ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

Flashback: Bachmann Spread Fears Of Scary Stalking Census Workers

beckbachmannBill Sparkman, the 51-year old Census worker who was hanged to death in Kentucky, was found “naked, gagged and had his hands and feet bound with duct tape.” A witness reports Sparkman also “had duct tape over his eyes, and they gagged him with a red rag or something.” The word “fed” was scrawled on his chest in a felt-tip pen, and his “Census ID was found taped to his head and shoulder area.”

The gruesome lynching of this Census worker seems to bear a disturbing similarity to some of the worst hate crimes committed across this country. Regardless of what the motive for the killing may have been, why would a murderer(s) take such pains to so blatantly convey anger, fear, and vitriol towards a Census employee? Perhaps because some on the right have created an impression that Census employees are terrifying.

Earlier this summer, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) waged a high-profile, wildly-dishonest campaign against the Census. The Minnesota congresswoman said she was so worried about the threat of the government asking “very intricate questions” and collecting information that she would illegally refuse to fill out the form. “They will be in charge of going door to door and collecting data from the American public,” she said. “This is very concerning.” She repeatedly used inflammatory and fear-mongering rhetoric against the Census:

– “I think there is a point when you say enough is enough to government intrusion.” [6/25/09]

– “If we look at American history, between 1942 and 1947, the data that was collected by the census bureau was handed over to the FBI and other organizations, at the request of President Roosevelt, and that’s how the Japanese were rounded up and put into the internment camps.” [6/25/09]

“You will receive approximately six contacts from them [Census workers], either through phone calls or they will knock on your door. If you still do not give them the information, they said they’ll contact your neighbor to the left of you, to the right of you to get information.” [6/25/09]

Bachmann’s irrational diatribes about scary stalking Census workers quickly spawned a right-wing movement. During an interview with Bachmann, Fox News’ Glenn Beck said, “Ok, so let me talk about the Census because there’s a lot of people that are concerned with it because they don’t want to fill it out, they’re not comfortable with ACORN members coming to find out all this information, they don’t want to give the government all this kind of information.”

Conservative radio host Neal Boortz told a caller, “Most of the rest of the [Census] information is designed to help the government steal from you in order to pass off your property to the moochers. They’re looters.” Boortz urged his listeners to resist the Census workers. “If somebody comes to my — if a burglar came to your house, are you going to show him where the silverware is?” he asked. “Maybe you will if he pulls out a gun.”

Update

The Washington Post reports that violence against Census workers is a growing concern:

Census takers who die on the job typically succumb to strokes, heart attacks and car accidents. But violence against field workers, while rare, is an ongoing concern.

The 2000 Census was marked by a spate of violence. In Indiana, a pack of dogs mauled a census taker to death. A California census taker was grabbed and forced into her car after a homeowner ordered her to leave and she lingered, trying to explain the importance of the Census. A Denver census taker was hijacked and stabbed, and in Chicago, a census taker was thrown down a flight of stairs.

This year, a county manager in New Mexico warned that many people take their property rights seriously, and some might shoot at census takers who trespass.

Featured

A subsequent investigation concluded the Sparkman committed suicide.

Security

County Chairman Says Deputization Of Immigration Law Hasn’t Led To A ‘Single Case’ Of Racial Profiling

At the Value Voters Summit this past weekend, Corey Stewart, chairman of the Prince William County Supervisors in Virginia, led a panel on “The Threat of Illegal Immigration.” After boasting about the success of the county’s 287(g) agreement with the Department of Homeland Security which allowed its local police to enforce immigration law, Stewart definitively argued that the controversial program has not led to “a single case of racial profiling” in Prince William County.

Stewart also defended a 287(g) champion, Arizona’s Maricopa County Police Chief Joe Arpaio, who is currently being investigated by the Department of Justice (DOJ) following “allegations of discriminatory practices and unconstitutional searches and seizures.” Stewart agrees with Arpaio that the investigation is a politically-motivated attack on the Sheriff on behalf of the Obama administration. Ultimately, Corey stated that he’d like to see all “illegal aliens” deported or leave the country:

There has not been one substantiated case of racial profiling in Prince William County due to this [287(g)] policy. I think that the Sheriff [Joe Arpaio] has been targeted by the Obama Administration. And I think it’s because he’s just doing the job of protecting the citizens of his locality and I support him in his efforts. I know what it’s like to be targeted by the liberal establishment in Washington for simply enforcing the law…I support a policy that would deport illegal aliens. Period.

Watch it:

Prince William County Police Chief Charlie T. Deane is less enthusiastic about the 287(g) program. According to Deane, resident satisfaction with the police department has decreased in response to the police department’s new role in immigration enforcement. Former Arizona Police Chief George Gascon went as far to say that the program is “setting the police profession back to the 1950s and 60s, when police officers were sometimes viewed in minority communities as the enemy.” Several reports have come out saying that 287(g) is expensive, breeds racial profiling and civil rights violations, and makes communities less safe because police end up focusing more on chasing immigrant traffic violators than fighting serious crime.

