ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

Am I A Georgian?

Common sense indicates that, no, I am not a Georgian. But John McCain says “today we are all Georgians.” But does he mean it? Suppose Russia was bombing Atlanta and threatening to advance to Savannah. In solidarity with Georgia (the state) Americans from all fifty states would band together and fight the Russians off. Now I don’t think we should go to war with Russia. And I hope John McCain doesn’t think we should go to war with Russia. But insofar as he doesn’t mean that we should go to war with Russia on Georgia’s behalf, what’s the meaning of the claim that “we are all Georgians”?

On one level, it’s empty political sloganeering. But on another level it’s not empty — it’s downright irresponsible, and an example of the sort of irresponsible behavior that got us into this. But this stuff isn’t a game — Putin, Shakashvili, the Ossetes and the Abkhaz are all playing for keeps. We shouldn’t imply guarantees that we don’t intend to keep, which means the public statements of our officials have to be driven by realistic assessments of the situation and of American interests not by mawkish sentimentality.

Politics

Site screw-ups.

Tonight, we rolled out some upgrades to ThinkProgress, but we encountered some problems in the process. The site was down for about 20 minutes around 8 pm tonight. In restoring the site, we lost a couple of blog posts, but we’re working right now to get those back up. We also lost all comments that were posted after approximately 4 pm. We apologize for these issues, and we’ll work to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

UPDATE: If the version of TP on your screen is not displaying correctly, try clearing your cache.

UPDATE II: If you see any technical problems with the site, please contact us here.

Politics

Dorgan: Withdraw Iraq reconstruction money, invest in renewable energy.

In light of a recent GAO report revealing that the Iraqi government may have a $79 billion budget surplus by the end of the year, “Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) said today that he wants $10 billion of U.S. funds that have been so far unpsent on Iraqi reconstruction rescinded,” the Politico reports. Dorgan has proposed using the funds to invest in renewable energy production:

Dorgan said he plans to introduce the Iraq Self-Sufficiency and American Energy Independence Act when Congress returns. The bill would transfer the unspent reconstruction funds to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in the Department of Energy.

“Today, Americans are paying sky high prices for oil and gas, and at the same time the Bush Administration is continuing to spend billions of dollars a year for Iraq reconstruction even though that country has huge budget surpluses. That is a bankrupt strategy,” said Dorgan.

Politics

Former governor who started Ted Stevens’ Senate career: ‘His time is over.’

Earlier this month, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) was indicted on charges that he concealed over $250,000 in gifts and home renovations he received from oil company Veco. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin (R) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have resisted calling on him to step down. Bloomberg reports, however, that former Alaska governor Walter Hickel is advising Stevens to step down. “He has served Alaska for 40 years, but his time is over,” said Hickel, who started Stevens’s Senate career by appointing him to a vacancy in 1968. (HT: The Crypt)

Yglesias

Pivotal Moments

Here for you “delusions of grandeur” files, is a little bit of yesterday’s Glenn Beck:

BECK: But doesn’t — isn’t this a pivotal moment for the United States of America? Where NATO and the United States can’t do anything for a democracy-loving republic?

MCFAUL: That’s right, it is. Russia invaded a sovereign country, a Democratic country. Russia’s not a Democratic country. Not only does the Georgian people and the Georgian government consider the United States their closest ally; we have our own military personnel in Georgia training that army as we speak. Hopefully they’re out by now. And we are really quite powerless to stop it as the Russians, from what I understand, they’re marching all the way to Tbilisi today.

BECK: Yes, Allen, let me go to you. I’ve been warning people for a while now that Russia is trying to corner the market. While everybody is saying, oh, they’re just waiting for us to lead the way on global warming. They`re going and they’re buying all of the carbon reserves that they can get their hands on. This is a play for the control of the globe in the long run, don`t you think?

The intensity of the desire to imbue these events in the Caucuses with extraordinary significance keeps running far ahead of any kind of actual logic of reasoning. To Beck, the significance here is that Russia is somehow going to “corner the market” on hydrocarbon energy sources which will, in turn, give them “control of the globe.” But while Georgia is the location of pipeline of some significance, to come anywhere close to cornering the market on oil Russia would need to be able to somehow overrun Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Or maybe hop across the ocean and seize control of Mexico or Venezuela. Either way, it’s not going to happen.

Politics

O’Reilly on Russia: ‘World War III’ is ‘on the horizon’

Russian President Dmitri Medvedev today said he agreed to a cease-fire in Georgia, discrediting many neoconservatives who were predicting war with Russia. On his radio show this afternoon, however, Bill O’Reilly still claimed that “World War III” is “on the horizon”:

But the message is sent: I, Vladimir Putin, and Russia can do whatever we want to do, and you can’t stop us because we have the oil. Now, its the same thing with Iran. Who props up Iran? Russia. Why? Because Russia wants the United States weakened. And Russia knows that Iran wants to dominate the oil in the Gulf. So Russia sells Iran weapons, blocks any sanctions against them, and he’s playing the double game. Putin is a real villain. Now, this is World War III on the horizon, ladies and gentlemen.

Listen here:


“It’s not actually true that the ‘lessons of Munich‘ are applicable to every single event in the world,” notes Matt Yglesias.

