ThinkProgress Logo

LGBT

Biden Blames Politics For Inability To End Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Discharges While Policy Is Being Repealed

Earlier this evening, during an appearance on The Rachel Maddow Show, Vice President Joe Biden expressed confidence that the Senate will pass the defense authorization bill and repeal the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy, saying that “everyone who was fired should be able to be reinstated if they wanted to.” But when Maddow asked Biden why the administration won’t order the military to stop discharging gay and lesbian servicemembers before the policy is officially repealed in the spring, Biden insisted that Democrats were bound by the existing compromise amendment:

MADDOW: In terms of the timing of that, if that goes as you say it’s possible that it could go. If that repeal happens, the timing is that the Defense Department is studying the issue through December. They’ve got another, I think, 60 days or something that they– after which they would have to delay any repeal process. So, we’d be looking at, best-case scenario for repeal, would be sometime in the spring. With the policy under such intense scrutiny, that study underway at the Defense Department, progress being made both in the courts and politically, why not suspend the discharges of people under the policy now, pending that Defense Department review? Why keep kicking people out now while all of this movement is happening towards ending the policy?

BIDEN: Because that is the compromise we basically had to make to get the votes to finally repeal it. In other words, everybody’s looking for, in my view, if I could just wave a wand, it would just be flat repeal. No one else would be able to suspend it. And everyone who was suspended would be able to come back if they wanted to. But the truth of the matter is, we had to build a consensus for this. Working very hard on the telephone. Calling people. And everybody’s looking forward to the orderly elimination of this law. I would prefer it not be orderly. I prefer it just end, boom, done. But that’s why that hasn’t happened. It’s resulted in us getting over 55 votes, I think we’ll get 55 vote, to flat repeal it.

Watch it:

Despite Biden’s explanation, many activists have argued that Obama could sign an executive order banning further military separations or increase the thresholds for separations.

Politics

Former Florida GOP Chair: ‘Many Within The GOP Have Racist Views’

jim-greer2 Last year, former Florida Republican Party Chairman Jim Greer — who has been ostracized by the GOP after he was charged with defrauding the party — accused President Obama of using his annual back to school message to preach “socialist ideology” to children. But in a statement Monday — perhaps feeling freer to express his true views after breaking with the party — Greer apologized for his 2009 charge, saying he felt the need to “placate the extremists.” He also said he has “found that many within the GOP have racist views:”

“In the year since I issued a prepared statement regarding President Obama speaking to the nation’s school children, I have learned a great deal about the party I so deeply loved and served,” Greer’s Monday statement said. “Unfortunately, I found that many within the GOP have racist views and I apologize to the President for my opposition to his speech last year and my efforts to placate the extremists who dominate our Party today. My children and I look forward to the President’s speech.”

Greer declined to name names, but said, “I had to discipline state members who promoted racists [sic] comments.” “It is not my belief that the Republican Party as a whole or even a majority of Republicans have racist views,” Greer elaborated on Tuesday. “I just believe there are some in the party that don’t think minority outreach should be a priority, that moving in that direction doesn’t help the party because it encourages more minorities to vote,” he explained. Greer added that as chairman, he had “to keep certain segments of the party happy,” and that he worries “there is no place for moderates in the Republican Party” today.

Economy

Blue Dog Matheson Using Discredited GOP Argument For Extending Bush Tax Cuts For The Rich

This week, Republicans have solidified the notion that they will hold an extension of middle class tax cuts hostage unless $830 billion in tax cuts is also given to the richest two percent of households. To justify such a move, they’re relying on the phony argument that letting the Bush tax cuts for the richest two percent expire would disproportionately harm small businesses.

But a group of conservative Congressional Democrats are also making the same bogus argument. This week, a number of self-styled Blue Dogs sent a letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) saying that they opposed allowing the cuts for the wealthy to expire. One of the main drivers behind the effort — Rep. Jim Matheson (D-UT) — told the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent today that his rationale for making the push is to protect small businesses:

“I recognize $250,000 is a lot of money for an individual to make for an individual,” he said. “But we’re also talking about businesses. That’s not a lot of money for small businesses.” Asked how many people in his district fell into the above-$250,000 category, Matheson answered: “I don’t know the answer to that.”

Before getting to Matheson’s specific argument, let’s review: Fewer than two percent of small businesses and less than three percent of households with any business income at all would be affected if the Bush tax cuts for the rich expire.

Republicans concede that very few businesses would be affected, but then claim that half of small business income would be hit. But that statistic only matters if you’re concerned about a slight tax increase on Bechtel Corp., the Tribune Company, doctors, lawyers, and corporate CEO’s receiving a speaking fee on the side, all of whom fall under the GOP’s overly inclusive definition.

