ThinkProgress Logo

Politics

DeMint: Businesses Tell Me ‘The Best Thing’ Would Be ‘Complete Gridlock’ (Updated)

Last summer, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) offered a quote that symbolized the GOP’s strategy of reflexive opposition to the President. “If we’re able to stop Obama on this [health reform], it will be his Waterloo. It will break him,” he said. DeMint was clear that his strategy was purely political. “If we stop him on health care,” he said, “then I think we have the opportunity to maybe realign the whole political system in our country.” Fortunately, DeMint didn’t get his way and 32 million more Americans will soon have health care.

But due to his successful efforts to help drive tea party senatorial candidates like Christine O’Donnell, Pat Toomey, and Marco Rubio to victory over establishment candidates, DeMint is emboldened. He told Bloomberg that businesses want him to produce “complete gridlock” in the Senate:

DeMint doesn’t care. “I’ve been told by businesses that if we would stop the tax increases the best thing that could happen for business after that is complete gridlock. At least gridlock is predictable,” he tells Bloomberg Businessweek, taking a quick break between TV appearances. His goal, he says, is to stop programs that violate his anti-Big Government ideology. “What happens in the Senate is the Republicans sink to the lowest common denominator,” he says. “People want an alternative to some kind of watered-down Republican philosophy.”

DeMint told reporters yesterday that so-called moderates are the scourge of his party. “I think what happens is when we have a few that vote with the Obama agenda, it defines the whole Republican Party,” DeMint said. “I don’t want the majority back if we don’t believe anything,” DeMint said on Fox News this week.

DeMint’s potentially powerful new bloc of supporters may pose a leadership challenge for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). Tellingly, this morning on the Today Show, DeMint couldn’t even remember his leader’s name. “Well, I like our current leadership,” he said. “Mitch – um, um [pause]. Um – Mitch is doing a great job.” Watch it:


Update

Bloomberg’s Lisa Lerer has changed the quote that she originally attributed to DeMint. The story now notes that DeMint was characterizing what business leaders have told him.


Update

,A spokesperson for DeMint reached out to ThinkProgress and provided the following statement: “The story about ‘gridlock’ was a glimpse of how upset businesses are with President Obama and Democrats in Congress, not DeMint’s legislative goals.”

LGBT

Christine O’Donnell And The Techniques Of Gay Baiting

In light of Christine O’Donnell’s gay baiting of Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE), Slate’s Margaret Wheeler Johnson put together this handy guide to how politicians have insinuated that their opponent are gay while avoiding direct confrontation. For the accuser, baiting is full of benefit and almost no risk, Johnson writes. The baiter can always plead ignorance or suggest that opponents needs to develop a sense of humor. The practice “has been around since before the Revolutionary War” and is still alive and well, despite growing public support for LGBT rights. Here is a sampling:

- The Euphemisms: “Relies on certain preexisting association in the public’s mind. Terms like “San Francisco,” “wine drinker,” and even “renter” rather than homeowner.”

- Weak and Whiny: “One way to suggest a man is gay is to play to the notion that a man with a soft voice, touch, or walk is weak, and that weak men are gay. i.e. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) described “a little too light in the loafers” to fill the shoes of his predecessor”

- Like a Woman: Another way to suggest that a male politician is sexually attracted to other men is to liken him to a woman. i.e. John McCain McConce called Obama “fussy” and “hysterical,” and in an ad compared him to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton.

- Lifestyle: “The goal of this bait isn’t necessarily to make voters believe the target is gay, only to make them think he possesses negative, stereotypically gay male qualities.” Ex: “When he’s not in San Francisco … Perry’s … flipping through the pages of his Food and Wine magazine … in his fancy … rental mansion.” This bait sticks not just because it is blatantly coded—”San Francisco,” “Food and Wine,” “fancy,”—or because it could also be cross-listed under “weak” and “effeminate” (the ad concludes, “Tell Rick Perry to stop cowering and face Texans like a man”)—but because it refreshes public memory of the already existing, unsubstantiated rumors that Perry is gay.

