ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Mahoney a no-show for debate.

mahoney.jpgA sell-out crowd at the Forum Club in West Palm Beach did not get what they came for this afternoon. A scheduled debate between Florida congressman Tim Mahoney (D) and his Republican challenger Tom Rooney did not take place as scheduled because Mahoney did not show up. He objected to the presence of TV cameras. Mahoney, who has admitted to having multiple affairs and may have paid off one of his mistresses, said the cameras would create a “circus” atmosphere. Rooney attended today had the entire event to himself, responding to questions posed by the moderator.

Update

ABC reports that Mahoney demanded his mistress “attend fundraisers and ‘tease c-ck’ to bring in more donations from the male members of the public.” He also reportedly demanded that she “engage in sexual conduct with another woman for his enjoyment.”

Politics

Apple comes out against Prop. 8.

Today, Apple publicly announced its opposition to the marriage equality ban in California:

applerainbow.gif Apple is publicly opposing Proposition 8 and making a donation of $100,000 to the No on 8 campaign. Apple was among the first California companies to offer equal rights and benefits to our employees’ same-sex partners, and we strongly believe that a person’s fundamental rights — including the right to marry — should not be affected by their sexual orientation. Apple views this as a civil rights issue, rather than just a political issue, and is therefore speaking out publicly against Proposition 8.

Last month, Google also took the unusual step of coming out against the measure. Support the No on 8 movement here.

Update

Saddleback Church pastor Rick Warren announced he is supporting the gay marriage ban.

Politics

Perino apparently unaware that former Treasury Secretary Snow testified on the Hill yesterday.

During yesterday’s House Oversight Committee Hearing on the Financial Crisis, former Treasury Secretary John Snow suggested that the push to expand homeownership was “overdone.” Today, a reporter tried to ask White House Press Secretary Dana Perino about Snow’s comments. Perino, however, had no idea that Snow even testified:

Q: Yesterday, the President’s former Treasury Secretary said that the push for homeownership, the bipartisanship push for homeownership simply went too far. And he went beyond saying that unqualified people –

PERINO: Are you talking about Greenspan, or –

Q: I’m talking about John Snow.

PERINO: John Snow, okay. Was he testifying?

Q: Yes, he testified to the House committee.

PERINO: Okay. I didn’t see his remarks. So hopefully, I’ll be able to answer your question.

Q: Well, maybe you won’t. (Laughter.)

Watch it:

Politics

Bachmann: Obama isn’t ‘anti-American,’ but his views are.

bachmannsmile.jpgStill on the defensive over her McCarthyite comments that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) “may have anti-American views,” Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) said on Dennis Miller’s radio show today that she doesn’t believe “that Barack Obama is anti-American.” Bachmann confused her own message later in the show when she said she was “concerned he may have anti-American views.” Listen here:

Bachmann’s contradictory statement is reminiscent of when Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told CNN that she wasn’t going to call Obama a socialist, but then added that his policies “sounds like socialism.” Coincidentally, some right wingers are already contemplating a “Palin/Bachmann 2012” dream ticket.

Politics

Lieberman: ‘Thank God’ Palin won’t have to ‘be president from day one.’

In an interview with Connecticut reporters, Sen. Joe Lieberman expressed concerns about Sarah Palin’s readiness to assume the presidency if John McCain were unable to:

[W]hen asked by The Advocate if Palin is ready to be president from day one, Lieberman said “thank God she’s not going to have to be president from day one. McCain’s going to be alive and well.”

Former Bush pollster Matt Dowd has previously said that McCain wanted to pick Lieberman as his running mate, but the GOP base would not allow him to. Instead, Dowd argued, McCain “put the country at risk” by selecting Palin.

Yglesias

Good News

I think increasing sales volume and falling prices is about the best news we could expect from the housing market. Given how expensive homes had gotten, there was really no alternative but for us to see some steep declines. There’s no use, in that sense, of crying over spilled milk. Home prices are traditionally “sticky” but it would be very bad for the economy for home-sellers to refuse to bow to reality and lower prices. It’s worth trying to do mass mortgage re-writes to avoid a plague of foreclosures and vacant buildings that could wreck neighborhoods and cause prices to overshoot on the downside, but prices need to fall. Beyond that, I think the best we can hope for is high sales volumes that let us re-allocate our resources more efficiently.

Security

Top Bush Pentagon Appointee Rejects Key McCain Counter-Terrorism Initiative

Our guest blogger is Brian Katulis, a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

vickers2.JPGIn a statement reminiscent of the “first art critic” scene in Mel Brooks’ History of the World, Part 1, the civilian head of the Pentagon’s Special Operations Command Michael Vickers today soundly rejected a core idea put forth by John McCain for meeting the threats posed by global terrorist groups.

