ThinkProgress Logo

Climate Progress

64% of GOP voters say Palin is their top choice for 2012, 69% say Palin helped McCain

No, this isn’t another story from The Onion. It is the finding of a serious new poll by Rassmussen Reports, one of the country’s top pollsters, who was exceedingly accurate in this election. So, as I wrote two weeks ago, we may yet see Palin In 2012: Backed by Big Oil.

Ninety-one percent (91%) of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, including 65% who say their view is Very Favorable. Only eight percent (8%) have an unfavorable view of her, including three percent (3%) Very Unfavorable.

When asked to choose among some of the GOP’s top names for their choice for the party’s 2012 presidential nominee, 64% say Palin. The next closest contenders are two former governors and unsuccessful challengers for the presidential nomination this year — Mike Huckabee of Arkansas with 12% support and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts with 11%.

Three other sitting governors — Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Charlie Crist of Florida and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota — all pull low single-digit support.

Hard to believe GOP voters could be so out of touch with reality. Then again, maybe it isn’t that hard to believe. They voted for Bush — twice! — after all. And only 42% of Republicans believe “the effects of global warming have already begun” (see “The Deniers are winning, but only with the GOP“).

Here’s more amazing news from Rasmussen:

Read more

Politics

Palin on the media: ‘There have been some stinkers.’

Sarah Palin stopped tonight to answer a few questions from the Alaskan press in an attempt to dispel some of the recent damaging media reports about her involvement in the McCain campaign. “I know that I know that I know that there was nothing done wrong in the campaign,” she said. Palin complained that the other 49 states “aren’t quite there” like Alaska because they don’t allow the same “equal opportunities and equal treatment.” She then argued that, while has been some “fairness and objectivity” by some in the media, “there have been some stinkers.” Watch Keith Olbermann’s report:

Defending the purchase of her fancy, expensive clothes during the campaign, she claimed, “I never asked for anything more than maybe a Diet Dr. Pepper once in a while.”

Climate Progress

Boeing: Jet biofuel in three years

green-airplane.jpgWired reports:

Darrin Morgan, who oversees strategy development and execution for Boeing’s Sustainable Biofuels Program, told Wired.com that the company expects a bio-fuel blend jet fuel to be certified sometime within the next three years, at which point it would be cleared for use in commercial jets.

Morgan says that while algae holds great promise, it is a family of fuels called synthetic paraffinic kerosene, which includes those distilled from the oils of Helianthus (sunflowers) and jatropha, that are closest to becoming certified. “We think it’s going to happen in three to five years,” Morgan says of the certification process. “Faster than most people thought.”

That is substantially faster than many had been saying. Jatropha oil is certainly among the hottest forms of next generation biofuels being explored. It doesn’t need to compete with food crops since it can be grown in the harsh climates with little water.

Read more

Politics

Poll: 64 percent of Republicans want Palin to run for president in 2012.

In a new Rasmussen poll out today, Republicans overwhelmingly say that they want Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as their presidential nominee in 2012. Sixty-four percent of GOP respondents said that Palin would be their top choice in 2012:

When asked to choose among some of the GOP’s top names for their choice for the party’s 2012 presidential nominee, 64% say Palin. The next closest contenders are two former governors and unsuccessful challengers for the presidential nomination this year — Mike Huckabee of Arkansas with 12% support and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts with 11%.

Three other sitting governors – Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Charlie Crist of Florida and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota – all pull low single-digit support.

In the same poll, 69 percent of Republicans said that Palin “helped John McCain’s bid for the presidency,” even though exit polls found that 60 percent of voters felt that she was “not qualified to be president if necessary.” (HT: John McCormack)

Yglesias

Center for Switzerland Progress

FYI — I’m right now at JFK airport about to depart for a week-long trip to Switzerland courtesy of the Swiss-America Foundation during which time I’ll be learning important things about the Switzerland, the Swiss-American relationship, and of course how to implement European-style socialism here in the USA.

The trip will last about a week. Blogging will continue apace, but due to various commitments and time zone issues may end up off the usual schedule.

Politics

Focus on the Family compares Obama victory to Nazi bombing.

minnery.gif Yesterday evening, James Dobson’s Focus on the Family Action sent out a fundraising e-mail lamenting the victory of Barack Obama. (Dobson had personally endorsed the McCain-Palin ticket.) The author of the e-mail, Focus on the Family Action senior vice president Tom Minnery, told his readers not to despair, saying that the right wing would overcome this situation just as Britons overcame Hitler’s bombing in World War II:

The spirit of Winston Churchill was alive and well on Tuesday night at Focus on the Family Action headquarters.

You may recall that in the most desperate days of World War II – when Great Britain was being pounded daily by Hitler’s Luftwaffe – that Winston Churchill called on his countrymen not to despair from danger but to rise to the challenge. [...]