- All the Single Ladies: “Also known as the sporty/brainy-ladies-with-short-haircuts-and-no-kiddos bait.” The Wall Street Journal decided to announce Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court confirmation proceedings alongside a photo of Kagan in her softball-playing days on its front page,

- Unruly Wife: ” This rumor insinuates that a political wife who refuses to allow her ambitions to be overwhelmed by her husband’s—who in this sense acts like a single lady—must be a lesbian. ” i.e. Hillary Clinton

O’Donnell’s gay baiting was, in some ways, even more direct. One group, working on O’Donnell’s behalf, suggested that Castle was “gay” and she herself called Castle ‘unmanly.’ “You know, these are the kind of cheap, underhanded, un-manly tactics that we’ve come to expect from Obama’s favorite Republican, Mike Castle,” said O’Donnell. “You know, I released a statement today, saying Mike this is not a bake-off, get your man-pants on.” For more on O’Donnell’s record of anti-gay rhetoric, click here.

Climate Progress

Dreadful climate story by BBC’s Richard Black

Can you write a story about this year’s record-setting global warmth and never mention the primary cause, indeed never mention human emissions at all?

Can you spin Arctic sea ice loss that is faster than every IPCC climate model as somehow evidence that computer model predictions of sea ice loss “seem to have been too extreme”?

You can if you are Richard Black, environment correspondent for the BBC News.

The bar for climate journalism has dropped so low — even for the few remaining serious science and environmental reporters — that people have become blas© about the kind of misreporting Black does in his piece, ” ‘Rapid’ 2010 melt for Arctic ice – but no record.“  But this kind of stuff is just inexcusable:

Read more

Politics

Texas Republican House Candidate Caught Padding Resume And Plagiarizing An Obama Speech

Stefani Carter is a Republican House candidate in Texas’s 102nd District who rejected “the liberal line” to become a “proud conservative.” Boasting of her credentials as a “contributing editorial writer for USA Today and a fellow at the Heritage Foundation, one of the most well known conservative think tanks in Washington, D.C,” Carter is well-versed in the party line. She tells supporters she’s “no” on “more government debt” and that she “will fight any attempts” by President Obama “to force feed socialized medicine to Texas families.”

But, while proudly rejecting the Obama’s progressive policies in Washington, Carter plagiarized a few of Obama’s “liberal lines” in her pursuit to get there. A video released by Lone Star Project this summer revealed Carter “reciting almost identical passages” from Obama’s 2004 keynote address “that many contend powered his campaign for president”:

The video compares the two speeches as follows:

Obama: “…Let’s face it, my presence on this stage is pretty unlikely. …”

Carter: “My presence here tonight, for those who know my background, is unlikely. …”

Obama: “They imagined me going to the best schools in the land, even though they weren’t rich, because in a generous America, you don’t have to be rich to achieve your potential.

Carter: “They imagined their kids going to any schools in the land, even though they weren’t rich, because in America you don’t have to be rich to achieve your dreams.”

Watch it:

The Carter campaign said plagiarism cannot be charged from “just snippets” of a speech that was “entirely different” from Obama’s address. But Lone Star Project pointed out that both speeches were intended to provide personal background and “you don’t have to copy an entire speech or even cover the same subject matter to be guilty of plagiarism. In taking a closer look at Carter’s credentials, Lone Star Project also discovered that Carter padded her resume by implying an internship made her a senior fellow at Heritage Foundation and “three guest pieces during her collegiate career” made her a USA today columnist.

While the Dallas County GOP Chairman dismissed her plagiarism as “petty” and “small ball,” he may have a harder time defending the more “hostile” and “absurd” tactics of Carter’s “amateur campaign.” According to counterfeitcarter.com, Carter recently sent a campaign staffer “with a camera to stalk” her opponent incumbent Rep. Carol Kent. He “was caught in a parking lot hiding between cars.” Carter also made “bizarre accusations” that “she had to call 911 twice because of suspicious vehicles parked at her campaign headquarters.”