Prince William County may have not caught the attention of DOJ officials, but the claim that there is no racial profiling is dubious at best. The immigration resolution that Stewart championed was allegedly drafted with the help of a designated hate group and the community’s decision to enter the agreement itself was marked by anti-immigrant vitriol that boiled down to a strong sentiment to “repel this [immigrant] invasion.” Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) recently filed papers on behalf of four Latino men who were arrested for loitering while standing on a public sidewalk in Prince William County. According to the ACLU, “these individuals were targeted because of their ethnicity” and “the anti-immigrant policies and resultant anti-immigrant climate that currently exist in Prince William County inevitably give rise to these kinds of abuses.”

So far, the most egregious case of potential racial profiling and civil rights abuse involved Agueda Dominguez, a Salvadoran immigrant who has legally lived in the US for eleven years and has a valid driver’s license. Dominguez ended up bloodied and hospitalized after a Prince William cop pulled her over for a burned out headlight. According to Dominguez, she was attacked with pepper spray, dragged out of her car, pulled to the ground by the hair, and brutally beaten by the police officer after refusing to sign a citation that she couldn’t read. A local news station quoted Dominguez saying that she was singled out because she’s an immigrant:

There are too many of us immigrants who keep quiet about these things because we are afraid…It’s unjust how they treat us Latinos, it’s purely discrimination…It hurts a lot…you come to the United States to pursue a dream and this type of stuff happens…especially in the Hispanic community. Most people are scared and so I just decided to step up and show everybody that we can stand up and defend ourselves.

Watch it:

The resisting charge against Agueda Dominguez that was later amended to obstruction of justice was dismissed. As of July, state police were still investigating whether the policeman who pulled her over acted improperly.

Politics

Uninsured 22-Year-Old Boehner Constituent Dies From Swine Flu

hjnyoungkimberly09-_568332bA 22-year-old woman from Oxford, Ohio, died from swine flu on Wednesday. Kimberly Young graduated from Miami University in December and continued to live in Oxford, Ohio, within Minority Leader John Boehner’s congressional distrct. Reports now indicate that after initially getting sick, Young put off treatment because she was uninsured:

Young became ill about two weeks ago, but didn’t seek care initially because she didn’t have health insurance and was worried about the cost, according to Brent Mowery, her friend and former roommate. […]

On Tuesday, Sept. 22, Young’s condition suddenly worsened and her roommate drove her to McCullough Hyde Memorial Hospital in Oxford, where she was flown in critical condition to University Hospital in Cincinnati.

“That’s the most tragic part about it. If she had insurance, she would have gone to the doctor,” Mowery said.

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 30 percent of 19-24 year olds are uninsured, more than any other group. Despite the conservative argument that young people are voluntarily refusing health coverage in favor of extra spending money, the reality is that high costs on the individual market put coverage out of reach. As Suzy Khimm notes at Campus Progress, young people “are far more likely to be working part-time or lower-paying jobs for employers who don’t offer coverage”:

In its 2008 study, the Commonwealth Fund found that 66 percent of young adults aged 19 to 29 who experienced a time without coverage in the past year said they had gone without it because of the cost. [...]

Young people might have a better chance of accessing comprehensive coverage if there were a public plan, which could lower the cost of insurance, particularly for those without good employer benefits. Young people may also have a better chance at coverage if there were generous subsidies for lower-income individuals, as many take lower-paying jobs when they first enter the workforce.

Even though Boehner represents a large university, he has been an outspoken opponent of a public option that would make insurance cheaper and more accessible to recent graduates like Young. On Meet the Press last week, the Minority Leader continued to stick to the obstructionist Frank Luntz-endorsed talking points, dismissing the public option as “big government” while defending a watered-down plan.

Update

TPM writes, “Still, if Young’s lack of insurance did contribute to her not seeking treatment sooner, it would be hard to find a
starker or more compelling example of the need to fix our broken health insurance system. And the fact that she was a constituent of the man who’s leading House Republicans’ in their effort to block reform only underlines the point.”

Yglesias

Political Tribalism

One of the oddest things about being in Germany during an election campaign is that I’m pretty sure I have right-of-center views relative to German politics. The CDU believes in limiting carbon emissions and has no intention of scrapping universal health care or eliminating pensions for old people. Nor do they believe in torturing prisoners and launching unprovoked wars. Conversely, it really does seem to me that labor markets in Germany are counterproductively over-regulated.

SDC10163

But every time I hear a businessman type talk about how he doesn’t like the Social Democrats, I instinctively want to side with the SPD. All my instincts are to side with the union-backed party against the business-backed party and to immediately tune out anyone who’s complaining about “socialism” or making vague assertions that people on the left don’t understand that economic growth is important. I’m just uncomfortable with the idea of being a conservative, even in a country where the policy status quo and the issues are quite different.

