ThinkProgress Logo

Yglesias

Disrespecting the Base

abortion 2

The fringe crazies at the tea party got a lot of attention. But one of the most noteworthy things about the protest was the heavy representation of anti-abortion activists who don’t like Obama’s health plan because it will offer federal subsidies for abortion. That’s not my view, but obviously there’s a substantial minority of Americans who want to see abortion banned so it’s natural that there would be opposition to this subsidized abortion scheme. Except for the fact that the health reform plans in congress wouldn’t actually do this. The anti-abortion side, in other words, already won this argument. Except nobody told them.

Tactically, that makes sense. The anti-abortion movement is one of the largest and most robust social movements in the United States. If you want to beat something, enlisting that movement’s passion and organization will be very helpful. So the leaders of the conservative movement are happy to willfully deceive their followers on this point, the better to mobilize them. It’s smart, but it’s ugly and it’s extremely disrespectful. It’s also, in strict anti-abortion terms, incredibly counterproductive. The anti-abortion side won this debate because many Democrats wanted to do health reform without feeling their wrath. But if the wrath continues even when you do what they want, then there’s very little incentive to make concessions in the future. Which only furthers one sense that the conservative elite sees the anti-abortion movement as something to be cynically manipulated rather than a cause to be advanced.

Politics

Hutchison Claims That Only A ‘Few’ Of Obama’s So-Called ‘Czars’ Have ‘Formal Titles’

ap090827032682 On July 30, the Washington Post gave House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) space to write an op-ed railing on President Obama’s “virtual army of ‘czars.’” Today, the Washington Post allowed Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison to write a similar op-ed complaining that these czars set “a dangerous precedent that undermines the Constitution’s guarantee of separated powers.” Hutchison tries to make these officials seem shady and mysterious by noting that many of them don’t even have “formal titles”:

Nearly 250 years later, these critical lines of separation are being obscured by a new class of federal officials. A few of them have formal titles, but most are simply known as “czars.” They hold unknown levels of power over broad swaths of policy. Under the Obama administration, we have an unprecedented 32 czar posts (a few of which it has yet to fill), including a “car czar,” a “pay czar” and an “information czar.” There are also czars assigned to some of the broadest and most consequential topics in policy, including health care, terrorism, economics and key geographic regions.

In fact, ALL of these officials have formal titles. For example, Hutchison cites Van Jones, the “green jobs czar.” But Jones had the title of Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise, and Innovation at the Council on Environmental Quality. The only person Obama has referred to as a czar is “drug czar” Gil Kerlikowske, whose official title is Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. (Additionally, “drug czar” was a term that existed long before the Obama administration.)

Hutchison’s lie mirrors a claim by Fox News’ Sean Hannity, who recently said that the only reason he calls these appointees “czars” is “because the White House itself does.” Of course, it’s the media — not the White House — that is driving the term.

Hutchison does not list the 32 individuals whom she considers to be “czars.” But if she’s relying on the same list as Cantor — who also cited 32 people — then several of them are far from unaccountable; they’ve actually already been confirmed by the Senate.

Yglesias

The Meaning of 9/12

Matt Welch offers a report on yesterday’s tea party that I’d say bends over to avoid discussing the ugly sentiments and crackpottery that the event was suffused with. What I really wonder about, though, is Welch’s assertion that “the meta-fact about a huge anti-Obamanomics protest eight months into his term is certainly significant.” What, I wonder, is significant about it?

There are about 300 million people in the United States of America of whom about 130 million voted last November. Of them, 60 million voted for John McCain, handing Barack Obama a solid though not overwhelming victory. Some of those people actually liked Obama, but just liked McCain more (both men had approval ratings over 50 percent on election day). But the median McCain voter really disliked Obama from the beginning. And some people disliked Obama even more than that median McCain voter. Indeed, about 60,000 people should have hated Obama three standard deviations more than the typical McCain voter. And apparently 30,000 people is a “generous” estimate of the tea party turnout.

To get 30,000 people to turn out to protest Obamanomics is a pretty impressive logistical/organizing achievement. But what does it really tell us? Nobody ran headlines the day after election day saying “MILLIONS OF AMERICANS REALLY DISLIKE BARACK OBAMA” but it was true then and it’s still true today. But what’s the significance of this fact? I recall some non-tiny anti-war rallies all across the country in the fall of 2001. But it’s a big country, and every statistically valid survey indicates that at that time both George W. Bush and the invasion of Afghanistan were hugely popular. If you want to know how people feel about Barack Obama, you can find out that a slight majority approve of the job he’s doing. But on the specific issue of the economy, he’s in slight negative territory.

