ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Palin: The less money Alaska has, the better.

During a recent interview with Fox News’s Sean Hannity, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) once again criticized President Obama for “spreading the wealth” while at the same time boasting that Alaska spreads its own wealth. “We have a share of our oil resource revenue goes back to the people who own the resources. Imagine that,” she said. But somewhat shockingly, later in the interview (and in a part that did not air on Hannity’s program last night) Palin actually said that she would rather have Alaska pull in less money in oil revenues that more:

HANNITY: The price of oil is going up again. It’s not quite at $140 a barrel, but it’s certainly on its way up to $70 and $80.

PALIN: Yeah, well and I thank God it’s not at $140. You know people say, “Hey, Alaska! Eight-five percent of your state budget is based on the price of a barrel of oil. Aren’t you glad the price is going up?” I say, “No!” The fewer dollars that the state of Alaska government has, the fewer dollars we spend. And that’s good for our families and for the private sector.

Watch it:

The Mudflats writes, “The less we have, the less we spend? And here we all were worried about the economy. So exactly how much of the 85% of our state budget does she wish will go away? Inquiring Alaskan minds want to know. Welcome to the 2012 election.”

Politics

Fox News hires Steve Doocy’s son as ‘a general assignment reporter.’

doocy123Last year, Peter Doocy, the son of Fox and Friends co-host Steve Doocy, grabbed his 15 minutes of fame when asked Sen. John McCain on MSNBC’s Hardball if then-Sen. Hillary Clinton was “hitting the sauce.” The young Doocy followed it up with an appearance on Fox and Friends and “reporting” at the Democratic National Convention that included twittering with the Denver Broncos cheerleaders. Now, TVNewser reports that Doocy has been hired as “a general assignment reporter” for Fox News. Doocy previously filed reports for the Fox News-affiliated student website Palestra and served as an intern on his father’s show in 2004.

Politics

Will O’Reilly whine about FNC ignoring today’s presser with survivor of recruiting station attack?

In recent days, Fox’s Bill O’Reilly has criticized the “liberal media” and CNN for what he viewed as a paucity of coverage of the deadly attack on the Army-Navy recruiting station in Little Rock, AR last week. “Only Anderson Cooper at 10 o’clock covered the story,” O’Reilly said of CNN. (In fact, CNN had reported on the attack over a dozen times.) Despite O’Reilly’s insistence that Fox News has been following the attack story more closely than its competitors, when the lone survivor of the attack, Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula, spoke with reporters earlier today, only CNN and MSNBC carried the press conference live. Fox News never cut to the press conference, choosing instead to focus on Newt Gingrich’s criticisms of the Obama administration from last night’s congressional Republican fundraiser:

terrorism_coverage

So the question is, will O’Reilly complain about his network’s failure to cover today’s presser? Or is Fox News above such complaints because its not part of the “liberal media”?

Climate Progress

The triumph of energy efficiency: Waxman-Markey could save $3,900 per household and create 650,000 jobs by 2030

The energy efficiency provisions in the House energy and climate bill (H.R. 2454) could save $750 per household by 2020 and $3,900 per household by 2030, according to an analysis by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE).   An ACEEE news release notes that not only will efficiency reduce the costs to consumers and businesses of cutting carbon pollution:

ACEEE estimates that approximately 250,000 jobs will be created by the energy efficiency provisions in H.R. 2454 by 2020, with a total of 650,000 jobs generated by 2030.

The bill’s authors clearly understood that Energy efficiency is THE core climate solution – the biggest and lowest cost carbon-free resource by far.

The ACEEE agrees with CP and major environmental groups that a key improvement for progressives to pursue would be to “require utilities to reduce electricity demand by 10 percent by 2020″ (as opposed to the 5% to 8% the bill allows), which would result in an extra $50 billion in cumulative consumer savings by 2030“”savings that Waxman-Markey is leaving on the table.

The bill has a remarkable number of energy-saving provisions [click to enlarge].

