ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

McCain Waffles On Support For Stimulus: Goes From ‘Hell No’ To ‘I Don’t Know’

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist (R) has taken a lot of heat from the right about his embrace of Obama’s stimulus package, fueling a right-wing challenge from former state Speaker Marco Rubio’s (R) in his senatorial campaign.

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) came to Crist’s defense yesterday, telling the St. Petersburg Times that, while Rubio is “mounting a serious threat,” he still thinks Crist “will win.” Asked if Crist’s support for the stimulus was a political mistake, McCain dodged the question, saying, “I don’t know.” McCain explained, “I haven’t kept up enough to really know about that. I can’t judge other people.”

But McCain had a much clearer opinion on the stimulus just two weeks ago when he appeared on Don Imus’ radio program:

IMUS: Did you support that bill?

MCCAIN: Hell no.

IMUS: I don’t think you have to swear at me Senator when I’m just asking a…

MCCAIN: I’m not swearing at you. I’m swearing I would’ve had to have been smoking something pretty strong to have voted for that outrageous use of taxpayers’ dollars.

Watch it:

It seems unlikely that McCain wouldn’t “really know about” the politics surrounding Crist’s endorsement of stimulus. The governor was a key early supporter of the plan and helped pitch it at a high-profile February town hall with President Obama in Ft. Myers. Caving to right-wing attacks, Crist has since tried to walk back his support of the measure, telling CNN last month that he never “endorsed” the stimulus. His flip-flopmade headlines all over Florida” and has been, perhaps, the most important issue driving Rubio’s unlikely lead in the Senate race. As the St. Petersburg Times notes, McCain is likely ignoring the facts to defend his “pal” because McCain “won Florida [in the 2008 GOP primary] in part due to Crist’s endorsement.”

Ironically for Crist, he is distancing himself from the stimulus at the same time it is bearing fruit. Approximately 600,000 to 1.6 million jobs have been created or saved nationally through September, according to the CBO. And nearly $7 billion has flowed from the stimulus into Florida, helping to create or save approximately 29,000 jobs. (State officials put the number closer to 47,000.) Meanwhile the nation’s economy grew during the third quarter of 2009, and job losses have slowed from 652,000 in March to only 11,000 in November.

Politics

Why women ‘hate’ Limbaugh: because he balks at giving them adequate health care coverage

On Feb. 23, Public Policy Polling released a survey showing that only 37 percent of women held a favorable opinion of hate radio host Rush Limbaugh, compared to 56 percent of men. Limbaugh was baffled by these results and decided to hold a “female summit” to find out why women hate him. Maybe, Limbaugh should just listen to his own show. Today, for example, Limbaugh griped that health insurance premiums will be going up if reform legislation is passed, in large part because private insurers will have to provide “women’s issues coverage”:

LIMBAUGH: About the premiums going up, and my brilliant dissertation on why prices will go up in the private sector, even if the public option is not there, and even if the Medicare buy-in is not there. It’s not just preconditions that are mandated to be covered in the health care bills in either the House or the Senate.

There was a recent amendment that was mandating private insurers to provide mammogram and other women’s issues coverage, including spousal abuse! Insurance for spousal abuse! And mammograms! Even though the mammogram age has been raised to the age of 50. You think of all the mandates that will be added onto private insurance, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Listen here:

Right now, many insurers treat domestic violence as a pre-existing condition and deny women health insurance coverage if they have been a victim. Women are also denied coverage — or face significantly higher premiums — if they are pregnant or have had a C-Section pregnancy in the past; the health care reform legislation would ban this discrimination. Additionally, an amendment by Sen. Barbara Milkulski’s (D-MD) amendment would make sure that insurers often women free mammograms and other preventive services.

Climate Progress

NASA reports hottest November on record, 2009 poised to be second hottest year, Hansen predicts better than 50% chance 2010 will set new record

Must-read Hansen: “I am now inundated with broad FOIA requests for my correspondence, with substantial impact on my time and on others in my office. I believe these to be fishing expeditions, aimed at finding some statement(s), likely to be taken out of context, which they would attempt to use to discredit climate science…. The input data for global temperature analyses are widely available, on our web site and elsewhere. If those input data could be made to yield a significantly different global temperature change, contrarians would certainly have done that — but they have not.”

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif

Fast on the heels of the hottest June to October on record, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies reports that last month was the hottest November on record, which should be no surprise to CP readers — see my November 24th post:

Read more

Climate Progress

Copenhagen is NOT on the verge of signing a treaty that would lock in 3C warming!

Let’s thank The Guardian for wasting our time, again.

Our guest blogger is Andrew Light, a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, on the ground in Copenhagen.  For a related post, see “Is it just too damn late? Part 1, the Science.

If we were all in the Bella Center I’d start this post with something like, “The buzz in the hall today at COP 15 in Copenhagen was a leaked UN document confirming the worst fears of . . .”  But we’re not in the hall.  Most of us were locked outside today.  So I’ll settle for:

The idle chatter in the Copenhagen pubs this evening was the news that a leaked UN document demonstrates that we’re on the verge of an agreement locking in 3 degrees C.  This headline comes to us from The Guardian:

Read more

Media

After His Story Is ‘Strenuously’ Denied, Goldfarb Attacks A Journalist For Having His Story Officially Denied

Rick Sanchez knows who Michael Goldfarb is talking aboutOn Tuesday, the Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb posted that that “a Senate aide” told him the White House threatened to put “Nebraska’s Offutt Air Force Base on the BRAC list” if Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) didn’t “fall into line” on health care. Though his rumor was categorically denied by both the White House and Nelson, Goldfarb’s story led 20 GOP senators to call for an investigation and Glenn Beck to accuse the White House of getting close to “treason.”