Unsurprisingly, Carter’s dubious antics failed to win over her employers at Sayles Werbner law firm in Dallas, who endorsed and donated to Kent’s campaign. But Carter shouldn’t worry about the bosses she dismissed as “liberal Democrats,” because if acts of plagiarism and paranoid accusations guarantee anything, it’s a natural home with the GOP. (HT: Burnt Orange)

Economy

Rep. Dreier Implies Democratic Economic Policies Are To Blame For Poverty Increase

Today, the Census Bureau released its poverty data for 2009, which confirms the extent to which the Great Recession has ravaged American households. The poverty rate rose from 13.2 percent to 14.3 percent, which is the highest its been since 1994. For working age people (18 to 64) the 12.9 percent poverty rate is the highest since 1965.

It was almost inevitable that political finger-pointing would commence with the release of the data, and Rep. Peter Dreier (R-CA) didn’t disappoint, taking to the House floor and implying that Democratic policies were to blame for the jump:

Well, the policies that we’ve seen over the past twenty months have killed jobs. As the report that is coming out this morning is that the increase in the poverty rate has been nearly unprecedented. We have lots of very very unfortunate economic indicators out there.

Watch it:

Of course, it was the global financial meltdown — which cost millions of Americans their jobs — that is to blame for the spike in poverty. And contrary to Dreier’s assertion, steps that the Obama administration and Democrats in Congress took prevented an ugly situation from being much worse. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, just seven targeted provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the stimulus package) kept 6 million people out of poverty.

Plus, another 3.3 million people were kept out of poverty by extended unemployment benefits:

House Republicans unanimously opposed the Recovery Act and fought tooth and nail against extending unemployment benefits, without which, the poverty rate would have been even worse.

And let’s not forget the dismal poverty record that occurred on the last administration’s watch. Under President Bush, the number of adults in poverty jumped 26 percent, while the number of children in poverty increased by 21.4 percent. In all, the Bush years saw an additional 8.3 million people fall below the poverty line. This all came after President Clinton made impressive reductions in both overall and child poverty.

Obviously, though, more has to be done to ensure that adequate policies are in place to reduce poverty. As Melissa Boteach pointed out today, Congress has two opportunities to do just that, by extending the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Emergency Fund (a successful jobs program) and reforming the earned income and child tax credits. “Between 2003 and 2007 we experienced the first-ever economic ‘recovery’ on record where productivity and profits grew but poverty went up and median incomes fell,” Boteach wrote. “We can and must do better this time around.”

Yglesias

Endgame

Near your house:

— Talking about the Gates Foundation.

— Here’s Obama’s Assistant Secretary of Treasury for Economic Policy on “The Prevalence and Effects of Occupational Licensing”.

— Insurance and the new census data.

— This is a neat map, but it sort of cheats by not splitting the colors to represent even quartiles.

— National teachers’ union spent $1 million to beat Adrian Fenty.

— RIP Smartbike, hello Capital Bikeshare.

Maps & Atlases, “I Slept on the Solid Ground Near Your House”.

LGBT

Reid Files Cloture On Defense Bill, McCain Throws Fit Then Softens Support For Don’t Ask, Dont’ Tell

This afternoon, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) filed cloture on the defense authorization bill, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who had moments before tweeted that he was preparing to speak in opposition to debating the bill, jumped the gun and unintentionally objected to the reading of the motion. Told by the presiding president — Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) of all people — that his objection was “not in order” McCain stood down, only to re-emerge minutes later.

“This is a transparent attempt to win an election,” McCain — who himself knows a thing or two about what it takes to win tough elections — began. He unleashed a fury of complaints, charging that in the last two years, Democrats had politicized the proceedings of the Senate Armed Services Committee, attached extraneous legislation to the defense measure, and eroded the committee’s history of bipartisanship. McCain criticized Democrats for using the defense bill as a vehicle to pass hate crimes legislation and complained that this year’s DREAM Act amendment was similarly out of place.

