ThinkProgress Logo

Justice

NEW DATA: 97% Of Transgender Individuals Report Being Mistreated Or Harassed At Work

The editorial pages of Roll Call and the Washington Times have become a battleground for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and transgendered people are in the bulls-eye of the conservative attack. These articles distill transgendered individuals of their humanity and presents them as freaks or pieces of flesh not deserving of legal protection. “Women should not be forced to share bathrooms with people with male body parts who say they want to be females,” the Washington Times wrote on Saturday. “It is right to discriminate between honesty and dishonesty, between politeness and impoliteness, between right and wrong. And it assuredly is right… to remove from the classroom a ‘she-male’ who insists on exposing her pupils to her unnatural transformation.”

That prominent national newspapers are accepting such extreme pieces and publishing them alongside supportive editorials is just appalling. Editors who would have never thought it appropriate to run an argument that advocated inferior health coverage for some minority group just several months ago, now publish articles that say transgedner people don’t deserve legal protection because of some alleged inferiority. These editorials legitimize the most reactionary social doctrines and set them as default conservative positions in the ENDA debate.

The most interesting progressive response to these arguments comes from Lisa Mottet of the the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. Mottret points to preliminary data “from a forthcoming, groundbreaking survey on discrimination against transgender people in the U.S. from the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Center for Transgender Equality [which] shows that discrimination in employment is a nearly universal experience:

- 97% our sample report being mistreated or harassed at work.

- 47% lost their jobs, were denied a promotion or denied a job as a direct result of being a transgender individual.

As she notes, “Americans support nondiscrimination in the workplace, including ENDA, because they aspire to workplaces where people truly are judged by their contributions to the workplace, not on personal characteristics. LGBT people simply want to be included in the American dream of equal opportunity for all.” Unfortunately, the balance in the media coverage suggests otherwise.

Climate Progress

Chait and Klein: Lindsey Graham is Right

Senate staffer: Graham’s been “completely genuine” in bipartisan negotiations for climate and clean energy jobs bill

If email, comments on CP, and some eco-bloggers are to be believed, conservative Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has been planning to walk on the climate bill for a long time — perhaps, nefariously, from the very beginning!  And I certainly understand where that sentiment is coming from, given that the GOP strategy on health care and financial reform has been to feign interest and then bolt.

In fact, however, that view lacks plausibility, as The New Republic‘s Jonathan Chait explained in his Sunday column, “Lindsey Graham Is Right.”  Indeed, the WashPost‘s Ezra Klein argues today that Graham, “is not only right to be annoyed, but as far I can tell, is actually right.”

Read more

Security

Racial Profiling Already A Problem In Arizona Before The Bill Was Signed Into Law

Shortly after signing Arizona’s draconian immigration bill into law, Gov. Jan Brewer (R-AZ) attempted to ease concerns about civil rights abuses, stating that she “will NOT tolerate racial discrimination or racial profiling in Arizona.” The truth is, she already is.

Arizona’s 3TV News reports that a U.S. citizen Latino commercial truck driver was pulled over at a weight scale check spot and handcuffed and detained at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in Phoenix until his wife came and provided both of their birth certificates. Abdon, who did not want to use his last name, said that though he provided his drivers license and his Social Security Number, police officers wanted more proof that he was legally present in the country. Abdon believes that he was ultimately “targeted for his race and forced to provide his birth certificate.” Watch the 3TV report (starts at 2:16):

The City of Phoenix Police Department is enrolled in ICE’s 287(g) Task Force Officers program which allows local Phoenix police to enforce immigration law — as all Arizona police will soon be required to do. Abdon isn’t the first Latino to fall victim to the deputization of immigration law and he certainly won’t be the last once Arizona’s new law goes into effect.

Maricopa County, in which Phoenix is located, is all too familiar with the problem of racial profiling. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is subject of a Department of Justice investigation into rampant allegations of racial profiling and discrimination and has been named in 2,700 lawsuits. In North Carolina, researchers found that 287(g)’s have “created a climate of racial profiling and community insecurity” in communities across the state. According to a report by the ACLU, racial profiling in Gwinnet County, Georgia has been exacerbated by the 287(g) program. The ACLU received complaints from drivers, pedestrians, and Gwinnett community members showing that police officers are targeting immigrants and people of color for stops, searches, and interrogations.

A representative at ICE told 3TV that the incident was “standard operating procedure.” According to the spokesperson, the agents “needed to verify Abdon was in the country legally and it is not uncommon to ask for someone’s birth certificate.” Abdon’s wife however, has a different take, stating, “It doesn’t feel like it’s a good way of life, to live with fear, even though we are okay, we are legal…still have to carry documents around.”

