ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Axelrod hits back at Andy Card: ‘We have to roll up our sleeves and clean up the mess.’

ap0811240193767.jpg In recent days, several of President Bush’s closest advisers have been attacking President Obama. Vice Preisdent Cheney, for example, said that there was “a high probability” of a WMD attack if Bush’s policies were reversed, and former chief of staff Andy Card said that Obama has turned the White House into a “locker room” because he isn’t requiring staff to wear jackets at all times. Axelrod sharply responds to the “tasteless” criticisms in a new interview with the Washington Post:

I was disappointed in the Vice President’s comments, not because he said–stated the obvious which is that there are threats that are grave, but that he suggested that somehow the President’s decisions on torture in Guantanamo would increase the likelihood of that. [...]

You know, the last thing that I think we’re looking for at this juncture is advice on fiscal integrity or ethics from Karl Rove, anyone who’s read the newspapers for the last eight years would laugh at that.

So, I appreciate that President Bush has been so classy during this period, and I’m disappointed that some of the folks who worked for him didn’t–don’t share that. [...]

I mentioned Andy Card saying that we were somehow denigrating the Presidency because people were wearing short sleeves in the Oval Office. We’re wearing short sleeves because we have to roll up our sleeves and clean up the mess that we inherited.

Politics

Will Bush join Facebook and Twitter?

Former White House chief of staff Andy Card said today that President Bush may jump into social networking, as he is “very technologically connected to the world.” When Politico asked if Bush would join Facebook and Twitter, Card left the door open, saying, “I don’t know that he’ll invite me to be his friend on Facebook.” Watch it:

A good start for Bush would be to figure out how to use “the Google” first.

Politics

Openly gay, African-American comedian Wanda Sykes to headline White House Correspondents dinner.

207139949.jpgYeas & Nays reports that comedian Wanda Sykes “will headline the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner this spring.” Sykes, who is well known for her roles on Curb Your Enthusiasm and The New Adventures Of Old Christine, came out of the closet last year in protest of California’s anti-gay marriage measure, Proposition 8. In September, Sykes mocked Alaska Governor Sarah Palin‘s foreign policy experience, saying “maybe I should be Secretary of State” because Palin had “just got a passport last year.”

Climate Progress

So much for geoengineering, Part 1: Avoiding the Frankenplanet

[I think that as a climate-saving strategy geoengineering is largely somewhere between a dead end and a hoax -- why would you choose chemotherapy that might make you sicker if your doctors told you diet and exercise would definitely work (see "Geoengineering remains a bad idea")? In retrospect, that analogy isn't perfect. The "diet and exercise" the country and the world needs is more like what the winner of the reality show "The Biggest Loser" undergoes. And the chemotherapy is actually more like an experimental trial for a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, where you have no idea at all if the treatment will work, as opposed to kill you outright, and you might be on the placebo. I have been planning to do a longer series on geoengineering, and Bill Becker's post seemed like a good place to start.]

bios2.jpg

I do not plan to make a career out of beating up on geo-engineers, but they were back in the news recently in articles published by the on-line magazine Yale Environment 360 and by The Economist.

For those of us who believe that engineering the Earth’s life-support systems is a wild and dangerous fantasy, there was good news and bad news.

The “good news” was reported by The Economist: Two new studies conclude that geo-engineering is not as promising an answer to climate change as some in that budding discipline hope.

If you are not yet familiar with geo-engineering, I will attempt to define it in non-technical terms before offering a few observations on the new research:

Read more

Politics

Conservatives Deny Reality, Claim Increasingly Popular Recovery Plan Is Losing Support

In his Wall Street Journal column today, former Bush adviser Karl Rove claims that House Republicans “are playing their hand extraordinarily well.” “House Republicans have used the stimulus bill to redefine their party, present ideas on how to revive the economy, and force congressional Democrats and the president to take ownership of the spending programs soon to be signed into law,” writes Rove.

As proof of their success, Rove claimed that “support for the stimulus is failing“:

The payoff is that support for the stimulus bill is falling. CBS News polling reveals a 12-point drop in support of the bill over the past month. Pew Research and Rasmussen have turned in similar numbers. The more Americans learn about the bill, the less they like it.

On Fox News this afternoon, Deputy Managing Editor Bill Sammon pushed the same message, saying that “public support has gradually declined as more and more details of this stimulus bill have come to light.” Later, during an interview with Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine, Fox’s Trace Gallagher said the American people “support what the president is doing,” but “they don’t support this plan.” Watch it:

Though pollsters found “a modest decline” in support last week, the popularity of a recovery package has risen this week.

For instance, a Gallup poll released Monday found that 67 percent of Americans approve of Obama’s push for an economic recovery package. Another Gallup poll out today finds that support for an $800 billion recovery plan has increased from 52 percent to 59 percent:

gallupstim.gif

It’s also ironic that Rove cites Rasmussen today, considering that hours after his column was published, Rasmussen released a new poll showing that Obama has “boosted support for the economic recovery plan working its way through Congress.” According to Rasmussen, 44 percent of U.S. voters now support the plan, compared to 37 percent last week.

Economy

Greenspan: I Was ‘Mystified’ By The Subprime Mortgage Market

alangreenspan.jpgIn October, as the true extent of the financial crisis was being realized everywhere, former Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan admitted that the crisis was “broader than anything I could have imagined.” And the Greenspan confession tour is evidently not over.