John McCain has called for the creation of a new espionage agency patterned on the Office of Strategic Services, a World War II-era agency that conducted operations behind enemy lines.

Speaking at an event (pdf) at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Assistant Secretary of Defense Vickers, one of the most important figures in the Bush administration’s efforts to address global terrorism, criticized McCain’s proposal, essentially saying it would be a big waste of time while “we’re at war.” Vickers stated his view clearly: “We have the institutions we need.”

McCain has advocated for his new OSS in speeches, and in his Foreign Affairs essay last year. He insists such a new agency “could take risks that our bureaucracies today are afraid to take.”

A cadre of such undercover operatives would allow us to gain the intelligence on terrorist activities that we don’t get today from our high-tech surveillance systems and from a CIA clandestine service that works almost entirely out of our embassies abroad.

McCain national security advisor Randy Scheunemann reiterated McCain’s support of the idea, telling the Washington Times that “while there may be some that think the status quo is just fine, John McCain has seen past failures of the intelligence community firsthand.”

But just as McCain’s half-baked League of Democracies idea is criticized by democracy promotion experts, intelligence and counter-terrorism experts have rejected McCain’s OSS idea as a structural solution. Robert Grenier, a former CIA official, criticized the idea, saying “as so many have before him, Senator McCain is trying to use a structural fix to solve what is fundamentally a leadership problem… To suggest that we could eliminate that by creating a new organization to pull all those elements together is completely unrealistic and in the short term would be enormously destructive.”

This flat-out rejection of a core McCain idea by a top defense and counter-terrorism official in the Bush administration exposes the emptiness of McCain’s national security proposals, something that frankly hasn’t gotten enough scrutiny from the media. John McCain might bluster that he would “follow Bin Laden to the gates of hell,” but his main idea on terrorism is simply to move some bureaucratic boxes around unnecessarily.

Transcript below: Read more

Yglesias

Thought of the Day

Lots of Senate speculation, including speculation about getting to 60 votes and speculation about stripping Joe Lieberman of his committee chairmanship. I’ve heard less speculation about what John McCain will do. He’s an old man, and by all accounts is neither well-liked by his Senate GOP colleagues nor does he like them. Is it so implausible that he’ll just retire after the election; take his toys and go home to one of his eight homes? His successor, appointed by Janet Napolitano, would presumably be a Democrat. Maybe to balance things out, he and Lieberman can simultaneously retire (Connecticut’s governor is a Republican), and ride off into the sunset together.

Politics

After Greenwashing His Climate Record, Sen. Sununu Reveals His True ‘Drill Here’ Mentality To Glenn Beck

Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) is facing a tough reelection campaign against former Gov. Jeanne Shaheen (D). During their debate on Tuesday night, Sununu tried to greenwash his dismal record on climate change, claiming to be “concerned” about global warming and touting his involvement with the issue in the Senate:

SUNUNU: I cosponsored legislation this past year with Tom Carper, bipartisan legislation, that would set restrictions not just on pollutants like mercury or sulfur or NOx, which causes ozone, but also limits on CO2 emissions. … I voted to move the climate change legislation forward on the Senate floor, because I think this is an important issue. [...]

QUESTION: Would you consider it a priority for you, global warming?

SUNUNU: Well a priority enough that I was the lead Republican on the piece of legislation that I cosponsored with Tom Carper.

Watch it:

As the moderator noted, just last year Sununu denied that a link between global warming and human activity even exists, so his new-found concern about the climate might have left viewers skeptical. That skepticism was validated today, when Sununu — appearing on notorious global warming denier Glenn Beck’s radio show — made his true feelings about global warming clear:

GLENN: All right. Talk to me a little bit about oil. Are you a global warming guy?

SENATOR SUNUNU: Drill here, drill now.

GLENN: Okay.

Listen here:

Considering Sununu’s long record of voting for Big Oil’s interests, it’s no wonder he’s latched on to their favorite cheer when asked if he’s “a global warming guy.”

Yglesias

Weekend Voting

24israel_190v.jpg

Steve Israel and Norm Ornstein correctly note that it would make a lot of sense to shift Election Day to a Saturday and then make special provision for the small number of observant Jews, Muslims, and Seventh-Day Adventists (with early voting increasingly popular and widespread, you wouldn’t need a big adjustments). This would be more convenient for most people and greatly enhance turnout.

You can see more on this at Why Tuesday? where, among other things, they make the point that the tradition of Tuesday voting is based on considerations that have absolutely nothing to do with modern conditions. Voting on Tuesday is, along with the electoral college and the filibuster, a dumb anachronism that we ought to do away with as quickly as possible.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up