McCain said that he suspected that Democrats were trying to move to the defense measure to please political constituents ahead of the November elections and fussed that Republicans would not have enough time to debate all their amendments. These concerns sounded bizarre, however, since moments before McCain spoke, Reid said that he would be “willing to work with Senate Republicans on a process that would permit the Senate consider [Republican amendments] and complete this bill as soon as possible.” And, McCain himself had refused to begin the debate earlier. On August 5th, he objected to a unanimous consent request from Armed Services Committee Chairman Cark Levin’s (D-MI) to begin debating the defense measure as soon as the Senate came back from recess (this week, rather than next week). Watch a compilation of these exchanges and Armed Services Committee Chairman Cark Levin’s (D-MI) response to McCain:

Next, McCain moved to the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell amendment and appeared to soften his strong support for the policy. McCain still insisted that Congress shouldn’t act before the Pentagon completed its review of the policy and argued that Democrats are ignoring the views of the troops, but said that he was not necessarily opposed to repeal:

MCCAIN: I want to make one thing very clear. I do not oppose or support the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell at this time. I do oppose taking legislative action prior to the completion of a real and thorough review of the law.

Watch McCain on DADT:

Prior to his primary campaign, McCain — who had in years passed argued that he would consider ending the ban on open gay and lesbian service if military leaders like Colin Powell asked him to review the policy — insisted that the policy was working and did not need to be changed. “The policy is one that has worked by the opinion of their commanders,” McCain told the Arizona Daily Star in April. “So by any objective view, our military is the most professional, best equipped, best trained, most highest quality that it’s ever been. That means that its policies are working.”

“So I think, again, when I talk to men and women in the military, they say it’s not broke, it’s not broken, so we don’t need to fix it,” McCain told Greta Van Susteren in February.

Meanwhile, the Advocate’s Kerry Eleveld is reporting that Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) is skeptical that supporters of repeal will have 60 votes to break a Republican filibuster. “The question is whether the Senate leadership can negotiate an agreement with the Republicans that will allow the bill to come up and get them to feel that they can introduce amendments that they want to introduce as well,” Lieberman told The Advocate. “But until that happens, I don’t think the votes are there to break the filibuster, which would be a shame.”

Politics

Prison Industry Funnels Donations To State Lawmakers Introducing SB1070-Like Bills Around The Country

Corrections Corporation of AmericaIn December 2009, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) — a powerful front group that helps corporate representatives craft template legislation for state lawmakers, funded partially by the private prison industry — hosted Arizona State Sen. Russell Pearce (R) and began debate on legislation that would provide broad powers to local police to arrest anyone who might look like an immigrant. ALEC then distributed the template legislation to its members. The January/February 2010 edition of ALEC’s magazine highlights the draft version of SB1070 — the “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act” — as model legislation.

In April of this year, Pearce then introduced ALEC’s template as the infamous SB1070 law. Notably, the ALEC task force which helped Pearce devise his racial profiling law included Laurie Shanblum, a lobbyist from the mega-private prison corporation Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) which previously played a role in privatizing many of Texas’ prisons. An investigation from Arizona’s KPHO-TV found more ties between SB1070 and the private prison industry: Paul Senseman, Gov. Janet Brewer’s (R-AZ) deputy chief of staff was a former lobbyist for CCA (his wife is still a lobbyist for CCA) and Chuck Coughlin, Brewer’s campaign chairman, runs the lobbying firm in Arizona that represents CCA. In These Times reporter Beau Hodai, who also reported much of SB1070′s connections to the private prison industry, has a chart to explain the relationship.