Matheson didn’t know how many households in his district would be affected if the Bush tax cuts for the rich expire, but according to the latest American Community Survey from the Census Bureau, the number is roughly 12,012. (The ACS survey cuts off at $200,000, not $250,000, so some of those 12,000 households would likely fall into the 28 percent marginal income tax bracket, and thus avoid a tax increase.)

The median household income in Matheson’s district is $55,000, while the median male full-time worker makes $46,000. Matheson’s favored extension would give a millionaire an annual tax cut of $128,832, or nearly three times what the median worker in his district earns in total.

Matheson is attempting to muddy the waters by making it sound like business revenues, not personal income, are what winds up on income tax filings. But that’s not how it works. As Matthew Yglesias has pointed out, “any small businessman who’s earning a middle class income isn’t paying in the top two brackets, just as any salaried employee who’s earning a middle class income isn’t paying in the top two brackets.” No matter how you slice it, extending the Bush tax cuts for the rich is spending $830 billion on the richest segment of the population.

Media

CNBC Guests And Hosts All Agree Christine O’Donnell’s Victory Is Good News For Wall Street

Today, CNBC aired a segment titled “When it comes to the market, is the Tea Party good news or bad news?” Hugh Johnson of the investment firm Hugh Johnson Advisors and Andy Busch of BMO Capital Markets joined hosts Larry Kudlow, Trish Regan, and Melissa Francis to discuss Republican radical Christine O’Donnell’s Senate primary victory in Delaware.

All the guests and hosts appeared to agree that O’Donnell’s victory was a good thing for Wall Street because she supports policies favorable to the financial industry. Although both guests conceded that O’Donnell’s nomination might be bad for Wall Street because it could enable a Democrat to win the Delaware seat, there was a general consensus that the string of Tea Party victories has sent the right “message” that Americans are drifting to the far right. The talking heads rattled off a variety of Tea Party and O’Donnell positions — like extending the Bush tax cuts for millionaires and opposing regulations — that they agreed with:

REGAN: So when it comes to markets, is the Tea Party and this victory in Delaware good news or bad news?

JOHNSON: You know in a strange sort of way, I think it’s good news because it first of all indicates passion but its passion on the part of the Republican Party. The passion is, we’re kind of tired, we’re fed up with big government and raising taxes. [...]

BUSCH: Well certainly the stance by the Tea Party candidate of a capital gains elimination for two years is wonderful for the markets! I think the central point or the salient point of the victory is not that this candidate is flawed. A lot of candidates are flawed as human beings are. But the point is, there is an energized base that is pulling the conversation this stance of fiscal responsibility but also business-friendly and market-friendly policies. [...]

KUDLOW: I totally agree, and we’re looking at a configured, conservative Congress. We don’t know if Republicans can take the Senate, that’s going to be close. It looks like they’re going to take the House, big time. That’s a conservative Congress. And as Andy said, that’s going to be pro-growth, pro-business, anti-spend, anti-tax views.

Watch it:

Generally, Kudlow and his associates have been proud partisans hoping for a Democratic defeat this November. But O’Donnell’s opponent Rep. Mike Castle’s (R-DE) was one of the few members of the GOP caucus to vote for financial reform. Notably, CNBC’s Kudlow is also a Tea Party movement funder through the attack group Club for Growth.

LGBT

Cornyn Endorses Anti-Gay Christine O’Donnell, Despite Efforts To Reach Out To Gay Republicans (Updated)

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX)

In late July, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) — who has a questionable record on gay rights — announced that he would attend a fundraiser next week for the Log Cabin Republicans — the GOP’s leading gay advocacy organization. “Some things we won’t agree on,” Cornyn, who is also chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee said at the time. “But I think it’s always better to talk and then try find those things we can agree on rather than just assume there’s no common ground whatsoever.” “I don’t want people to misunderstand and think that I don’t respect the dignity of every human being regardless of sexual orientation,” Cornyn said.

But earlier today — after an initial tepid statement of support from NRSC executive director Rob Jesmer — Cornyn endorsed Delaware U.S. Senate GOP primary winner Christine O’Donnell, despite her strong history of anti-gay rhetoric and positions. “I reached out to Christine this morning, and as I have conveyed to all of our nominees, I offered her my personal congratulations and let her know that she has our support,” Cornyn wrote in an email. “This support includes a check for $42,000 –- the maximum allowable donation that we have provided to all of our nominees.” Later in the day, he appeared on Sean Hannity’s radio show to clear up any confusion about his commitment:

CORNYN: Well, really I don’t know the source of the rumors that were attributed to the Republican National Senatorial Committee. I’m the Chairman as you know and certainly without my authorization I corrected the record, talking to Christine this morning. Told her we will support her, in fact we send her some money already…I’ve encouraged my other colleagues to send money from their leadership PAC funds. We’re going to do everything we can to help her get elected in November.

