ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Rove Repeats ‘Belittling’ Comments About Richmond, But Praised Cheney’s Small Town Background In 2000

As ThinkProgress noted, Karl Rove attacked Richmond, VA this week when he criticized Gov. Tim Kaine’s (D) possible candidacy for vice president, saying Kaine was only the mayor of the “105th largest city in America…not a big town.” In response, Richmond residents called Rove’s comments “patronizing” and “belittling.” But that didn’t stop Rove. Yesterday on Fox News, he repeated the charge:

ROVE: And look, Kaine is undistinguished. With all due respect, he’s an able but undistinguished governor of the state of – or the commonwealth of Virginia and a former mayor of Richmond, which is the 105th largest city in America, not very big. And you can’t get Virginians to tell you really anything that he’s done, other than and raise taxes for transportation.

Watch it:

However, after President Bush selected Dick Cheney — whose prior elected experience included being a congressman from Wyoming — Rove said Cheney was a “great candidate for us.” On Fox News on Sept. 23, 2000, Rove said Cheney received “the best candidate training” from “retail campaigning” in Wyoming:

ROVE: Well, look, the best candidate training is to, is — you know, this is a guy who won elections in, in a very contested primary in Wyoming, where you have to do a lot of retail campaigning, and got reelected a number of times. He’s — it’s — he’s exercising those political muscles again.

Health

Cavuto On Holtz-Eakin’s Budget Double Talk: ‘I’m Begging You To Stop’

On Thursday during an interview on Fox News, Neal Cavuto took McCain Senior Economic Adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin to task for dodging simple questions on McCain’s economic plan:

CAVUTO: We have a candidate who claims that his opponent, his Democratic opponent, is a tax-hiker. Yet, we have a candidate, in your guy, John McCain, who cannot account for his spending with the aggressive tax cuts he`s planning. Which goes? Which is real?

Watch it:

Cavuto is right. On issue after issue, McCain’s campaign is trying to have it both ways:

– McCain wants “everything on the table” to fix social security, but says any slight tax increases on the rich are “out of the question.

– McCain’s health care plan is either a budget busting expenditure or a tax hike on the middle class, but his campaign insists it’s neither.

– McCain’s tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy would blow a hole in the deficit, but McCain promises to balance the budget by 2013.

As Douglas Holtz-Eakin went on the attack instead of explaining his candidate’s plan, Cavuto shouted “I’m begging you to stop.” We know how you feel, Neal.

Politics

McCain: ‘I Have Not Missed Any Crucial Vote’ On Energy Legislation

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) currently holds the title of most absent U.S. senator, missing over 60 percent of votes this session. In an interview with Walter Isaacson at the Aspen Institute yesterday, McCain claimed he has not “missed any crucial vote” on energy legislation:

McCAIN: I have a long record of that support of alternate energy. … I’ve always been for all of those and I have not missed any crucial vote. But my citizens in Arizona know that when I’m running for the President of the United States I have to be out campaigning.

Watch it (via Progressive Accountability):

McCain’s has actually missed several “crucial” energy votes. In July alone, he missed every single energy vote brought to the floor. This session, McCain has skipped votes supporting renewable energy tax credits four times, all of which were filibustered. In June, for example, McCain missed a vote on the landmark Lieberman-Warner climate change legislation.

McCain has also been the “crucial” absent vote on key legislation. In December, legislation stripping tax break giveaways to Big Oil and investing in cleaner sources failed by one vote, 59-40 (Vote #425); McCain missed that vote to campaign. In February, McCain skipped a vote on extending tax credits to renewables, which also failed by one vote (Vote #8). Both times, McCain was the only senator absent.

“It’s interesting to hear Sen. McCain talk about bringing Congress back” for a vote on offshore drilling, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said this week. “He wasn’t even in Congress when we had two very important bills on energy.”

Update

Tom Friedman: “John McCain has a perfect record on this renewable energy legislation. He has missed all eight votes over the last year — which effectively counts as a no vote each time. Once, he was even in the Senate and wouldn’t leave his office to vote.” (HT: SilentPatriot)

Yglesias

Young and Sweet, Only 72

Abba

Walter Isaacson chats with John McCain about Abba:

Speaking to Walter Isaacson at the Aspen Institute in Colorado on Thursday, McCain found himself explaining a recent interview with Blender Magazine in which he selected ABBA’s 1976 track “Dancing Queen” as his favorite song.

“What were you thinking?,” Isaacson asked him, looking incredulous.

“If there is anything I am lacking in, I’ve got to tell you, it is taste in music and art and other great things in life,” McCain joked. “I’ve got to say that a lot of my taste in music stopped about the time I impacted a surface-to-air missile with my own airplane and never caught up again.”

Yes, yes, we get it — John McCain is so famously reluctant to discuss his POW experience or exploit it for political gain that he manages to bring it up in the context of wildly unrelated questions about his affection for 1970s-era Scandinavian pop acts. And wait a minute — Abba’s from the seventies! Spencer Ackerman notes:

What? McCain was shot down in 1967. ABBA began making music in 1972. Don’t try this shit on me, McCain! Your POW experience has nothing to do with your Partridgey musical taste.