Politics

Only One Republican Federal Lawmaker Has Spoken Out Against Arizona’s Draconian Immigration Law

Both progressives and conservatives have sharply criticized Arizona’s new strict immigration law that requires local police to attempt to determine the immigration status of anyone they encounter as part of a “lawful contact” and allows them to arrest undocumented immigrants. The ACLU warns that the law will “exacerbate racial profiling,” and former Republican Arkansas governor has similarly said that “Hispanic Americans have the right to be unhappy about the fact that they might be pulled over.” Even far-right former Colorado Republican congressman Tom Tancredo, who said he supports the Arizona law, has stated, “I do not want people here, there in Arizona, pulled over because you look like [you] should be pulled over.”

In the U.S. House and Senate, however, Republicans have been far quieter. ThinkProgress rounded up at least five Republicans who have spoken out in favor of the law and three who have been non-committal. The only Republican to condemn it so far is Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, a Hispanic lawmaker from Florida who is retiring:


FOR THE LAW NON-COMMITTAL AGAINST THE LAW
Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-CA): “They will look at the kind of dress you wear. There’s different type of attire. … There’s behavior things that professionals are trained in across the board. And this group shouldn’t be exempt from those observations as much as anybody else.” Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ): “And my own view is until the federal government does our part back here by providing the resources that are necessary, and that could include, by the way, the financial resources to support National Guard troops on the border, then you are going to see more of this. It won’t just be the state of Arizona that passes laws like this.” Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL): “I strongly disagree with the Arizona immigration law.”
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA): “[I]f that’s what the people of Arizona want to do, then certainly they have that right.” Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): “I haven’t had a chance to look at all the aspects, but I do understand why the Legislature would act.”
Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK): “I don’t see anything wrong with that [the Arizona law].” Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY): “I haven’t studied it.”
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA): “I think that Arizona has a point, which is the federal government has not done a good enough job. … And if it’s a message to the administration they need to do a better job, then a state has to right to send that message.”
Rep. Steve King (R-IA):I commend Arizona for standing up for the Rule of Law and protecting American workers.”

Republicans may be unwilling to alienate their far-right allies who support this legislation, but they simultaneously risk driving away Latinos. Over the weekend, thousands of people showed up at the Arizona state capitol to protest the new law, and the Arizona Hispanic Republicans said they will not be supporting Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R) re-election bid because she signed the discriminatory measure.

Are there any federal GOP lawmakers we missed? Let us know in the comments section.

Yglesias

Endgame

It’s not appropriate:

— All about the boobquake.

— Norway’s Prime Minister talks about navigating the crisis successfully (I’ll note, it’s easier if you have vast oil and gas wealth).

— How do I recognize a Census-taker.

— Arnold Kling’s ideas for financial reform.

— Women are much more likely to report that spending time with parents is unpleasant.

More boobquake.

— Why immigration is getting more traction than climate change.

— I don’t understand why Paul Krugman thinks immigration makes a social safety net impossible; I hope he’ll address this in more detail.

Two Door Cinema Club, “I Can Talk”.

Climate Progress

White House: Immigration Is ‘Important’ And Energy Is ‘Critical,’ But Reid ‘Sets The Agenda’

Although both immigration and climate reform are top priorities for the Obama administration, White House domestic policy adviser Melody Barnes said, it is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) who “sets the agenda.” MSNBC’s Chuck Todd questioned Barnes this morning over the conflict between Reid and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) that derailed the expected unveiling of comprehensive climate legislation Monday. Barnes said that energy reform — what President Obama has called one of his “foundational priorities” — is “critical to this country,” while immigration reform is “important.” However, she repeatedly indicated that the responsibility for moving forward lies with Reid:

MELODY BARNES: What the president and administration want is to work with Congress, Republicans and Democrats in Congress to address these big issues. The Senate Majority Leader will make a decision how to go forward. Immigration reform is important. We also know that comprehensive energy reform is critical to this country. We have to get away from reliance on foreign oil. We know we can create clean energy jobs. So both of these are top priorities for this president. We’re going to be working with the Senate.

CHUCK TODD: Can either be signed this year?

BARNES: We’re hoping to move forward with the majority leader as he sets the agenda.

Watch it:

Reid’s staff had leaked to reporters that the majority leader wanted the Senate to consider an immigration bill before climate legislation, a statement that made little sense other than a response to local political pressures. As Graham, who has been the lead Republican on both issues, voiced his displeasure, it seems neither Reid nor the White House reached out to quell his anger. Graham and Sen. John Kerry’s (D-MA) American Power Act is ready to be unveiled for direct floor consideration, but immigration reform requires “significant committee work that has not yet begun” — as Reid said. President Obama has been keeping his pledge to immigration reform advocates to raise the issue with Republicans like Sen. Scott Brown (D-MA) to get on board with Graham and Sen. Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) immigration effort, but the two bills aren’t on the same timetable.

In addition to the fealty of most Republicans to killer fossil industries, Democrats have competing camps on the best pathway to energy action, with senators like Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) pushing for alternate strategies to President Obama’s comprehensive climate reform. Reid has waffled on whether he would be willing to risk conflict with Democratic committee chairs by taking climate reform straight to the floor. This potential conflict with senators like agriculture chair Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and finance chair Max Baucus (D-MT) would likely have to be mediated by the President, even as Graham would have the responsibility of locking down Republican votes other than himself.