CCA is set to receive well over $74 million in tax dollars in FY2010 for running immigration detention centers. In a presentation given earlier this year, Pershing Square Capital, a hedge fund with a large financial stake in CCA, suggested that CCA’s profitability depends on increasing numbers of immigrants sent to prison. Many of the legislators helping to earn CCA more profits with radical anti-immigrant bills mirroring SB1070 have been recipients of private prison industry cash or have worked closely with the CCA-funded ALEC organization:

– TENNESSEE: Earlier this year, legislators in Tennessee passed an immigration bill with provisions “similar to, but less harsh than, those of SB 1070, including requiring city and county jails in the state to report any person who may be in violation of immigration laws to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.” But that wasn’t enough: right-wing local lawmakers also passed a resolution honoring Arizona’s SB1070, and a delegation of state lawmakers promised to introduce an anti-immigrant bill even “broader” than SB1070 in 2011. Many of the leading local lawmakers who voted for the anti-immigrant bill and resolution received thousands of dollars from CCA’s political action committee in the past two years, including State Reps. Gerald McCormick ($250), Barrett Rich ($500), Eric Watson ($250) and State Sens. Bill Ketron ($1,000), Jim Tracy ($500), Dolores Gresham ($1,000), Bo Watson ($500), and Jack Johnson ($500). Tracy, who sponsored the resolution honoring Arizona’s SB1070, also received $2,000 directly from CCA founder Tom Beasley, reports the Nashville City Paper. CCA retains five lobbyists in the state and spent at least $50,000 this year to lobby on immigration and other issues.

– OKLAHOMA: Rep. Mary Fallin (R-OK), who won her party’s nomination to run for governor this year, received the maximum donation permitted by law from CCA. State Rep. Randy Terrill (R-OK), who announced that he was planning an “Arizona-Plus” immigration bill that would be harsher than SB1070, is a proud member of the CCA-funded American Legislative Exchange Council.

– COLORADO: A group of Republican lawmakers in Colorado, after a research trip to Arizona this summer, have stated that they plan on passing a SB1070 law in Colorado next year. CCA’s lobbyists in Colorado have raised funds for many of the lawmakers in the group. CCA lobbyist Margy Christiansen raised $400 State Rep. Randy Baumgardner, one of the leaders of Colorado’s Arizona expedition, and CCA lobbyist Jason Dunn raised $150 for State Sen. Mike Kopp, the Republican minority leader who is promising to promote an SB1070 bill next session.

– FLORIDA: During the gubernatorial primary campaign between disgraced businessman Rick Scott and Attorney General Bill McCollum (R-FL), the prospect of importing Arizona’s SB1070 became a prominent issue in the race, with both candidates promising to bring a version of the law to the state. While many Florida Republicans recoiled at the idea, which stands to alienate many Hispanic voters, a cadre of state lawmakers and candidates for the state legislature, most funded by the prison industry, announced their support for an SB1070-type law. State Rep. Bill Snyder, who has received $500 from CCA, pledged to introduce a bill more draconian than SB1070. State House candidate Ben Albritton, another outspoken supporter of SB1070, took $500 from CCA, and State Rep. Joe Negron, who has been working with Snyder to sponsor the bill, received $1,000 from the Geo Group, another major private prison contractor which operates immigrant detention centers. Overall, the Republican Party of Florida has been the biggest recipient of prison industry cash in the past two years: $37,000 from CCA and $145,000 from the Geo Group.

– PENNSYLVANIA: In the Key State, State Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R-PA) introduced the ALEC-drafted “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act,” one month before State Sen. Russell Pearce (R-AZ) introduced his version of the bill in Arizona. Metcalfe is a highly active member of ALEC. He was paid $1,500 by ALEC just to attend its meetings with CCA lobbyists on how to draft the law.

In Tennessee, the average daily number of immigration detainees sank to 40 in FY2009, down from 95 in FY2008. This may change with CCA’s aggressive lobbying for more laws encouraging aggressive arrests of immigrants or people who look like immigrants. Charles Maldonado, who has reported on CCA’s corrupting influence at the Nashville City Paper, notes that CCA may see new business at its West Tennessee Detention Facility with the passage of more SB1070-related laws.

ALEC, with funds from several private prison companies, helped sponsor “truth-in-sentencing” and “three-strikes-you’re-out” laws all over the country for the past two decades. These laws have greatly increased incarceration rates, and have contributed to America’s distinction of having the largest prison population in the world.

