainees because “they’ll all get lawyers“:

By the end of 2005, those defending the regime of torture were no longer seeking primarily to protect the search for valuable intelligence. They were fighting for its survival, in the face of considerable evidence of the failure of SERE and other programs, because they feared being prosecuted should the program be halted and exposed. Even releasing detainees whom they knew to be entirely innocent was dangerous, since once released they could talk. “People will ask where they’ve been and ‘What have you been doing with them?’” Cheney said in a White House meeting. “They’ll all get lawyers.”

(HT: Noam Scheiber)

Security

‘Conditional Engagement’ Vague On Regional Diplomacy Needed to Stabilize Iraq

Our guest bloggers are Brian Katulis, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and Peter Juul, a Research Associate at the Center.

(Parts one, two, and three of this series.)

The fourth problem with the Center for a New American Security’s “conditional engagement” strategy for Iraq is its “regional diplomacy” section — which comes in two brief, underdeveloped pages out of a 51-page report.

For the first 80 percent of the report, Iraq is treated largely in isolation of a Middle East that is in turmoil. Iraq’s internal tensions reverberate throughout the region and the fallout from the Iraq war continues to impact the Middle East — most tangibly in the millions of refugees that have flowed out of Iraq into neighboring countries. Turkey, Iran, and Syria are all watching closely the tensions over the status of Kirkuk and the fate of Iraq’s Kurds. Yet the conditional engagement strategy — wedded mostly to a narrow, bilateral, U.S.-Iraq prism — does very little to acknowledge the multilateral dimensions of the Iraq challenges. The bipartisan Iraq Study Group, which released its report more than eighteen months ago, rightly acknowledged that the challenges posed by Iraq are interlinked with other regional challenges — and it provided a strategic pathway for moving forward that was solidly grounded in regional dynamics.

While ominously warning of the prospects of Iranian hegemony over the Gulf and regional war, the conditional engagement report is otherwise disconnected from its environment, and offers no rationale for how its proposed strategy builds into a larger framework for sustainable security in the Gulf. Rather than craft an Iraq policy toward a regional strategy, CNAS appears to be crafting a regional strategy around its preferred Iraq policy. Conditional engagement puts the Iraqi cart before the regional horse, making formulating a coherent strategy for the broader region more difficult. Read more

Politics

McCain Mocks Obama With Tire Gauges, But Agrees That Inflating Car Tires Properly Will Save Energy

gaugeweb.jpgToday, Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) presidential campaign and the Republican National Committee are taking issue with Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) recent suggestion that Americans inflate their car tires to save on gasoline.

Both are not only falsely claiming that Obama’s energy policy is based entirely on car maintenance, but they are concurrently selling and handing out tire gauges reading “Obama’s Energy Plan” as part of a fundraising campaign. This is an odd strategy given that just last week McCain agreed with Obama’s position, saying, “My friends, let’s do that“:

McCAIN: [Obama] said that the high cost of gasoline doesn’t bother him only that it rose too quickly. Yesterday, he suggested we put air in our tires to save on gas. My friends, let’s do that. But do you think that’s enough to break our dependence on Middle Eastern oil? I don’t think so.

Watch it:

Of course, Obama never said proper tire pressure would “break our dependence on Middle Eastern oil.” Some of McCain’s highest level supporters — Govs. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA) and Charlie Crist (R-FL) — also agree with the value of inflating car tires properly:

Both governors appealed to those with the real power to make change — average citizens — to drive slower, keep engines tuned and tires properly inflated, to buy hybrids and lower overall consumption.

“We all do have the power. Let’s not wait for government,” Schwarzenegger concluded. “Energy prices are not going back to the good old days.”

As ThinkProgress recently noted, the Department of Energy and the auto industry have said proper car care can have a significant impact on saving energy and gas money. Moreover, stock car racing giant NASCAR also agrees, urging its fans to pay attention to tire inflation pressure to increase fuel economy.

Part of McCain’s solution to energy independence and high gas prices is to “immediately” start “drilling off shore.” Such an approach would yield a savings of 6 cents/gallon two decades from now, in addition to putting to the planet in peril. By contrast, car maintenance can save 12 cents/gallon immediately.

Digg It!

Update

Seth Colter Walls notes that top McCain surrogate Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (I-CT) “own website still features several press releases that treat tire efficiency as a smart idea — even a critical national security issue.”

Politics

Ingraham: We don’t need graphic war images because ‘we know what it’s like’ from ‘high-tech Hollywood.’

Today on her radio show, right-wing talker Laura Ingraham hosted Zoriah Miller, a photojournalist whose embed with the Marines in Iraq was abruptly cut short after he published photos on his website of a dead Marine. Once Miller’s segment was over and he was gone, Ingraham accused him of having a political agenda and acting in “desperation” to turn people against the war. She also said war photography like his was unnecessary because “we know what it’s like” from “high-tech Hollywood”:

INGRAHAM: As the situation in Iraq continues to improve, I think you’re going to see more acts of desperation like this on the part of the anti-war clack, and of course Zoriah Miller has to be one of them. … We know what it is like for people to be disemboweled by an IED or a sniper’s bullet. We’ve seen enough of the horror, with the high-tech Hollywood, okay. We know what it is.