When it comes to setting the national agenda and leading the Democratic Party, the buck stops at the President’s desk, not at Harry Reid’s. The real people who need real action on immigration and climate reform need the White House to assert leadership.

Transcript: Read more

Politics

City Of San Francisco Moves To Join Growing Boycott Of Arizona Over New Anti-Immigration Law

Protest4On Friday, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) signed a draconian immigration bill that has been slammed by both Democrats and Republicans, and is likely illegal. Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) has been calling for a boycott of his own state, urging, “Do not do business with a state that is propagating the idea separate but equal treatment under the law can be codified.”

Now, the “nation’s biggest Spanish-language newspaper” La Opinion has joined the effort, calling for “a boycott of all goods and services from Arizona and [a] pledge to avoid tourism in the state as well.” “Let’s send a signal of our disgust with an arrogant state government that asserts powers it does not have in order to persecute a minority population,” the paper editorialized.

Indeed, a growing number of travelers have said they will avoid the state because of the new law, prompting New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to say, “We’re happy to have those businesses and tourists come here.” The state has already lost the business of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, which decided “moments after” Brewer signed the law to move their upcoming conference from Arizona to another state.

Meanwhile, San Francisco City Supervisor David Campos — himself a former undocumented immigrant from Guatemala — said this morning that he will introduce emergency legislation tomorrow calling for a boycott of Arizona. While Campos needs more time to work out the details, SF Weekly reports his measure is likely to advance:

I feel the city and county of San Francisco has to take a stand against what’s happened in Arizona,” said Campos. “The law they’ve enacted is really an affront to the basic principles of the constitution.” [...]

While Campos plans to introduce his emergency bill at tomorrow’s full Board of Supervisors meeting — and safe money would be on its advancement — a boycott of Arizona is not immediately imminent. Campos said more analysis is required by city departments in the “next week or so” to determine just what this city’s ties to Arizona are, and how a boycott would affect them.

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said he is “fully committed” to the effort, and will help to “identify all applicable contracts, and to pursue termination wherever possible.” He also said his office “stands ready to assist in any legal challenges in whatever way it can.” “Arizona has charted an ominous legal course that puts extremist politics before public safety and betrays our most deeply held American values,” Herrera said.

Tourism is one of Arizona’s biggest industries, but Jon Garrido, a former Tucson economic development official, wrote in the Tucson Citizen that a national boycott is necessary to combat “Jim Crow actions,” even if it causes economic pain.

Climate Progress

Energy and Environmental News for April 25th, 2010; BP’s 42,000 gallon a day oil spill now covers over 1,800 square miles; Questions continue over Cape wind farm

BP struggles to cap leak as US oil slick spreads

Oil Spill Now Covering More Than 1,800 Square Miles

Coast Guard officials said Monday afternoon that the oil spill near Louisiana was now covering more than 1,800 square miles of the Gulf of Mexico, and they have been unable to engage a mechanism that could shut off the well thousands of feet below the ocean’s surface.

Read more

Yglesias

To Be Sure of the Day

Jonah Goldberg: “This is not to say that there aren’t other important differences between, say, the German Social Democrats (the Socialists) and the Nazis or between the Nazis and the Bolsheviks.”

Indeed.

Yglesias

The D-Bag Factor

Harvard OCS  1

This post of Ezra Klein‘s made me joke on Twitter that you can’t properly analyze the Harvard to Wall Street pipeline without using the term “douchebag.” And I think Dara Lind’s followup item in which she notes some structural similarities between Wall Street recruiting on Ivy League campuses and Teach for American recruiting on the same campuses makes me want to double down on the joke. Simply put, there’s a question of character here.

Out of deference to feminist considerations I’ll avoid trying to put a label on it, but there’s a certain kind of person who walks into a room filled with people interested in working on Wall Street and people who do work on Wall Street and says to himself (and it’s no coincidence that it’s almost always himself) “these are the kind of people I want to align myself with.” TFA is, in this regard, totally different and appeals to a different sort of mentality. It’s true that there’s a bit more to the recruiting process than jerks of a feather flocking together, but firms like DE Shaw that break from the mold are really exceptions that prove the rule—they have an approach that’s based specifically on trying to snare talent that would normally be repulsed by the repulsive nature of the people working in the field.

As best I can tell, which admittedly is not that well, the tendency of unpleasant people to congregate in this particular line of work is cross-cultural. By far the most annoying people I met in Germany, for example, were finance guys in Frankfurt. Compared to politicians, non-financial businessmen, random bartenders, bus drivers, etc. they were horrible. Obviously this sort of thing is relative and probably if you ask a bunch of bankers they’ll say all the worst people from college went on to become glib political journalists or to teach in inner-city schools.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up