Politics

Pawlenty called out on false claim that large numbers of undocumented immigrants are using public services.

Today on ABC’s This Week, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R) defended Rep. Joe “You Lie!” Wilson’s (R-SC) concern that undocumented immigrants would be able to get federal health care benefits. Although Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius stated that President Obama and Congress have made it clear that undocumented immigrants shouldn’t “have access to the new health insurance exchange,” Pawlenty claimed that they will still will “show up” and “get the services” because no one checks their citizenship status. When Stephanopoulos called out his inaccurate claim, Pawlenty stumbled for a response:

PAWLENTY: Well, there’s a missing piece here, George. And even if you have language that says illegal immigrants will not be a part of this program — unless you have the enforcement mechanism in place, it doesn’t mean much. In Minnesota, we have laws that say illegal immigrants won’t get many services, but unless somebody actually checks, guess what, they show up and they get the services.

STEPHANOPOULOS: There’s been a study done by the House Oversight Committee that showed these Medicaid provisions, they spent about $8 million to enforce and they caught eight illegal immigrants.

PAWLENTY: Well, clearly, though, if you have a law that’s unenforced, it isn’t much of a law. So first of all, if the secretary is saying we’re going to have a provision in the bill that says illegal immigrants will not be covered, that’s progress, but we also need to make sure we can back that up with proper enforcement.

Watch it:

Over at the Wonk Room, Igor Volsky has more on Pawlenty’s inaccurate claim and points out that “documentation requirements may be weeding out more eligible applicants than illegals.”

Climate Progress

Iraq Vet Condemns ‘Despicable’ Exploitation Of The ‘Good Name Of Our Veterans’ By Opponents Of Climate Action

Our guest blogger is Bryan R. Lentz (D-PA), a state representative from Pennsylvania’s 161st district and an Iraq war veteran.

Operation FreeLast week, congressional investigators uncovered a forged letter sent to the office of Rep. Tom Perriello (D-Va.), criticizing the House’s climate change bill. According to the Washington Post, this letter was forged to appear as if it had come from an American Legion post in Virginia when in fact it was drafted by a lobbyist for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity opposing clean energy legislation.

As an Iraq war veteran and a state legislator, I object to the exploitation of the good name of our veterans and one of our nations’ most distinguished veterans organizations to serve the interest of for profit special interest groups.

On Thursday, the very same day this falsified letter came to light, I joined with a real group of veterans, over 150 from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and others. As part of Operation Free, we came from across the country to join former Senator John Warner to call on the United States to end its dependence on dirty fossil fuels, and take action to combat the national security threat of climate change. As Senator Warner, a veteran of WWII and Korea, said:

Terrorism and insurgency are fed by famine, poverty and failing states. There is a direct link between famine, poverty and failing states and climate change.

That is why we as veterans care about the energy policy – it impacts our national security.

I traveled to DC because I believe the Senate needs act on the Waxman-Markey bill quickly, and pass serious climate change legislation this year. The dishonest tactics of special interest groups are despicable at all times. But when our nation’s security and the good name of real soldiers are put on the line in the name of greed and profiteering, it’s a whole new level of unacceptable.

Media

If Only It Had Been Crazy

I can’t believe this paragraph actually made it to publication:

Nor are Democrats strangers to having their crazy uncles take center stage. During the run-up to the Iraq war, for example, Reps. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) and David Bonior (D-Mich.) famously flew to Baghdad, where McDermott asserted that he believed the president would “mislead the American public” to justify the war. The trip made it a cakewalk for critics to describe the Democratic Party as chockablock with traitorous radicals.

Even in retrospect, going to Baghdad was a terrible PR strategy. And I’ll admit to being among those who, at the time, thought those three were crazy uncles. But guess what: I was totally wrong and the President really was misleading the American public to justify the war. Jim McDermott was totally right! Are we seriously still mocking him, seven years later, for having issued an accurate warning at a time when doing so was politically unpopular?

Politics

Tina Fey wins Emmy for her Sarah Palin impersonations.

Actress Tina Fey received an Emmy Award yesterday for her Saturday Night Live portrayals of former Alaska governor Sarah Palin. Accepting her sixth Emmy, Fey thanked her parents, “who are lifelong Republicans, for their patience.” “Mrs. Palin is an inspiration to working mothers everywhere because she bailed on her job right before Fourth of July weekend,” Fey added. “You are living my dream. Thank you, Mrs. Palin.”