Politics

Will The White House Finally Comment On The Plame Leak?

plame.jpg Today, the D.C. Court of Appeals dismissed Valerie Plame’s lawsuit against members of the Bush administration for leaking her covert CIA status in 2003. Plame had hoped that the appeals court would overturn the ruling of U.S. District Judge John D. Bates, who had initially rejected her case. Today, the appeals court agreed with Bates, ruling that Vice President Cheney and others were acting within their official capacities:

Government employees who engage in questionable acts, such as abusing prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay facility or engaging in defamatory speech, cannot be held individually liable if they are carrying out official duties, the court said.

The conduct, then, was in the defendants’ scope of employment regardless of whether it was unlawful or contrary to the national security of the United States,” Appeals Court Chief Judge David Sentelle wrote in the opinion.

Plame’s lawyer, Melanie Sloan, is not sure what the next steps for the case will be, but is investigating another appeal. If an appeal doesn’t happen, however, the White House will be forced to start publicly commenting on its role in the Plame leak. For years, officials have been stonewalling, citing the various ongoing investigations:

– “I know that there’s going to be a lot of disappointment with this, but there is an ongoing criminal proceeding. … And so our principled stand of not commenting on ongoing legal investigations is going to continue.” [White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, 3/6/07]

– “I did talk to our counsel’s office because I forgot that there is a civil case that is pending on this issue. I did forget. The Wilsons have filed a case in civil court, it was dismissed, and they are on appeal.” [Perino, 12/12/07]

What will be the White House’s excuse once there are no more cases pending?

Health

Veterans Pan McCain’s ‘Veterans Care Access Card’ Plan

s-mccain-veterans-large.jpgSen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) plan to extend health benefits to veterans living in rural areas of the country received mostly negative reviews on Saturday from veterans attending the Disabled Veterans of America convention in Nevada.

According to the Las Vegas Sun:

Just one of 14 veterans interviewed by the Sun after his speech said he is a certain McCain voter, and the nonpartisan group’s legislative director expressed concerns about McCain’s proposed “Veterans’ Care Access Card.”

Indeed, prominent veterans organizations oppose McCain’s proposal to “give veterans the option to use a simple plastic card to receive timely and accessible care” outside of the VA system.

AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, Paralyzed Veterans of America, and the Veterans of Foreign Wars all argue that while veterans should have access to private care, providing “rural veterans greater access to VA-sponsored care exclusively through private providers” may undermine the VA:

- “The VA’s specialized health-care programs…would suffer irreparable impact by the loss of veterans from those programs.”

- “The VA’s medical and prosthetic research program…would lose focus and purpose were service-connected and other enrolled veterans no longer present in VA health care.”

- If veterans turned to private practice, “they would lose the many safeguards built into the VA system through its patient safety program, evidence-based medicine, electronic medical records and bar code medication administration,” resulting in “lower quality of care for those who deserve it most.”

Currently, the VA “outpaces other systems in delivering patient care.” A recent study by the RAND corporation found that “VA patients were more likely to receive recommended care” and “received consistently better care across the board, including screening, diagnosis, treatment and follow up”:

vetchart.JPG

Rather than taking veterans out of a system that consistently delivers “higher quality of care,” McCain should expand its services and improve access. As the RAND study concludes, “if other health care providers followed the VA’s lead, it would be a major step toward improving the quality of care across the U.S. health care system.”

Politics

Bachmann tells Pelosi to give up on global warming because Jesus already saved the planet.

bacch3.jpg TPM notes that Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) told OneNewsNow that the U.S. doesn’t need environmental advocates such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) because Jesus saved Earth already:

[Pelosi] is committed to her global warming fanaticism to the point where she has said that she’s just trying to save the planet. … We all know that someone did that over 2,000 years ago, they saved the planet — we didn’t need Nancy Pelosi to do that.

Digg It!

Yglesias

The Low-Level Subversion Menace

Hitler

Blake Hounshell responds to my post suggesting that folks wielding the “appeasement” ax are drastically overstating Russia’s practical ability to coerce Ukraine by giving examples of a few kinds of mischief Russia coule plausibly cause and then saying “when people are talking about the Russian threat, this kind of low-level subversion is primarily what they mean — not tanks in the streets of Kiev.”

I agree that Russia could plausibly engage in low-level subversion against the Ukrainian government, but Blake’s being way too generousto the “every day is Munich” crowd here. The trouble with appeasement at Munich wasn’t that Hitler followed up the absorption of the Sudetenland with a campaign of low-level subversion aimed at the remaining parts of Czechoslovakia. It’s that he followed it up with a full scale invasion of Prague, the dismemberment of the country, and then a new round of war aimed at Poland all of which was part of a deranged scheme of world conquest. If people don’t mean to conjure up images of tanks rolling into Kiev — or at a minimum, bombers in the sky above — when they talk about future Russian pressure on Ukraine, then they shouldn’t use inflammatory language about Munich and appeasement. Writers choose these analogies for a reason — they’re intended to shut down consideration of costs and benefits in favor of creating an emergency mentality. The fact that some other, radically scaled-back version of the claim might be true doesn’t make the initial claims any less irresponsible and inaccurate.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up