Listen to it:

In a column on the subject by the New York Times’ public editor this week, executive editor Bill Keller noted, “Death and carnage are not the whole story of war — there is also heroism and frustration, success and setback, camaraderie and, on occasion, atrocity — but death and carnage are part of the story, and to launder them out of our account of the war would be a disservice.”

Digg It!

Politics

Bush Rebuffs GOP’s ‘Boston Tea Party,’ Won’t Request Special Session For Oil Drilling Stunt

hense5.gif House conservatives have been engaging in political stunts to demand a vote on oil drilling. Last Friday, they stormed the floor after Congress adjourned “to attack Democrats for leaving town without doing something to lower gas prices.” Today, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) brought to the floor a “large garish photo” of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) with the words, “I am trying to save the planet” written beneath it. (Watch some of Friday’s shenanigans here.)

These conservatives are desperately trying to convince the American public that this crude political stunt is actually important. To do so, they are casting the protest as historic, akin to what happened at the founding of the nation:

– “Today is the 2008 version of the Boston Tea Party.” [Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ), 8/1/08]

– “Without your help we won’t be able to do anything…like the founders of this country we’re going directly to the American people.” [Rep. Tim Price (R-GA), 8/4/08]

– “Tell your congressman- we don’t want you back home. We want you in Washington. This could be America’s greatest hour. Insist that we come back to vote.” [Rep. Don Manzullo (R-IL), 8/4/08]

– “As a part of their history-making efforts to continue the fight to lower gas prices, House Republicans held a press conference just a few moments ago to demand that Speaker Pelosi allow a vote on the American Energy Act.” [Blog of House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), 8/4/08]

But even the White House refuses to endorse this political theater. Last Friday, Reps. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) and Mike Pence (R-IN) asked the White House to “convene an immediate energy special session of Congress.” The Hill reports today that administration officials have rejected this request, deciding to sit out the so-called 2008 Boston Tea Party:

The White House has rejected calls from House Republicans that it convene a special session of Congress on energy, saying it wouldn’t make a difference.

We don’t have plans to call Congress into session — it won’t make a difference if Democratic leaders are unwilling to bring up a bill for an up-down vote,” said White House spokesman Tony Fratto.

The conservative stunt is a waste of time. As even the White House has admitted, there is no “short-term” solution to high gas prices. Both the Energy Information Administration — and McCain’s own economic adviser — have stated that expanding offshore drilling “would not have a significant impact” on oil prices.

Digg It!

Update

Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI) today channeled Moses, stating, “Madam Speaker, let my people vote!” He received “rousing applause” from his fellow conservatives.

Featured

stateofthedivision Says:

A real “tea party” would have people dumping the offending product. Bad analogy, once again.

Opening up drilling is “America’s greatest hour”? If so, welcome to disaster capitalism.

Health

McCain On HIV/AIDS Prevention: All Talk, No Action

img-johnmccain13.jpgOn Saturday, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) reported that the number of Americans infected with HIV is “much higher than previously thought.” According to the study, 56,300 people became infected with HIV in 2006, “40% higher than previous figures.”

Responding to the new data, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) pointed out that under the Bush administration, the inflation-adjusted HIV prevention budget “had fallen over the past six years by 19%.” Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), while promising to “work closely with non-profit, government, and private sector stakeholders to continue the fight against HIV/AIDS,” would likely continue neglecting America’s domestic AIDS epidemic:

- Has not called for a national AIDS strategy: Even though the United States committed to developing a national AIDS strategy in 2001, it lacks a national plan. “In 2004, the Institute of Medicine determined that fragmentation of insurance coverage, and differing eligibility requirements and services across states, “do not allow for comprehensive and sustained access to quality HIV care,’ in the US.”

- Did not support federal funding for syringe exchange: While McCain opposes lifting the ban on federal funding for syringe exchange programs, “eight federally funded research reports concluded that needle and syringe programs, as part of a comprehensive HIV prevention strategy, are an effective public health intervention that reduces HIV transmission without increasing the use of illicit drugs.”

- Did not support the Early Treatment For HIV Act (ETHA): When confronted by HIV activists, McCain claimed to “look into” the issue. The act would expand “Medicaid to cover poor people who are living with HIV but are not diagnosed with AIDS.”

As senator, McCain rarely supported initiatives to prevent new HIV infections. In 2007, McCain admitted that he has “never gotten into these issues or thought much about” the effectiveness of condoms in stopping sexually transmitted disease,” but regularly opposed expanding access to contraception.

McCain “voted for a Jesse Helms strategy to cut off funding for prevention efforts aimed at the gay community” and “voted against HIV/AIDS programs, funding and research at least seven times.”

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up