ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Palin claims that all her appointees as governor ‘absolutely’ deserved the job.

Yesterday during an interview with a local Louisville, KY ABC affiliate, reporter Mark Herbert asked Sarah Palin about reports that she doled out political positions to friends, family and campaign donors. When Palin said the people she hired weren’t “cronies” or “politicos,” Herbert asked, “They weren’t politicos, they were just folks who deserved the job?” “Absolutely, yes,” Palin replied. Yet a recent Los Angeles Times examination of state records has shown otherwise:

palinweb.jpg– More than 100 appointments to state posts — nearly 1 in 4 — went to campaign contributors or their relatives, sometimes without apparent regard to qualifications.

– Alaska historians say some of Palin’s appointees were less qualified than those of her Republican and Democratic predecessors.

– [Tom] Lamal, a public school teacher in Fairbanks until he retired in 2006, was hired as a right-of-way agent despite reports of internal conflicts over whether he was qualified under state law.

The New York Times also reported last month that Palin appointed a high school classmate to a top position in the State Division of Agriculture who “cited her childhood love of cows as a qualification for running the roughly $2 million agency.”

Politics

Cavuto rips McCain: ‘On economic matters, you have no convictions.’

Yesterday on Fox News Business, Neil Cavuto dressed down Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for his constantly shifting economic policy proposals. Cavuto complained that McCain’s “positions are always changing” and asked, “What’s the deal with the Straight Talk Express?”:

You rail against big government, yet continue to push cockamamie spending plans that make a mockery of it. That’s why you’re losing right now, Senator McCain. Not because you don’t have the courage of your convictions. But because on economic matters, you have no convictions.

Watch it:

(HT: Crooks and Liars)

Climate Progress

Is There Anything Palin Doesn’t Like ‘Tapping Into’?

Yesterday, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) gave a speech on energy policy at a solar energy company, in her words, “in a manner with much substance.” She repeatedly went off the script of her prepared remarks (as Jed Lewison and Ana Marie Cox have noted), using many of her favorite locutions. One of her most common rogue phrases was a call for tapping into various sources of, well, just about anything. Her approach exposes the conservative ideology that all forms of energy are created equal; that details like cost, pollution, and long-term consequences are immaterial.

Watch it:

For those watching at home, here’s the list:


Palin’s Top Eight For The Tapping
Solar energy

Some technology that will allow our nation to be firmly put on that path towards energy independence

Hundreds of trillions of cubic feet [of natural gas]

Hungry markets flowing our resources into those hungry markets

Energy supplies [safely, ethically]

Nucular energy

100 new plants [of nucular energy]

American ingenuity

Many, many alternative sources

Of that list, only natural gas is a resource that can be literally “tapped into.” Palin’s use of an oil industry metaphor to describe all forms of energy and innovation is consistent with the mindset of supply-side exploitation, a dangerously simplistic approach to energy policy that only considers the short-term profit interests of energy corporations. Some of her off-script “tapping” remarks had some policy “meat,” such as her attack on solar energy:

We have many many alternative sources that have not yet been tapped into and allowed to become economic and reliable. That’s the key, of course, is the reliability of these alternative sources.

This false attack on the unreliability of renewable energy is one both she and McCain have made before.

Media

After Fox Editor Defends LAT Decision To Withhold Obama Video, Fox Continues Attacking The Paper

For days now, Fox News, conservative bloggers and the McCain campaign have been accusing the Los Angeles Times of “intentionally suppressing” a 2003 videotape of then-state Sen. Barack Obama attending a banquet honoring Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi. On Tuesday, the Times said in a statement that it would not release the tape because “it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it.”

In a blog post at 4:38 PM yesterday, Bill Sammon, the deputy managing editor of Fox’s Washington Bureau, said that “the newspaper is on firm journalistic ground in refusing to make the tape public”:

To me, it’s pretty simple. Reporter Peter Wallsten made an agreement with a source to refrain from publicly disclosing the tape. Unless that source lets Wallsten off the hook, the reporter is journalistically bound to abide by the agreement, regardless of how much heat his newspaper takes from pundits on TV.

Indeed, Wallsten has little choice in the matter. If he were to cave in to mounting public demands for the tape, no self-respecting source would ever give him another shred of information. Nor should they.

But the declaration by a top Fox News editor that the decision by the LA Times is non-controversial hasn’t stopped the network’s anchors and guests from giving the paper “heat.” On nearly every Fox show that aired after Sammon posted his opinion, Fox’s pundits have attacked the LA Times as being “the subsidiary of a campaign” and “an example of journalism losing objectivity in this election.” Watch a compilation of Fox’s obsession:

Some Fox pundits like Sean Hannity and Bernard Goldberg have accused the Times of “lying” about their agreement with the source. “I’m not sure the LA Times is telling the truth,” said Goldberg. But Sammon addressed this point as well, saying, “Unless we have evidence to the contrary, I’m afraid we have to take The Times at its word.” (HT: Michael Calderone)

Politics

Palin vows to balance budget in first term — 10 days after campaign says it’s nearly impossible.