At any rate, SPD leader Frank-Walter Steinmeier is hosting a rally right by my hotel very soon so maybe he’ll convince me. (More likely he’ll be speaking German which I don’t understand at all).

Yglesias

Eurolinks

Hielten zich fur Captain Kirk:

— Subsidies for fossil fuels dwarf subsidies for clean energy.

—Regulating needle exchange to death.

— The “Ayers as Obama’s Secret Ghostwriter” theory marches on.

— If I ran the zoo this “when’s the next bus coming” technology would be all over America.

— A man motorcycles on a tightrope.

Song of the day is Nena’s “99 Luftballons”—definitely my favorite tune about the total destruction of human civilization in a nuclear war.

Politics

Insurer Denies Woman’s Claim: She Should Have Known That Her Bleeding Breast Was Not An ‘Emergency’

One of the worst abuses of private insurance companies is the practice of using spurious reasons to deny claims. In April, Rosalinda Miran-Ramirez awoke and found her shirt soaked in blood. Realizing that her “her left breast [was] bleeding from the nipple,” she rushed to the emergency room.

Today, CBS-5 reports that this San Francisco Department of Public Health employee has had her claim denied because her insurance company, Blue Shield of California, didn’t consider her situation to be an “emergency.” Even though her doctor told her it was likely a tumor, Blue Shield said that Miran-Ramirez should have known it wasn’t:

But Miran-Ramirez said the real shock came when her insurance company, Blue Shield of California HMO, which had initially approved the claim for the emergency room visit, reversed course and sent her a new bill three months later requiring her to pay the total charges for that visit: $2,791.00.

Why? Documents from Blue Shield indicate the company had reviewed the case and determined Miran-Ramirez “reasonably should have known that an emergency did not exist.”

“I am like how can they say that it was not an emergency? Like, my breast was bleeding! I am not a clinical person but if your breast is bleeding, for me that’s an emergency,” she said. [...]

So she appealed. And she was denied again. This time Blue Shield told her she hadn’t been in “any acute distress.”

Watch CBS-5′s report:

The sad truth is Miran-Ramirez is certainly not alone in having her claim denied by a major health insurer. The California Nurses Association (CNA), a nurses’ union and health care advocacy group, recently released a comprehensive study of claims denials across California. The study found that the six largest insurers in California rejected 47.7 million claims in the first half of 2009, nearly 22 percent of all claims submitted. The CNA twice successfully lobbied the California legislature to pass legislation that would establish a single-payer universal health care system in the state, only to have it vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA).

Last week, in a congressional hearing titled “Between You and Your Doctor: the Bureaucracy of Private Health Insurance,” top insurance executives testified before Chairman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) that the insurance company practice of denials can be fatal for its customers.

Indeed, such a denial cost 17-year old Nataline Sarkisyan her life in 2007, when Cigna denied coverage for a liver transplant until it was too late. Her mother, Hilda Sarkisyan, came to D.C. earlier this year to lobby for a public health insurance plan that would stop such denials. She told the press, “Insurance companies cannot decide who’s going to live and who’s going to die.”

Following the CBS-5 investigation, Blue Shield agreed to pay for all charges for Miran-Ramirez’s emergency room visit.

Climate Progress

Scientists: Political ‘Reality’ Will Lead To Climate Catastrophe

Global temperature projections“Climate researchers now predict the planet will warm by 6.3 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century even if the world’s leaders fulfill their most ambitious climate pledges, a much faster and broader scale of change than forecast just two years ago.” This analysis was conducted by the Climate Interactive project, led by climate scientist Dr. Robert Corell, the chair of the Heinz Center’s Climate Action Initiative. The researchers fed the possible commitments by the world’s nations for the global climate deal to be negotiated this December in Copenhagen, Denmark into a dynamic model that projects how the climate will respond:

We collected emissions reductions proposals in the public domain up until September, 2009 – and found that even if these were fully implemented they would be far from sufficient to meet the goal of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 levels at or below 350 ppm, reaching instead about 716 ppm CO2 and 944 CO2e by 2100. These proposals would not be sufficient to limit warming to 2°C over pre-industrial temperatures, creating instead approximately 3.5°C of temperature increase by 2100.

As top climate scientist Stefan Rahmstorf explained at the Copenhagen Climate Change Congress in March, even limiting global warming to two degrees Centigrade above historical levels — 1.3 degrees (2.3 F) above current temperatures — isn’t as safe as Russian roulette. However, the scientists behind the analysis recognize that taking action is dramatically better than business as usual. Andrew Jones writes that this finding could also be described in a positive light — “New Analysis Shows Growing Commitment to a Global Deal Will Help Stabilize Climate“:

Following the “current proposals” path is much better than “business as usual” path. Many countries have offered concrete proposals, others (like China) are looking more encouraging, and the results add up. About 3100 gigatons of CO2e would be kept out of the atmosphere between now and the end of the century, resulting in CO2 levels 239 ppm lower and the world a full degree C cooler by 2100 (3.5 degrees C vs. 4.5).