Last night, Goldfarb dismissed the denials, claiming that the proposed investigation by the Republican senators vindicated his story:

Meanwhile, both Nelson and the White House strenuously deny the allegation. A statement from White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer asserts “This rumor is absolutely false, as the people spreading it well know. This is nothing but a cynical, crass political game that is designed to maintain the status quo. Let’s be clear: the people spreading these falsehoods think nothing is wrong with a system under which families and businesses continue to bear the brunt of skyrocketing costs, insurance companies are allowed to discriminate and drop at will, and thousands of Americans lose their coverage every single day.”

They protest a little too much. I do not know this story is “absolutely false.” To the contrary, I’m confident it’s true. Twenty senators are now calling for an investigation, and each is presumably pretty well sourced in the Senate. If the charges are “absolutely false,” maybe the White House will encourage Senate Democrats to call this Republican bluff. I won’t hold my breath.

As Media Matters has noted, Goldfarb is struggling to preserve his disintegrating story as well as his own credibility. On Glenn Beck’s Fox News show last night, he retracted some of the details of his story. In an interview on WorldNetDaily’s radio show today, Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) undermined Goldfarb’s claim that the GOP senators had vindicated him, saying that they called for the investigation based on “rumors” that they “haven’t confirmed.”

In a KLIN radio interview today, Nelson denied it again. He said that he had discovered “at least one of the sources” of the rumor and that those pushing the story would be “embarrassed” because “those who have started the rumors and those who’ve been speculating on it, they might have something to fear” in an investigation.

Despite the increasing headwind against the credibility of his reporting, Goldfarb had the audacity to mock another journalist, Time’s Joe Klein, today for getting “caught making things up.” Goldfarb’s proof that Klein got his story wrong? Official denials in the same vein that Nelson and the White House have denied his story.

Goldfarb responded on Twitter to questions about the consistency of his respect for official denials by saying, “Like everybody else, I believe official denials except when I have a good reason not to.”

Update

Joe Klein responded to Goldfarb, saying that he stands by his story.

Climate Progress

China in Copenhagen, Day 10 & 11: Of Chickens and Eggs

By Angel Hsu and Andrew Barnett, part of Yale University’s “Team China” blogging live from Copenhagen, re-posted from The Green Leap Forward.

As we predicted from the beginning, the negotiations in Copenhagen are coming down to two countries that could make or break a deal – China and the United States. As we mentioned in our post on Day 9, the crux of this deadlock seems to be centered around a few critical issues.  The United States’ Congress won’t pass domestic legislation without key developing countries like China, which is now a major greenhouse gas emitter signing on to reduction commitments; and China sees themselves as a developing country that has acted progressively and responsibly to address climate change when it technically has no obligation to do so under the UNFCCC.

Read more

Climate Progress

CAP’s Andrew Light predicts interim political deal will be signed at Copenhagen

Optimism breaks out at COP-15 following Clinton’s arrival and tough negotiations, but confusion reigns about impact of a potential deal on ultimate planetary warming

Here is CAP Senior Fellow explaining what he expects over the next 24 to 36 hours (video here, in case embed code acts up):

I found similar optimism in my evening conversations with Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA) and many senior environmental leaders.  More on that tomorrow.

The BBC report tonight was similarly optimistic:

Read more

Economy

Bernanke Acknowledges He Could Do More To Boost Employment, But Won’t

AP091207017053Yesterday, I wrote that if Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke really wants to earn Person of the Year honors, he needs to do more to fight unemployment. Contrary to Alan Greenspan’s assertions, the Fed does have some more unemployment fighting tools in its arsenal (and a legal mandate to maximize employment, in addition to assuring price stability).

Via Matthew Yglesias and Free Exchange, the Wall Street Journal posted responses to questions Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) collected and sent to Bernanke. And Bernanke’s answer to an inquiry from Brad DeLong shows that he is well aware that he could do more to boost employment, but he isn’t planning to:

The Federal Reserve has not followed the suggestion of some that it pursue a monetary policy strategy aimed at pushing up longer-run inflation expectations. In theory, such an approach could reduce real interest rates and so stimulate spending and output. However, that theoretical argument ignores the risk that such a policy could cause the public to lose confidence in the central bank’s willingness to resist further upward shifts in inflation, and so undermine the effectiveness of monetary policy going forward. The anchoring of inflation expectations is a hard-won success that has been achieved over the course of three decades, and this stability cannot be taken for granted. Therefore, the Federal Reserve’s policy actions as well as its communications have been aimed.

As Free Exchange put it, “I can’t imagine getting a more direct answer from the chairman than that. Mr Bernanke does not want to risk a de-anchoring of inflation expectations. He is willing to accept 10% or greater unemployment and the resulting economic and political fall-out in order to avoid that risk.”

Bernanke’s nomination for a second term was approved by the Senate Banking committee today on a 16-7 vote, with six Republicans and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) voting against. While most of the rhetoric coming from those voting “no” had to do with the Fed’s lack of transparency or roll in the housing crash (both legitimate concerns), Merkley couched his criticism in terms of unemployment and a complacency towards Main Street. “Following our economic collapse, it is also apparent that [Bernanke] has not changed his overall approach to prioritizing Wall Street over American families,” Merkley said. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) made many of the same points as Merkley, but still voted for Bernanke.

As Yglesias put it, “unemployment is high in large part because the policymakers with primary responsibility for achieving full employment don’t want to use the tools at their disposal to achieve that goal.” Bernanke really needs to be pressed on why that is.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up