Campaigning today, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) said that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) would fix the economy by imposing a spending freeze. She also declared that a McCain administration would balance the budget by the end of their first term. Watch it:

Palin must not have gotten the memo. After promising a balanced budget (though on a constantly shifting timeline) for months, 10 days ago the campaign admitted that it would be virtually impossible to achieve that in just four years:

The events of the past few months have completely thrown a wrench into that, there’s no way round it. He would still like to balance it. It’s going to be harder, take longer,” said [top economic adviser Douglas] Holtz-Eakin at a debate with his Democratic counterpart at Columbia University in New York.

Health

McCain Camp: Decrease The Size Of The Pool, Increase The Price Of Insurance Policy

burgesslabel.jpgIn the final days of the election, the McCain campaign has significantly altered its health care rhetoric. Initially arguing that McCain’s health care plan would allow voters to abandon their employer-based insurance plans for cheaper options on the individual market, the campaign is now emphasizing the importance of group coverage.

Senior McCain adviser and implosion watch subject Douglas-Holtz Eakin created a firestorm after effectively conceding the inferiority of individual health care plans on Tuesday, and Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) is all too eager to follow his lead.

While stumping for McCain’s health care plan, the three-term congressman attempted to combat critics who charge that McCain’s plan “basically blows up the current system“:

Burgess agreed that many workers wouldn’t initially drop employer-sponsored coverage. He said the cost of individual plans would drop if insurers were allowed to offer plans across state lines, as Mr. McCain favors.

“The price for the policy goes down if you increase the size of your pool,”
he said.

Progressives have long argued that larger risk pools effectively spread both the risk and cost of health insurance across a wide spectrum of the population, allowing healthier people to subsidize the sick. McCain plan flips this principle on its head, breaking up employer-risk pools and shuttling everyone into an individual plan.

By Burgess’ own definition, if you adopt McCain’s health plan and decrease “the size of your pool,” “the price for the policy” goes up.

Climate Progress

Obama pledges cooperation with McCain on climate change

An intriguing story from Greenwire (subs. req’d):

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said yesterday on a late-night comedy show that global warming cannot be solved without participation from Republicans, and he pledged to work with his Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, on the issue no matter who wins the White House on Tuesday.

Appearing on Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, Obama cited climate change as an issue on which he and McCain could find common ground after this year’s bitter presidential campaign concludes.

“I hope that after the election, however way it turns out, that we can work together, because some of the problems are ones that we’re not going to be able to solve with one party just trying to dictate a solution to the problems,” Obama said via satellite from Sunrise, Fla., where his campaign held one in a series of rallies in the battleground state.

The Illinois senator then brought up climate change.

Read more

Media

Sanchez v. Goldfarb

Rick Sanchez carves a “B” in Michael Goldfarb’s face:

Couldn’t have happened to a more loathesome operative. At the same time, I have no idea why we’re conceding the premise that Rashid Khalidi is motivated by anti-Jewish racism. I suppose their might be some evidence for that, but one would think that being a Palestinian would be a perfectly sufficient reason for being a Palestinian nationalist.

Politics

Palin won’t say if she will vote for Ted Stevens.

Earlier this week on MSNBC, McCain campaign flack Tucker Bounds said that if John McCain and Sarah Palin were Alaska voters, they would not vote for Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) — who was recently convicted on seven felony counts. But as First Read noted, Palin is an Alaska voter. However, yesterday during an interview with a local Toledo, OH CBS affiliate, Palin declined to answer when asked if she would vote for Stevens:

Q: So will you cast your ballot for Ted Stevens and are you encouraging others to do so? [...]

PALIN: I’ve never told people who I have voted for before because I see that as a very precious freedom in our country. Free and fair and uh – elections allow us to cast a secret ballot behind the voting booth curtain so that’s the way I’m going to keep it.

Watch it:

When First Read e-mailed Bounds to inform him that Palin will indeed be voting in Alaska, Bounds replied: “She called for him to step down in an interview this morning. I think I’m safe.”

Yglesias

Obama: Gimme Money

I’m not sure if it’s the audacity of hope, but it certainly takes some kind of audacity to follow up a seven-network 30 minute prime time ad buy with a fundraising email pleading poverty:

Our spending plans have been stretched by John McCain’s negative attacks and the overwhelming resources of the Republican National Committee.

As of October 15th, John McCain and the RNC together had nearly $20 million more in cash than the combined total of Obama for America and the DNC. And just this week, we’re facing new and unexpected spending against us in Montana and West Virginia.

There’s some impressive illogic in that last sentence. McCain being forced to play defense in Montana and West Virgina is spun as an unexpected problem for the poor, cash-strapped Obama campaign. It’s clever.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up