Here is ACEEE’s discussion of the key efficiency provisions of the bill (and go to their original analysis for a detailed spreadsheet of the electricity, natural gas, and CO2 savings of each provision):

Read more

Yglesias

Endgame

Hoping the Magic can make this a real series:

— Streetsblog launches a DC edition focused on national policy.

— Blue Dogs backing away from “trigger” mechanism for public plan.

— Is Gordon Brown secretly doing a good job of handling the UK recession?

— Will home prices keep on falling?

— I think Social Democrats’ problem in Europe is mainly that the European center-right is too sensible on economics; Republicans are easier to beat.

— Mel Martinez tries to push back on conservative racial freakout.

Last, check out Peter Suderman fighting against the twitification of the right.

Health

HELP Releases ‘Affordable Health Choices Act’

kennedybillToday, the House, Pensions, and Labor Committee (HELP) officially released the “Affordable Health Choices Act,” the committee’s health care reform legislation.

[Read the 600+ page bill HERE or a summary HERE]

In a press release touting the proposal, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) described the bill as “legislation that will strengthen what works and fix what doesn’t”:

If you like the insurance you have today, you can keep it. If you don’t like what you have today, we’ll give you better choices, including a public option for health care. This does not symbolize the end of the game or even the end of the first quarter. We still have a lot of work ahead of us and are looking forward to working with our colleagues on a bipartisan basis to resolve the remaining issues and move forward with a mark-up of this legislation next week

The bill, which does not include financing options, closely reflects the ‘draft of a draft‘ proposal circulated last week and a summary released earlier today. The legislation aims to improve access to coverage by regulating insurers — they would no longer be able to deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions — expanding Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and building state-sponsored insurance Gateways (or exchanges) to help Americans find affordable coverage. [Read an analysis of the bill HERE]

The most controversial details of health reform — the employer mandate and the structure of a new public option — have yet to be ironed out, however. According to the press release, “Democrats and Republics on the Committee will meet to discuss outstanding legislative options such as the public option and employer mandate” on Wednesday, June 10 and Thursday, June 11.” The ext of the available legislation leaves the public option and employer-mandate sections blank:

helpbilllang2

A public hearing is scheduled for Thursday, June 11 at 3 p.m. in Dirksen 430. Mark-up will begin Tuesday, June 16 at 2:30 p.m. in Russell 325.

Politics

Lieberman-Graham torture photo ban will be added to ‘every piece of legislation that comes down the pike.’

Yesterday, Jane Hamsher reported that the detainee photo amendment sponsored by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was stripped from the war supplemental in committee. The amendment would have allowed the Obama administration to suppress any “photograph taken between September 11, 2001 and January 22, 2009 relating to the treatment of individuals engaged, captured, or detained” after 9/11 by U.S. forces. This afternoon, Graham and Lieberman held a press conference to register their objections to dropping the measure and announce that they had “added our original legislation as an amendment to the FDA regulation of tobacco bill that’s on the floor right now”:

LIEBERMAN: [W]e’re going to vote against cloture on the bill, and I’m going to do everything I can to see if I can convince other Democrats to do that.

We’re just not going to roll over because some folks in the House don’t like this amendment. [W]e’re going to do everything we can to hold up the supplemental appropriations bill until we’re sure that this amendment prohibiting the release of these dangerous photographs is on that bill. And then we’ll continue to do everything we can to attach it to other legislation, to slow up the process.

Graham said the amendment was needed because “These photos, if they’re released, will be used by the enemy to incite violence as they walk down these streets.” A “senior Democratic aide” told the Weekly Standard that the two senators would “attach [the amendment] to every piece of legislation that comes down the pike.”

Yglesias

Rahm and the Israelis

rahmemanuel

Very interesting Newsweek article on Rahm Emannuel’s role in Barack Obama’s push for Middle East peace:

Emanuel’s status as a near-native son gave some Israelis and Jews the impression he would be their guy on the Obama team—the pro-Israeli with the receptive ear. He had those golden Zionist credentials, after all: His father, Benjamin, had been a member of the Irgun, the right-wing Jewish militia that existed before Israeli independence. His Uncle Emanuel had been killed in a skirmish with Arabs back in the ’30s, prompting the family to change its name from Auerbach to honor him. But some in the Jewish community have been disappointed. Even his own rabbi, Asher Lopatin, has doubts about his absent congregant. “There is a lot of disappointment,” says Lopatin, who presides over the Modern Orthodox Anshe Sholom B’nai Israel Congregation in Chicago. “In some ways there was a heightened expectation because Rahm is so connected to Israel and the Jewish community. Instead what we’ve seen is more of the tough Rahm Emanuel. Not the warm Rahm.