Health

Olympia Snowe: Trigger Is ‘Not On The Table And It Won’t Be’ In Senate Finance Bill

Earlier this month, the White House was building support for a scaled-back health care bill that would trigger a public health insurance option if private health insurers did not substantially reduce health care costs. Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) — a member of the Senate Finance Committee and the so-called Gang-of-six tasked with producing a bipartisan health care bill — had floated the idea and was negotiating the option with the White House.

But this morning on CBS’s Face The Nation, Snowe suggested that a ‘trigger’ did not generate any bipartisan support. “It’s not on the table and it won’t be,” in the final Senate Finance Committee bill, Snowe said. “We’ll be using the co-op as an option at this point as a means for injecting competition in the process.”

Watch it:

A trigger proposal would activate a public option into the Exchange if private insurers failed to lower premiums by X% over Y years and — if triggered — may lead to greater cost reductions than Sen. Kent Conrad’s (D-ND) proposal to establish a network of consumer driven health care cooperatives.

As Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) explained this morning on ABC’s This Week, “people talk about a cooperative plan. Health co-ops. And I called the head of the national association really early, and he said, it’s great on water, it’s great on farm, it’s great on electricity, etc, but it really doesn’t work on health care. There are fewer than 20 in the country and there are only two that really work. And one of them is in Washington, the other one is in Minneapolis, Minnesota. And both of these senators from Washington are voting for a public option. So it hasn’t had a future, it goes back to the 30s and 40s, and I don’t think you can take the chance. You have to start a national thing all the way up.”

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) is expected to release the official draft of the committee’s bill on Wednesday. Most observers believe that it may be the only legislation that could pass the senate through regular procedure. On Fox News Sunday, however, Sen Orrin Hatch (R-UT) — also a member of the committee — said, “Even with all the work that I give my fellow senators credit for in the Finance Committee…I just do not believe that they’re going to have the Republican support on this type of approach.” Snowe refused to say if she would cast the lone Republican vote for the committee’s health legislation.

Yglesias

Jim DeMint’s Selective Tentherism

(cc photo by mar is sea Y)

(cc photo by mar is sea Y)

Aaron Wiener has an interesting report on Senator Jim DeMint’s curious view that the constitution prohibits Obama’s health care plan, and that this prohibition also applies to Medicare, but we should overlook that fact, presumably in the interests of political opportunism since (as depicted at right) an awful lot of socialized medicine’s biggest detractors are also its biggest fans:

Asked whether states should use the 10th Amendment to prevent health care reform from taking effect, he replied that an assertion of states’ rights was “probably the only way we’re going to stop this reckless spending.” He continued, “There’s no constitutional authority for the government to actually do [the reform proposed by Democrats], but whether the courts take it up is a different matter.”

The rules change, however, when it comes to Medicare.

DeMint expressed doubts as to the legality of Medicare under the Constitution, but said, “Regardless of constitutionality, it is a promise that we have to keep. … I think Medicare and Social Security have to be protected.”

People counting on folks who think Medicare is unconstitutional to protect their Medicare might want to think harder about the situation.

Politics

Kristol: Leave Joe Wilson alone!

Today on Fox News Sunday, Rep. Joe “You Lie!” Wilson (R-SC) said that he will not offer an apology to the House for his conduct during President Obama’s joint address to Congress. The House leadership has said that unless Wilson apologizes, they will introduce a resolution of disapproval. Later in the show today, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol issued a desperate plea for Democrats to leave Wilson — who has a “reputation for bipartisanship” — alone. He said that Pelosi will be leading the party “off the cliff” if they rebuke Wilson:

KRISTOL: Can I just say one thing? He [Obama] is leading his party off a cliff, and Speaker Pelosi is going to lead his party — her party off the cliff if they try to rebuke Joe Wilson.

He has apologized. It will be a disgrace if they do some stunt in the House to try to humiliate this man, who is, in fact — has a reputation for bipartisanship on the Armed Services Committee and the Foreign Relations Committee he’s on.

Obama and Pelosi are leading the party off a cliff, I think, and I hope a lot of Democrats say, Slow down. Let’s take a look at this bill.

Watch it:

Republican leaders, including Minority Leader John Boehner (OH), have also been pressuring Wilson to apologize to the House.

Featured

sc mom says: “Wilson’s reputation for bipartisanship on the Armed Services Committee and the Foreign Relations Committee? he voted against many veterans’ benefit bills which was a huge reason Miller ran in the first place.”

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up