O’Donnell has a long track record of saying and doing things that would suggest that she doesn’t respect the “dignity” of gay people. For instance, as president of Savior’s Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT), “O’Donnell helped facilitate an ex-gay program within the group, even bringing on a staff member to work exclusively on ex-gay issues.” During a 2000 interview on Fox’s now defunct Hannity & Colmes, “O’Donnell decried ‘offensive’ behavior at gay rights parades, complaining that ‘homosexuals’ special rights groups can get away with so much more than nobody else can!” “They’re getting away with nudity! They’re getting away with lasciviousness! They’re getting away with perversion,” she said.

As press secretary for Concerned Women of America, O’Donnell complained that policies extending health benefits to gay employees’ partners “legitimizes the homosexual lifestyle” and could “desensitize” Americans to same-sex relationships and lead to legal marriage. O’Donnell also opposed funding programs for AIDS sufferers through the Ryan White Act because she said that federal money has “in the past gone to teach teenagers to use condoms to engage in homosexual behavior that includes anal sex.” Most recently, in her race against Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE), O’Donnell insinuated that Castle is gay and then denied it.

And while social conservative organizations have criticized Cornyn for speaking at the Log Cabin event, LGBT friendly groups have remained mum on the Senator’s apparent contradiction. Reached today by phone, Jimmy LaSalvia, a co-founder of GOProud and its Executive Director, told me that “if you look at it, O’Donnell wasn’t elected on social issues. She was elected nominated for the same reason that a lot of other candidates are bring nominated and that’s to call an end to the status quo in Washington.”

The Log Cabin Republicans did not reply to my questions about Cornyn’s participation at next week’s fundraiser, despite repeated inquiries. It would be interesting to know if Cornyn is still invited to attend their event.

Update

Cornyn is confirming that he will still attend the Log Cabin Republican fundraiser. In a letter to Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins, Cornyn re-stated his conservative credentials and wrote:

First, part of my job is to reach out to those committed to defeat Senate Democrats this November. The Log Cabin Republicans are doing just that, as they stand for fiscal discipline, limited government, and a strong national defense. We many not agree on several key issues, but we do agree that every committee in the United States Senate should be chaired by a Republican.

Second, as social conservatives we affirm the basic dignity of every human life, including not only unborn children, but also adults with whom we may disagree. I believe we are all made in the image and likeness of God. I believe the beauty and blessing of America is that people of different faiths and creeds can live together in peace, despite serious disagreements. Respecting each other’s dignity does not mean ignoring those disagreements, but rather being honest about them, and working together when possible despite them.

Justice

LGBT Groups Look Towards Implementing A Repeal Of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

With the defense authorization measure now moving in the Senate, two organizations dedicated to the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell are urging to Department of Defense to adopt new regulations to ensure that gays and lesbians can serve openly and equally. Under the amendment in the defense bill, the policy cannot be repealed until the Pentagon completes its review of the policy and President Obama, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen certify that a repeal would not undermine military readiness or cohesion. The policy would then be repealed after a 60-day period.

But a Congressional vote does not end the fight to repeal the policy. Even if the Senate passes the authorization, and it survives the conference committee, and the President’s veto threat, the Pentagon would have to do more to guarantee full equality. Servicemembers’ Legal Defense Network (SLDN) has released the following recommendations:

– Adopt a policy of nondiscrimination based on sexual orientation.

– Allow service members to identify their same-sex domestic partners and the children of these relationships in their personnel records.

– Allow service members discharged under “don’t ask, don’t tell” to rejoin the armed forces if they are otherwise qualified for re-accession.

– Adopt streamlined procedures for service members discharged under “don’t ask, don’t tell” and prior homosexual conduct policies to have their discharge records amended.

Similarly, a new report from the Palm Center also recommends that the military must implement an affirmative non-discrimination policy and adopt one standard of conduct and facilities. “The standard set by President Obama and Admiral Mullen is one of integrity and equality and suggests an appropriate standard that is nothing short of equal and open service for all gay and lesbian troops,” it concludes.

Back in March, the Center for American Progress reviewed the experiences of Great Britain, Canada and Israel and noted eight areas where the military can change rules and regulations in order to effectively implement the new policy and offered similar recommendations.