Something to ponder over your weekend. This is really kind of a softball question, it should be possible for McCain to give a more normal answer.

Politics

McCain’s Hypocrisy: Promises To Protect ‘Copyrighted Works’ While Infringing On Artists’ Copyrights

mccainguitar.jpgYesterday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) finally released a statement laying out his positions on technology policy. Under a header describing himself as a champion of “fair and open world trade,” McCain promises to “protect the creative industries from piracy“:

John McCain Will Protect The Creative Industries From Piracy. The entertainment industry is both a vital sector of the domestic economy and among the largest U.S. exporters. While the Internet has provided tremendous opportunity for the creators of copyrighted works, including music and movies, to distribute their works around the world at low cost, it has also given rise to a global epidemic of piracy. John McCain supports efforts to crack down on piracy, both on the Internet and off.

As Richard Koman at ZDNet points out, McCain’s stated desire to protect “the creators of copyrighted works” is at odds with the fact that multiple artists have accused his campaign of copyright infringement.

Just yesterday, the Los Angeles Times reported that singer Jackson Browne is suing the McCain campaign and the Ohio Republican Party for copyright infringement because his song “Running on Empty” was used in an ad by the state party, which Browne’s lawyers say “McCain and his campaign were well aware of.” Browne isn’t alone in complaining about McCain:

– Earlier this week, the McCain campaign re-cut a web ad after comedian Mike Myers’ publicist complained about the use of footage of Myers and fellow Saturday Night Live alum Dana Carvey’s Wayne’s World characters.

– Last month, the McCain campaign had to pull and re-cut a web ad after Frankie Valli’s record label, the Warner Music Group asserted its copyright claims over the use of the song “Can’t Take My Eyes Off Of You.”

– Earlier this year, the copyright owners for the “Rocky” theme song “telephoned the McCain campaign to politely complain it was being used without permission.”

Ironically, McCain has joked on the campaign trail that he has refrained from using music by his beloved ABBA because of “licensing and other concerns.” “If you’re not careful you can alienate some Swedes,” said McCain.

Security

The Good News Is, Unlike Peters, Nobody’s Campaign Is Interested In Peretz’s Advice

peretz.JPGAs proof that we here in the Wonk Room are interested in calling out bigotry in a totally non-partisan fashion, since I posted on Ralph Peters yesterday, today I note that former New Republic owner and editor in chief/continuing liberal embarrassment Marty Peretz — who TNR’s current editors have stashed in the attic and away from the children while he indulges his obsessive anti-Arab racism like a deranged uncle with a ham radio — has now seen fit to sneer at the death of beloved Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish not once, not twice, but thrice.

Way to elevate the discourse, TNR!

Yglesias

The (Bleak) Future of Air Travel

Airship

It’s occurred to me now and again that pretty much every real or hypothetical technological development you hear about that could make things radically more fuel efficient relates to cars. But high oil prices would also imperil the viability of airplanes. And while it’s pretty clear in the case of automobiles that if 10-15 years from now oil is incredibly expensive we’ll be able to shift to plug-in vehicles of some kind nobody seems to think you can build an electric plane. Brad Plumer looked into this for The New Republic and, indeed, there seems to be absolutely nothing on the horizon, technologically speaking, that could shelter air travel from its heavy vulnerability to air travel.

For short flights, high-speed rail is a very good alternative option. It would require substantial investment in infrastructure, but it’s not as if we got our current air travel network without substantial investment in infrastructure. But even a train enthusiast such as myself needs to acknowledge some serious limits to this option. Most notably, as Brad says, “Trains, of course, can’t span oceans.” Which leads to some genuinely wacky scenarios:

Perhaps the most unlikely alternative to emerge in recent months is the rebirth of the dirigible or airship, as companies have already been unveiling new designs for niche tourist trips and transporting cargo. The good news is that modern helium airships are far safer than the Hindenburg and emit a great deal less carbon than jumbo jets. The bad news is that natural reserves of helium may be running low and, more to the point, airships can’t carry many people at a time, don’t handle heavy weather well, and are quite slow: A flight from New York to London would take around 40 hours. (Fast passenger ships would take twice as long, though modern ocean liners suffer in peak oil scenarios, too.)

Near the end, Brad quotes George Monbiot saying that a major decline in the availability of air travel “flies in the face of everything we have been encouraged to regard as progress.” It’s worth considering in that regard, however, that for decades now aerospace technology has really been disappointing the high hopes that once existed for it. We’ve already pulled back from manned travel to the moon and from supersonic passenger travel as basically impractical so it wouldn’t totally shock me to see further backsliding on this front even as advances continue in other domains.