As our incredible team of staff members watched the election results pour in on Election Night, an amazing thing happened that Churchill might have recognized. Despite some sobering disappointments, there was no mood of despair and no “bunker mentality.”

(HT: C&L)

Update

Ben Smith points out that, on the Corner, John Derbyshire compares Obama’s Americorps program to Nazi concentration camps and medieval forced labor.

Yglesias

Snot and Centrists

ap_rahm_081104_mn.jpg

Megan McArdle says:

I’ve heard two superficially plausible and, I think, completely contradictory narratives of what the Rahm Emmanuel appointment means. One: that Barack Obama is taking his administration in a more pragmatic, less ideological direction. Two: that Barack Obama is looking for a hatchet man to beat the snot out of the Republicans. Which is true? I’m not enough of an insider to even hazard a guess. But it’s interesting how the same piece of information can plausibly tell two utterly different stories.

I don’t think these are really contradictory ideas. The idea that hard-core partisanship and being a hard-core ideologue go together is a mistake. Big liberals are often relatively un-partisan because they have all kinds of gripes with various Democrats along with their gripes with Republicans. By contrast, someone dedicated to partisanship uber alles is going, by definition, to need a lot of ideological flexibility.

Meanwhile, from where I sit it’s hard to read these tea leaves. Emanuel has extensive high-level experience as a White House staffer and as a congressional leader and has a personal relationship with Obama. Those are, generically, good qualifications for a chief of staff. If there were three people with that kind of background all with different ideological leanings, then the choice of person could be seen as having great ideological significance. But that’s not the situation.

Politics

Army counselor sends out recruiting e-mail promising Obama will ‘get us out of Iraq.’

Within 24 hours of Barack Obama’s election, an Army career counselor sent out a recruiting e-mail promising that the new president would “get us out of Iraq,” reports VetVoice’s Brandon Friedman. “What are you waiting for?” the e-mail asks, arguing the election of Obama makes now the perfect time to join up:

army-recruiting.gif

Though it’s not clear whether this recruiter is acting alone, it signals that President Obama might be used as a new, forceful recruiting tool. “If so, this would symbolize a stunning — if not totally rational — renunciation of the Bush administration and its handling of the military,” Friedman writes. “If this becomes an Army policy, it represents a true ‘ding-dong the witch is dead’ moment for the service.”

Media

Nobody Knows

What Spencer said. I really wish people would not do all this fake reporting on who’s going to get which jobs. Most of the time, there’s not even an answer to uncover. Nobody knows who’s going to be Secretary of Education because nobody picked a Secretary of Education! Meanwhile, when the decisions are made they’re announced — it’s not like unearthing a secret network of off-the-books prisons, you’re not genuinely contributing to the stock of knowledge.

Of course speculation is fun. And people should have fun. But they ought to just label their speculations as that — speculations — based on information about who has ties to whom and who might serve which goals, but not on actual information about anyone’s thinking.

Health

Stimulus Watch: Increasing Medicaid Reimbursement Percentages

New Labor Department data indicate that U.S. companies cut 240,000 jobs in October, bringing the nation’s unemployment rate to 6.5 percent, the highest since March 1994:

Since August, the economy has lost 651,000 jobs — more than three times as many were lost from May to July. So far, 1.2 million jobs have been lost this year.

“The latest signs of distress seemed certain to inject more urgency into the debate over another round of government stimulus to spur spending,” the New York Times reports. “Democratic leaders in the House suggested this week that they might seek swift passage of $60 billion worth of measures that would extend unemployment benefits and food stamps, while aiding states whose tax revenues have plummeted.”

The point is this: a 1 percent increase in unemployment results in 1 million more people enrolling in Medicaid and SCHIP and another 1.1 million more people becoming uninsured. If the downturn economy requires government assistance, then helping states afford Medicaid sounds like a good place to start.

Brian Rosman is suggesting that the stimulus bill should also include an increase in the percentage the federal government reimburses states for Medicaid expenditures. As Rosman explains, “it’s based on a sliding scale, with the richer states, like Massachusetts, getting the minimum reimbursement, 50%… States like West Virgina and and Mississippi get around 75 cents back.”

Easing the pressure on state budgets to prevent states from cutting back Medicaid eligibility rules makes sense in the context of a souring economy and massive job losses. In fact, state governments and average Americans are both struggling to to keep up with increasing health care costs. Currently, at least 27 states are facing budget gaps and some have already slashed safety-net programs (Medicaid consumes an average 17 percent of state budgets).

Simultaneously “about 80 percent of Americans say they fear the ongoing global financial meltdown might affect their ability to pay their medical bills” and 47 percent of the public “reports someone in their family skipping pills, postponing or cutting back on medical care that they needed in the past year due to the cost of care.”

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up