Yglesias

Education and Inequality: The Participation Mechanism

bartelsinequality

Today’s edition of Timothy Noah’s ongoing series on income inequality in America looks at the Katz/Goldin thesis that the slowdown in educational attainment is playing a huge role. I highly recommend both Noah’s piece and their book The Race between Education and Technology.

In a more speculative vein, something I think is probably worthy of more attention in this regard not as a cause of growing inequality but as a potential solution is the way that education impacts political participation. The run-up in inequality is obviously related to politicians’ tendency to care a lot about what rich people want and not very much about what people at the bottom think. Larry Bartels’ finding, reproduced to the right, casts this in a very dramatic light showing that Senators of both parties don’t care about the bottom-third of the income distribution and Republicans are positively obsessed with the rich.

Some of this is just about money. But income is highly correlated with education. Kay Lehman Schlozman, Sidney Verba, Aaron Smith, and Henry Brady did an interesting report last year about participation with a focus on internet issues. This table provides a handy summary of the basic shape of things:

educationparticipation

As you can see, there’s a big education gap here. And it’s easy to see why politicians are likely to be more responsive to the desires of people who participate more in politics. Some of the greater political participation of well-educated people is probably semi-incidental to actual education and reflects the fact that college graduates have more money and cushier jobs. But some of it is likely a real effect of education. People with more schooling are going to be more able to read about public affairs and communicate about it with others. Such people will have a greater sense (and reality) of efficacy, and will be more listened to encouraging further participation.

Security

Neocon ‘Team B’ Accuses Obama Administration Officials Of Being Part Of ‘Iran Lobby’

Yesterday I reported on the release of the new report Sharia: The Threat To America (pdf), released by the neoconservative Center for Security Policy, led by conspiracy theorist Frank Gaffney.

Unsurprisingly, given some of the characters involved in its writing (Gaffney admitted to me that no actual Islamic scholars were consulted, which seems odd for a report on Islamic law), the report is a stew of unscholarly assertions about Islam and wildly paranoid claims about the threat posed by sharia-adherent — read: observant — Muslims to the United States. It throws disparate and competing Muslim groups and movements (Al Qaeda, Iran, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood) together under one heading — “sharia” — and then basically asserts that every pious Muslim in America is a potential fifth columnist.

Indeed, the report even asserts that some of those fifth columnists could be inside the Obama administration. Under the section entitled “The Iran Lobby,” (pg. 98) the authors write, “It is of considerable concern that individuals associated with the Iran Lobby network… have found their way into influential posts in the Obama administration”:

Even as events in the Middle East move inexorably toward renewed conflict and Iran defiantly accelerates its nuclear weapons program, such “friends of Iran” as Dr. Vali Nasr (now the senior advisor to Ambassador Richard Holbrooke for Afghanistan/Pakistan issues), Dr. Susan Rice (U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) and John Limbert (until July 2010 a top official at the State Department’s Iran desk)– have helped ensure that U.S. policy towards Iran remains incoherent and contrary to long-term U.S. national security interests.

The magnitude of damage Iranian elements are capable of perpetrating in America in furtherance of their shariah agenda is greater if, as seems to be the case, senior U.S. national security policymaking circles have been penetrated by agents of influence — be they witting or unwitting — whose actions, intentional or otherwise, serve to support the objectives of a hostile foreign power. To date, there is no evidence that such a possibility has been seriously considered, let alone thwarted by American counter-intelligence.

If Gaffney and his crew want to criticize the administration for having an incoherent Iran policy, that’s one thing. I’d probably agree with them on some points. But accusing U.S. government officials of working to “ensure that U.S. policy towards Iran” is “contrary to long-term U.S. national security interests” is a serious charge, which, probably needless to say, the authors don’t come close to backing up. But these sorts of irresponsible, unsubstantiated assertions are very much in keeping with the rest of the report.

Older

Switch to Mobile
ThinkProgress Signup Overlay Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress Skip and Continue to ThinkProgress

Sign Up