The leaders of the world’s top economies — and greatest polluters — are now meeting in Pittsburgh for the G-20 summit. The chair of the International Panel on Climate Change, Rajendra Pachauri, and Center for American Progress president John Podesta have now made a dramatic appeal to those leaders to “reflect this imperative” that “that temperatures should not be allowed to exceed 2 degrees Celsius and that, as a consequence, global emissions must be reduced 50 percent by 2050.”

The Climate Initiative analysis provides evidence that even that target is likely insufficient to keep warming below 2 degrees Celsius. The G-20 should accept scientific reality and recognize that the goals they are now debating represent a minimal effort to stave off planetary catastrophe.

Politics

New Orleans newspaper takes Rep. Steve King to task for his ‘heartless’ contempt of Katrina victims.

In an interview with The Hill this week, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) boasted that “the best vote” he ever cast while in Congress was to deny $52 billion in aid to Hurricane Katrina victims. Yesterday, the Times-Picayune, New Orleans’ award-winning newspaper, calls King’s comments “heartless” and “appalling,” especially because he is from “a state that’s also vulnerable to flooding“:

Greater New Orleans suffered catastrophic destruction not only because of a powerful storm but because the flood protection system built by the federal government failed.

While some lawmakers from other parts of the country showed a lack of concern and understanding after Katrina — even questioning the wisdom of rebuilding our community — it’s hard to understand how a lawmaker from Iowa, a state that’s also vulnerable to flooding, could be unwilling to help.

Even now, officials in Des Moines are complaining about a slow and inadequate response to their flood recovery — including the lament that FEMA is underestimating the amount of money needed to replace public buildings. That’s something that South Louisianians can understand, and in fact, we feel for Iowans.

Unfortunately, when it counted, Rep. King didn’t feel for us.

Health

Rep. Jan Schakowsky: ‘There Will Be A Public Option In The Bill,’ Will Be Added In Conference

J“At the end of the day, there will be a public option in the bill,” Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) told reporters at an early morning briefing hosted by the Democratic Women’s Working Group and attended by The Wonk Room. Schakowsky predicted that the House would pass a public option and integrate the provision into the the final bill during conference. “I see momentum building,” she said.

Schakowsky pointed to a recent poll commissioned by Health Care for America Now of 91 conservative House swing districts — including many Blue Dog and rural ones — “which concluded that the public option has solid majority support among those voters.” According to the poll, “including a public option is essential to implementing an individual mandate. Voters also already prefer the implementation of a public option, and do not see a need for a trigger.” Greg Sargent has the details:

There’s over-whelming opposition to an individual mandate when the only choices are private insur-ance, but there’s net support for a mandate when people have the choice of a public option. And swing district voters are convinced private sector healthcare has failed to make health care affordable, and prefer the public option now rather than waiting on a trigger option.

Schakowsky said that she supported a ‘robust’ public plan that reimbursed providers a set percentage above Medicare rates, but could not guarantee that this reimbursement formula will be preserved in the final bill. According to the Congressional Budget Office, “a public plan based on Medicare rates would save $110 billion over 10 years,” $85 million more than a plan that independently negotiated with providers.

Conservatives argue that Medicare, which pays providers approximately 14 percent lower than private insurers, underpays providers and shifts costs to Americans with private coverage. The bills before Congress would provide bonus payments to primary care doctors and institute payment reforms that will begin rewarding medical providers for the quality of care they deliver rather than quantity.

Politics

Inhofe on why global warming isn’t real: ‘God’s still up there. We’re going through these cycles.’

On C-Span’s Washington Journal this week, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), the godfather of global warming deniers, said that he will travel to the climate change summit in Copenhagen this fall to present “another view.” “I think somebody has to be there — a one-man truth squad,” he said. Throughout the program, Inhofe went through his tattered global warming denier claims: that climate change is a “hoax,” that CO2 is not a pollutant, and — latching on to the latest false right-wing talking point — that clean energy legislation will cost American families $1,700 a year. At the end of the interview, Inhofe explained what guides his views:

CALLER: Yes, I agree with the Senator on what he says about the climate change. I believe that the world is just changing like it usually does. [...]

INHOFE: I think he’s right. I think what he’s saying is God’s still up there. We’re going through these cycles. … I really believe that a lot of people are in denial who want to hang their hat on the fact, that they believe is a fact, that man-made gases, anthropogenic gases, are causing global warming. The science really isn’t there.

Watch it:

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up