Politics

McCain Adviser/Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman Silent On Campaign’s Opposition To Net Neutrality

whitmanmcc.jpg It’s been widely reported that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) is a self-admitted “illiterate” when it comes to computers. But some have suggested that he could still put forward sound technology policy because he surrounds himself with tech-savvy advisers, such as former Hewlett-Packard chairman and CEO Carly Fiorina and former eBay president and CEO Meg Whitman.

But it’s unclear how much he is listening to them. Yesterday, McCain finally released his technology platform. (Until this time, “technology” was not even listed in the Issues section of his campaign website.) His plan supposedly focuses on innovation, but in reality, it often repeats McCain’s previous non-innovative positions, such as his opposition to net neutrality:

When Regulation Is Warranted, John McCain Acts. John McCain does not believe in prescriptive regulation like “net-neutrality,” but rather he believes that an open marketplace with a variety of consumer choices is the best deterrent against unfair practices.

This position is misguided and opposed by major Internet innovators. As Free Press explains, net neutrality preserves a “free and open Internet” by preventing “from blocking, speeding up or slowing down Web content based on its source, ownership or destination.”

On April 5, 2006, technology industry leaders wrote to Congress and asked it to preserve net neutrality. Although these companies would be more than able to pay any fees the telecoms might charge, they recognized that it would hamper future entrepreneurship on the Internet. One of the signers to the letter? Meg Whitman, who was then heading eBay. From the letter:

Until FCC decisions made last summer, consumers’ ability to choose the content and services they want via their broadband connections was assured by regulatory safeguards. … This “innovation without permission” has fueled phenomenal economic growth, productivity gains, and global leadership for our nation’s high tech companies.

To preserve this environment, we urge the Committee to include language that directly addresses broadband network operators’ ability to manipulate what consumers will see and do online.

Whitman has stayed silent about McCain’s opposition to net neutrality, and apparently, McCain is refusing to listen to Whitman as well. In 2006, McCain sided with the telecom industry and voted against legislation sponsored by Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) that would have prevented broadband providers from creating a pay-for-play system. McCain sided with the telecom industry and voted against this bill.

Update

It turns out that it is Whitman vs. the McCain camp on another technology issue – whether consumers should have legal protections for their privacy when surfing online. The new McCain privacy statement says that the market and “self-regulation” should protect our privacy. But Whitman testified in Congress in 2006 supporting a federal statute to protect privacy.

Yglesias

Comment of the Day

Today’s comment of the day is courtsey of Hussein Toasterhead over at the main Think Progress blog. It concerns John McCain’s contention that the outbreak of hostilities between Russia and Georgia is the first serious international crisis since the end of the Cold War. It’s a bit technical, so to help illustrate, I’ve also provided a picture (lifted from Wikipedia) of probability densities corresponding to the wavefunctions of an electron in a hydrogen atom possessing definite energy (increasing downward: n = 1, 2, 3, …) and angular momentum (increasing across: s, p, d,…). Anyways, here’s Toasterhead to explain it all:

Quantum

Now that I’ve parsed his statement, “probably serious crisis internationally,” I see where the qualifier lies. It’s the word “probably.” McCain is, of course, referring to quantum conflict, which is the logical successor to the old theory of Newtonian conflict.

While Newtonian law states that conflict is inevitable, quantum conflict theory assigns a probability distribution to the possibilities of an escalation of conflict. This theoretical warfare exists as a series of eigenstates that, due to the Uncertainty Principle, can’t be known until the waveform actually collapses.

Iraq, Afghanistan, DR Congo, Lebanon, Chad, Sudan – these are all collapsed-waveform conflicts. We know the forms they take. But Russia-Georgia, Colombia-Venezuela, India-Pakistan, China-East Turkestan, Israel-Iran – these are all merely quantum wars.

For now.

Keep that in mind next time you hear some liberal say that John McCain doesn’t know what he’s talking about. His understanding of quantum national security policy is just too sophisticated for the typical pea-brained progressive.

Yglesias

Transit Bill Needs Senate Help

The House of Representatives passed a good bill back in June to give federal support to local transit agencies feeling budgetary squeeze from the downturn, and Hillary Clinton introduced a Senate version of the bill that’s garnered support thus far from the New York and New Jersey delegations. But as Ben Fried points out “The problems that the bill addresses are not confined to two states.”

News of service cuts and fare hikes keeps pouring in from places as far-flung as San Diego, Corpus Christi, Cleveland, and Burlington. All are getting squeezed by fuel costs while handling ridership surges as great as 35 percent or higher.

Keeping service running smoothly while new riders switch to transit is not solely the concern of one party, either. Republican Senator George Voinovich of Ohio just directed a $1.5 million earmark to Dayton’s transit agency, saying “it is critical that we continue to make our public transportation systems more efficient and accessible.”

Organizing needed funding through earmarks, however, is not an especially sound way to proceed. Far better to pass a proper, widely applicable bill that uses the federal government’s ability to engage in deficit spending to help provide some transit stimulus. At a time when booming energy prices are the main factor driving an economic downturn, cutting back on alternative transportation services is extremely foolish and will only prolong economic problems.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up