Politics

Glenn Beck To Fat People: ‘I Say Let Them Die’

Since First Lady Michelle Obama unveiled her Let’s Move! program to fight obesity, conservatives have portrayed the effort as a government assault on personal freedoms and liberties. After the administration released a report on obesity in May, Matt Drudge ran a headline saying, “White House seeks controls on food marketing” and on his Fox News show, Sean Hannity asked: “Does every American family need a dietitian appointed by the government to tell them that this food is going to make you fat and this food is not?” Yesterday, Glenn Beck joined the act, criticizing Michelle Obama for encouraging restaurants to “offer healthier versions of the foods that we all love.” He also joked that fat people should die:

BECK: When I heard this I thought, get your damn hands off my fries, lady. If I want to be a fat fat fatty and shovel French Fries all day long, that is my choice. But oh oh, not so fast anymore. Because now we have the new fact, whether you like it or not, we have government health care now. … You know those fat people sitting on their couches? And I mean really fat. I don’t mean not like me. I mean the people who’s skin grows into the couch. … I say let them die. I say punish the person who’s been bringing them the milk shakes that allowed them to eat and not get up off the couch. Am I too harsh?

Watch it:

Beck was being facetious, but obesity is, in fact, a killer. The Wonk Room examines the obesity epidemic and details what the White House plans to do about it. (H/T: MMFA)

Yglesias

Postal Policy in the CSA

3f_1_2_greenstamp2 1

Something I often puzzle over is why we’re supposed to believe that conservative ideas will produce prosperity when the portions of the country most governed by conservative ideas tend to be least-prosperous. Relatedly, Ta-Nehisi Coates brings us some insights from Drew Gilpin Faust:

Confederate statesmen believed that any subsidization of the mail would represent an unwarranted support for the nation’s commercial interests. Thus postal rates reflected actual costs, a policy that sent the price of stamps skyrocketing after secession…Despite its high cost, mail delivery was far from reliable and southerners reported instances where service was interrupted for months at a time.

Somewhat awkwardly for the purposes of the polemical point I’m trying to make here, I’m open to postal privatization in the contemporary United States along the lines being implemented (PDF) in Europe. But were I to make that case, I’d start by observing that mail delivery isn’t critical telecommunications infrastructure in 2010 the way it was in the 19th century. Back in the 1860s, however, it most certainly was critical infrastructure! And in either case, there’s actually a large difference between the question of whether a service should be subsidized and whether service delivery should be in private hands—SNAP (“food stamps”) is, for example, a subsidy for retail purchases of food but we don’t have government-run grocery stores for poor people.

Which is all just to say that investment in infrastructure and public services is important and always has been.

Security

What The DREAM Act Has To Do With U.S. Defense And National Security

latinoarmySince Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) announced that the defense authorization bill will include the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act — which would put eligible undocumented youth who were brought to the U.S. as children on a path to citizenship — Republicans have accused the Majority Leader of “using the defense bill in a political fashion.” While it would be naive to suggest that Reid’s decision to include the DREAM Act has nothing to do with politics, the Republican argument that the DREAM Act has nothing to do with the defense reauthorization bill is mistaken.

In fact, the DREAM Act is included in the Department of Defense’s FY2010-12 Strategic Plan to help the military “shape and maintain a mission-ready All Volunteer Force”:

dod

That’s because a specific provision of the DREAM Act would allow those who meet all eligibility requirements, serve in the U.S. armed forces for at least two years and maintain “good moral character” to obtain regular lawful permanent resident status after six years. Many Military experts have come out in support of the DREAM Act because it would significantly increase the pool of qualified recruits in the Latino population, which comprises the majority of undocumented immigrants and which research indicates are more likely to enlist and serve in the military than any other group.

Margaret Stock, retired Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve, has stated “Potential DREAM Act beneficiaries are also likely to be a military recruiter’s dream candidates for enlistment … In a time when qualified recruits—particularly ones with foreign language skills and foreign cultural awareness – are in short supply, enforcing deportation laws against these young people makes no sense. Americans who care about our national security should encourage Congress to pass the DREAM Act.” Conservative military scholar Max Boot has stated, “I think it’s crazy we are not tapping into it.”

According to Jorge Mariscal of the University of California, San Diego, the military provision of the DREAM Act was “there at the beginning, the Pentagon helped write the DREAM Act.”

Overall, the DREAM Act would have a positive fiscal impact and would help a significant portion of the undocumented Latino community to become productive legal U.S. residents. It’s hard to deny that the DREAM Act is directly related to the nation’s military and defense interests, however, it’s important to at least keep in mind the warnings that others have presented concerning the implications of that, particularly for the Latino community.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up