There’s also this warning of dire political consequences:

All that will present political problems for Obama at home as well—with Emanuel playing his familiar role of fireman for his boss. Rep. Eric Cantor, the only Republican Jewish member of Congress, says the Obama administration is taking a position “that’s vastly different from the mainstream American Jewish community” in trying to engage with Iran. “The pro-Israel community has consistently been for keeping sanctions pressure on the terrorist regime in Iran … The administration has indicated in all ways I can tell that we ought not to be pursuing sanctions while talks go on.” (Administration officials deny they intend to let up on sanctions if talks go forward.)

I think the fact that Cantor is “the only Republican Jewish member of Congress” should tell you must of what you need to know about what mainstream American Jewish opinion is.

Health

Paul Ryan Wants Large Insurers And Hospital System To Continue Setting Health Prices

paulryanhandsThis afternoon, in response to my question about the public option on POLITICO’s The Arena, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) closed the door to compromising on the public health option:

12:18
[Comment From Igor Volsky]
Rep. Ryan — are you open to considering any kind of compromise on the public health care plan? Would you be open to modeling the open on state-based employee plans? And why can’t we design a level playing field but also allow the new public option to use its inherent advantages to get better rates? Isn’t that what WalMart does today?

12:20
Paul Ryan:  I am not open to creating any policy architecture which puts the gov’t in the position of competing with the private sector. The deck will always be stacked, and can never be ‘fair’ competition. If the goal is a truly level playing field, than it should be done through the non-profit sector, not the government.

Ryan supports competition with a non-profit because such an entity would not be able to use Medicare rates or Medicare’s leverage to secure lower prices. Currently, “insurer and hospital markets are increasingly dominated by large insurers and provider systems.” Private insurers rarely negotiate with dominant hospital systems and typically pass on the higher costs to beneficiaries in the form of higher premiums. In fact, non-profit insurers (like the Blue Crosses) and non-profit hospitals have done little to lower health care spending.

A public health care plan would do something a non-profit cannot: use Medicare’s leverage and Medicare-like prices to negotiate lower prices and — through the miracle of head-to-head competition with private plans — push insurance companies to negotiate more aggressively with providers and dramatically lower health care spending.

It’s the same way WalMart or Home Depot operate — negotiating lower rates with suppliers and passing on lower prices to customers — but Ryan is content with preserving a non-competitive health market that props up inefficient systems and providers. He prefers allowing large hospitals and insurance companies to continue setting prices.

Politics

Steele points to the ‘one young black woman’ in College Republicans crowd: ‘This is my reality.’

At the College Republican annual conference last weekend, RNC Chairman Michael Steele confronted the issue of race and the Republican Party. Lamenting the problem that “a lot of these people don’t have the technology of Internet or television,” one attendee asked Steele, “With you being chairman of the party, what are your strategies for reaching out to African American and inner-city communities?” Steele first responded by sarcastically brushing off the notion of reaching out to African Americans, before pointing to the sole African American attendee to single her out for “special recognition“:

STEELE: What? To reach out to black people? I ain’t doing anything. Black people don’t vote for Republicans, why would I bother with them? […] I’m just messing with you. That is the point I wanted you to get to. Stop it, I know what you meant. But I wanted to illustrate a point. And unfortunately you were at the wrong end of that point. But this is my reality. I look in this room and I see one young black woman here.

ThinkProgress attended the conference and recorded audio of Steele’s speech. Listen here:

Later in the speech, Steele cautioned the GOP students that they should be prepared to hear “vacuous” responses when they first speak to African Americans about President Obama.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up