In a forthcoming CNBC documentary, Greenspan reportedly admits that he was “mystified” by the subprime mortgage market. As DealBook reported:

Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, told CNBC in a documentary to be shown Thursday night that he did not fully understand the scope of the subprime mortgage market until well into 2005 and could not make sense of the complex derivative products created out of mortgages.

“So everybody in retrospect now knows that that boom was developing under the markets for quite a period of time, but nobody knew it,” Mr. Greenspan told CNBC’s David Faber. “In 2004, there was just no credible information on that. It wasn’t until we got well into 2005 that the first inklings that that was developing was emerging.

In 2001, subprime mortgages accounted for 5 percent of mortgage originations, totaling $173.3 billion dollars. By 2005, that had grown to 20 percent, totaling $600 billion.

Politics

Is The GOP’s Future Still ‘Cao’? Or Is It Now Rush Limbaugh?

cao3221.jpgIn 2008, Anh “Joseph” Cao became the only non-Hispanic minority in the GOP. With the party struggling to shed its all-white image, the Republican leadership quickly embraced the first Vietnamese member of Congress. In a memo called “The Time Is Cao,” House Minority Leader John Boehner told his colleagues that Cao is the “future” of the GOP:

“The Future is Cao” reads the subject line of Boehner’s memo. “As House Republicans look ahead to the next two years, the Cao victory is a symbol of what can be achieved when we think big, present a positive alternative, and work aggressively to earn the trust of the American people,” offers Boehner.

But today, Cao said that he will defy his GOP colleagues, who unanimously opposed the House recovery package, and will support the final stimulus bill:

“Even though it is going to be a humongous bill, even though we will be in debt for years, I believe that more likely than not, I will vote for it because the 2nd Congressional District needs a stimulus package.” … “A lot of the provisions in the bill will be good for the district, because we need almost everything,” he said. “You name it, we need it.”

Cao added: “I’m voting along what my conscience dictates and the needs of the 2nd Congressional District dictate, even if I were to be the only member of the GOP to vote for the stimulus package.”

Throughout the debate over the recovery package, it has become painfully clear that Rush Limbaugh, who wants Obama to “fail,” is the new “unofficial leader” of the GOP — as his “prominence and political import” has skyrocketed in recent weeks. In fact, House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) said he is happy to be a hard-right party, saying, “What transpired…and will give us a shot in the arm going forward is that we are standing up on principle and just saying no.” “We’re beginning to find our voice,” said Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI).

So is the “future” of the GOP still Cao? Is the “time” still Cao? Will the GOP follow his lead or continue to take its marching orders from Rush Limbaugh?

Media

A Joe The Plumber for the Left?

A colleague suggests: “This guy should come advise House Democrats on economic policy: We need a Joe the Plumber.”

s_olbermann_julio_large.jpg

My sense is that thanks to our superior mastery of new media we can just rely on bloggers instead.

Health

How Betsy McCaughey And Big Pharma Can Kill You

betsy2.jpgBetsy McCaughey’s manufactured controversy about the so-called “secret provisions” in the stimulus bill shows no signs of slowing down. Its power rests in its emotional appeal. The effort exploits familiar conservative narratives — the government will have its hand in your cookie jar — to scare Americans into spending more on health care and prevent health reform efforts.

As James Fallows suggests, “let’s stop this before it goes any further.” Already, 25 million insured Americans can’t afford our skyrocketing medical costs. Yet we waste approximately one-third of our health care dollars — as much as $700 billion — on duplicated care, unnecessary care, and treatments that just don’t work.

To lower the costs of health care, to make insurance more affordable, and to lay the foundation for a more sustainable system, both Democrats and Republicans have supported the idea of establishing federal standards for electronic medical records and investing federal dollars in sensible medical research.

The idea is this: just like the government established standards for the cell phone industry and then allowed private companies to build on a single network, setting privacy guidelines for electronic health records would establish a framework for vendors to develop a system for securely sharing electronic records and medical data. A Verizon Wireless customer can connect to a T-Mobile cell phone and a primary care physician should be able to transfer medical records and data to a specialist.

Similarly, a serious approach to comparative effectiveness “could not only educate other providers on how to improve, but also inform policymakers on how to design policy that promotes these best practices,” Newt Gingrich explains in a Washington Times editorial. Ultimately, this “fight is over the very concept of evidence-based medicine“:

Health care, we know, is too expensive, and it’s too expensive in part because we pay for lots of treatments that don’t work. But every dollar of medical waste if also a dollar of manufacturer profit. And they — and their allies on the Right — will work very hard to keep those dollars.

Indeed, Big Pharma — which, incidentally, bankrolls Betsy McCaughey’s Hudson Institute — currently instructs doctors on the effectiveness of medications, and opposes research that could persuade physicians to eschew ineffective or unnecessary treatments. Fewer prescriptions translate into lower profits and the industry has lobbied hard to pare down the cost effectiveness language in the House version of the stimulus bill.

The industry has also funded the Partnership to Improve Patient Care, a lobbying group that seeks to “give industry a seat at the table when federal officials decide what to research with the $1.1 billion.”

Ironically, in the interest of protecting their bottom lines, pharmaceutical companies, which so often manufactures life-saving drugs, are undermining research that could save or improve the lives of millions of Americans.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up